Connect with us

Finance

Changing The Tune On Tokenization

Published

on

Changing The Tune On Tokenization

Businesses are finding value in putting real-world assets on blockchains.

For years, tokenization—creating a digital representation of a tangible asset like real estate—was just a finance-sector buzzword. But lately, more companies are making it a reality by weaving it into their corporate finance strategies (i.e., smart contracts, stablecoins and tokenized US Treasury bills).

The bet is that after a two-year stretch of economic turbulence and sticky inflation, tokenization can help increase liquidity, facilitate faster payments, lower costs, and improve risk management. And while big-name firms are still in the early phases of adopting this Web3 tech, they’re already boasting about viable use cases.

Look at Citi’s new pilot program with global logistics company Maersk. The third-largest US bank tokenized a smart contract to serve the same purpose as bank guarantees and letters of credit, reducing transaction processing times “from days to minutes.”

Big-picture, the firm predicts that tokenized assets will grow by a factor of 80 in private markets and reach up to almost $4 trillion in value by 2030.

“Partnerships like the one made by Citi and Maersk are a significant step forward in showcasing the potential of tokenization for streamlining cash management and trade finance,” says Paul Turner, an Abu Dhabi-based executive director at multi-asset fintech provider Capex.

Advertisement

Visa is testing tokenization, too. In September, the payments giant teamed up with Paysafe in London to integrate a tokenization service that, it expects, will better protect customers.

Within the same month, Visa led a $12.5 million funding round for Agrotoken. The Argentina-based startup is touted as the first platform to convert physical grains into a digital counterpart via tokenization.

Like other real-world assets [RWAs], the grain goes from being a “real-world asset” to an investment instrument. Once ownership is registered on the blockchain, it becomes tradable, and can be divided into fractions, or securely held.

“There’s a whole drumbeat around wanting to get tokenized real-world assets on chain,” Richard Johnson, CEO of Texture Capital, a broker-dealer specializing in tokenized assets, says.

In the case of Agrotoken, farmers can exchange their tokenized grain for things like supplies, machinery or fuel. The “grain tokens” can also be used to generate a guarantee to request loans, exchanged for local currency, or as a hedge against inflation.

Advertisement

Tokenization projects are also taking off at Johnson’s former company, Société Générale. The French multinational bank, where he was once head of quantitative electronic services, is “busy putting more institutional assets on chain.” In December, SocGen grabbed headlines when its Ethereum-based stablecoin, the EUR CoinVertible, started trading on European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp.

Afterward, the asset management arm of Paris-based insurance firm AXA used the SocGen stablecoin to buy 5 million euros ($5.4 million) worth of tokenized green bonds. According to AXA, this format bolsters transparency and traceability, and speeds up transactions and settlements.

Also in December, DWS Group (formerly Deutsche Asset Management) confirmed partnering with blockchain firm Galaxy Digital to launch a euro-denominated stablecoin that will “accelerate mass market adoption of digital assets and tokenization.”

Scenarios like these are going to inspire more C-suite executives to embrace tokenization in 2024, if they haven’t already, says Caitlin Long, founder and CEO of Custodia Bank. “Every bank CEO knows this technology is coming, and if they’re not planning for it now, they’re already behind,” she adds. “Watch what they do, not what they say.”

Among the new use cases Long notices, many revolve around tokenized dollars, which can serve as a cash equivalent for accounting and for liquidity coverage ratio purposes. One of the significant benefits of tokenized dollars is that they’re programmable, and “can be embedded into all kinds of software applications, including smart contracts and artificial intelligence,” she explains.

Advertisement

Tokenized securities are also helpful because of their believed narrower margin for error. “I’m always amazed at the inaccuracies in corporate stockholder or bondholder lists,” Long says. “Tokenization will help fix those inaccuracies while also cutting costs.”

Token Economies

Observers of the “token economy” trend say clashing attitudes could possibly hinder the momentum of mainstream adoption. On one end there are proponents like BlackRock’s Larry Fink. On January 12, the CEO of the world’s largest asset management firm praised the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for finally approving a bitcoin exchange-traded fund, or ETF, after years of back-and-forth.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust was among the crypto ETFs that made their trading debut in the US last month. Fink now wants Ethereum ETFs to win SEC approval, but so far, the Gary Gensler-led agency has refused.

“These ETFs are stepping stones toward tokenization, and I believe that’s where we’re headed,” Fink said in a TV appearance.

In contrast, there’s JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who  told lawmakers during a December 6 Senate hearing that he has “always been deeply opposed to crypto, bitcoin, etc.”

Advertisement

Dimon didn’t delineate whether the “etcc” included all tokenization, but it’s worth noting that his firm claims to handle $1 billion in daily transactions on its private blockchain network.

This “hot and cold” tone underscores a lack of focus on the utility of the technology, Jack O’Holleran, CEO of San Francisco-based blockchain startup Skale Labs, says. “The beauty of web3 is that it brings power, transparency, and ownership to users and workers of networks and marketplaces,” he adds. “Web3 will happen with or without the support of centralized banking leaders.”

Abroad, it’s a different vibe. On a recent visit to the Token 2049 event in Singapore, O’Holleran noticed that his Asia-Pacific counterparts are actively encouraged to adopt tokenization.

“APAC projects” enjoy an “innovative ecosystem, supportive regulatory frameworks, and a vibrant community that actively fosters blockchain and tokenization initiatives,” he says. “The US is falling behind in the race to grab Web3 global market share. I’m hoping this will change.”

Capex’s Turner shares a similar sentiment. “The US regulatory landscape is still evolving, with various agencies overseeing different aspects, leading to uncertainty and hindering clear implementation guidelines,” he adds. “The large size of the US economy and its financial markets could hinder the incentives to be a first mover in this area.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Turner notes, countries like Singapore are “more proactive and supportive of regulatory frameworks for tokenization in a bid to attract startups and companies to explore the technology and become a global hub for the industry.”

In November, the Monetary Authority of Singapore launched several tokenization pilots. The campaign attracted marquee US firms, including Citi, T. Rowe Price Associates, Fidelity International, BNY Mellon, Franklin Templeton, Apollo and, yes, even JPMorgan Chase.

The EU is also warming up to tokenization, Johnson says, citing regulators “coming up with a new rule book.” In May, the EU adopted its Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (MiCAR), establishing an overall framework for markets in crypto-assets across the region.

That’s a positive, Johnson says, “whereas here in the US, the mantra has been that [regulators] don’t need any new rules. “I think that’s wrong.”

Skeptics also cite the shady goings on at some of the crypto industry’s most prominent companies. In 2022, there was the $32 billion “fiasco,” as Johnson calls it, that enveloped crypto exchange FTX.

Advertisement

Less than a year later, the stablecoin issuer Terraform Labs collapsed and crypto lender Celsius underwent a $4.7 billion bankruptcy. And, like FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, Celisus’ founder and former CEO Alex Mashinsky faced fraud charges.

On-chain security is also an issue. According to research from blockchain firm CertiK, more than $1.8 billion in digital assets went missing last year. That’s high, despite being a 51% drop from 2022, when losses to hacks and other incidents totaled $3.7 billion.

For Betsabe Botaitis, CFO of blockchain software developer Hedera, the advice is simple: “Prioritize cybersecurity measures to protect your company’s assets and sensitive information.”

“CFOs need to begin realizing that their companies will sooner or later use digital assets as an embedded part of their operations,” Botaitis says. Their teams “will need to anticipate and be ready to account for, and report on, any digital asset position.” 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Supervisor Horvath Sounds the Alarm After Today’s LAHSA Finance Committee Meeting – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath

Published

on

Supervisor Horvath Sounds the Alarm After Today’s LAHSA Finance Committee Meeting – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath



Supervisor Horvath Sounds the Alarm After Today’s LAHSA Finance Committee Meeting – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath
















Advertisement





Advertisement







Advertisement

Advertisement

Supervisor Horvath Sounds the Alarm After Today’s LAHSA Finance Committee Meeting


Supervisor Horvath Sounds the Alarm After Today’s LAHSA Finance Committee Meeting


1024
888



Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath







Advertisement



Advertisement

Continue Reading

Finance

Mesirow Financial Investment Management Buys 2 Million Shares of Akre Focus ETF | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Mesirow Financial Investment Management Buys 2 Million Shares of Akre Focus ETF | The Motley Fool

An actively managed ETF, Akre Focus targets high-quality U.S. companies with strong returns and disciplined management.

On Feb. 4, 2026, Mesirow Financial Investment Management, Inc. disclosed a new position in the professionally managed Akre Focus ETF  (AKRE +0.00%).

What happened

According to an SEC filing dated Feb. 4, 2026, Mesirow Financial Investment Management acquired 2,012,662 shares. The value of the position was $131.8 million as of Dec. 31, 2025. The quarter-end value of the position matched the estimated trade size based on the ETF’s average trading price during the quarter.

Professionally Managed Portfolios – Akre Focus ETF

Today’s Change

Advertisement

(0.00%) $0.00

Current Price

$0.00

What else to know

  • This is a new position for the fund, representing 2.7% of its 13F-reported AUM in the filing.
  • Top holdings after the period include:
    • UNK: BRK-B: $408 million (8.4% of AUM)
    • NASDAQ: AAPL: $271 million (5.6% of AUM)
    • NYSEMKT: MOAT: $205 million (4.2% of AUM)
    • NASDAQ: GOOG: $164 million (3.4% of AUM)
    • NASDAQ: MSFT: $140 million (2.9% of AUM)
  • As of Feb. 4, 2026, AKRE shares were priced at $58.33, or 14.5% below the 52-week high.
  • AKRE was down 14.5% over the last year, underperforming the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points.

Company Overview

Metric Value
Fund assets $7.5 billion
Price (as of market close 2/4/26) $58.33
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management

Company Snapshot

  • Offers a diversified portfolio of U.S. equities, preferred stocks, warrants, options, cash equivalents, and select foreign securities.
  • Operates as an actively managed ETF, seeking to invest in companies with high returns on capital, strong management, and attractive reinvestment opportunities.
  • Provides exposure to high-quality U.S. and select global equities through a concentrated, fundamentals-driven investment approach.

Akre Focus ETF is an actively managed fund specializing in high-quality U.S. companies with strong shareholder returns and disciplined management. The fund’s strategy emphasizes purchasing businesses at reasonable valuations, with flexibility to invest in a range of equity-like instruments and up to 35% in foreign securities. The ETF’s competitive advantage lies in its focused, fundamentals-driven selection process and its ability to adapt allocations based on valuation and opportunity.

What this transaction means for investors

Mesirow Financial Investment Management holds an extensive portfolio mixed with quality growth stocks and ETFs. Notably, the firm reduced positions in several holdings last quarter, including large-cap tech stocks like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, while adding a relatively large position in the Akre Focus ETF.

AKRE is a new ETF version of the famous mutual fund by the same name, which has put together a solid record since its 2009 inception. The fund holds a portfolio of around 20 to 30 quality stocks that the manager has thoroughly researched and believes can compound at above-average rates over the long term.

Advertisement

Since 2009, AKRE has returned about 14% annually — almost identical to the S&P 500 return. But over the last five years, it has underperformed by about six percentage points annually.

After a year that saw tech stocks soar, Mesirow is rotating out of some of its winners and into a quality, actively managed fund that could see better days ahead. AKRE’s focus on looking for undervalued “compounding machines” could pay off for patient investors.

John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Continue Reading

Finance

Campaign finance data shows most Anchorage Assembly races are close on fundraising

Published

on

Campaign finance data shows most Anchorage Assembly races are close on fundraising
Election officials prepare the Assembly Chambers for in-person voters on Monday, March 24, 2025. (Bill Roth / ADN)

Half of the Anchorage Assembly’s seats will be decided in this April’s municipal election. According to campaign finance reports submitted to the Alaska Public Offices Commission earlier this week, many of the six races are close in terms of fundraising, with some exceptions.

In the years since Anchorage shifted to mail-based balloting for its elections, many candidates have generally adjusted their spending strategies, retaining cash until March, when voters begin receiving their ballot packets. Several of this cycle’s candidates appear to have held off on major spending. But a number of challengers seeking to knock off incumbents have made significant expenditures already.

Voters will begin receiving their ballots in the mail in mid-March, and ballots are due back by the April 7 deadline.

District 1 – Downtown/North Anchorage

Assembly Chair Chris Constant is barred by term limits from running again. Four candidates are vying to fill his seat, though only two reported significant fundraising and campaign expenditures.

Sydney Scout reported raising $50,130 since launching her campaign last year. She’s spent a little more than half of that, with close to $23,000 in cash still on hand.

Advertisement

Among Scout’s donors are a number of political action groups representing labor and public safety unions. She saw a few larger contributions from local donors but overwhelmingly reported smaller contributions under $500. Among her financial supporters are many prominent local politicos, including several current members of the Assembly and Anchorage School Board, as well as Democratic groups.

Most of her $27,509 in expenditures so far have gone to campaign services paid to Amber Lee Strategies, as well as $7,500 to True Blue Associates, a strategy firm run by two former progressive bloggers who have worked for Democrats in the Legislature in the past. There are a number of purchases for ads on Meta’s social media platforms, Facebook and Instagram, as well as in-person campaign events.

Justin Milette reported raising $36,771 in his Alaska Public Offices Commission disclosure, with at least $13,000 from Milette himself. He received several other major donations, including $5,000 from a loan officer at Alaska Growth Capital, another $5,000 from a local attorney and $2,500 from independent investor Justin Weaver. That was about the same amount Weaver contributed to Scout’s campaign.

Milette received contributions from a number of prominent local political figures and advocates, including Republican gubernatorial candidate Treg Taylor and Sami Graham, who briefly served as chief of staff for former Mayor Dave Bronson.

Most of Milette’s spending — $22,566 — has gone to the firm Red Dirt Campaigns for a range of services, including donor data, printing, canvassing data and media products.

Advertisement

Two other candidates filed to run for the seat, Nicholas Danger and Max Powers. Danger reported no campaign income. Powers had not submitted a fundraising disclosure report to APOC as of Thursday.

District 2 – Eagle River

Assembly member Scott Myers, who currently represents the communities north of the Anchorage Bowl, is not running for a second term.

First-time candidate Donald Handeland reported raising more than $40,000, of which a little more than $26,000 has been spent so far.

Though Handeland reported contributing $2,500 of his own money, he raised the overwhelming majority of his funds through relatively modest donations from well over a hundred people.

Many prominent conservatives show up on Handeland’s donor rolls, including former heads of the Alaska Republican Party Tuckerman Babcock, Randy Ruedrich and Peter Goldberg; both of the district’s current Assembly members, Myers and Jared Goecker; and many of the individuals who regularly contributed to Bronson’s mayoral campaigns.

Advertisement

Handeland reported spending more than $13,000 on campaign services from Red Dirt Campaigns. He also bought digital ads on social media. He split costs with four other candidates for a fundraising event called “Axe the Tax” at a local ax-throwing parlor. The fundraiser was premised on candidates’ shared opposition to a proposed city sales tax, which was eventually pulled back by Mayor Suzanne LaFrance in early January.

Campaigning against Handeland is Kyle Walker, who ran unsuccessfully to represent the district during the last cycle. Of the $8,258 he reported raising, $5,500 came from union PAC contributions. The remainder were small individual donors.

Though Walker reported a little more than $4,000 in expenses so far, he listed another $13,666 in financial commitments to the Ship Creek Group for campaign management and a comprehensive suite of services. Ship Creek has been a major player in local politics, working primarily with moderate and left-leaning candidates, but is attached to only one other Assembly campaign this cycle.

District 3 – West Anchorage

The race is a rematch of the 2023 contest for the same seat, in which Assembly Vice Chair Anna Brawley beat challenger Brian Flynn by a 17-point margin. Then as now, there is a lot of money flowing to both candidates.

So far, Flynn has outraised Brawley but is also spending down his war chest more aggressively, primarily on campaign services by firms both inside and outside of Alaska.

Advertisement

Brawley reported $52,044 in campaign contributions, including thousands of dollars from just under a dozen organized labor PACs. Her largest individual donor was retired banker Victor Mollozzi, who contributed $4,000 in two separate installments. Among her prominent backers are current members of the Assembly and school board, Democratic former U.S. Sen. Mark Begich and Democratic gubernatorial candidate and former state Rep. Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins.

Brawley has spent several thousand dollars so far on campaign services from Amber Lee Strategies, the same firm that handled her 2023 run. She’s also paid for printed signs, as well as access to the Alaska Democratic Party’s voter information. But most of her resources are in reserve. Brawley listed $17,400 committed to the The Mobilization Center, a local outfit that handles field operations for political campaigns.

Flynn reported raising $81,663. Among his contributors are a number of prominent local Republican and conservative politicians, including outgoing School Board member and current Assembly candidate Dave Donley, Republican former House Minority Leader and current state Rep. Mia Costello, and former Anchorage first lady Deb Bronson.

Flynn received a few hefty donations from individuals. John and Kari Ellsworth, who own part of the Anchorage Wolverines junior hockey franchise, gave a combined $6,500. Business owners Teresa Hall and Diane Bachman each gave $5,000.

According to Flynn’s APOC report, he’s spent $63,414. The biggest portion of that, more than $21,000, has gone to Optima Public Relations, a Wasilla-based firm that primarily handles conservative and Republican political campaigns. He also spent more than $7,000 on direct mail handled by national Republican consulting firm Axiom Strategies, and several hundred dollars more to its polling arm Remington Research for text messaging services. A $3,700 expenditure was listed to former Assembly candidate Travis Szanto for “putting up signs, sign frames.”

Advertisement

District 4 – Midtown

Incumbent Felix Rivera is terming off the Assembly. The race to replace him is between two older candidates who both have experience with local political campaigns, and are roughly even on their fundraising and expenditures so far.

Dave Donley has served as a Republican in the Alaska Legislature, and is winding down three terms on the Anchorage School Board. He reported raising close to $39,000 so far, of which he’s spent almost $28,000. A number of influential conservative politicians, both current and former, chipped in to his campaign, including gubernatorial candidates Treg Taylor and Shelley Hughes, as well as former Anchorage mayors Rick Mystrom and George Wuerch. He also received contributions from several union PACs.

Donley’s main expenditures include services provided by Red Dirt Campaigns, which range from consulting work and data to social media and content production. He’s also spent money advertising on conservative opinion blogs.

Paralegal and former nurse Janice Park reported raising $42,226, and has spent less than half of that. Park has unsuccessfully run several times for legislative positions as a Democrat. She received contributions from several current and former Democratic lawmakers, as well as current members of the Assembly and the Anchorage Democrats. Her largest contributor was Justin Weaver, the private investor, who so far has donated $14,000 to Park.

Park has made a lot of small ad buys to Meta for social media reach, as well as on traditional analog printed signs. But her largest expenditure is for “campaign consulting, including communications, compliance, and strategy” to True Blue Associates.

Advertisement

Kim Winston, a third candidate who formally filed for the seat, reported no income to APOC.

District 5 – East Anchorage

Incumbent George Martinez is fending off a challenge from Cody Anderson, a retired non-commissioned Air Force officer and church pastor.

Martinez raised close to $11,000, most of it in new contributions from individual donors and unions, on top of $5,000 in money carried over from a past campaign. Several current Assembly members chipped in modest amounts, along with a $300 contribution from the Anchorage Democrats.

Martinez only listed $5,634 in campaign spending so far. The two largest expenditures in his APOC report were $1,000 for “promotion/advertisement” to a company based in Miami, Florida, and $1,256 to Alaska Airlines for “travel,” with no additional details listed in the report.

Anderson reported raising $45,878, however his campaign finance disclosure listed payments to his campaign manager and other substantial expenditures as income, distorting the total by more than $16,000, according to a review of his APOC report.

Advertisement

Among those donations are thousands of dollars from employees at Mountain City Church, where Anderson works, including $1,000 from former head Jerry Prevo and $2,000 from lead pastor Ron Hoffman. The Anchorage Republican Women’s Club donated $750.

Anderson’s biggest expenditures listed were $5,500 to his campaign manager for various services and $7,500 for content creation and social media placement to Stephanie Williams, who worked as a special assistant under former Mayor Bronson before resigning in 2021.

District 6 – South Anchorage

Incumbent Zac Johnson is running for a second term against Bruce Vergason, whose background is in business and construction, as well as a third candidate, Janelle Anausuk Sharp, an environmental scientist.

Johnson reported $33,272 in contributions, with $9,239 spent and more in future financial commitments to a local political firm.

Johnson received contributions from several organized labor groups, along with current and former members of the Assembly.

Advertisement

He listed $11,500 in future payments committed to Ship Creek Group for comprehensive campaign management services.

In his APOC filing, Vergason listed $43,843 in fundraising and $17,052 in spending. He received major contributions from local business owner Susanne Gionet and physician John Nolte, who donated $5,000 each.

On top of $6,290 paid to Optima for campaign work, Vergason also paid $2,460 to election data firm i360 for canvassing services, along with significant outlays for sign printing. Vergason was part of January’s ax-themed fundraiser, coordinating with Handeland, Anderson, Donley and Flynn on the joint event.

Sharp appears to have raised around $3,500. Though her APOC disclosure listed a significantly higher figure, it erroneously categorized expenses as income. Cheryl Frasca, who is listed as her campaign treasurer, has a long record of handling compliance reports for political campaigns, including several current Republican gubernatorial candidates, and headed the municipality’s Office of Management and Budget under Bronson.

Outside of a $679 contribution to Optima for campaign logo design, Sharp’s biggest expenditure was $4,233 to The Business MD for services that include “assisting with general campaign strategy and organization, communications guidance, and outreach planning to help strengthen voter connection organization, all of which is advisory in nature.” The company is run by a local businesswoman focused on emotional intelligence coaching.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending