Connect with us

Finance

Business continuity & disaster recovery in finance: Endpoint resiliency in a high-stakes world

Published

on

Business continuity & disaster recovery in finance: Endpoint resiliency in a high-stakes world

In financial services, “time is money” is more than a saying — it’s an unforgiving law. A few hours of downtime can mean millions lost, confidence shaken, and regulators knocking. 

As firms invest heavily in data protection, disaster recovery, and infrastructure redundancy, one critical layer often remains underinvested: endpoint resilience. The devices that connect analysts, traders, portfolio managers, risk teams, and back‑office staff to core systems are often the weakest link, and when they fail, the rest of the architecture can’t save you fast enough.

Why endpoints are the last mile of risk

Regulators are already raising the bar. The FFIEC’s modern guidance for U.S. financial institutions reframes the standard from simple business continuity and disaster recovery (BC&DR) plans to operational resilience, demanding full continuity even under cyber disruption. In 2025, global regulatory regimes are similarly shifting, like DORA in the EU, for example, mandating rigorous ICT risk management, continuity, and incident response rules across financial institutions. It isn’t enough to recover your back-end systems; your users must be able to reconnect securely and fast.

Here’s the hard truth: More than half of attacks in financial services begin at endpoints. In 2024, 65% of financial institutions reported ransomware attacks. Of those, 49% experienced full encryption of datathough many also mitigated before full encryption. The average recovery cost (excluding ransom) in finance hit $2.58M in 2024, and ransom demands routinely range into the millions. 

Advertisement

When systems grind to a halt in finance, the effect isn’t just measured in spreadsheets — it’s seen on the trading floor, in anxious client calls, and across frozen payment screens. Downtime isn’t just a technical hiccup; it erodes trust and sends shockwaves across the business. A few minutes offline can mean missed trades, unsettled deals, and regulatory headaches that persist long after recovery.

Today, most downtime is tied to security incidents and not just IT failures. That means the pressure is higher, and expectations from regulators and clients are relentless. Traditional fixes like hardware swaps or reimaging can’t keep up. In finance, recovery needs to be instant, seamless, and leave no room for doubt because every moment counts.

The real costs of traditional endpoint recovery in finance

Let’s examine a few real-world barriers:

  • Scale & complexity: Financial institutions often manage tens of thousands of endpoints across trading floors, branch networks, remote staff, and data centers.
  • Critical prioritization: Some devices, such as those running trading desks or risk models, must come back online before others.
  • Forensic & compliance integrity: Overwriting or wiping devices can destroy audit trails needed for post-incident investigations and regulatory reviews.
  • Latency to value: Shipping replacement devices or reimaging at scale introduces unacceptable delays.
  • Dependency on VDI/remote desktop: But what if the endpoint itself is compromised or can’t initiate the remote session? That fallback collapses under attack.

Even in the most mature BC/DR strategies, endpoint recovery is typically an overlooked blind spot.

IGEL: Embedding continuity into every endpoint

Advertisement

IGEL’s approach to BC&DR closes this gap with endpoint‑level resilience that matches the expectations in finance. Instead of treating endpoints as passive dependencies, IGEL turns them into active recovery enablers.

  • IGEL Dual Boot & USB fallback: Each device boots into an immutable IGEL environment separate from the main system, so users can regain secure access instantly, without wiping or losing the original partition.
  • Scale with control: IGEL Universal Management Suite (UMS) orchestrates recovery across thousands of endpoints from one console while enforcing policy and priority.
  • Preserve forensic integrity: The compromised partition remains untouched, preserving logs and evidence for regulators and investigations.
  • Regulator-ready workflow: IGEL’s architecture aligns with operational resilience frameworks (e.g. DORA, FFIEC, local mandates), enabling auditable and rapid recovery steps.
  • Minimized disruption: No hardware swaps, no freight delays, no extended downtime. Users reboot and resume work in minutes — not hours, not days.

For finance, this is more than a technical improvement, it’s a structural advantage. Imagine a trading desk seamlessly rebooting into a clean environment while IT investigates. 

Making endpoint recovery the next pillar of resilience

To adopt endpoint resilience, financial leaders should:

  1. Reframe endpoint risk: View endpoints as active assets in recovery, not passive liabilities.
  2. Simulate real attacks: Test a full-scale endpoint compromise in tabletop and live drills.
  3. Tier your devices: Assign priority levels (trading, risk modeling, client-facing) and map recovery SLAs accordingly.
  4. Integrate IGEL BC&DR: Deploy the IGEL Dual Boot failover plan across endpoints layered into your continuity playbooks.
  5. Audit & certify: Use IGEL’s immutable architecture and audit trails to satisfy regulators demanding proof of quick, reliable recovery.

Conclusion: Not just resilience — Continuity without compromise

In finance, downtime bleeds value faster than any other domain. The best business continuity and disaster recovery strategies already protect data, applications, and infrastructure. But true resilience demands one more layer at the endpoints.

IGEL BC&DR empowers financial services firms to convert their most vulnerable assets into recovery enablers, shrinking downtime from days to minutes, safeguarding compliance, preserving forensic visibility, and keeping clients, stakeholders, and regulators confident through disruption.

Advertisement

If you’re ready to elevate your continuity approach and embed resilience where it really matters, see IGEL in action today.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Published

on

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Cornell University administrator Warren Petrofsky will serve as the Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ new dean of administration and finance, charged with spearheading efforts to shore up the school’s finances as it faces a hefty budget deficit.

Petrofsky’s appointment, announced in a Friday email from FAS Dean Hopi E. Hoekstra to FAS affiliates, will begin April 20 — nearly a year after former FAS dean of administration and finance Scott A. Jordan stepped down. Petrofsky will replace interim dean Mary Ann Bradley, who helped shape the early stages of FAS cost-cutting initiatives.

Petrofsky currently serves as associate dean of administration at Cornell University’s College of Arts and Sciences.

As dean, he oversaw a budget cut of nearly $11 million to the institution’s College of Arts and Sciences after the federal government slashed at least $250 million in stop-work orders and frozen grants, according to the Cornell Daily Sun.

He also serves on a work group established in November 2025 to streamline the school’s administrative systems.

Advertisement

Earlier, at the University of Pennsylvania, Petrofsky managed capital initiatives and organizational redesigns in a number of administrative roles.

Petrofsky is poised to lead similar efforts at the FAS, which relaunched its Resources Committee in spring 2025 and created a committee to consolidate staff positions amid massive federal funding cuts.

As part of its planning process, the committee has quietly brought on external help. Over several months, consultants from McKinsey & Company have been interviewing dozens of administrators and staff across the FAS.

Petrofsky will also likely have a hand in other cost-cutting measures across the FAS, which is facing a $365 million budget deficit. The school has already announced it will keep spending flat for the 2026 fiscal year, and it has dramatically reduced Ph.D. admissions.

In her email, Hoekstra praised Petrofsky’s performance across his career.

Advertisement

“Warren has emphasized transparency, clarity in communication, and investment in staff development,” she wrote. “He approaches change with steadiness and purpose, and with deep respect for the mission that unites our faculty, researchers, staff, and students. I am confident that he will be a strong partner to me and to our community.”

—Staff writer Amann S. Mahajan can be reached at [email protected] and on Signal at amannsm.38. Follow her on X @amannmahajan.

Continue Reading

Finance

Where in California are people feeling the most financial distress?

Published

on

Where in California are people feeling the most financial distress?

Inland California’s relative affordability cannot always relieve financial stress.

My spreadsheet reviewed a WalletHub ranking of financial distress for the residents of 100 U.S. cities, including 17 in California. The analysis compared local credit scores, late bill payments, bankruptcy filings and online searches for debt or loans to quantify where individuals had the largest money challenges.

When California cities were divided into three geographic regions – Southern California, the Bay Area, and anything inland – the most challenges were often found far from the coast.

The average national ranking of the six inland cities was 39th worst for distress, the most troubled grade among the state’s slices.

Bakersfield received the inland region’s worst score, ranking No. 24 highest nationally for financial distress. That was followed by Sacramento (30th), San Bernardino (39th), Stockton (43rd), Fresno (45th), and Riverside (52nd).

Advertisement

Southern California’s seven cities overall fared better, with an average national ranking of 56th largest financial problems.

However, Los Angeles had the state’s ugliest grade, ranking fifth-worst nationally for monetary distress. Then came San Diego at 22nd-worst, then Long Beach (48th), Irvine (70th), Anaheim (71st), Santa Ana (85th), and Chula Vista (89th).

Monetary challenges were limited in the Bay Area. Its four cities average rank was 69th worst nationally.

San Jose had the region’s most distressed finances, with a No. 50 worst ranking. That was followed by Oakland (69th), San Francisco (72nd), and Fremont (83rd).

The results remind us that inland California’s affordability – it’s home to the state’s cheapest housing, for example – doesn’t fully compensate for wages that typically decline the farther one works from the Pacific Ocean.

Advertisement

A peek inside the scorecard’s grades shows where trouble exists within California.

Credit scores were the lowest inland, with little difference elsewhere. Late payments were also more common inland. Tardy bills were most difficult to find in Northern California.

Bankruptcy problems also were bubbling inland, but grew the slowest in Southern California. And worrisome online searches were more frequent inland, while varying only slightly closer to the Pacific.

Note: Across the state’s 17 cities in the study, the No. 53 average rank is a middle-of-the-pack grade on the 100-city national scale for monetary woes.

Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Why Chime Financial Stock Surged Nearly 14% Higher Today | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Why Chime Financial Stock Surged Nearly 14% Higher Today | The Motley Fool

The up-and-coming fintech scored a pair of fourth-quarter beats.

Diversified fintech Chime Financial (CHYM +12.88%) was playing a satisfying tune to investors on Thursday. The company’s stock flew almost 14% higher that trading session, thanks mostly to a fourth quarter that featured notably higher-than-expected revenue guidance.

Sweet music

Chime published its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results just after market close on Wednesday. For the former period, the company’s revenue was $596 million, bettering the same quarter of 2024 by 25%. The company’s strongest revenue stream, payments, rose 17% to $396 million. Its take from platform-related activity rose more precipitously, advancing 47% to $200 million.

Image source: Getty Images.

Meanwhile, Chime’s net loss under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) more than doubled. It was $45 million, or $0.12 per share, compared with a fourth-quarter 2024 deficit of $19.6 million.

Advertisement

On average, analysts tracking the stock were modeling revenue below $578 million and a deeper bottom-line loss of $0.20 per share.

In its earnings release, Chime pointed to the take-up of its Chime Card as a particular catalyst for growth. Regarding the product, the company said, “Among new member cohorts, over half are adopting Chime Card, and those members are putting over 70% of their Chime spend on the product, which earns materially higher take rates compared to debit.”

Chime Financial Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(12.88%) $2.72

Current Price

$23.83

Advertisement

Double-digit growth expected

Chime management proffered revenue and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) guidance for full-year 2026. The company expects to post a top line of $627 million to $637 million, which would represent at least 21% growth over the 2024 result. Adjusted EBITDA should be $380 million to $400 million. No net income forecasts were provided in the earnings release.

It isn’t easy to find a niche in the financial industry, which is crowded with companies offering every imaginable type of service to clients. Yet Chime seems to be achieving that, as the Chime Card is clearly a hit among the company’s target demographic of clientele underserved by mainstream banks. This growth stock is definitely worth considering as a buy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending