Finance
Audit and Finance seeks more input before voting on board and commission changes – Austin Monitor
The City Council Audit and Finance Committee on Wednesday deliberated scaling back about two dozen of the city’s boards, commissions and other governmental bodies but ultimately took no action pending further input from the affected groups.
The discussion centered on a City Council-approved resolution to consolidate or dissolve up to 36 citizen groups, although Council Member Ryan Alter, who sponsored the initiative, reduced the number to 26 after hearing feedback from commissioners and other volunteer members.
After lengthy consideration, Committee Chair Mayor Kirk Watson summarized the conversation by asking staff to gather more feedback from the existing bodies that would be impacted by merging with other citizen groups. A sunset review process should also be used for dissolving those governmental bodies that have been rendered inactive, Watson said.
The city clerk’s office, working with the city manager’s office, received only a few responses to each of the questions posed in an online survey, as part of the resolution’s direction. But Audit and Finance members, along with other Council members, have heard a lot from individual board members and commissioners.
The most vocal opposition came from members of the Resource Management Commission, which had been slated to merge with the Zero Waste Advisory Commission. Alter has since removed that merger from a list of proposed consolidations.
Additionally, the Urban Transportation Commission opposed merging with the Bicycle Advisory Council and the Pedestrian Advisory Council.
Alejandro de la Vega, vice chair of the Bicycle Advisory Council, told the committee that merging the UTC with the bicycle council “would actually diminish, not amplify, cyclist representation” in Austin. He noted that his group had received over 300 signatures in the last five days in support of keeping the Bicycle Advisory Council as a single entity.
Mayor Pro Tem Vanessa Fuentes said she had heard negative feedback from several of her commissioners about the potential changes.
“I certainly cannot support merging some of these commissions and would like further consideration of how that should look … and more time for the community to weigh in,” she said.
Council Member Chito Vela said he couldn’t see the logic of folding the Bond Oversight Committee into the Planning Commission.
“I consider those kind of two completely different functions,” he said. He said a more understandable scenario would be to merge the Planning Commission with the Zoning and Platting Commission; however, Alter countered that the Planning Commission already has a full plate.
Indeed, when City Council formed the two commissions in 2001, the Planning Commission was struggling to consider zoning cases while also trying to plan a future Austin with a more visionary mindset.
While the duties of both commissions have morphed over time, one recommendation under consideration is reassigning the two commissions’ roles, with ZAP taking up all zoning cases citywide while the Planning Commission focuses on planning, code amendments and capital planning.
Other potential changes include merging the Downtown Commission with the South Central Waterfront Advisory Board and the Tourism Commission, plus updating membership requirements for the Airport Advisory Commission.
Another direction from the resolution has already been completed: an online tracker that monitors all the recommendations made by city boards and commissions.
Alter stressed that his resolution would be a continuing conversation and suggested moving forward at a future meeting on any proposed changes that have consensus.
“I think that the staff has really laid out a great process for us to review these bodies, whether it’s for future consolidation or just scope adjustment,” he said. “It will allow for these boards and commissions to ultimately be more effective, and that’s the goal … not to get rid of anybody’s board or commission but to make their work more effective and to make it so that staff is not having to go to three different bodies and make the same presentation.”
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
You’re a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?
Finance
Houghton students put lessons to the test at Financial Reality Fair
HOUGHTON, Mich. (WLUC) – As students prepare to graduate in the coming weeks, the cost of living continues to grow around them.
One Houghton County school hopes to prepare them to financially face those obstacles.
“It’s all really mundane things that you wouldn’t usually think that you would need a class to learn,” Senior Katie Manchester said. “But then you’re in the class, and you’re like ‘Oh, this is actually really helpful’”.
Manchester is among the juniors and seniors at Houghton High School who participated in its third annual Financial Reality Fair on Tuesday. Each year, students in the school’s Personal Finance class get a glimpse into what independent life could be like after graduation.
Personal finance teacher Jennifer Rubin says that students learning personal finance skills is more important than ever.
“Everyone’s pocketbooks have been stretched,” Rubin said. “I think people see it in their own households. They see it with their parents struggling with finances, and they see gas prices. They’re seeing all of these things having much more of an impact than maybe it used to be a few years ago.”
Rubin says students got hands-on training during the fair, making financial decisions and budgeting. Senior Elli Sommerville found this particularly useful.
“I knew about budgeting beforehand, but actually getting to do it was really helpful,” Sommerville said. “We worked on it for about a month.”
Student Kylie Hatman said the fair helped her better understand her habits.
“Budgeting is a main thing for me,” Hatman. “I figured out that I don’t spend as much as I think I do. I liked the ‘Budget Down to Zero’ method. Figuring out how to format that really helped me.”
Rubin notes that these students will soon take these skills and teach them to a younger generation at Houghton-Portage Elementary School.
“Tomorrow, all seniors in personal finance are partnering with an elementary classroom, and they’re going to be teaching the elementary kids,” Rubin added. “They’re going to be the teacher.”
The video above will feature the TV6 livestream until staff can clip the corresponding story, if available, from broadcasts or other TV6 content. You can subscribe to our YouTube page or download TV6+ to stream the latest local news and weather.
Copyright 2026 WLUC. All rights reserved.
Finance
Landscape of Climate Finance in Ethiopia – CPI
Macroeconomic reforms and escalating climate shocks are placing climate finance at the center of Ethiopia’s development trajectory. The country contributes 0.4% of global emissions but faces high climate risks, particularly due to its reliance on rain-fed agriculture and hydropower. At the same time, high inflation, foreign-exchange shortages, rising debt service obligations, and a recent sovereign default have constrained fiscal space and raised the cost of capital. Ethiopia must therefore rapidly scale up climate investment in line with its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC 3.0), while navigating macroeconomic constraints and the declining predictability of international concessional and donor finance.
Ethiopia’s climate policy framework is increasingly investment-oriented, moving from ambition to action. Building on the Climate Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) Strategy (2011) and earlier NDCs, the country’s NDC 3.0 (2025–2035) shifts from high-level ambition toward defined sectoral pathways and financing needs. Parallel reforms signaling growing institutional readiness include greening the financial sector under the National Bank of Ethiopia, developing a national green taxonomy, capital market reforms linked to the Ethiopian Securities Exchange, and emerging carbon market frameworks. However, coordination challenges, fragmented mandates, and limited project preparation capacity continue to constrain delivery.
Tracking how climate finance is mobilized and deployed is critical to inform policy decisions, guiding development partner strategies, and identify opportunities to crowd in domestic and private capital. This second iteration of the Landscape of Climate Finance in Ethiopia provides an updated baseline of project-level climate finance commitments for 2019 to 2023, with a focus on the biennial average for 2022 and 2023. It tracks flows across mitigation, adaptation, and dual-benefit activities, mapping finance from domestic and international sources, through public and private actors, to instruments and end-use sectors.
This assessment draws on publicly available and proprietary datasets compiled on a best-effort basis. Data gaps remain material, especially for domestic public spending, given the absence of systematized climate budget tagging, and for certain private sector investments that are not consistently disclosed. As a result, some flows, particularly domestic public spending and difficult-to-track private investments, are likely underestimated.
Key findings
- Ethiopia’s climate finance has gradually increased but must rise by at least fourfold to meet identified needs. Tracked flows averaged USD 2.3 billion annually in 2022/23, equivalent to approximately 1.7% of GDP. This is an 11% increase from the annual average of USD 2.1 billion in 2020/21 but still well below the estimated USD 10.6 billion annual requirement under the NDC 3.0 (2025–2035).
- Ethiopia’s heavy reliance on international public sources exposes its climate agenda to the constraints of external concessional finance. In 2022/23, 93% of tracked flows originated from international public sources. Public actors committed approximately USD 2.2 billion annually, primarily through grants (80%) and concessional debt (14%). Multilateral development finance institutions and donor governments were the largest providers. This concentration underscores the urgency of mobilizing broader and more sustainable domestic and private funding sources.
- Ethiopia’s shallow capital markets and regulatory uncertainty have limited private climate finance. Private actors contributed USD 113 million annually in 2022/23, representing less than 5% of total flows. This is insufficient to signal a functioning market or provide any buffer against public finance volatility. Private flows were concentrated in agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU) and small-scale energy activities. Investments were influenced by guarantee-backed transactions and philanthropic grants. Macroeconomic risk, currency constraints, shallow capital markets, and regulatory uncertainty continue to deter private participation at scale.
- Adaptation finance accounts for the majority of Ethiopia’s climate flows, reflecting the country’s high vulnerability to drought, hydrological variability, and disaster risk. Adaptation represented 59% of tracked climate finance in 2022/23 (USD 1.4 billion annually), a slight rise from 56% in 2019/20. This finance was overwhelmingly grant-based (92%) and internationally sourced. While they exceed mitigation in volume, adaptation flows remain far below the estimated USD 4 billion annual need.
- Mitigation finance remains insufficient relative to emissions structure and targets and costed needs. These flows averaged approximately USD 500 million annually, compared to the estimated USD 6.6 billion requirement under NDC 3.0. Finance was concentrated in the energy sector and largely concessional in nature. Mitigation flows declined relative to 2020/21 due to project cycle effects. The AFOLU sector, a large source of emissions, received a small share of mitigation finance, highlighting a structural imbalance between emissions sources and investment patterns.
- Cross-sectoral and resilience-oriented programs feature prominently across both mitigation and adaptation. In 2022/23, adaptation investment averaged USD 644 million, mitigation investment USD 77 million, and dual-benefit projects received USD 306 million. These flows targeted initiatives such as disaster-risk management, food security, institutional capacity building, and policy support. This reflects Ethiopia’s integrated CRGE vision and climate–development nexus and requires strong coordination, monitoring, and financial management systems.
- Institutional reform momentum is building, but delivery constraints persist. Ethiopia has implemented several climate-related reforms, including fuel subsidy reform, electric mobility incentives, financial sector greening initiatives, carbon market readiness efforts, and capital market development. These reforms can help to mobilize domestic and private capital. Yet fragmented governance structures, limited project preparation capacity, incomplete climate finance tracking systems, and constrained fiscal space continue to limit the scale and predictability of flows.
Recommendations
Strengthening governance, institutional capacity, and monitoring systems can help align climate finance mandates, build investable pipelines, and improve investor confidence. Strategic use of concessional finance, supportive regulation, and appropriate financial instruments can help mobilize private capital over time. This report highlights six priority actions for scaling Ethiopia’s climate finance:
- Strengthen climate finance governance to accelerate implementation. Enhance the role of the Climate Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) strategy as an inter-ministerial coordination mechanism with clear mandates and decision rights. This should link NDC planning to budget allocation, including climate budget tagging, and be aligned with public financial management processes. TCRGE efforts can serve as a central platform for screening and prioritizing NDC-aligned projects, coordinating technical assistance, and structuring blended finance/PPP transactions.
- Build capacity for project preparation as well as institutional and subnational delivery to convert policy ambition into implementable pipelines. Improve technical capacity for feasibility studies, financial structuring, safeguards, risk allocation, and results-based planning across line ministries and subnational institutions, and establish standardized project preparation tools and targeted support for high-priority sectors, particularly AFOLU.
- Strengthen climate finance tracking, transparency, and data credibility. Climate budget tagging could be extended to regional and local levels, as well as to climate-aligned sectors such as energy, AFOLU, transport, water and wastewater, buildings and infrastructure and industry. Embedding tagging in budget execution and reporting can reconcile climate-relevant expenditures with actual spending and outputs.
- Optimize scarce public resources through catalytic de-risking and innovative fiscal instruments. Ethiopia must meet its NDC3.0 USD 2.4 billion annual domestic public finance target amid fiscal constraints, including rising debt servicing (13% of revenue), declining tax-to-GDP ratio (7.5%), and volatile donor finance. The country can strategically use its CRGE Facility and national funds to provide guarantees or first-loss capital to crowd in private flows. Aggregation mechanisms (SPVs, Platform-based structures, financial intermediary aggregation) can also help accelerate a shift from small, planning-oriented grants to scalable investments. Debt-for-climate swaps may be another viable source.
- Unlock international and institutional capital through stronger enabling frameworks and domestic markets. High country risk, regulatory gaps, and weak monitoring limit private investment. Momentum is building through initiatives such as Ethiopia’s National Carbon Market Strategy, the establishment of the Ethiopian Securities Exchange, and the NBE’s Greening Financial Systems program. Next steps could include frameworks and regulations for carbon markets, green bonds, and other climate-aligned instruments to reduce uncertainty, enable transactions, and scale local-currency finance. Carbon markets offer a near-term opportunity to mobilize private capital, given the country’s land restoration and reforestation programs.
- Scale finance for sectors that are hard to abate or prioritized under the NDC 3.0. The limited climate finance flowing to industry represents a missed opportunity, given the sector’s importance in shaping Ethiopia’s long-term emissions trajectory and development ambition. Costed pipelines for carbon-intensive sectors, blended finance, and technical assistance for project preparation, standards, and technology deployment can help direct more capital to NDC 3.0 mitigation priorities, including industrial energy efficiency, fuel switching, and low-carbon technologies.
Finance
Sezzle Financial Literacy Tools Help Consumers Develop Better Habits | PYMNTS.com
Sezzle found in a March consumer survey that engagement with its financial literacy tool MoneyIQ correlates with improved consumer habits.
-
Atlanta, GA3 days ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
South-Carolina1 week agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Movie Reviews6 days agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Vermont1 week ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Politics1 week agoTrump’s Ballroom Design Has Barely Been Scrutinized
-
Politics1 week agoJD Vance says he was ‘obsessed’ with UFOs, believes aliens are actually ‘demons’
-
Atlanta, GA1 week agoFetishist ‘No Kings’ protester in mask drags ‘Trump’ and ‘JD Vance’ behind her wheelchair
-
Entertainment6 days agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium