Connect with us

Finance

Are women more effective in sustainable finance than men? – ESG Clarity

Published

on

Are women more effective in sustainable finance than men? – ESG Clarity

Covid-19 has fundamentally altered the global paradigm, and its impacts are evident practically in every facet of our lives. The growing interest in social risk and human capital management, and enthusiasm for ESG and socially responsible investing, has increased worldwide.

In 2023, the majority of assets managed in Europe, comprising approximately €7trn out of a total of €12trn euros, were allocated to ESG funds or strategies with a sustainability-oriented emphasis.

As for asset management in this sector, various research studies show that women are even better investors than their male colleagues and have the ability to bring more profit. Given that, it is essential to have a deeper look at women in asset management and the existing gender gap in this industry.

Positive outcomes of women’s inclusion In asset management

First of all, women exhibit greater efficiency in any fund allocation. They perform better as investors, favouring a “buy and hold” strategy. In contrast with men, women show a reduced tendency to impulsive and emotional decision-making in the stock market, focusing on thoughtful decision-making.

Advertisement

More importantly, the surge of ESG-driven investments stemmed from women’s initiatives and served as one of the essential drivers for change. A study conducted by Goldman Sachs revealed, for the first time in 2020, European funds managed by female or mixed-gender teams outperformed those led exclusively by men. This event may serve as further evidence of women’s positive impact on the asset management industry, which stands out for raising gender diversity in the industry. Thus, the presence of women in this industry brings not only profit but also socially significant changes.

Nevertheless, even though the ESG investment sector is on the rise and women have confirmed their importance in it, it continues to be mostly male-dominated, with women constituting a minority among investors and asset managers. And even in 2023, the problem of the gender gap in this occupation still takes place. According to the 2023 data, it is verified that only 20% of portfolio managers in Spain and Italy are women, and only 5% of women occupy senior management roles. The statistics in the UK and the USA are even worse: 11.8% and 11%, respectively, of workers in this field are women.

Why does gender disparity still exist?

History lessons state that initially, any job was characterised by a dominant number of men engaged in all kinds of activities. The finance and asset management industries that emerged later were no exception. Certainly, the number of women in the sector is growing from year to year. Nevertheless, more time is needed to even out this imbalance.

In addition, the belief that investing is more of a “man’s job” still exists in society and, what is more, is very widespread around the world. On the other hand, this problem has deeper roots. Since ancient times, it has been considered right if a woman does housework and takes care of the whole family. This prejudice creates another impediment to having a full-time job outside the house.

This conviction prevents some women, despite their outstanding abilities, from starting a career in a particular financial environment or climbing the career ladder. Even if a woman gets a job at a company involved in finance, investment or asset management, she may still feel vulnerable because of the representation imbalance and lack of women in senior management or C-suite positions. Moreover, in particular, for starters, it is important to feel supported in a company and have a role model to look up to, and this is often complicated if there are no or few female representatives in the team.

Advertisement

How to tackle the problem of inequality

Reports on wealth management disclose a striking revelation: by 2025, an estimated 60% of the wealth in the UK will be controlled by women. Considering this fact, It is becoming more and more clear why the deep-rooted gender gap problem must be tackled.

The actions for addressing this point must be very concrete: asset management firms should proactively implement measures, such as enabling more women managers to oversee high-net-worth families, individuals, and foundations. A great example of this is The Diversity Project Europe (DPE). One of its fundamental goals is to build a more inclusive asset management industry across the region. Furthermore, this project assists companies in achieving a more gender balanced workforce ‍and promotes social mobility among all genders. Our society does need way more of these illustrations to pave the way for women in the financial industry.

Thus, the main solution to this thorny issue is diversification, which is essential to the realms of investing and asset management. In embracing this, it becomes imperative to promote increased participation of women in asset management careers, ensuring equal opportunities for progress and cultivating an inclusive environment. Following the example of the DPE, in the long-run, the rise of women recognition will be expected and the structural barrier of gender imbalance will be eliminated. This implies introducing training programs to address biases and stereotypes related to gender in hiring, promotions, and decision-making processes, as well as support for women to pursue careers in finance and asset allocation.

These critical measures are pivotal in advancing gender equality within the industry. Beyond women being advantageous for the sector, they are crucial for fortifying and enhancing the resilience of the asset management framework, especially investments related to ESG. The earlier prominent companies realise the significance of augmenting the female workforce, the more advantageous it will be for their long-term profitability.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

US SEC obtained record financial remedies in fiscal 2024, agency says

Published

on

US SEC obtained record financial remedies in fiscal 2024, agency says

NEW YORK (Reuters) -The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission obtained $8.2 billion in financial remedies, the highest amount in its history, in fiscal 2024, the agency said in a statement on Friday.

The SEC filed 583 enforcement actions in the year that ended in September, down 26% from a year earlier, it said in a statement.

The $8.2 billion in financial remedies included $6.1 billion in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, a record, and $2.1 billion in civil penalties, the second-highest amount on record, according to the SEC’s statement.

Much of the total financial remedies came from a single action: a $4.5 billion settlement with the now-bankrupt crypto firm Terraform Labs, following a unanimous jury verdict against the firm and its founder Do Kwon. The SEC is expected to collect little of that settlement amount because it agreed to be paid only after Terraform satisfies crypto loss claims as part of its bankruptcy wind-down.

The SEC also obtained orders barring 124 individuals from serving as officers and directors of public companies, the second-highest number of such prohibitions in a decade. Holding individuals accountable for misconduct has been a priority of the agency under Chair Gary Gensler, who is stepping down in January.

Advertisement

“The Division of Enforcement is a steadfast cop on the beat, following the facts and the law wherever they lead to hold wrongdoers accountable,” Gensler said in a statement about the agency’s 2024 enforcement results.

(Reporting by Chris Prentice; Editing by Leslie Adler and Jonathan Oatis)

Continue Reading

Finance

Cop29: $250bn climate finance offer from rich world an insult, critics say

Published

on

Cop29: 0bn climate finance offer from rich world an insult, critics say

Developing countries have reacted angrily to an offer of $250bn in finance from the rich world – considerably less than they are demanding – to help them tackle the climate crisis.

The offer was contained in the draft text of an agreement published on Friday afternoon at the Cop29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, where talks are likely to carry on past a 6pm deadline.

Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, Panama’s climate envoy, told the Guardian: “This is definitely not enough. What we need is at least $5tn a year, but what we have asked for is just $1.3tn. That is 1% of global GDP. That should not be too much when you’re talking about saving the planet we all live on.”

He said $250bn divided among all the developing countries in need amounted to very little. “It comes to nothing when you split it. We have bills in the billions to pay after droughts and flooding. What the heck will $250bn do? It won’t put us on a path to 1.5C. More like 3C.”

According to the new text of a deal, developing countries would receive a total of at least $1.3tn a year in climate finance by 2035, which is in line with the demands most submitted before this two-week conference. That would be made up of the $250bn from developed countries, plus other sources of finance including private investment.

Advertisement

Poor nations wanted much more of the headline finance to come directly from rich countries, preferably in the form of grants rather than loans.

Civil society groups criticised the offer, variously describing it as “a joke”, “an embarrassment”, “an insult”, and the global north “playing poker with people’s lives”.

Mohamed Adow, a co-founder of Power Shift Africa, a thinktank, said: “Our expectations were low, but this is a slap in the face. No developing country will fall for this. It’s not clear what kind of trick the presidency is trying to pull. They’ve already disappointed everyone, but they have now angered and offended the developing world.”

The $250bn figure is significantly lower than the $300bn-a-year offer that some developed countries were mulling at the talks, to the Guardian’s knowledge.

The offer from developed countries, funded from their national budgets and overseas aid, is supposed to form the inner core of a “layered” finance settlement, accompanied by a middle layer of new forms of finance such as new taxes on fossil fuels and high-carbon activities, carbon trading and “innovative” forms of finance; and an outermost layer of investment from the private sector, into projects such as solar and windfarms.

Advertisement

These layers would add up to $1.3tn a year, which is the amount that economists have calculated is needed in external finance for developing countries to tackle the climate crisis. Many activists have demanded more: figures of $5tn or $7tn a year have been put forward by some groups, based on the historical responsibilities of developed countries for causing the climate crisis.

skip past newsletter promotion

This latest text is the second from an increasingly embattled Cop presidency. Azerbaijan was widely criticised for its first draft on Thursday.

Advertisement

There will now be further negotiations among countries and possibly a new or several new iterations of this draft text.

Avinash Persaud, a former adviser to the Barbados prime minister, Mia Mottley, and now an adviser to the president of the Inter-American Bank, said: “There is no deal to come out of Baku that will not leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth, but we are within sight of a landing zone for the first time all year.”

Continue Reading

Finance

US Treasury Selects BNY as Financial Agent for Direct Express Program | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

US Treasury Selects BNY as Financial Agent for Direct Express Program | PYMNTS.com

The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) will serve as the financial agent for the Direct Express program, which provides 3.4 million Americans with a prepaid debit card to receive monthly federal benefits.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service said in a Thursday (Nov. 21) press release that it selected BNY for this role after evaluating proposals from multiple financial institutions and seeing the bank’s offering of features and customer service options.

The new agreement will begin Jan. 3 and will last five years, according to the release.

“Since 2008, the Direct Express program has paid federal beneficiaries seamlessly, inclusively and securely, while sparing taxpayers and customers the costs and risk associated with cashing paper checks,Fiscal Service Commissioner Tim Gribben said in the release.This new agreement will further our goals of delivering a modern customer experience and strengthening Treasury’s commitment to paying the right person, in the right amount, at the right time.”

With this agreement, BNY will add to the cardholder experience features like online/digital funds access, bill pay, cardless ATM access, omnichannel chat and text customer service, online dispute filing and in-person authentication options, the bank said in a Thursday press release.

Advertisement

“Drawing on our leading platform capabilities, we look forward to advancing the program’s goal of providing high-quality financial services to individuals and communities throughout the U.S.,Jennifer Barker, global head of treasury services and depositary receipts at BNY, said in the release.

Seventy-seven percent of the recipients of disbursements opt for instant payments when given the option, according to the PYMNTS Intelligence and Ingo Payments collaboration,Measuring Consumers’ Growing Interest in Instant Payouts.”

That’s because consumers looking for disbursements — paychecks, government payments, insurance settlements, investment earnings — want their money quickly, the report found.

In October, the Treasury Department credited the Office of Payment Integrity, within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, with enhancing its fraud prevention capabilities and expanding offerings to new and existing customers.

The department said itstechnology and data-driven” approach allowed it to prevent and recover more than $4 billion in fraud and improper payments, up from $652 million in 2023.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending