Connect with us

Entertainment

Will Jane Campion’s wild weekend affect her Oscar chances?

Published

on

By practically each measure, it was a superb weekend for filmmaker Jane Campion and her Oscar-nominated film, “The Energy of the Canine.”

Campion took the Administrators Guild prize Saturday evening and obtained off a jab at actor Sam Elliott on the crimson carpet earlier than the ceremony. “I’m sorry, he was being a bit of little bit of a B-I-T-C-H,” Campion, 67, stated, responding to Elliott’s criticism of her western (“What the f— does this lady from [New Zealand] know concerning the American West?”) on Marc Maron’s “WTF” podcast two weeks in the past.

Campion continued her dismissal of Elliott: “He’s not a cowboy; he’s an actor.”

Campion gained the director honor once more on the British Academy Movie Awards on Sunday, together with her movie additionally taking BAFTA’s greatest image prize. That evening, Campion and “Canine” each prevailed on the Critics Alternative Awards as nicely.

Advertisement

However after being celebrated Saturday on social media for her Elliott takedown, Campion discovered herself on the receiving finish of a backlash for remarks made towards tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams throughout her Critics Alternative speech. After saying she was honored to be within the room with the tennis stars and expressing a love for his or her sport, Campion saluted her fellow nominees — “the blokes,” she known as the administrators — after which circled again to the sisters.

“Serena and Venus, you’re such marvels,” she stated. “Nonetheless, you don’t play towards the blokes, like I’ve to.”

It was a clumsy remark at greatest, disrespectful at worst. And Monday morning, Campion issued an apology.

“I made a inconsiderate remark equating what I do within the movie world with all that Serena Williams and Venus Williams have achieved,” Campion stated, in a press release supplied to The Instances. “I didn’t intend to devalue these two legendary Black girls and world class athletes. The actual fact is the Williams sisters have, truly, squared off towards males on the courtroom (and off), and so they have each raised the bar and opened doorways for what is feasible for ladies on this world.

“The very last thing I’d ever need to do is decrease exceptional girls,” Campion continued. “I like Serena and Venus. Their accomplishments are titanic and provoking. Serena and Venus, I apologize and utterly have a good time you.”

Advertisement

With closing Oscar voting starting Thursday, the query round Hollywood was how Campion’s wild weekend would possibly have an effect on this yr’s races. The New Zealand director has lengthy been celebrated as an iconoclast, a lady whose radiant movies meld magnificence and barbarism of their depiction of the world and the flawed people inhabiting it. She’s not slick or calculated, both in her artwork or in dialog.

That authenticity, extensively celebrated by followers and admirers, additionally could be harmful in terms of spontaneous remarks in speeches and on the crimson carpet.

“You may see each the Sam Elliott diss and the Williams sisters misstep as two sides of the identical coin,” stated a author who declined to be named on account of membership within the movement image academy. “She speaks her thoughts. She’s not rehearsed. And today, with social media being what it’s, that may result in hassle.”

Social media backlash, although, doesn’t at all times go away its echo chambers in ways in which influence the skin world. The 9,487 members of the academy aren’t, for essentially the most half, members of Movie Twitter. Nor had been a lot of them doubtless watching the derided Critics Alternative Awards, which drew simply 630,000 viewers and a 0.1 score Sunday evening.

However Oscar voters do prefer to gossip. And between the 2 viral moments, Campion gave them one thing to whisper about because the awards season grinds towards a conclusion seven months after “The Energy of the Canine” and different contenders premiered at fall movie festivals. (The Oscars shall be held March 27.)

Advertisement

“The humorous factor is, there may be simply as many, if no more, academy members who’re offended by what she stated about Sam Elliott — or, no less than, the way in which she stated it — than the entire Venus and Serena factor,” stated an Oscar-voting producer. “She didn’t must take the low street and reply to Sam Elliott’s stupidity two weeks after it occurred. However she’s within the information now … I’m positive a lot to the consternation of everybody at Netflix.”

Netflix, which launched “The Energy of the Canine,” hopes that Campion’s film will lastly win the streamer the most effective image Oscar, after different high-profile titles like “Roma” and “The Irishman” got here up quick in earlier years. Whereas Campion stays a near-lock to win the director Oscar, the prospects for the film stay murky, although a win on the Producers Guild Awards this coming Saturday may assist soothe the frayed nerves of the streamers’ executives and consultants.

The considering, conveyed by rival studios and a few voters, is that “The Energy of the Canine” is a film that individuals admire greater than love. (“And I do know lots of people who simply flat-out hate it,” boasted one competing awards exec.) With the ranked selection voting system that the academy makes use of to find out greatest image — voters record the ten nominated motion pictures so as of desire — the highest Oscar typically goes to the film that’s most typically appreciated — or, to place it one other means, the least disliked.

That system may result in a crowd-pleaser just like the Apple TV+ coming-of-age story “CODA” profitable greatest image.

After I spoke with Campion just a few weeks in the past, previous to the controversy, I requested how she felt about all of the accolades and a spotlight she has acquired for her movie.

Advertisement

“You realize, it’s higher than a kick within the face,” Campion stated in her typical blunt, self-effacing trend.

Because the season takes its closing flip, she may be reassessing that appraisal.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Catherine Breillat Is Back, Baby

Published

on

Catherine Breillat Is Back, Baby

The transgressive French filmmaker is in fine, fucked-up form with Last Summer, about a middle-age lawyer who starts sleeping with her stepson.
Photo: Janus Films

When Anne (Léa Drucker) has sex with her 17-year-old stepson, she closes and sometimes covers her eyes. It’s a pose that brings to mind what people say about the tradition of draping a napkin over your head before eating ortolan, that the idea is to prevent God from witnessing what you’re about to do. Théo (Samuel Kircher) is as fine-boned as any songbird — “You’re so slim!” Anne gasps in what sounds almost like pain during one of their encounters, as she runs her hands up his rangy torso — and just as forbidden. And despite the fact that what she’s doing could blow up her life, she can’t stay away. It wouldn’t be fair to say that desire is a form of madness in Last Summer, a family drama as masterfully propulsive as a horror movie. Anne remains upsettingly clear-eyed about what’s happening, as though to suggest otherwise would be a cop-out. But desire is powerful, enough to compel this bourgeois middle-age professional into betraying everything she stands for in a few breathtaking turns.

Last Summer is the first film in a decade from director Catherine Breillat, the taboo-loving legend behind the likes of Fat Girl and Romance. Last Summer, which Breillat and co-writer Pascal Bonitzer adapted from the 2019 Danish film Queen of Hearts, could be described as tame only in comparison to Rocco Siffredi drinking a teacup full of tampon water in Anatomy of Hell, but there is a lulling sleekness to the way it lays out its setting that turns out to be deceptive. Anne and her husband Pierre (Olivier Rabourdin) live with their two adopted daughters in a handsome house surrounded by sun-dappled countryside, a lifestyle sustained by the business dealings that frequently require Pierre to travel. Anne’s sister and closest friend Mina (Clotilde Courau) works as a manicurist in town, and conversations between the two make it clear that they didn’t grow up in the kind of ease Anne currently enjoys. It’s a luxury that allows her to pursue a career that seems more driven by idealism than by financial concerns. Anne is a lawyer who represents survivors of sexual assault, a detail that isn’t ironic, exactly, so much as it represents just how much individual actions can be divorced from broader beliefs.

Advertisement

In the opening scene, Anne dispassionately questions an underage client about her sexual history. She informs the girl that she should expect the defense to paint her as promiscuous before reassuring her that judges are accustomed to this tactic. The sequence outlines how familiar Anne is with the narratives used to discredit accusers, but also highlights a certain flintiness to her character. Drucker’s performance is impressively hard-edged even before Anne ends up in bed with her stepson. There’s a restlessness to the character behind the sleek blonde hair and businesswoman shifts, a desire to think of herself as unlike other women and as more interesting than the buttoned-up normies her husband brings by for dinner. Anne enjoys her well-coiffed life, but she also feels impatient with it, and when Théo gets dropped into her lap after being expelled from school in Geneva for punching his teacher, he triggers something in her that’s not just about lust. Théo is still very much a kid, something Breillat emphasizes by showcasing the messes he leaves around the house as much as on his sulky, half-formed beauty. But that rebelliousness speaks to Anne, who finds something invigorating in aligning herself with callow passion and impulsiveness instead of stultifying adulthood — however temporarily.

This being a Breillat film, the sex is Last Summer’s proving ground, the place where all those tensions about gender and class and age meet up with the inexorability of the flesh. The first time Anne sleeps with Théo, it’s shot from below, as though the camera’s lying in bed beside the woman as she looks up at the boy on top of her. It’s a point of view that makes the audience complicit in the scene, but that also dares you not to find its spectacle hot. Breillat is an avid button-pusher responsible for some of the more disturbing depictions of sexuality to have ever been committed to screen, but Last Summer refuses to defang its main character by portraying her simply as a predatory molester. Instead, she’s something more complicated — a woman trying to have things both ways, to dabble in the transgressive without risking her advantageous perch in the mainstream, and to wield the weapons of the victim-blaming society she otherwise battles when they are to her advantage. It’s not the sex that harms Théo; it’s the mindfuck of what he’s subjected to. After dreamily playing tourist in Théo’s youthful existence, Anne drags him into the brutal realities of the grown-up world. The results are unflinching and breathtakingly ugly. You couldn’t be blamed for wanting to look away.

See All

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: In the underpowered 'Daddio,' the proverbial cab ride from hell could use more hell

Published

on

Review: In the underpowered 'Daddio,' the proverbial cab ride from hell could use more hell

The art of conversation has been a casualty in these deeply divided days of ours, and the poor state of talk in the movies — so often expositional, glib or posturing — is an unfortunate reflection of that. The new film “Daddio” is an attempt to put verbal discourse front and center, confining to a yellow taxi a pair with different life paths, as you would expect when your leads are Sean Penn and Dakota Johnson. (Guess which one is the cabbie.)

Johnson’s coolly elegant, nameless traveler, a computer programmer returning to New York’s JFK airport from a trip visiting a big sister in Oklahoma, may be getting a flat rate for her journey, but the meter’s always running on the mouth of Penn’s gleefully crusty and opinionated driver, Clark. He’s a twice-married man prone to streetwise philosophizing about the state of the world and, over the course of the ride, the unsettled romances of his attractive fare. And as she drops clues about her life — sometimes unwittingly, then a little more freely — she gives back with some probing responses of her own, trying to pry him open.

Writer-director Christy Hall, who originally conceived the scenario as a stage play, lets the chatter roll — there’s a significant stretch in which the cab isn’t even moving. And when silence sets in, there’s still an exchange to tend to, as Johnson occasionally, with apprehension, responds to a lover’s insistent sexting. This third figure (unseen, save one predictable picture sent to her phone) becomes another source of conjectural bravado for Clark, a self-proclaimed expert in male-female relations, who makes eye contact through the rearview mirror.

Sean Penn in the movie “Daddio.”

(Sony Pictures Classics)

Advertisement

Watching the unremarkable “Daddio,” you’ll never worry that anything untoward or combustible will happen between the chauvinist driver with a heart of gold and the smart if vulnerable young female passenger who “can handle herself,” as Clark frequently observes. That lack of tension is the problem. The movie is less about a nuanced conversation between strangers than a writer’s careful construction, designed to bridge a cultural impasse between the sexes. Hall is so eager to stage a big moment that upends expectations and triggers wet-eyed epiphanies — He’s a compassionate blowhard! She can laugh at his crassness! — that we’re never allowed to feel the molecules shift from moment to moment in a way that isn’t unforced. Life may be the subject, but life is what’s missing.

It doesn’t help that in directing her first feature, Hall has given herself one of the hardest jobs, getting the most out of only two ingredients and one container. It’s probably why Jim Jarmusch went the variety route with five different tales for his memorable 1991 taxi suite “Night on Earth.” That film conveyed a palpable sense of time and space.

“Daddio,” on the other hand, is nowhere near as assured visually or in its pacing. Hall has an experienced cinematographer in Phedon Papamichael (“Nebraska,” “Ford v Ferrari”) but chooses an unfortunate studio gloss that suggests utter control, rather than a what-might-happen vibe. Not that there’s anything wrong with a movie so clearly made on a set. But Johnson’s well-rehearsed poise and Penn’s coasting boldness make them seem like the stars of a commercial for a scent called Common Ground rather than flesh-and-blood people. At times, they hardly seem to be sharing the same car interior, leaving “Daddio” feeling like a safe space, when what it needs is danger.

‘Daddio’

Advertisement

Rating: R, for language throughout, sexual material and brief graphic nudity

Running time: 1 hour, 41 minutes

Playing: In limited release Friday, June 28

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Kunddala Puranam’ Review | A simplistic tale featuring an in-form Indrans, Remya Suresh

Published

on

‘Kunddala Puranam’ Review | A simplistic tale featuring an in-form Indrans, Remya Suresh

‘Kunddala Puranam’, starring Indrans and Remya Suresh in the lead, is the kind of movie you might want to watch for its focus on village folk and their everyday lives, offering a break from the bustling city. However, its far too simplistic approach may not work for all, especially at a time when filmmakers are trying to break new ground with experimental storytelling, unique styles, and mixing genres.
‘Kunddala Puranam’, directed by Santhosh Puthukkunnu, is set in Kasaragod, where a family opens up their private well to their neighbors. The well is an often-used trope in Malayalam cinema, with women characters gathering around it for water and some gossip. Venu (Indrans) and Thankamani (Remya Suresh) have a school-going daughter who yearns to wear gold earrings but can’t because of an ear infection. When her condition improves, Venu, who works as a security guard at a local bar, decides to purchase a pair for her. The gold earrings soon become the source of both happiness and unhappiness for the family.

The Kasaragod dialect, explored in films since the latter half of the last decade, has a certain charm, but what is particularly interesting is how Indrans effortlessly mouths his dialogues in the dialect. He is a masterclass in emotional acting and nails his role as a resolute father in this film. Remya Suresh, who played a prominent role in last year’s acclaimed movie ‘1001 Nunakal’, performs exceptionally well in this movie. Unni Raja, best known for ‘Thinkalazhcha Nishchayam’, also plays an interesting character. However, it is the child actor Sivaani Shibin who manages to capture the audience’s hearts with her playful innocence, a quality sadly missing in characters written for children in recent years.
Though the writers have tried their hand at humor in the movie, most of the dialogues fall flat, except for some scenes involving a drunkard and the other villagers. The story, though interesting, is stretched too long for comfort. Sound designer and musician Blesson Thomas manages to capture the mood of the story well through his music.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending