Connect with us

Entertainment

This summer marks the twilight of classic rock

Published

on

This summer marks the twilight of classic rock

Santana, who postponed six live shows “out of an abundance of warning” whereas he recovers, is a legendary guitarist whose distinctive mix of rock chords and Latin rhythms have gained him 10 Grammys.

He is also 74.

And of the rock icons out on tour this 12 months, he is likely one of the youngest.

Bob Dylan is 81 and has been touring nearly nonstop since final fall. Paul McCartney turned 80 final month shortly after wrapping up North American dates on his “Obtained Again” tour. Former Seaside Boy Brian Wilson, 80, is touring by way of September. The Rolling Stones — anchored by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, each 78 — are taking part in stadiums throughout Europe. The Who, with Pete Townshend, 77, and Roger Daltrey, 78, are touring into November.

Additionally on the highway this summer time are Eric Clapton, 77, Rod Stewart, 77, Elton John, 75, and 78-year-old Roger Waters, co-founder of Pink Floyd, who continues to be packing arenas along with his majestic songs and mind-bending stagecraft. The checklist goes on.

Advertisement

At arenas and stadiums the world over, we’re witnessing historical past. By no means earlier than has such a grizzled group of rock icons graced so many main levels on the similar time.

This second is one thing to have a good time. But it surely’s additionally slightly bittersweet, as a result of it marks the twilight of an early era of rock ‘n’ roll — the rockers who got here proper after seminal artists like Chuck Berry, Elvis and Jerry Lee Lewis.

We are able to nonetheless get a thrill from listening to these performers reside: the visceral punch of the opening guitar chords to “Begin Me Up,” the lilting piano intro to “Tiny Dancer,” the shimmering sonic brilliance of “Good Vibrations.”

However let’s simply say it — by nearly any normal, these rock stars are outdated. And it forces these of us who grew up with their music to acknowledge that we’re getting outdated, too.

As critic Steven Hyden wrote in his 2019 e-book, “Twilight of the Gods: A Journey to the Finish of Traditional Rock,” “You’ll be able to’t speak about traditional rock now with out additionally fascinated about demise.”

‘It is higher to fade away like an outdated soldier than to burn out’

In 2019, Damon Linker wrote a extensively shared essay for The Week, provocatively titled, “The approaching demise of nearly each rock legend.”

In it he predicted that the majority getting old rock icons had been seemingly going to die within the subsequent decade or so.

Advertisement

“Behold the killing fields that lie earlier than us,” he wrote, earlier than itemizing 28 rock stars in or on the verge of their seventies: Dylan, McCartney, Wilson, Jagger, Richards, Daltrey, Townshend, Waters, Clapton, Stewart, Elton John, Paul Simon, Artwork Garfunkel, Carole King, Joni Mitchell, Jimmy Web page, Robert Plant, Ray Davies, David Gilmour, Debbie Harry, Neil Younger, Van Morrison, Bryan Ferry, Don Henley, James Taylor, Jackson Browne, Billy Joel and Bruce Springsteen.

Three years later, all 28 of them are nonetheless alive. (So are Tina Turner, now 82, Ringo Starr, 81, Neil Diamond, 81, Sly Stone, 79, Bob Seger, 77, Stevie Nicks, 74, Ozzy Osbourne, 73, Bonnie Raitt, 71, and plenty of others.)

Brian Wilson, founding member of the Beach Boys, performs at The Kia Forum on June 9, 2022, in Inglewood, California.

Contemplating the rock ‘n’ roll life-style’s toll on musicians’ well being, and the truth that we have since been hammered by a world pandemic that preys on the aged and has killed greater than 6 million folks, that appears nothing in need of wonderful.

So is the truth that most of those artists are nonetheless touring.

Ought to they nonetheless be touring? That’s one other query completely.

“Individuals at all times ask me, ‘How do you are feeling about writing, ‘I hope I die earlier than I get outdated?’” Townshend instructed the viewers at an April present by The Who in Miami. “I really feel actually, actually outdated.”
One in all Neil Younger’s songs from the Seventies goes, “It is higher to burn out than to fade away,” a much-repeated lyric in regards to the inventive lifespan of rock musicians. The road, famously quoted by Kurt Cobain in his suicide be aware, suggests rock stars are higher off flaming out in a quick blaze of inventive glory than fading slowly into obsolescence.
However John Lennon, requested about Younger’s track in an interview three days earlier than he died, stated he hated the lyric.

“It is higher to fade away like an outdated soldier than to burn out,” Lennon stated. I worship the individuals who survive.”

Advertisement

‘These are giants of music historical past nonetheless strolling the earth’

Linker is not so positive. In a follow-up piece for The Week final 12 months, he argued that the standard of rock stars’ musical output invariably declines as they age, turn into wealthy and lose the inventive hearth that sparked their earlier songs.

And reside, a lot of them seem bodily diminished as effectively.

Linker says he and his spouse lately caught Genesis’ reunion tour and had been dismayed watching the 71-year-old Phil Collins, so restricted by well being issues that he could not play the drums and sang sitting down.

“It was present — nice lights and sound, and Phil Collins’ son Nic did a superb job with the drums. However Phil clearly wasn’t as much as it,” Linker instructed CNN. “That left us sort of down by the tip of the night. It might’t assist however be a relentless reminder that we have gotten a lot older, too.”

Phil Collins sings during a reunion concert by Genesis at U Arena on March 17, 2022, in Nanterre, France.

Linker feels equally about different septuagenarian rock bands who preserve soldiering on regardless of the deaths of key members.

“I do not need to sound imply, however Roger Daltrey of The Who hasn’t been in a position to hit excessive notes in a long time. Who songs are actually onerous to sing! And he is now 78 years outdated. But they preserve going on the market. There’s one thing very unhappy — very needy — about that,” Linker stated. “I really feel the identical means in regards to the Rolling Stones: Come on, guys, you had an amazing run — possibly the very best run in rock historical past! Time to present it a relaxation.”

Advertisement
However Scott Russell, music editor of Paste journal, disagrees.

To him, there’s one thing particular about watching somebody take a track you have beloved for many years and produce it to life earlier than your eyes.

“These live legends with catalogs to match, giants of music historical past nonetheless strolling the earth regardless of a long time in a grueling trade. You could possibly hear the years in Bob Dylan’s voice, however that is by no means what made his music particular to start with,” he instructed CNN.

“Touring is a significant pressure on the physique and thoughts, so any artist nonetheless on the highway at a sophisticated age is doing it for extra than simply monetary safety,” Russell added, noting that the overwhelming majority {of professional} musicians should scrape and claw to make a residing touring.

“Any artist who makes it to that mountaintop has earned the suitable to hang around there so long as they like.”

A farewell tour for traditional rock

Advertisement

These rock ‘n’ roll icons are all survivors. However time, you may say, is not on their aspect.

And their particular style of music is doomed as effectively.

“Traditional rock” was coined by radio programmers to explain guitar-driven music of a definite time — roughly from the mid-’60s by way of the grunge period, Linker and Russell level out.

“By definition, that is a factor from the previous,” Linker stated.

Roger Daltrey, left, and Pete Townshend of The Who perform at TQL Stadium on May 15, 2022, in Cincinnati.

Certain, you continue to hear traditional rock on mainstream radio, in your uncle’s Spotify playlists and bashed out by cowl bands in bars around the globe. Its greatest songs stay timeless.

However as a recent cultural drive, its relevance is fading. In an more and more various international music scene, it is a style dominated by older White dudes.

“Is traditional rock itself now a problematic relic from a time when white male musicians commanded a disproportionate quantity of consideration?” Hyden puzzled in his 2018 e-book. “Does it need to fade away?”

Advertisement

Rock has lengthy ceased being the dominant fashionable music style within the US, overtaken by hip-hop, nation, rap and dance-oriented pop. Exterior of some school and neighborhood stations, it is tough to search out new rock music on the radio.

As extra rock legends die within the coming years, the final vestiges of an period will die with them.

Will a brand new era of disciples take up the flag?

There are many candidates — Dave Grohl, Eddie Vedder, Thom Yorke, Trent Reznor and members of U2 and Metallica, simply to call just a few — however they’re throughout 50. It is onerous to think about many younger rock artists who can fill stadiums like McCartney and Elton John.

And that is okay. There is not any scarcity of gifted younger musicians increasing the boundaries of rock earlier than enthusiastic crowds in theaters and golf equipment. Good music will at all times discover an viewers.

Advertisement
Bob Dylan performing in London's Hyde Park on July 12, 2019. Dylan, now 81, is touring again this year.

“Rock could by no means regain its place atop the pop music pecking order, nevertheless it’s by no means going to go away, both. As one era of rock musicians ages out, there’s at all times one other on their means up,” stated Paste’s Russell, citing such rising artists as Bartees Unusual, Turnstile and Moist Leg. “What’s outdated can at all times be made new once more.”

Rock ‘n’ roll “is a superb components for younger folks in search of a inventive outlet, so I do not assume it’s going to die out,” agreed Linker. “I imply, all the good outdated stuff continues to be there in our Spotify and Apple Music accounts to take heed to and encourage new generations of discontented youth, which is the place rock music comes from.”

Within the meantime, let’s recognize these touring rock music legends whereas they’re nonetheless round.

Sure, possibly Pete Townshend’s signature windmills are getting slightly creaky. Possibly Brian Wilson outsources his excessive notes to youthful singers. And lots of of those artists’ live shows are overpriced.

However they’re nonetheless on the market evening after evening, doing what they love. They’ve given us a lot. We’re fortunate to have had them this lengthy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film Review: 'Nutcrackers' Has a Good Heart But Not Enough Laughs – Awards Radar

Published

on

Film Review: 'Nutcrackers' Has a Good Heart But Not Enough Laughs – Awards Radar
Hulu

David Gordon Green is capable of tackling just about any story and doing it in his own distinct manner. His career has gone in so many directions, to be sure. So, when he was making a family film again with Nutcrackers, I was open to pretty much any type of family flick. As such, it’s a bit of a disappointment for the movie to be totally cute and inoffensive, but little more than that. It’s amusing, sure, but should be more amusing. Plus, it’s just not quite as funny as you want it to be.

Nutcrackers has charm and a good heart, no doubt about that. It just never builds on the goodwill to become something memorable. There’s a clear hope to become an eventual holiday staple, being rewatched over and over again by families. However, by playing it so safe, it falls short of that mark by a bit. The film threatens at times to become more, but ultimately is unable to get to that point and fully win you over.

Hulu

Straight-laced Mike (Ben Stiller) has come from Chicago to the farm where his recently deceased sister and brother-in-law used to live in order to sign some paperwork. When he arrives in the small town, he finds out that he’s essentially become the temporary guardian of his now orphaned nephews. Moreover, the quartet of moppet young men are pretty much feral. Mike is initially no match for Justice (Homer Janson), Simon (Arlo Janson), Steve Jr. (Ulysses Janson), and Samuel (Atlas Janson). In fact, they’re actively torturing him.

As you might expect, both sides thaw. While a social worker (Linda Cardellini) attempts to find the boys a new home, some bonding occurs. Of course, Mike wants his old life back, while leads to tension when his nephews feel like he doesn’t want them. Some very funny moments result, but the climix obviously is going to be a heartfelt attempt to get you to roll a tear.

Hulu

Ben Stiller isn’t asked to do anything he hasn’t done before, which is a shame. He’s good in the role, without question, but he has more to offer than this. He’s allowed to be funny and be serious, and he’s aces in a scene where he tells the story of Rambo as a bedtime tale, but it’s a case where you’re waiting for a next level that never comes. The quartet of Arlo Janson, Atlas Janson, Homer Janson, and Ulysses Janson are fine, provided you’re alright with cute kid performances. A sequence where they ask Mike to teach them sex ed has them at their funniest. Linda Cardellini doesn’t get much to do, unfortunately, but she’s a warm presence. Supporting players here include Ari Graynor, Tim Heidecker, Toby Huss, and more, but it’s mostly about Stiller and the boys, who can amuse and make you smile, albeit not quite enough.

Director David Gordon Green has a personal stake in this picture, but it never comes across in the final product. Now, the screenplay by Leland Douglas is just so generic that Green can’t do too much with it, but it’s still a shame. The aforementioned moments are comedy highlights, though you wish that Nutcrackers was funnier. The ending is cliched but effective, though you wish that the drama of it all was a bit more consistent. In the end, you just wish for a bit more all around.

Nutcrackers is perfectly fine, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but David Gordon Green and Ben Stiller’s presence had me hoping for more. As a Hulu release you can watch with family this holiday weekend, you can do a lot worse. The thing is, you can do better, and I just can’t fully let that slide. So, consider this ever so close to a recommendation, even though I’m not quite there…

Advertisement

SCORE: ★★1/2

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Rocker Marilyn Manson drops lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood, will pay legal fees

Published

on

Rocker Marilyn Manson drops lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood, will pay legal fees

Embattled rock icon Marilyn Manson has dropped his lawsuit against former fiancée Evan Rachel Wood and will pay her $327,000 in attorney fees, her lawyers confirmed Tuesday afternoon.

Manson, whose real name is Brian Warner, sued the “Westworld” actor in March 2022 for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The couple dated for three years, beginning when she was 19 and he was 37.

Evan Rachel Wood, in an image from “Showbiz Kids,” a frank documentary about the challenges of being a child actor.

(HBO)

Advertisement

The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, accused Wood of hatching plans to manufacture sexual-abuse allegations against Manson and to profit from them, among other claims, according to the complaint.

Most of that lawsuit was thrown out after Wood petitioned for an anti-SLAPP exemption, a legal maneuver used to strike down frivolous and expensive lawsuits that can silence critics, and Manson was ordered to pay $327,000 in attorney fees.

Manson had appealed but reached out to settle, according to Wood’s lawyers.

A call to Manson’s legal representative was not immediately answered.

Manson initially offered to pay some of the fees in exchange for settlement terms of confidentiality and a “mutually acceptable” public statement, according to Wood’s attorneys.

Advertisement

Wood’s legal team rejected the proposal. Manson eventually agreed to the full settlement without confidentiality.

“Manson…filed a lawsuit against Ms. Wood as a publicity stunt to try to undermine the credibility of his many accusers and revive his faltering career,” Michael J. Kump, Wood’s attorney, said in a statement. “But his attempt to silence and intimidate Ms. Wood failed. As the trial court correctly found, Warner’s claims were meritless.”

The crux of the lawsuit revolved around Manson’s accusation that Wood and artist Illma Gore had orchestrated a campaign to cast him as a rapist and destroy his career.

Wood alleged in 2022 that Manson had “essentially raped” her during the filming of Manson’s 2007 “Heart-Shaped Glasses” music video.

That allegation was strenuously denied by Manson’s legal team, which eventually filed the complaint.

Advertisement

“Game of Thrones” actor Esme Bianco also sued the musician in 2021, alleging sexual assault, sexual battery and human trafficking. They settled the lawsuit in 2023 after Bianco said Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón “mishandled” the case.

Ashley Walters, Manson’s former assistant, also sued and alleged sexual assault and harassment. Court proceedings are expected to resume in January.

In 2023, Manson also settled with an unnamed woman who alleged that he had raped her in 2011.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Gladiator II” – Valdosta Daily Times

Published

on

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Gladiator II” – Valdosta Daily Times

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Gladiator II”

Published 3:15 pm Tuesday, November 26, 2024

“Gladiator II”

(Drama/Action: 2 hours, 28 minutes)

Advertisement

Starring: Paul Mescal, Denzel Washington, Connie Nielsen, and Pedro Pascal

Director: Ridley Scott

Rated: R (Strong bloody violence)

Movie Review:

“Gladiator II” takes place 16 years after Russell Crowe’s gladiator Maximus from 2000’s “Gladiator” (also directed by Ridley Scott). “Gladiator II,” despite its unhistorical aspects and over-the-top fight scenes, is entertaining while not capturing the artful grandeur of the 2000 prequel.

Advertisement

In 211 A.D., Maximus’ former lover Lucilla (Nielsen) is now married to a hero of Rome, General Acacius (Pascal). As Lucilla, Acacius and some select senators plot to overthrow Emperors Geta (Joseph Quinn) and Caracalla (Fred Hechinger), Maximus’ young son Lucius (Mescal) returns as a gladiator owned by malevolent and sly gladiator promoter Macrinus (Washington).

“Gladiator II’s” narrative is comparable to its prequel. The protagonists in both movies are driven by a noble sense of revenge for a murdered loved one. “Gladiator II” just adds some political intrigue to the story, better special effects and more brutal action scenes..

Ridley Scott offers a similar story. He just makes it more ornately decorated. Apart from Denzel Washington’s Macrinus’ schemes to ascend to power, the “Gladiator II” story is unconvincing because of fast character shifts. Characters appear inconsistent from one scene to the next in a hastened manner filled with platitudes.

Go for the gladiator events in the Colosseum. The fight sequences are a bold reconceptualization of the ancient Roman arena.

Grade: B- (The arena is full of action but is not dramatically fulfilling.)

Advertisement

“Wicked”

(Musical Drama/Fantasy: 2 hours, 40 minutes)

Starring: Cynthia Erivo, Ariana Grande, Michelle Yeoh, Jonathan Bailey and Jeff Goldblum

Director: Jon M. Chu

Rated: PG (Scary action, thematic elements and suggestive material)

Movie Review:

Advertisement

“Wicked” is an absorbing movie based on characters from L. Frank Baum’s 1900 “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” and Gregory Maguire’s 1995 novel “Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West.” It holds one’s attention for a runtime of two hours and 40 minutes. It is a good movie with some interesting developments.

“Wicked” is a prelude to the famous “The Wizard of Oz,” a 1939 American musical fantasy film that has been seen in cinemas and televisions by multiple generations for 84 years. “Wicked” details how the Wicked Witch becomes the villain in the land of Oz.

A bubbly and popular student, Galinda Upland, who becomes Glinda the Good, is played by Ariana Grande. Cynthia Erivo plays Elphaba Thropp, who becomes the Wicked Witch. Galinda and Elphaba must share a room at Shiz University, a mandate of Madame Morrible (Yeoh). Galinda despises her roommate and initially hates sharing the large dorm room. After multiple disagreements, the bitter rivals become friends at the elite school. As Elphaba adapts to her growing sorcery powers, she soon learns that the good life is not for all citizens in Oz. Even more, she is being duped into helping with the notorious scheme.

“Wicked” is one of the more entertaining movies – a dashing musical – one will see this year. It has plenty of good lessons to learn and meaningful characters and a well-developed story.

Erivo and Grande are a dazzling duo. Erivo plays Elphaba with endearing qualities. She makes the character endearing, a young being deceived. Conversely, Grande plays Galinda in a beautifully annoying style. Galinda is rich, spoiled and thrives on superficial aspects, such as her appearance and clothes.

Advertisement

The movie does have nuances that perplex. The biggest is that Elphaba’s green skin alarms everyone, yet the students take a history class taught by Dr. Dillamond, an erudite goat voiced by Peter Dinklage. No one finds that oddity strange.

However, the land of Oz is a fantasy ripe with talking trees, flying monkeys and other fascinating creatures. It is a nice escape for those looking for the perfect getaway for families.

Grade: B (Something deliciously wicked this way comes.)

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin”

(Period Drama/History: 2 hours, 13 minutes)

Starring: Jonas Dassler, David Jonsson and Clarke Peters

Advertisement

Director: Todd Komarnicki

Rated: PG-13 (Violent content, thematic elements and some smoking.)

Movie Review:

“Bonhoeffer” is an intriguing story set during World War II. It follows the plot of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (a skillful Dassler), a pastor who attempts to help save his homeland of Germany from Hitler. Bonhoeffer is one of the first people to notice that Hitler is trying to reinvent the Christian church as he annihilates the Jews. Bonhoeffer’s rejection of Hitler’s Third Reich through his fiery sermons does not go unnoticed, and he quickly becomes one of the freedom fighters deemed a threat to the Nazi’s rule of Germany.

This movie is based on true events, and it is captivating. It shows how a man of faith becomes part of a plot to assassinate Hitler. However, it does have two glaring faults. The producers and writer of this movie try too hard to make Bonhoeffer a modern Jesus Christ. This is sort of an overkill.

Advertisement

The second is something directors do too much today because they think it is an artistic measure. Director Todd Komarnicki (“Resistance,” 2003) is better known as a writer for his screenplay “Sully” (Director Clint Eastwood, 2016). He has too many flashbacks. They often interfere with the story.

Komarnicki does this to give insight into Bonhoeffer, but a straightforward synchronous story is often better. A visit to a concession stand or a bathroom break could cause one to be out of synch for just a split moment because flashbacks interfere with synchronous story-telling.

Otherwise, this true tale of a man’s bravery fighting against the evil he sees is gratifying. It captures a slice of history by making it a biographical thriller, even if its execution is iffy.

Grade: B- (The pastor’s theology is sound.)

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending