Connect with us

Entertainment

They traveled hundreds of miles to watch ‘Sinners’ make Hollywood history in Imax 70mm: ‘It was a no-brainer’

Published

on

They traveled hundreds of miles to watch ‘Sinners’ make Hollywood history in Imax 70mm: ‘It was a no-brainer’

If you ask a cinephile, there’s nothing better than Imax 70mm film. So Ryan Coogler’s latest movie, “Sinners,” which was partially shot on Imax film cameras and is being shown in Imax 70mm, has been all the buzz since its Easter weekend debut, when it grossed $63.5 million worldwide, exceeding expectations.

“Sinners” features a refreshingly original plot that is part Jim Crow period piece about two brothers who open a juke joint, part vampire thriller. Starring frequent Coogler collaborator Michael B. Jordan and newcomer Miles Caton, the film received an A CinemaScore — the first ever for a horror movie — and 98% on Rotten Tomatoes.

For many moviegoers, the fervor about the genre-bending film is matched by excitement for Coogler’s technical accomplishments, which follows in the footsteps of Christopher Nolan’s best picture winner, “Oppenheimer.” (While Todd Phillips’ “Joker: Folie à Deux” and Denis Villeneuve’s “Dune: Part Two” were also recently shown in Imax 70mm, they were shot for Imax digitally.) Ahead of “Sinners’” release, Coogler encouraged audiences to see the film in its intended format, on Imax 70mm screens in 1.43:1 aspect ratio.

But the mandate is harder to meet than it may seem as “Sinners” is screening in Imax 70mm in only eight theaters in the United States and 10 theaters globally: Harkins Arizona Mills 18 & IMAX in Tempe; Regal Irvine Spectrum & IMAX in Irvine; Universal Cinema AMC at CityWalk Hollywood & IMAX in Los Angeles; AMC Metreon 16 & IMAX in San Francisco; AutoNation IMAX Theater in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.; IMAX Theatre in the Indiana State Museum in Indianapolis; AMC Lincoln Square 13 & IMAX in New York City; Cinemark Dallas & IMAX in Dallas; Cineplex Cinemas Vaughan & IMAX in Ontario, Canada; and British Film Institute IMAX in London.

The per-screen average for the Imax 70mm locations (excluding London) was about $91,000 over the weekend, according to Jason Allen, head of publicity at Imax.

Advertisement

As for what makes Imax 70mm so special, the film camera is generally considered the highest resolution motion picture camera ever developed. The captured Imax negative has a resolution of 12x18K, according to Imax chief quality officer David Keighley. In comparison, the highest resolution of the average television or movie screen is 4K.

The visual is “absolutely sharp from edge to edge on a 90-foot screen,” said Bill Counter, a theater historian and retired projectionist. “An extraordinary amount of detail is captured.” Simply put, “it’s bigger, it’s sharper, it’s better.”

An Imax 70mm projector.

(Imax)

Advertisement

Adding to the hype, while not the first movie to utilize mixed aspect ratios, “Sinners” is the first film to be shot on both Imax (1.43:1) film and Ultra Panavision 70 (2.76:1). Cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw is the first female director of photography to shoot in Imax film. Ultra Panavision 70 had a resurgence with the release of Quentin Tarantino’s “The Hateful Eight” in 2015. Prior to that, the format hadn’t been used for almost 50 years.

“Sinners” puts Coogler in the same company as renowned filmmakers Nolan, Tarantino, Paul Thomas Anderson, Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg, who have the clout and expertise to shoot on film, said Keighley.

“We’re excited because he’s a young filmmaker and he has done an incredible job with this,” Keighley said. “He’s not just a director that is enamored by the story, he’s a person who is enamored by the technology and believes both of those things together drive people to the theaters.”

Keighley said “Sinners” is one of the most positively received films he’s worked on. And in Dallas, Cinemark added 10 a.m. showings to the movie’s two-week Imax run to meet audience demand, said retired Imax technician and projectionist Patrick Caldwell.

“Sinners’” relatively limited 70mm release — “Oppenheimer” was presented in Imax 70mm in 30 theaters worldwide — came down to a business decision, said Keighley.

Advertisement

Caldwell put it more bluntly: “‘Oppenheimer’ got them going but let’s face it, Ryan Coogler is not Christopher Nolan. Mr. Coogler doesn’t have the name recognition to demand 30 theaters with each print costing upwards of $50,000, not to mention the cost of the equipment. Just the light bulb of the projector is $4,000.”

On the flip side, the limited opportunities to see the film in its intended format “makes it an event and people know they will get a more deluxe experience and they’ll get the entire image,” said Counter.

“Well, how rare is that if you’re a movie nut?” asked Caldwell. “People travel thousands of miles to see that.”

The Times spoke with moviegoers who did just that:

Sean Smrtka, 46

Where do you live? Outside of Cleveland

Advertisement

What theater did you watch the film in? IMAX Theatre in the Indiana State Museum in Indianapolis

Why did you make the trip? The main thought is we only have three actual Imax screens that are remotely accessible — Indianapolis, Grand Rapids and Toronto. I didn’t understand any of it until a few years ago when “Oppenheimer” came out. I grabbed a ticket in Indianapolis, I walked in like, “Wow OK, the screen’s gigantic,” and it just blew my mind how big it was compared to the Imax I know at home. I was completely immersed in it. For the 10-year anniversary in December, I went back out to see “Interstellar.”

People think, “Oh it’s just bigger or there’s more sound,” but the aspect ratio actually changes from scene to scene and it really impacts your viewing experience. I took my dad to see “Sinners” in Indianapolis last Thursday. I got dead-center perfect seats. He walked in, he’s looking around like, “Where’s the screen?” I’m like, “That whole wall is the screen.” The movie opened in a 1.43:1 ratio. He’s just sitting there looking around, you can tell his mind was blown by it. Hearing him talk about it afterward definitely made the five-hour drive worth it.

David Janove, 36

Where do you live? Chicago

What theater did you watch the film in? IMAX Theatre in the Indiana State Museum

Advertisement

Why did you make the trip? I lived in L.A. and Orange County for 17 years and we’re really spoiled there. There’s several Imax theaters — the kind of Imax that is capable of showing the real film, not the laser projection. Chicago had one at Navy Pier, but it shut down during COVID and Chicago doesn’t even have laser projection.

So when a movie was shot, like “Sinners” was and like Christopher Nolan does his, I want to see it in 70mm Imax, and Indianapolis was the closest. I got a $166 plane ticket just for the day — this was [Tuesday] — I flew out at 7 a.m. from Chicago. My Uber driver even was like, “You’re heading to the airport, you don’t need any luggage?” I was like, “I don’t need luggage today.” It’s a short flight — only 35 minutes — and relatively cheap. When I landed, I took an Uber to downtown Indianapolis, got lunch, saw “Sinners” and then literally got a Lyft back to the airport and was back in Chicago at 4 p.m. It’s a little crazy. I still can’t believe that I did that.

I was talking with my girlfriend and my friends about this trip and they were like, “Is it worth it?” and I was like, “Yes, it’s worth it because they only put out a 70mm Imax movie once a year.” When I saw that YouTube video of Ryan Coogler talking about the different aspect ratios, I was like, “This guy is speaking to me.” … I’m glad he and Christopher Nolan are putting their weight behind 70mm Imax. I’m not a purist, but I want these incredible formats to survive.

Anudeep Metuku, 23

Where do you live? Sacramento

What theater did you watch the film in? AMC Metreon 16 & IMAX in San Francisco

Advertisement

Why did you make the trip? As soon as the tickets went live, I made sure to get two tickets [for] April 19, but as the day approached, I came upon some information through Reddit saying Ryan Coogler had been at the Grand Lake Theatre in Oakland on Thursday and that he might be at the Metreon on Friday. So I was contemplating that Friday afternoon if I should make the trip. It was kind of a gamble, but my younger brother, who is also interested in Imax, encouraged me. I was refreshing the page until I got a really good seat and drove two hours straight to San Francisco after work.

Experiencing the film in this format was fantastic, especially knowing that Metreon Imax was Coogler’s “home” Imax. I’d seen videos but never been in an auditorium with a director like that. The energy in the room — everyone was really excited when he came in. He mentioned when he presented the film, pointing to the audience, that he sat in almost the same seat as I did for “Sinners” at the Metreon when he watched “The Dark Knight” in 2008 (the first time Imax 70mm was used in a feature film and not a documentary) and that after that he knew he wanted to shoot [on Imax film]. I also got to see “The Dark Knight” in 2008. We were living in Hyderabad, India, and my dad took me and my little brother to an Imax theater called Prasads. That was me and my brother’s first exposure to 70mm Imax, and ever since, we always tried to catch Imax movies at Grand Theater venues.

Brendan Cauvel, 27

Where are you from? Washington, D.C.

What theater did you watch the film in? AMC Lincoln Square 13 & IMAX in New York City

Why did you make the trip? In high school and college, I was aware that there was this greater format to see the films, but being from the Midwest, I didn’t really have the means. So “Oppenheimer” was the first one that I experienced and I did it for “Dune 2” last year. It was a no-brainer for “Sinners.”

Advertisement

I got friends to come with me; we did a three-person road trip and we didn’t even stay the night. We left D.C. at 5 a.m., got there by 9, saw the movie at 1 p.m., drove back at 4 and got home by 9. It was a full 10-hour workday. We all loved it. I’m going to see it now for the third time within a week.

What’s really special about “Sinners” — [with] everything from the blockbuster horror side, to how they marketed it as a genre film, all the film nerd stuff was sort of the cherry on top.

It’s a skill that Ryan Coogler has in general, his ability as a Black filmmaker to weave in Black stories into movies like “Creed” and a Marvel film with “Black Panther,” and make that angle digestible for people who are not used to going to films that have social commentary. His ability to make that, and now this technical expertise, digestible in a horror genre is really impressive and special. You don’t need to understand that stuff to enjoy it, but for people who understand it, those technical elements add value.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: A real-life ’70s hostage drama crackles in Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

Published

on

Movie Review: A real-life ’70s hostage drama crackles in Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

It plays a little loose with facts but the righteous rage of “Dog Day Afternoon” is present enough in Gus Van Sant’s “Dead Man’s Wire,” a based-on-a-true-tale hostage thriller that’s as deeply 1970s as it is contemporary.

In February 1977, Tony Kiritsis walked into the Meridian Mortgage Company in downtown Indianapolis and took one of its executives, Dick Hall, hostage. Kiritsis held a sawed-off shotgun to the back of Hall’s head and draped a wire around his neck that connected to the gun. If he moved too much, he would die.

The subsequent standoff moved to Kiritsis’ apartment and eventually concluded in a live televised news conference. The whole ordeal received some renewed attention in a 2022 podcast dramatization starring Jon Hamm.

But in “Dead Man’s Wire,” starring Bill Skarsgård as Kiritsis, these events are vividly brought to life by Van Sant. It’s been seven years since Van Sant directed, following 2018’s “Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot,” and one of the prevailing takeaways of his new film is that that’s too long of a break for a filmmaker of Van Sant’s caliber.

Working from a script by Austin Kolodney, the filmmaker of “My Own Private Idaho” and “Good Will Hunting” turns “Dead Man’s Wire” into not a period-piece time capsule but a bracingly relevant drama of outrage and inequality. Tony feels aggrieved by his mortgage company over a land deal the bank, he claims, blocked. We’re never given many specifics, but at the same time, there’s little doubt in “Dead Man’s Wire” that Tony’s cause is just. His means might be desperate and abhorrent, but the movie is very definitely on his side.

Advertisement

That’s owed significantly to Skarsgård, who gives one of his finest and least adorned performances. While best known for films like “It,” “The Crow” and “Nosferatu,” here Skarsgård has little more than some green polyester and a very ’70s mustache to alter his looks. The straightforward, jittery intensity of his performance propels “Dead Man’s Wire.”

Yet Van Sant’s film aspires to be a larger ensemble drama, which it only partially succeeds at. Tony’s plight is far from a solitary one, as numerous threads suggest in Kolodney’s fast-paced script. First and foremost is Colman Domingo as a local DJ named Fred Temple. (If ever there were an actor suited, with a smooth baritone, to play a ’70s radio DJ, it’s Domingo.) Tony, a fan, calls Fred to air his demands. But it’s not just a media outlet for him. Fred touts himself as “the voice of the people.”

Something similar could be said of Tony, who rapidly emerges as a kind of folk hero. As much as he tortures his hostage (a very good Dacre Montgomery), he’s kind to the police officers surrounding him. And as he and Dick spend more time together, Dick emerges as a kind of victim, himself. It’s his father’s bank, and when Tony gets M.L. Hall (Al Pacino) on the phone, he sounds painfully insensitive, sooner ready to sacrifice his son than acknowledge any wrongdoing.

Pacino’s presence in “Dead Man’s Wire” is a nod to “Dog Day Afternoon,” a movie that may be far better — but, then again, that’s true of most films in comparison to Sidney Lumet’s unsurpassed 1975 classic. Still, Van Sant’s film bears some of the same rage and disillusionment with the meatgrinder of capitalism as “Dog Day.”

There’s also a telling, if not entirely successful subplot of a local TV news reporter (Myha’la) struggling against stereotypes. Even when she gets the goods on the unspooling news story, the way her producer says to “chop it up” and put it on air makes it clear: Whatever Tony is rebelling against, it’s him, not his plight, that will be served up on a prime-time plate.

Advertisement

It doesn’t take recent similar cases of national fascination, such as Luigi Mangione, charged with killing a healthcare executive, to see contemporary echoes of Kiritsis’ tale. The real story is more complicated and less metaphor-ready, of course, than the movie, which detracts some from the film’s gritty sense of verisimilitude. Staying closer to the truth might have produced a more dynamic movie.

But “Dead Man’s Wire” still works. In the film, Tony’s demands are $5 million and an apology. It’s clear the latter means more to him than the money. The tragedy in “Dead Man’s Wire” is just how elusive “I’m sorry” can be.

“Dead Man’s Wire,” a Row K Entertainment release, is rated R for language throughout. Running time: 105 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Disney+ to include vertical videos on its app

Published

on

Disney+ to include vertical videos on its app

In a bid for greater user engagement, Walt Disney Co. will introduce vertical videos to its Disney+ app over the next year, a company executive said Wednesday.

The move is part of the Burbank media and entertainment company’s effort to encourage more frequent app usage, particularly on smartphones.

“We know that mobile is an incredible opportunity to turn Disney+ into a true daily destination for fans,” Erin Teague, executive vice president of product management, said during an onstage presentation in Las Vegas at the Consumer Electronics Show. “All of the short-form Disney content you want, all in one unified app.”

Teague said the company will evolve that capability over time to determine new formats, categories and content types.

Disney’s presentation also touched on its interest in artificial intelligence. Last month, San Francisco startup OpenAI said it had reached a licensing deal with Disney to use more than 200 of the company’s popular characters in its text-to-video tool, Sora. Under the terms of that deal, users will be able to write prompts that generate short videos featuring Disney characters and use ChatGPT images to create those characters’ visages. Some of those Sora-generated videos will be shown on Disney+, though the companies said the deal did not include talent likenesses or voices.

Advertisement

Disney also said it would invest $1 billion into the AI company.

Part of Disney’s move toward AI is to appeal to young Gen Alpha viewers, who are more comfortable with AI and “expect to interact with entertainment” instead of simply watching stories on the screen, Teague said.

“AI is an accelerator,” she said. “It’s why collaborations with partners like OpenAI are absolutely crucial. We want to empower a new generation of fandom that is more interactive and immersive, while also respecting human creativity and protecting user safety.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film review: IS THIS THING ON? Plus January special screenings

Published

on

Film review: IS THIS THING ON? Plus January special screenings

.

Is This Thing On?

Cinematic stories of disintegrating marriages are fairly commonplace—and often depressing emotional endurance tests, besides—so it’s interesting to see co-writer/director Bradley Cooper take this variation on the theme in a fresher direction. The unhappy couple in this place is Alex and Tess Novak (Will Arnett and Laura Dern), who decide matter-of-factly to separate. Then Alex impulsively decides to get up on stage at an open-mic comedy night, and starts turning their relationship issues into material. The premise would seem to suggest an uneven balance towards Alex’s perspective, but the script is just as interested in Tess—a former Olympic-level volleyball player who retired to focus on motherhood—searching for her own purpose. And the narrative takes a provocative twist when their individual sparks of renewed happiness lead them towards something resembling an affair with their own spouse. The screenplay faces a challenge common to movies about comedians in that Alex’s material, even once he’s supposed to be actively working on it, isn’t particularly good, and Cooper isn’t particularly restrained in his own supporting performance as the comic-relief buddy character (who is called “Balls,” if that provides any hints). Yet the two lead performances are terrific—particularly Dern, who nails complex facial expressions upon her first encounter with Alex’s act—as Cooper and company turn this narrative into an exploration of how it can seem that you’ve fallen out of love with your partner, when what you’ve really fallen out of love with is the rest of your life. Available Jan. 9 in theaters. (R)

JANUARY SPECIAL SCREENINGS

KRCL’s Music Meets Movies: Dig! XX @ Brewvies: As part of a farewell to Sundance, Brewvies/KRCL’s regular Music Meets Movies series presents the extended 20th anniversary edition of the 2004 Sundance documentary about the rivalry between the Dandy Warhols and Brian Jonestown Massacre as they chart different music-biz paths. The screening takes place at Brewvies (677 S. 200 West) on Jan. 8 @ 7:30 p.m., $10 at the door or 2-for-1 with KRCL shirt. brewvies.com

Trent Harris weekend @ SLFS: Utah’s own Trent Harris has charted a singular course as an independent filmmaker, and you can catch two of his most (in)famous works at Salt Lake Film Society. In 1991’s Rubin & Ed, two mismatched souls—one an eccentric, isolated young man (Crispin Glover), the other a middle-aged financial scammer—wind up on a comedic road trip through the Utah desert; 1995’s Plan 10 from Outer Space turns Mormon theology into a crazy science-fiction parody. Get a double dose of uncut Trent Harris weirdness on Friday, Jan. 9, with Rubin & Ed at 7 p.m. and Plan 10 from Outer Space at 9 p.m. Tickets are $13.75 for each screening. slfs.org

Advertisement

Rob Reiner retrospective @ Brewvies Sunday Brunch: Last month’s tragic passing of actor/director Rob Reiner reminded people of his extraordinary work, particularly his first handful of features. Brewvies’ regular “Sunday Brunch” series showcases three of these films this month with This Is Spinal Tap (Jan. 11), The Princess Bride (Jan. 18) and Stand By Me (Jan. 25). All screenings are free with no reservations, on a first-come first-served basis, at noon each day. brewvies.com

David Lynch retrospective @ SLFS: It’s been a year since the passing of groundbreaking artist David Lynch, and Salt Lake Film Society’s Broadway Centre Cinemas marks the occasion with some of his greatest filmed work. In addition to theatrical features Eraserhead (Jan. 11), Inland Empire (Jan. 11), Mulholland Dr. (Jan. 12), Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (Jan. 14), Blue Velvet (Jan. 19) and Lost Highway (Jan. 19), you can experience the entirety of 2017’s Twin Peaks: The Return on the big screen in two-episode blocs Jan. 16 – 18. The programming also includes the 2016 documentary David Lynch: The Art Life. slfs.org

Death by Numbers @ Utah Film Center: Directed by Kim A. Snyder (the 2025 Sundance feature documentary The Librarians), this 2024 Oscar-nominated documentary short focuses on Sam Fuentes, survivor of a school shooting who attempts to process her experience through poetry. This special screening features a live Q&A with Terri Gilfillan and Nancy Farrar-Halden of Gun Violence Prevention Center of Utah, with Zoom participation by Sam Fuentes. The screening on Wednesday, Jan. 14 at 7 p.m. at Utah Film Center (375 W. 400 North) is free with registration at the website.

Continue Reading

Trending