Connect with us

Entertainment

Review: Claire Denis’ erotic thriller ‘Stars at Noon’ emits the sweat smell of sexcess

Published

on

Review: Claire Denis’ erotic thriller ‘Stars at Noon’ emits the sweat smell of sexcess

Few filmmakers can evoke, as absolutely as Claire Denis does, the intoxication and menace of feeling solid adrift in a world the place you don’t belong. Consider the French coffee-plantation proprietor in “White Materials,” clinging desperately to the war-torn African nation she’s claimed as her personal, even because it tries to expel her like a lethal virus. Or consider the solitary man of thriller wandering the globe and attempting to stave off his personal mortality in “The Intruder,” a title that might simply sum up this filmmaker’s personal adventurous, boundary-defying spirit.

I flashed on each these motion pictures in between all the new intercourse, cool liquor and lukewarm longueurs of “Stars at Midday,” Denis’ fifteenth characteristic and a co-winner of the Grand Prix on the latest Cannes Movie Pageant. Tailored from “The Stars at Midday,” Denis Johnson’s 1986 novel of virtually the identical title, it’s nominally a political thriller, marbled with sweaty erotic interludes, a number of listless chase sequences and a quasi-Beckettian streak of existential aimlessness. It isn’t considered one of her higher motion pictures, however like even her lesser achievements, it warrants greater than simple dismissals. It’s an enchanting confluence of expertise and tedium; it’s additionally a narrative wherein tedium — the day-after-day frustration of a stalled, thwarted existence — could be the purpose.

That story facilities on a younger American journalist named Trish (Margaret Qualley, an impudent firecracker), who’s sweating it out within the Nicaraguan capital of Managua. As soon as she should have arrived right here on a tide of youthful muckraking idealism, wanting to see and perhaps change the world. Now she drifts between random bars and random beds, subsisting on a rum-based food plan and having intercourse with any man for a fistful of córdobas. Trish simply needs a Coke, a shampoo and a aircraft ticket residence, all eminently cheap if not-so-easily realizable objectives. She hasn’t written a chunk in ages, having burned one editor too many (John C. Reilly has a hilarious Zoom cameo as considered one of them). She’s additionally had her passport confiscated by the Nicaraguan authorities, which doesn’t look after her protection of native unrest.

You gained’t be taught an excessive amount of about that unrest in “Stars at Midday,” aside from a number of obscure references to kidnappings and election woes, a tasty late-breaking flip by Benny Safdie as a CIA man, and lots of pictures of armed troopers patrolling streets and corridors plastered with protest indicators (“No mas abuso de poder / No extra abuse of energy”). The political specifics don’t appear to curiosity Denis terribly a lot, which can account for why she and her co-writer, Andrew Litvack, have shifted Johnson’s story from its authentic 1984 Nicaraguan Revolution setting to roughly the current day — one thing the film rapidly alerts by having Trish compulsively don and drop a face masks as she hustles and bustles and hustles some extra.

And so “Stars at Midday” is, amongst different issues, a COVID film, as was Denis’ earlier image from this yr, the shattering French melodrama “Each Sides of the Blade.” Her narrative lodging of mid-pandemic protocols is simply one other reminder that Denis doesn’t do simple escapism, that even her most transporting fictions have hassle untethering themselves from the true world. Nobody assessments constructive in “Stars at Midday,” although I think the quarantined model of this film wouldn’t look all that completely different. It will in all probability nonetheless contain Trish spending hours holed up in her dumpy motel room, having sweaty (however phlegmier) intercourse with the good-looking fellow traveler who would possibly show her salvation or her undoing.

Advertisement

Joe Alwyn, left, and Margaret Qualley in “Stars at Midday.”

(A24)

That may be Daniel (Joe Alwyn), a white-suited Englishman with a seductive gaze, fetching whiskers and an agreeable air of mischief. He operates with mysterious motives — he works for an oil conglomerate with obscure pursuits within the area — although there’s nothing particularly mysterious about his want for Trish, or Trish’s willingness to reciprocate. If nobody understands cultural and geographical dislocation higher than Denis, it’s additionally true that nobody movies sexual congress with the identical palpable, completely unself-conscious warmth. And I do imply warmth, the type that drenches; “Stars at Midday” is probably not an ideal film, however it is likely one of the nice latest achievements in perspirational cinema. As these two beauties thrash and rut and moan, Trish clasping Daniel so laborious that she leaves crimson hand-prints on his pale pores and skin, their couplings appear to obliterate all else, together with the thinly sketched tensions and conflicts unfolding simply exterior their window.

In impact, “Stars at Midday” performs like a extra narratively unruly model of a film like Peter Weir’s “The Yr of Dwelling Dangerously,” with its foreign-correspondent intrigue and its drive-by view of native turmoil. Denis, who’s spent a lot of her profession desirous about and dismantling the white colonialist gaze, could have really made the extra trustworthy film, insofar as “Stars at Midday” doesn’t feign any extra political concern or consciousness than its feckless lead characters do. There’s perhaps a sliver of wry commentary within the half-patient, half-weary seems to be that Trish will get when she barks orders on the bartenders who pour her martinis and the cab drivers who ferry her down alternately steaming and rain-drenched streets. She’s a stupendous lady and a decidedly ugly American, and the film appears by turns fascinated, appalled and electrified by Qualley’s mercurial efficiency.

Advertisement

Trish is drunk on her personal sense of unbelonging; as a film character, she’s absolutely, insistently and exasperatingly alive. Daniel is one other story, and whereas you should buy their mutual and tirelessly consummated attraction, you possibly can’t fairly imagine that Trish would comply with him into the frenzied, blood-spattered however weirdly tension-free chaos of this film’s third act. However then, Denis’ talent as a filmmaker has usually rested, to a point, on her indirect story building and her prioritization of temper. Given how successfully and generally brilliantly she takes the narrative highway much less traveled, it’s no shock that the thriller mechanics of “Stars at Midday” are what really feel probably the most perfunctory.

The film’s most overpowering second is solely that, a second, stolen from the move of time and disconnected from the others. Pausing throughout considered one of their mad dashes to nowhere, Trish and Daniel cling to one another on an empty dance ground, gorgeously bathed in purple gentle and backed by a haunting authentic title tune by the band Tindersticks. Dance scenes are maybe a too-easy candy spot for Denis by now, however there’s no mistaking her really feel for entangled our bodies and swaying rhythms, or her potential to forge highly effective emotional connections out of virtually nothing. It might be probably the most seductive of lies, however for one fleeting, fugitive occasion, Trish is correct the place she’s presupposed to be.

‘Stars at Midday’

In English and Spanish with English subtitles

Rated: R, for sexual content material, nudity, language and a few violence

Advertisement

Operating time: 2 hours, 16 minutes

Taking part in: Begins Oct. 14, Alamo Drafthouse, downtown Los Angeles; Laemmle Monica, Santa Monica; Laemmle Glendale; Harkins Chino Hills; Regency Agoura Hills; Regency Laguna Niguel; accessible Oct. 28 on Hulu

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

When Amazon workers on Staten Island successfully voted to unionize in the spring of 2022, becoming the corporate retailer’s first American workplace to do so, it was hailed as one of the most important labor victories in the United States in nearly 100 years. 

For the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) to organize employees at the JFK8 warehouse to vote in favor of union representation was a David versus Goliath story for the age of globalization — and a rousing reminder that collective grassroots efforts can still succeed despite massive employer concentration, management intimidation, and other hindrances to building worker power. And that an independent, worker-led coalition led the drive at this 8,000-plus-employee facility, rather than an established union, made its victory all the more impressive, even as the vote to unionize brought organizers into uncharted territory and set up a protracted legal battle with Amazon, which has since refused to recognize the ALU or negotiate a contract. 

Telling the story of how the ALU reached this historic moment, “Union,” a new documentary co-directed by Brett Story (“The Hottest August”) and Stephen Maing (“Crime + Punishment”), takes a detail-driven, ground-level approach, following current and former Amazon employees in Staten Island as they mount a grassroots worker-to-worker campaign, standing their ground against one of the world’s powerful corporations all the while. 

No talking-head documentary but a keenly observational chronicle of the unionization push and its aftermath, “Union” often plays like a thriller by virtue of its sharp, smart editing rhythms. Early on, Story and Maing juxtapose Jeff Bezos blasting off into space on a rocket made by his Blue Origin company and Amazon workers trudging wearily into work; it captures the unimaginable scale of the company’s operations while foregrounding the human scale often concealed by breathless (yet inevitably compromised) reporting of Amazon’s designs on empire. 

Made over the course of three years, Story and Maing’s film explores the human cost of the convenience economy and illuminates oppressive working conditions in Amazon’s factories. From constant surveillance to high injury rates and a lack of breaks, the pressures of working in Amazon warehouses compound to create punishing environments for workers, ones Amazon has steadfastly refused to address or even accurately report. And the threat of retaliation against workers who organize is ever-present; in addition to pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into union-busting campaigns that include mandatory “captive audience” meetings (which have since been banned in the state of New York), Amazon issues warnings of possible termination to workers involved with the unionization drive. 

Advertisement

Bookended by footage of vast cargo ships transporting goods, a reminder of the slow, perpetual motion with which the gears of modern capitalism grind on, Story and Maing’s film is smart in how systematically its narrative lays out obstacles to the union’s success. It also insightfully depicts ground-level dialogue between workers as a powerful tool with which to overcome them. Some of the most remarkable footage, inside Amazon headquarters, covertly films one of those captive audience meetings; here, the company’s anti-union propaganda (One reads: “We’re asking you to do three simple things: get the facts, ask questions and vote no to the union”) is disrupted by ALU organizers, who successfully push back on Amazon managers just long enough to make their case to workers. 

One of the ALU organizers, Chris Smalls, takes center stage in “Union,” though the documentary largely sidesteps the temptation to cast him as a conquering hero. (That’d be an easy trap, given that he became the organization’s public face across the period “Union” depicts.) Smalls, fired from Amazon after protesting inadequate PPE provision during the pandemic (and besmirched by the company’s general counsel as “not smart or articulate” in an internal meeting of executive leaders), is a father of three who was moved to activism by the flagrant injustice of the company’s abusive labor practices. As a leader, he’s at once charismatic and hard-charging, dedicated to his fellow “comrades” but ever driven to push forward even in the face of inter-union dissent.

One of the film’s great strengths is its ability to surface the multiplicity of tensions between organizers working toward a shared cause. Take the world of difference separating the experiences of two subjects: Maddie, a white college graduate using her campus activism experience to help the cause, and Natalie, an older Latina woman living out of her car for years. In one charged exchange, Natalie pushes back on the suggestion, made by white male organizers, that Chris intentionally gets himself arrested by New York police officers to draw attention to the unionization drive. Ultimately, Natalie’s dissatisfaction with the ALU—due to her disagreements with leadership as much as her desire to wait for larger union support—leads her to leave the organization. It’s a testament to the complexity of individual motivations and the absence of easy triumph in this type of effort.

“Union” documents the internal debates and disagreements over governance, organizing, and leadership strategies that divided the ALU before its successful unionization vote and were compounded by its subsequent failed attempt to unionize a second warehouse. Though Smalls’ force of personality, passion, and determination fueled the fight to unionize JFK8, the film carefully depicts this as a collective victory. It rarely gives in to the temptation to single out Smalls for praise at the expense of others, and making it clear that his leadership style also contributed to internal rifts in the ALU that at various points may have weakened its ability to further the union’s mission. 

This becomes particularly important in the film’s latter half, after the unionization vote, at which point the sobering realities of the long work ahead come more fully into view. The heroism of the ALU organizers will never be in question. But with only one battle won in the war for workers’ rights, and Amazon continuing to contest or undercut its results by every means available, “Union” concludes on a note of weary fortitude rather than declarative victory. The film captures both the pain and the power of people at the base of a global infrastructure. By not departing from the frontlines of the fight against Amazon’s labor exploitation, Story and Maing bring the true face of their struggle into focus. 

Advertisement

“Union” will be self-distributed theatrically, starting on Oct. 18. This review was filed from the film’s New York premiere at the New York Film Festival. 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

Published

on

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

In 2017, the film “Wonder” was a surprise critical and commercial hit for Lionsgate. Adapted from a children’s novel by R.J. Palacio, the film starred Jacob Tremblay as young Auggie, a boy with the facial deformities of Treacher Collins syndrome who teaches his family and peers about the importance of kindness. (Julia Roberts and Owen Wilson co-starred as his parents.) Naturally, a sequel, adapted from one of Palacio’s “Wonder” spinoff books, was quickly green-lighted by the studio.

It’s now been seven years since “Wonder” came out, and the long-awaited sequel, “White Bird: A Wonder Story,” which has been plagued by delays both pandemic- and strike-related, is finally hitting theaters. Directed by Marc Forster and written by Mark Bomback, “White Bird” is very loosely connected to the original film, but it takes a more global, historical approach to the same message about the importance of small but high-stakes gestures of kindness.

Bryce Gheisar returns as Julian, Auggie’s bully from “Wonder,” who has been expelled from school for his cruelty. Now himself the new kid at a new school, he struggles to fit in. But Julian has the opportunity to reinvent himself, which is underscored by a surprise visit — and lesson — from his grandmother Sara (Helen Mirren) that completely changes his perspective on how to move through the world.

Thus unfolds the real story of “White Bird,” which isn’t about Julian, who serves merely as a framing device and a tenuous link to the world of “Wonder.” “White Bird” is actually Sara’s story of her childhood in Nazi-occupied France and the harrowing events she experienced as a young Jewish girl there.

If you’ve ever watched (or read) young-adult Holocaust films or fiction, “White Bird” will feel familiar. It takes a similar tack to real-life stories such as Anne Frank’s. Teen Sara (Ariella Glaser) is the adored and privileged daughter of a professor and a doctor (Ishai Golen) living an idyllic life in a small French village. Drawn to the handsome Vincent (Jem Matthews), she and her friends scoff at quiet Julien (Orlando Schwerdt), who is disabled from polio. Insulated from the harsh realities of occupation until laws limiting the freedom of Jews encroach on her town, Sara’s family makes plans to escape, though they are unable to outrun the Nazi roundups.

Advertisement

Sara, though, manages to escape into the snowy woods, and Julien escorts her through the underground sewers away from the school to his family’s barn where he stows her away, and where he and his parents (Gillian Anderson and Jo Stone-Fewings) care for her. She will remain there, in hiding, until the forces of fascism that have infected her community must be reckoned with. But the story is about the connection she forges with Julien, and the circumstances that allow her to learn to evaluate character through shared humanity and bravery, not status and power.

The strength of “White Bird” lies in its performers, especially Glaser and Schwerdt, who deliver complex, nuanced takes on young people experiencing global atrocities on an intimate scale, while also trying to navigate the complications of connecting as teenagers. They are both excellent and keep the film emotionally grounded.

Forster presents a somewhat sanitized view of the Holocaust that is sobering but digestible for younger audiences. The pastoral setting remains picturesque and almost fairy-tale-like. As recounted through Sara’s memories, it has a kind of glowing haze about it, almost too beautiful at times. Computer-generated flowers bloom before our eyes. A cranberry-red coat stands out starkly against a snowy winter background. It’s an interesting stylistic choice (and one you may have seen in another much-celebrated Holocaust movie), but it speaks to the storytelling element of the film, the way our brains craft memories that might be more vivid and lovely, even after decades.

As a “Wonder Story” and a Holocaust story, the messaging of “White Bird” is unsurprising though important: Empathy matters, especially in action, and that often, caring for others can mean putting one’s own self in danger, but we should do it anyway. In the grand tapestry of human existence, we are all connected. It may be a message we’ve heard time and again, but it’s one that bears repeating.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.

Advertisement

‘White Bird: A Wonder Story’

Rating: PG-13, for some strong violence, thematic material and language

Running time: 2 hours

Playing: In wide release Friday, Oct. 4

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

Published

on

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

CTRL movie audience review: CTRL started streaming on Netflix on October 4. The thriller, directed by ace Bollywood director Vikramaditya Motwane, stars Ananya Panday and Vihaan Samat.

The story is about Nella and Joe, who seem like the ideal influencer couple. However, when Joe cheats on Nella, she uses an AI app to erase him from her life — only for it to gain control over her.

The Netflix movie has received some highly-positive reviews from viewers, who posted their comments on social media. Let’s take a look at some of those.

CTRL public reviews

“CTRL is… terrific, absorbing and made with a lot of finesse… Do watch if you have time.”

“Found Vikramaditya Motwane’s new Netflix film #CTRL utterly fascinating. So much to admire. An ambitious, timely, deeply uncomfortable screenlife thriller that’ll make you want to change your passwords, cover your webcam and move to the hills.”

Advertisement

“This is quite good. Only 1 hour 40 minutes, and not gonna lie, I had underestimated Motwane a bit with this movie. Ananya did well because she nailed this genre. It starts off slow, happy, and lighthearted, but the tension builds as the story progresses. Give it a watch, it’s nice.”

“vikramdityamotwane Gives a nuanced and gripping narrative and @ananyapandayy has finally come into her own, and does a fine job.”

“As a big fan of Motwane’s films, I’ve always seen him set new standards in mainstream cinema. From Udaan to AK vs AK he has always proved his merit. However, #CTRL feels like just an okay film, despite good casting with Ananya Panday. It lacks a strong impact and becomes somewhat preachy about our relationship with technology, leaving you with little to think about afterward.”

“The movie is abt how social media, AI and corporates are controlling us and not vice versa. Ananya Panday is good. Vihaan Samat is brilliant. The movie cudve been much better. Esp the climax.Theres no closure!”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending