Connect with us

Entertainment

On the ‘Laguna Beach’ reunion, this former love triangle is back for nostalgia, not drama

Published

on

On the ‘Laguna Beach’ reunion, this former love triangle is back for nostalgia, not drama

It feels like a relic from a bygone age of simplicity: an entire season of reality TV hinging on the social lives of a group of unpolished teenagers. They gossiped, cried, partied and fought. They worried about college admissions and which shade of polish to choose at the nail salon. They cast longing looks from across the room.

That was “Laguna Beach.”

Series creator Liz Gateley had just started working at MTV in 2003 when she pitched an unscripted series following a real group of high schoolers in Southern California.

“The logline was, ‘90210’ and ‘Heathers’ meets ‘Dawson’s Creek,’’’ because we knew we wanted music to be a big part of it,” Gateley said. “We didn’t know it would be the phenomenon it became.”

Shot more like those glossy dramas than a reality series, every “Laguna Beach” episode opened with Hilary Duff’s “Come Clean” playing over the sunkissed credits and a title card that let viewers know “the people, the locations and the drama are real.”

Advertisement

For the most part, they were.

At the heart of the first season was a quasi-love triangle between on-again, off-again Laguna Beach High School couple Stephen Colletti and Kristin Cavallari, and Colletti’s close friend (possibly more), Lauren Conrad.

The cast of MTV’s “Laguna Beach,” from left: Stephen Colletti, Kristin Cavallari, Morgan Olsen, Christina Schuller, Trey Phillips, Lo Bosworth, Lauren Conrad and Talan Torriero.

When the series premiered on MTV in 2004, it became an instant (and controversial) hit, made millennial household names out of Cavallari, Colletti and Conrad, and led to the spin-offs “The Hills,” “The City” and “Newport Harbor.”

Advertisement

Now, 10 original cast members, including those stars, have reunited for “The Reunion: Laguna Beach” premiering Friday on the Roku Channel. (The special was originally planned to coincide with the cast’s 20th high school reunion in 2024 but is now loosely timed to the anniversary of the show’s 2006 finale.)

Hosted by actor Casey Wilson, the reunion is an upbeat, feel-good affair, highlighting some of Season 1’s most memorable moments and faces. Cavallari, Colletti and Conrad all served as executive producers and wielded a degree of “creative control,” Colletti said.

“We didn’t want it to be this dramatic, ‘Housewives’-type reunion,” Cavallari said. “We wanted to do it for the nostalgia.”

Ahead of the reunion’s premiere, Colletti and Conrad, both 40, and Cavallari, 39, convened for a lengthy interview with The Times at a beachfront hotel restaurant in Santa Monica. Nestling into a corner booth with the trio felt like sitting with the cool kids you’d only ever watched from afar.

Yet, the three — even Cavallari and Conrad, who were pitted against each other in the 2000s — were warm and chummy, cracking jokes and enthusiastically agreeing with one another.

Advertisement

They’ve come a long way from their high school drama. Conrad has returned to Laguna Beach where she and her husband, the Something Corporate guitarist turned attorney William Tell, are raising their two sons. Cavallari oversees a lifestyle brand in Nashville and shares three children with her ex-husband, the former NFL quarterback Jay Cutler. And Colletti recently appeared on “The Traitors” and stars in the upcoming second season of the comedy “Everyone Is Doing Great.” He and his wife, NASCAR host Alex Weaver, are currently expecting their first child.

These are edited excerpts from the conversation.

How did the reunion come about? Did anyone require convincing?

Cavallari: I credit Stephen for all of this, because the [“Back to the Beach”] podcast [co-hosted by Cavallari and Colletti] was his idea, and then from there, the reunion.

Colletti: When I first called Lauren about it, she was like, “Alright, I have a few questions.” You didn’t shoot it down right away, but you could tell there were some things that we needed to work through for this to make sense, and rightfully so.

Advertisement

Conrad: For me, just the idea of bringing cameras back into my life was very nerve-racking, but we were all executive producers. We all had a say, so we felt like we had a bit of control, which, in the past, we haven’t.

Three people smiling and laughing as they lean against a white railing.

Conrad, Colletti and Cavallari are all executive producers on “The Reunion: Laguna Beach.”

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

The “Laguna Beach” producers chose your high school for the show in 2003 and then began selecting interested students to star. What do you remember about your applications?

Cavallari: I just remember trying to make myself stand out. I was competitive. I didn’t even have the foresight to be like, “Do I want to be on TV?” It was more like, “I want to win this thing,” like I’m competing to be on TV. Everybody was vying for it.

Advertisement

Colletti: I remember doing some of the interviews [with the producers], and I’m freaking mumbling. I’ve got this pineapple hair. I’m trying to be like Freddie Prinze Jr. I didn’t know who I was.

What was your understanding of what being on reality TV entailed?

Conrad: Well, they put together a package for us. They had filmed for maybe a week, and they showed it to us and our parents before we signed on — and that was pretty different from where we landed.

Cavallari: It was more PG. No real drama, more like a documentary.

Colletti: No s— talking.

Advertisement

Conrad: Just like, “What’s it like to live in a beach town?”

Cavallari: I remember my dad being like, “Well, this is going nowhere. They’re really boring.”

When did you realize that your love triangle was going to be the central storyline of Season 1?

Cavallari: Pretty quickly. In my [audition] interview, a lot of the questions were geared toward it. Obviously, once we started shooting, we got a pretty clear idea.

Colletti: They started to hone in on certain things, or they fed our friends a question to ask us.

Advertisement

Cavallari: I remember having to be very careful about what I said — but not careful enough because I didn’t think about editing. I was just like, “Well, if I don’t say it, what are they going to do?”

Conrad: A look says it all. They’ve admitted to me that in the pilot, at the hotel, they used a scene where I’m looking at a tray of food, and they made it look like I was looking at Stephen.

Lauren and Kristin, you don’t ever really speak face-to-face on “Laguna Beach.” Were there more interactions happening at that time that we didn’t see?

Conrad: No, that was it.

Cavallari: We really did not.

Advertisement
A woman in a black outfit and heels poses near white railing overlooking the beach.

“I have a lot of respect for Lauren, and I think it’s been really nice to get to know this version of her, as adults, as moms, as business owners,” says Kristin Cavallari about her former castmate Lauren Conrad.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

You two share a really mature conversation in the reunion. How have your perceptions of each other changed over the years?

Cavallari: I have a lot of respect for Lauren, and I think it’s been really nice to get to know this version of her, as adults, as moms, as business owners. We have a lot more in common than I ever thought. I’m just really thankful that we can close this “Laguna Beach” chapter this way. It does feel really therapeutic.

Conrad: I echo everything you said. So much time has passed and pretty quickly after the show ended, we sort of squashed everything, but we’ve lived separately and we don’t see each other ever. So, this was a nice excuse to do it on camera because I think that actually is meaningful for people who were invested in that storyline to see — you grow up and you move on and these things are not that important.

Advertisement

The fashion on the show was pretty iconic during that era. Were you putting much thought into your TV outfits?

Conrad: Not in Season 1. I had to buy all my own clothes, so I’m mostly in a C&C tank top and Miss Sixty [jeans] that I saved up for. It’s all the same outfit, I’m just reversing tanks.

Colletti: For me, it was board shorts all the time. In Season 2, for some reason, we started wearing sports coats over hoodies. Not good.

Cavallari: I wish I cared more in Season 2. That was my senior year, and I was over high school in general, so that carried through to the show and my appearance. Maybe that was part of the appeal, as well. There was this innocence with us just being normal kids.

There were no false lashes or full faces of glam.

Advertisement

Conrad: Oh no, no, no. A lot of it’s, like, last night’s eyeliner.

Cavallari: I always had a zit.

Conrad: Oh, yeah, I know! Not for you, but for me. My skin wasn’t very good.

A group of teenagers posing for photo outdoors near a doorway.

The cast in 2004, from left: Lo Bosworth, Trey Phillips, Kristin Cavallari, Lauren Conrad, Talan Torriero, Christina Schuller, Morgan Olsen and Steven Colletti.

(MTV)

Advertisement

You were all 16 and 17 when you were cast on “Laguna Beach.” Were there any discussions around, “Be mindful of what you do on camera,” or “This might follow you for the rest of your life”?

[All laugh]

Cavallari: Honestly, no.

Colletti: The only media training that we got was like 30 minutes before the VMAs [Video Music Awards] in Miami right before [the first season of] the show was about to air. They’re like, “If anybody asks, it’s all real.” That’s what we were told. “Don’t say this. Say this,” and “Good luck.”

The show was more tame than most of today’s reality TV, yet there was a lot of on-camera underage drinking.

Advertisement

Cavallari: Oh, yeah. A lot.

Conrad: [The producers] were very aware. They couldn’t buy us alcohol, but they were aware we were drinking.

Did anyone ever step in and say, “Hey, maybe we shouldn’t be filming these teenagers in an inebriated state”?

All: No.

Cavallari: I don’t even remember it ever being a conversation.

Advertisement

Colletti: There was a moment where producers said, “You know you guys are underage, so you can’t be drinking.” But they said it so casually and while the cameras were rolling —

Conrad: — Oh, liability.

Colletti: Yes. I actually felt for a moment, should we put [the drinks] away? And everyone’s like, “No, dude. It’s fine.”

Cavallari: In no way, shape or form was MTV ever pushing it. We were just naturally doing that, like most high school kids back then.

Conrad: On “The Hills,” they had to start filming morning scenes of us hungover because they showed so much drinking. They were like, “We have to show the consequences of drinking.”

Advertisement

Gateley noted that the “Laguna Beach” producers “would have, for sure, stepped in if anyone was not safe.”

Kristin, during the reunion you said that you didn’t realize saying “no” to the producers was an option. What would you have done differently?

Cavallari: I don’t regret anything, it just never crossed my mind. Maybe because I’m a high school kid, and I have these adult producers saying, “Hey, show up here and do this,” and I just assumed that was what I was supposed to do. I wised up later in my reality TV career, but not for a while.

Conrad: I remember [castmate] Lo [Bosworth] used to say no to a lot of stuff. She’d be like, “I’m just not going to go,” and I was like, “I don’t think we can do that!” I was very like, “I signed up, I need to show up.” I can’t remember ever saying no. I questioned stuff sometimes, like the voiceover. I would reword stuff because it would feel a little harsh.

Colletti: They never forced anything on us, but when you’re 17 years old and you’ve signed this contract with MTV, you felt that responsibility.

Advertisement

Cavallari: I realized too that they were going to get what they wanted no matter what, whether you put up a fight about a line or not.

Conrad: I went into the [production] office once and they had a storyboard on a big wall. I realized we were only halfway through the wall, and there was a card like, “Story continues.” I was like, “Oh, my God, what’s going to happen? What comes next?” It felt very “Truman Show.”

In a memorable Season 1 episode, the teens journey to Mexico to spend spring break in Cabo San Lucas. While there, they get drunk at a club. Kristin gets close with another boy and dances on a bar, while Stephen repeatedly yells that she’s a “slut.”

The first Cabo episode —

Advertisement

Colletti: It looms large.

Stephen and Kristin, how do you look back on that now?

Cavallari: We were so young. At 17 and clearly being intoxicated, my go-to was to pop off. So, when I watched it back, I was proud of myself for trying to remove myself from the situation. I can totally appreciate what Stephen was going through. Not everyone has a camera in their face at age 17, and we had to grow up in front of an audience.

Colletti: I had fully locked that away. I don’t even know if I even watched it all the way through [when it aired]. But, ultimately, it boils down to just not [being] proud of the way I acted.

I look at it feeling sorry for us, for those two kids, that this is an embarrassing moment that’s on camera. You wish it’s not there for them, but at the same time, look how far they’ve come from that time and that moment.

Advertisement

Did MTV show you the episodes before they aired?

Conrad: They came the day before.

Colletti: Sometimes, strategically, I think that they ended up arriving the next day. It was like, “Oh, we didn’t get it in the mail to you on time!”

Were they on DVD?

Conrad: VHS! [Executive producer] Adam DiVello bought me a VHS player for my dorm in San Francisco so that I could watch them.

Advertisement

When the show premiered, did your lives change instantly?

Conrad: It felt immediate for me. The first week I arrived at college, [MTV] came out with these posters that said, “They really are this rich and beautiful.” That was the tagline. And I was, like, at art school. I never got to have a college experience because pretty immediately it was like, “Oh, I’m that girl.”

Colletti: The irony is, I wanted to do the show to no longer conform to the trends of high school. I made the choice to go to San Francisco State because not a lot of people from Laguna were going there, and then [everyone] saw this version of me on the show. It was a lot to process — people in the dorm trying to take pictures of you when you’re walking to the shower, or guys at parties trying to fight you just because you’re a guy from a reality show.

Cavallari: I was sort of in a bubble still being in high school. Life felt fairly normal, but then they would call me and be like, “Hey, we need to get on a plane tonight to be on ‘TRL.’ tomorrow.”

Three smiling people standing near a white railing overlooking the beach.

The castmates say their lives changed after “Laguna Beach” aired: “It felt immediate for me. The first week I arrived at college, [MTV] came out with these posters that said, ‘They really are this rich and beautiful,’” Lauren Conrad, far left, says.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Do you remember what you bought with your first paycheck? It was around $2,000 for the whole first season.

Conrad: I bought a pair of Chanel sunglasses.

Cavallari: I bought a little Chanel purse. I think that was probably the second season, though.

Colletti: I blew it on some golf clubs. I’d always had hand-me-downs from my brother, so the fact that I could buy new golf clubs, I was on top of the world.

Advertisement

Cavallari: I would have done the show for free. I was like, “We’re going to get paid for this?!”

Would you let your kids be on a reality show when they’re in high school?

Cavallari: No, I would never let them do a show like we did. Those are such precious years. When you graduate and you turn 18, that’s one thing. But while you’re a kid, just be a kid.

Conrad: If we were going back and doing it during the time we did it and in that environment, maybe it’s a conversation. Now, with social media, I would have a hard time letting one of my children do it. It’s just so much pressure.

Colletti: I’ve got this master plan of telling my kid that his dad was on a TV show that was really cool back in the day. And then, when he sees his dad on it, he’ll be like, “It’s not cool. I don’t want to do what Dad did.” It’ll deter him or her.

Advertisement

Why do you think “Laguna Beach” continues to resonate?

Colletti: It represents a very specific time in society, and it was [showcasing] kids who were not trying to become famous. The whole fame machine that is reality TV these days, we really did not think we were getting ourselves into that.

Conrad: Nowadays, people do a show and they’re like, “This is going to kickstart my career.” I was looking to make some connections in the fashion industry, but besides that, I wasn’t looking to create a brand or do any of those things. We didn’t seek it out.

Are there any other paths you’d like to pursue that you haven’t? [“The Hills” star] Spencer Pratt is running for L.A. mayor — any chance you’ll have a political career?

Cavallari: No. I feel pretty fortunate that I’ve been able to do a lot of really exciting things over the years. I feel pretty content.

Advertisement

Conrad: Me too. I worked so hard in my 30s. I wanted to do everything, but I’m in a place where I’m so lucky to have my family, and I just want to be present for them.

Colletti: I’m excited to become a dad. It’s such an exciting time. Everything feels right where it should be.

Movie Reviews

‘Hen’ movie review: György Pálfi pecks at Europe’s migrant crisis through the eyes of a chicken

Published

on

‘Hen’ movie review: György Pálfi pecks at Europe’s migrant crisis through the eyes of a chicken

A rogue chicken observes the world around it—and particularly the plight of immigrants in Greece—in Hen, which premiered at last year’s Toronto International Film Festival and is now playing in Prague cinemas (and with English subtitles at Kino Světozor and Edison Filmhub). This story of man through the eyes of an animal immediately recalls Robert Bresson’s Au Hasard Balthazar (and Jerzy Skolimowski’s more recent EO), but director and co-writer György Pálfi (Taxidermia) maintains a bitter, unsentimental approach that lands with unexpected force.

Hen opens with striking scenes inside an industrial poultry facility, where eggs are laid, processed, and shuttled along assembly lines of machinery and human hands in an almost mechanized rhythm of production. From this system emerges our protagonist: a black chick that immediately stands apart from the others, its entry into the world defined not by nature, but by an uncaring food industry.

The titular hen matures quickly within this environment before being loaded onto a truck with the others, presumably destined for slaughter. Because of her black plumage, she is singled out by the driver and rejected from the shipment, only to be told she will instead end up as soup in his wife’s kitchen. During a stop at a gas station, however, she escapes.

What follows is a journey through rural Greece by the sea, including an encounter with a fox, before she eventually finds refuge at a decaying roadside restaurant run by an older man (Yannis Kokiasmenos), his daughter (Maria Diakopanayotou), and her child. Discovered by the family’s dog Titan, she is placed in a coop alongside other chickens.

After finding a mate in the local rooster, she lays eggs that are regularly collected by the man; in one quietly unsettling scene, she watches him crack them open and cook them into an omelet. The hen repeatedly attempts to escape, as we slowly observe the true function of the property: it is being used as a transit point for migrants arriving in Greece by boat, facilitated by local criminal figures.

Advertisement

Like Au Hasard Balthazar and EO, Hen largely resists anthropomorphizing its animal protagonist. The hen behaves as a hen, and the humans treat her accordingly, creating a work that feels unusually grounded and almost documentary in texture. At the same time, Pálfi allows space for the audience to project meaning onto her journey, never fully closing the gap between instinct and interpretation.

There are moments, however, where the film deliberately leans into stylization. A playful montage set to Ravel’s Boléro captures her repeated escape attempts from the coop, while a romantic musical cue underscores her brief pairing with the rooster. These sequences do not break the realism so much as refract it, gently encouraging us to read emotion into behavior that remains, on the surface, purely animal.

One of the film’s central narrative threads is the hen’s search for a safe space to lay her eggs without them being taken away by the restaurant owner. This deceptively simple instinct becomes a powerful thematic mirror for the film’s human subplot involving migrant trafficking. Pálfi draws a stark, often uncomfortable parallel between the treatment of animals as commodities and the treatment of displaced people as disposable bodies moving through a similar system of exploitation.

The film takes an increasingly bleak turn toward its climax as the migrant storyline comes fully into focus, sharpening its allegorical intent. The juxtaposition of animal and human vulnerability becomes more explicit, reinforcing the film’s central critique of systemic indifference and violence. While effective, this escalation feels unusually dark, and our protagonist’s unknowing role feels particularly cruel.

The use of animal actors in Hen is remarkable throughout. The hen—played by eight trained chickens—is seamlessly integrated into the film’s world, with seamless editing (by Réka Lemhényi) and staging so precise that at times it feels almost impossible without digital augmentation. While subtle effects work must assist at certain moments, the result is convincing throughout, including standout sequences involving a fox and a dog.

Advertisement

Zoltán Dévényi and Giorgos Karvelas’ cinematography is also impressive, capturing both the intimacy of the hen’s low vantage point and the broader Greek landscape with striking clarity. The camera’s proximity to the animal world gives the film a distinct visual grammar, grounding its allegory in tactile observation rather than abstraction.

Hen is a challenging but often deeply affecting allegory that extends the tradition of animal-centered cinema while pushing it into harsher political territory. Pálfi’s approach—unsentimental, patient, and often confrontational—ensures the film lingers long after its final images. It is not an easy watch, nor a comfortable one, but it is a strikingly original piece of filmmaking that uses its unusual perspective to cast familiar human horrors in a stark, unsettling new light.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Karol G at Coachella was a global hit. Yet other foreign acts fear touring the U.S.

Published

on

Karol G at Coachella was a global hit. Yet other foreign acts fear touring the U.S.

On the first Sunday night of Coachella, headliner Karol G told her American fans, and her global audience, to keep fighting.

“This is for my Latinos that have been struggling in this country lately,” the Colombian superstar told the tens of thousands watching her in person, and many more on the fest’s livestream. She’d recently criticized ICE in a Playboy interview, but this set was about her fans’ resolve. “We want everyone to feel welcome to our culture, so I want everyone to feel proud of where you come from. Don’t feel fear — feel pride!” she said.

Any artist would be proud to play that caliber of headline slot. But right now, many foreign acts also feel fear — or at least wariness — about booking substantial tours in the United States. A year of brutal ICE raids, tensions at border crossings and policed political speech, coupled with sky-high prices for expedited visas, fuel and other touring logistics, could push international acts away from the U.S.

“The fears that ICE would raid shows didn’t really materialize, but there is a chilling effect,” said Andy Gensler, editor of the touring-biz trade bible Pollstar. “Trump’s only been back in office a year, so we haven’t fully seen the effects, but it does send a message that if you’re a political artist you won’t get a visa. With the economic shock of gas prices and tourism way down, the signifiers are out there.”

The music economy is still thriving in SoCal. Coachella sold out with record spending from fans, and fears that ICE might show up for a prominent Latin headliner proved unfounded. (The agency did not respond to a request for comment on Coachella, and Lt. Deirdre Vickers of the Riverside County Sheriff’s office said that their office “does not participate in immigration enforcement operations.”)

Advertisement

But in smaller venues featuring emerging and mid-tier global acts, some see trouble ahead.

Pollstar’s Gensler estimates that the total number of concerts in the U.S. they tracked for the first quarter of 2026 was down about 17% from last year. That could be due to many economic factors — but slower international touring could be contributing.

“The U.S. is still incredibly lucrative market, the arena and stadium level buildings are vast and you can make more money here than any market in the world,” Gensler said. “But I’ve heard anecdotally that fewer people are going to South by Southwest, and tourism from Canada is way down, and that includes music tourism to California. As barriers go up, and the economic shock of gas prices impacts touring, it’s hard to know how that will all shake out.”

Talent firms who specialize in bringing young acts to the U.S. began noticing pullback before this year’s festival season. Adam Lewis is the head of Planetary Group, a marketing agency that produces and promoting musician showcases in the U.S., with a significant roster of artists from abroad. He said that performers who ordinarily would leap at the chance to play U.S. festivals are taking hard looks at the payoffs and risks.

“Artists are thinking twice, based on what the government is doing right now,” Lewis said. “You can look at the economics — the fees are cost prohibitive to get a visa. People are scared, at the bottom line. Artists and industry people are afraid to come to the U.S. for any music event. The money is going elsewhere.”

Advertisement

South by Southwest, the March Texas confab for music, film and tech, was among the first festivals to feel a pinch this year. Several sources said they saw fewer foreign showcases and acts amid a broader culling of music. In 2025, Canada canceled its popular annual showcase, after deciding that hostile policies made the risks not worth the rewards. Many still pulled off successful events, but acknowledged the mood has shifted.

“The perception of how hard it’s gotten has taken root, and that has meant that not as many acts will take the chance on the threat of being turned away or risking future entry,” said Angela Dorgan, the director of Music From Ireland, the Irish Music Export office (which is funded by Culture Ireland). That organization has helped break acts like CMAT (a hit at Coachella this year) and Fontaines DC in the U.S.

“Artists want to continue to come here in spite of the trouble and not stay away because of it. There’s a unique pull to America for all Irish people, so we don’t want to see you hurting,” Dorgan said. ”Irish artists feel that their U.S. fans need music more than ever now and want to continue to connect with and support their fans.”

Takafumi Sugahara, the organizer of “Tokyo Calling X Inspired By Tokyo,” a Japanese showcase at South by Southwest, agreed: “Bringing artists to the United States has always been challenging when it comes to obtaining visas, but it feels like the process has become even more difficult than before — perhaps due to the current political climate under the current administration.”

Fans watch Karol G perform at the Coachella stage last weekend. “We want everyone to feel welcome to our culture, so I want everyone to feel proud of where you come from. Don’t feel fear — feel pride!” the Colombian superstar said.

Advertisement

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

After high-profile incidents of tourist detainments and fear of reprisals for political speech, those worries and long-dreaded expenses may shift their priorities. “From my point of view, the impact of global conflicts or wars does not seem to be affecting artists’ decisions very strongly for now,” they said. “However, if the current situation were to worsen, it’s possible that we could begin to see that change.”

Coachella usually hits a few visa snafus every year (this year, the English electronic artist Tourist had to cancel. Last year, it was FKA Twigs). Yet the Grammy-winning Malian Algerian group Tinariwen had to cancel a major tour this year, after the Trump administration placed severe new travel restrictions on 19 countries, including Mali. Folk legend Cat Stevens scotched a book tour after visa problems. Outspoken acts like the U.K.’s Bob Vylan have been denied U.S. visas for criticizing Israel, and the Irish rap group Kneecap faced hurdles after their visa sponsor, Independent Artist Group, dropped them for similar reasons last year.

The Times spoke to one European band (who asked not to be named, for fear of reprisals from the U.S. government) who had a substantial tour of U.S. theaters booked last year, before their visas were denied just days before the tour was due to begin. They were forced to cancel those dates and reschedule for spring 2026, losing tens of thousands of dollars in up-front costs and non-refundable fees. (A performance visa routinely costs $6,000 with now-necessary expedited processing.)

Advertisement

“Our manager said, ‘This has never happened before, but even though you paid lot of money and the check cleared, you won’t have visas,’” the band said. They wondered if their pro-Palestinian advocacy might have played a role, but now believe it was due to changes in their application forms.

That small discrepancy “meant we lost tens of thousands of [dollars], which for a mid-tier band with a loyal cult following, was quite ruinous,” they said. “We had to put on fundraising shows to get to zero, then re-apply for visas, and paid four grand extra to expedite them. We took out a loan to pay it. We felt relentlessly fleeced,” they said. “We love the U.S., but now there is a reality in which we have to cut our losses and stop coming. A lot of bands are giving up on the U.S., for sure.”

“It’s a different feeling now where the U.S. government can do anything to us, and we just have to take it,” they added. “They’re moving the goalposts the whole time. It’s scary.”

That fate can befall even major acts, particularly those from Latin America.

Last year, superstar Mexican singer Julión Álvarez canceled his concert for a planned 50,000 fans in Arlington, Texas, when his touring visa was revoked. Grupo Firme faced a similar fate at the La Onda festival in Napa Valley. Los Alegres del Barranco saw their visas canceled after they projected an image of drug kingpin “El Mencho” during a concert.

Advertisement

“That was a moment where people realize how serious or scary it can get for promoters with this administration when comes to the visa situation, how quickly things can change and you can lose millions,” said Oscar Aréliz, a Latin music expert at Pollstar.

An act the caliber of Karol G might not face quite the same risks, though she told Playboy that “If you say the thing, maybe the next day you’ll get a call: ‘Hey, we are taking your visa away.’ You become bait, because some people want to show their power.”

If it can happen to a stadium-filler like Álvarez, it can happen to anyone. That might make some Latin acts prioritize other regions.

Bad Bunny demurred on touring the continental U.S. for fear of ICE raids at his shows, opting for a lengthy residence in his home territory of Puerto Rico instead.

Local Latin music hubs like Santa Fe Springs and Pico Rivera have suffered greatly under recent ICE raids and have seen fans retreat in fear. Las Vegas is a major touring destination for acts during Mexican independence celebrations in September, but now “it feels different,” Aréliz said. He expects the city — typically boisterous with Latin acts then — to lose a big chunk of music tourism from the north and south.

Advertisement

“Vegas’ top tourist countries are Canada and Mexico, so we’re going to see other countries benefit from this. If acts struggle to tour here because of the visa situation, they’re going to tour Mexico and Latin America instead,” he added.

Tours typically book a year in advance, so the full effects of the visa issues and ICE fears may not be felt until later in 2026 or 2027. The results of the midterm elections may change global perception of America’s safety. The country is still an incredibly valuable touring market for acts that can make it work.

But the world’s music community now looks at the U.S. like an old friend going through a rough patch: They’ll be happy to see us once we pull it together.

“Certainly over the last number of years in the U.S., we have been thinking of where we could find these new audiences for Irish music,” Dorgan said. “The unofficial theme of our at home showcase Ireland Music Week was, ‘America. We are not breaking up with you, but we are seeing other people.’”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘The Drama’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘The Drama’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – Many potential brides and grooms-to-be have experienced cold feet in the lead-up to their nuptials. But few can have had their trotters quite so thoroughly chilled as the previously devoted fiance at the center of writer-director Kristoffer Borgli’s provocative psychological study “The Drama” (A24).

Played by Robert Pattinson, British-born, Boston-based museum curator Charlie Thompson begins the film delighted at the prospect of tying the knot with his live-in girlfriend Emma Harwood (Zendaya). But then comes a visit to their caterers where, after much wine has been sampled, the couple wanders down a dangerous conversational path with disastrous results.

Together with their husband-and-wife matron of honor, Rachel (Alana Haim), and best man, Mike (Mamoudou Athie), Charlie and Emma take turns recounting the worst thing they’ve ever done. For Emma, this involves a potential act of profound evil that she planned in her mind but was ultimately dissuaded from carrying out, instead undergoing a kind of conversion.

Emma’s revelation disturbs all three of her companions but leaves Charlie reeling. With only days to go before the wedding, he finds himself forced to reassess his entire relationship with Emma.

As Charlie wavers between loyalty to the person he thought he knew and fear of hitching himself to someone he may never really have understood at all, he’s cast into emotional turmoil. For their part, Rachel and Mike also wrestle with how to react to the situation.

Advertisement

Among other ramifications, Borgli’s screenplay examines the effect of the bombshell on Emma and Charlie’s sexual interaction. So only grown viewers with a high tolerance for such material should accompany the duo through this dark passage in their lives. They’ll likely find the experience insightful but unsettling.

The film contains strong sexual content, including aberrant acts and glimpses of graphic premarital activity, cohabitation, a sequence involving gory physical violence, a narcotics theme, about a half-dozen uses of profanity, a couple of milder oaths, pervasive rough language, numerous crude expressions and obscene gestures. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

Read More Movie & Television Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending