Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Vaazha’ movie review: Anand Menen’s comedy is a fun ride that also touches upon certain relevant issues

Published

on

‘Vaazha’ movie review: Anand Menen’s comedy is a fun ride that also touches upon certain relevant issues

A still from ‘Vaazha’ 

Five aimless youngsters who bear the load of their parents’ ambition on their frail shoulders! An oft told tale of angst, anger and anguish. But what redeems Vaazha, ’the biopic of a billion boys’, is the humour woven in all the scenes in the first half of the film and the relatability factor in the second half. Smart one-liners — some crude, some crackling — bring on the laughs.  

Ajo Thomas, Vishnu, Moosa, Abdul Kalam and Vivek Anand are five thick friends who can’t seem to crack examinations, and the travails of the backbenchers strike a chord with many viewers. The five buddies come from middle-class families, as the film tracks their lives from pre-school to college and beyond.

But for Moosa, whose father stands by him through thick and thin, the other young men have to deal with parents who have no time to listen to their woes or even let them follow their dreams.

Vaazha means plantain tree in Malayalam; it is also a take on a popular grim adage in Malayalam that says that instead of spending money on a good-for-nothing kid, it would have been better to plant a plantain tree instead!

Film director Vipin Das of Jaya Jaya Jaya Jaya Hey and Guruvayoor Ambalanadayil is the writer of the movie, which is directed by Anand Menen who made his debut with Gauthamante Radham.

Advertisement
Vaazha (Malayalam)

Director: Anand Menen

Cast: Jagadish, Kottayam Nazeer, Azees Nedumnagad, Siju Sunny, Amith Mohan Rajeswari, Joemon Jyothir, Anuraj OB and Saaf

Runtime: 125 minutes

Storyline: The journey of five thick friends, all backbenchers, who drift through school and college, burdened by the expectations of their parents

The Reels-like feel of the film is enhanced by crisp scenes that depict the youngsters’ encounters with unsympathetic, unimaginative teachers in school and college. There is action, fisticuffs and comedy. Somewhere, after the interval, the writer and director suddenly realise that the film — like the protagonists — has been drifting along happily. So, they decide to bring in reality bytes to firm up the story.  

Advertisement

As they plod through engineering college, with seats bought by their parents who dream of the sons achieving their dreams, reality begins to hit them in the form of failed examinations, botched interviews and dead-end flings.

That is when the film shows how parents fail their children by forcing them to follow paths the parents have navigated. How teachers and educators go by examination marks as markers of achievement and have no time to cater to students who might want to chase rainbows of a different kind. Toxic parenting comes under the scanner with age-old practices of abject obedience and gaslighting by nosy relatives being questioned in the movie. A scene in which Ajo’s father (essayed by Azzez Nedumangad) takes on his toxic brothers who gaslight and put down his son, is bound to be a heartwarming moment for youngsters who are forced to exist with such folks.

Even while portraying the hurdles posed by the students’ lack of academic success, writer Vipin does not forget to keep the laughs going. Moreover, even certain poignant scenes in Vaazha do not become cheesy at any point.

What works for this movie most is the relatability factor; director Anand ensures that the film does not become maudlin, although the second half has plenty of scenes where it could have turned into a typical tear-jerker.

Amith Mohan Rajeswari, Siju Sunny, Joemon Jyothir, Anuraj OB and Anu essay the five classmates, and Saafboi appears as the antagonist, the top-scorer and teachers’ pet who ticks all the boxes as an A-lister.

Kottayam Nazeer as Vishnu’s disappointed dad aces his role, and so do Jagadish and Azees. Noby Marcos, appearing as Moosa’s father, keeps its subtle, yet scores as the supportive father. Basil Joseph’s guest appearance adds a zing to the storyline.

Although the women in the film have nothing much to do, Vipin does not make that an excuse for chauvinism or toxic masculinity. Instead, the script underscores how the lack of emotional empathy and maturity make it difficult for them to strike a healthy relationship with women.

Advertisement

The several loopholes in the script are filled by the overall feel-good tone of the movie. The technical team supports the director with apt editing by Kannan Mohan and cinematography by Aravind Puthussery.

Vaazha is a full-on comedy that also asks certain pertinent questions about parenting and education.

Vaazha is currently running in theatres

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘Hamnet,’ ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ and ‘Eternity’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘Hamnet,’ ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ and ‘Eternity’

‘Hamnet’

Directed by Chloé Zhao (PG-13)

★★★★

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

MOVIE REVIEWS: “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t,” “The Running Man,” “Trap House” and “Keeper” – Valdosta Daily Times

Published

on

MOVIE REVIEWS: “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t,” “The Running Man,” “Trap House” and “Keeper” – Valdosta Daily Times

“Now You See Me: Now You Don’t”

(Crime/Thriller: 1 hour, 53 minutes)

Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Dave Franco

Director: Ruben Fleischer

Rated: PG-13 (Strong language, violence and suggestive references. )

Movie Review:

Advertisement

This heist movie is the sequel to 2016’s “Now You See Me,” also directed Ruben Fleischer. It is entertaining just like his predecessor. However, more implausibility exists with “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” than its prequel.

This outing, The Horsemen illusionists and three new young magicians, Bosco (Dominic Sessa), Charlie (Justice Smith) and June (Ariana Greenblatt), set out to take down the Vanderbilt corporation led by Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike). Their task will not be easy, but the magician’s use of sleight of hand and tricks help with their mission.

Much like the “Fast and the Furious” movies, the antics here are not always tangible, though they are enjoyable. The entertaining action scenes, mixed with the comical banter, even when juvenile, make the film worth it.

Think of this movie as a reunion for the magicians and the initiation of three freshmen. The new magicians take the lead in this film and in some ways overshadow their older counterparts. Think of this as a passing of the torch to a new generation.

The problem is that the old cast members are still dynamic and not just generational cookie-cutter characters. Jesse Eisenberg and Woody Harrelson’s comedic repartee is still a highlight of this movie. While the younger cast is talented, the older cast members are the reason moviegoers return, and that is the razzle dazzle that makes “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” inviting.

Advertisement

Grade: B- (It is not as magical as it once was, but it still charms.)

“The Running Man”

(Action/Science-Fiction: 2 hours, 13 minutes)

Starring: Glen Powell, Colman Domingo and Josh Brolin

Director: Edgar Wright

Rated: R (strong violence, some gore, and strong language)

Advertisement

Movie Review:

“The Running Man” is a remake of the 1987 film with Arnold Schwarzenegger and directed by Paul Michael Glaser. Both screenplays feature a future dystopian America based on the novel by Stephen King. The 1987 movie was much more plausible than the current one, yet this version is still very entertaining thanks to the performance of Glen Powell, the newest action hero.

Glen Powell plays Ben Richards, a husband and father to a very sick young daughter. Richards decides the easiest way for his daughter and wife to remain healthy and have a secure future is to become a competitor on The Running Man reality show. Sponsored by the state-controlled Network, the show features a person trying to survive while violently hunted by several so-called patriots. Richards realizes he may have just made one of the biggest mistakes of his life, but after signing a contract, he cannot back out so he becomes a running man.

Again, the 1983 movie maintained a realistic appeal this new version misses. The original also had better lines such as a Schwarzenegger and Richard Dawson sequence. Schwarzenegger’s Ben Richards says, “Killian, I’ll be back,” and Damon Killian, played by former Family Feud host Richard Dawson, responds, “Only in a rerun.”

This new adaptation involves contestants like Richards out in the public where bystanders are killed — sounds like lawsuits waiting to happen all over the place. But the Network is more a part of the US government in this movie, so the Network has a modus operandi where people at home watching seem to enjoy the violence.

Advertisement

Not all citizens appreciate the running man show in this movie, and that at least is something tangible to hold on to. If America ever gets to this point in real life, we have hit a major low point of no point of return.

That aside, the other thing that makes this movie interesting is Glen Powell . He is believable as a leading man, and he works here. And, Powell is definitely athletic because he does plenty of running here.

Grade: B- (If you are in shape, run with him.)

“Trap House”

(Crime: 1 hour, 42 minutes)

Starring: Dave Bautista, Jack Champion and Bobby Cannavale

Advertisement

Director: Michael Dowse

Rated: R (Strong violence and bloody imagery)

Movie Review:

“Trap House” is an interesting movie mainly because it tries something different. That difference is not realistic in several scenes, but one must compliment the writers for trying. Part of the reason this movie seems unlikely is the missed opportunities for dramatic moments, which could help viewers get to know the characters better.

Dave Bautista plays Ray Seale a single father and DEA agent supervisor. He and his team have been tracking cartel crimes in El Paso, Texas. After his son Cody (Champion) sees some of the cartel information at his father’s office, the young man gathers three of his friends to rob cartel trap houses to raise money for the son of a murdered DEA agent who was killed in the line of duty. Soon, Ray must contemplate whether he should put duty above family when he finds out about his son‘s extracurricular activities.

Advertisement

“Trap House” finds a way to make it itself interesting, yet it remains a trap too. Characters keep doing the same thing even when it seems unusual for their very nature. Just when it looks like some of the characters are about to do the correct action, they do not, and this script misses key moments for the dramatic development of characters. This crime photoplay does rebound with a very engaging apex.

Grade: B- (It’s a trap, but it is an entertaining one).

“Keeper”

(Horror: 1 hour, 39 minutes)

Starring: Tatiana Maslany, Rossif Sutherland and Birkett Turton

Director: Osgood Perkins

Advertisement

Rated: R (Violent content/gore, strong language, and sexual references)

Movie Review:

“Keeper” is a horror movie by director Osgood Perkins (“Longlegs,” 2024), the son of famed actor Anthony Perkins. For a moment, it manages to create a neat psychological thriller. It has only a few frights, but they are effective. Then, writer Nick Lepard’s script becomes something similar to a women’s empowerment movie and loses the edge it had.

Liz, a painter, travels to a countryside estate with her boyfriend Malcom, a doctor, for a romantic getaway. He tells her he thinks she is the one. Malcom‘s brother Darren (Turton) agrees and tells him that Liz is a keeper. Supernatural occurrences happen to Liz, especially after her husband goes to see one of his clients and leaves her in the big house for a lengthy period of time.

“Keeper” is a movie you have to watch very closely, or it will seem like a character or two may go missing from scene to scene. Even more, audiences must understand what is happening, which is common in psychological thrillers. Still nothing seems to happen for long periods of runtime. Then, characters explain what is happening, and it becomes a less potent fairytale with visual monsters.

Advertisement

Grade: C+ (do not keep it.)

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Woman in Cabin 10 movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

The Woman in Cabin 10 movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Prolific horror-thriller writer Ruth Ware’s novel “The Woman in Cabin 10” is the source material for Netflix’s new original mystery, directed by Simon Stone. The movie stars Keira Knightley as Lo, a persistent hotshot journalist. After a recent source from her high-profile article is drowned in retribution, her return to work is marked by flashbacks she’s hesitant to confront. But when opportunity strikes in the form of a new story, hosted aboard a three-day luxury cruise captained by dying billionaire Anne Bullmer (Lisa Loven Kongsli) and her husband, Richard (Guy Pearce), Lo sees it as a perfect marriage of work and leisure. She is to write an article about the ever-so-generous foundation the couple intends to form posthumously. But once on board, the story reveals itself to be much more sinister than anticipated. 

Also aboard the yacht is Lo’s old situationship and assigned photographer, Ben (David Ajala), wealthy gallerist Heidi (Hannah Waddingham), her husband, Anne’s doctor (Art Malik), rockstar Danny Tyler (Paul Kaye), and his influencer PR-girlfriend (Kaya Scodelario), and socialite Adam (Daniel Ings). When Lo checks into her room, cabin 8, there are signs of a guest in her neighboring room: cigarette butts that blow from the neighboring balcony onto hers. Furthermore, in an attempt to avoid running into Ben in the hallway, she backs into the titular cabin and runs into a woman who has just gotten out of the shower. And later that night, Lo hears the commotion of a crime being committed, and witnesses a woman’s body thrown overboard. 

However, when she reports it, hysterically but lucidly, everyone on board insists there was never a person housed in that cabin, all crew and passengers are accounted for, and the room is spotless and undisturbed. And so ensues a film reminiscent of “Flightplan” or an old Agatha Christie ensemble story, as Lo shuns the incessant refusals to pursue the real story on board, even if it puts her life at risk. 

For fans of a mystery tale, “The Woman in Cabin 10” is plainly suitable. It’s simple and snappy, like reading an airport novel. The confined location works well for building tension, using a glamorous surface and labyrinthine underbelly to parallel the story’s own themes. And while predictable, it’s still decently entertaining to watch the facade unravel. The script falls victim to some indisputably dumb character behavior, particularly in Ben, whose sole purpose is to keep the machine churning for the next twist. And once all is revealed, there’s still another act left that pumps the brakes with unneeded vigor to turn towards a conclusion. 

All the acting is just fine. Like a game of Clue, this ensemble cast is full of archetypes who play their roles to be as perfectly ignorant, flippant, or sinister as the film’s limited story will allow. The moving parts of this thriller are subservient to nailing plot points down on a bulletin of perfectly wound red twine. On account of this, “The Woman in Cabin 10” entertains enough to pass the time, but certainly doesn’t thrill.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending