Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘The Boys in the Boat’ Review: George Clooney Directs His Best Film in a While, a ’30s Rowing Saga That’s an Old-Fashioned Movie Daydream

Published

on

‘The Boys in the Boat’ Review: George Clooney Directs His Best Film in a While, a ’30s Rowing Saga That’s an Old-Fashioned Movie Daydream

If the day ever arrives when a smart director decides to make “Born to Run: The Bruce Springsteen Story,” he should seriously consider casting Callum Turner, the dreamy raw-boned star of George Clooney’s period rowing drama “The Boys in the Boat.” Turner, who is British (he’s best known for his role in the last two “Fantastic Beasts” films), has the dark-eyed, purse-lipped, lock-jawed scowl of Springsteen the working-class prince — even though Bruce, as he admitted in his one-man Broadway show, totally trumped up his proletarian roots. He was a middle-class kid from Jersey palming himself off as a kind of roughneck factory worker of the soul. In “The Boys in the Boat,” Turner, playing the pivotal member of the 1936 University of Washington crew team, exudes the same duality.

His character, Joe Rantz, has been on his own since he was 14, living in a tin-roof encampment in Seattle during the Depression (he was abandoned by his father after his mother died). When he tries out for the college rowing team, it’s strictly to make some cash; he’s studying to be an engineer and is about to run out of tuition money. Turner, speaking in a gruff uninflected just-the-facts-ma’am growl, wears his bootstrap bona fides with expert understatement; you really believe that he wouldn’t know how to put on airs. But he’s also got the muffled glamour of a star — a rock-steady gaze and Springsteenian hunger. In the movie, Callum sports thick blond hair, making him a golden boy, but he’s a golden boy who cares more about doing the right thing than winning.

Drawn from a true story, “The Boys in the Boat” is a painstakingly wholesome, sun-dappled, old-fashioned movie that now fits into a rather ironic slot. These days, there is often a well-pedigreed drama that comes out at the end of the year and serves as an alternative to the awards films. But that’s only because it’s framed as a traditional “crowd-pleaser,” which means that two or three decades ago it would have been an awards film (or, at least, an awards wannabe). Remember “Chariots of Fire?” In 1982, it won the Oscar for best picture. Today, it wouldn’t win dog-catcher, and “The Boys in the Boat,” a movie that may remind you of “Chariots of Fire,” is a kind of WASP daydream of a sports movie. It could almost be a late-’90s Matt Damon movie, only with less interior conflict.

“Chariots of Fire,” of course, had its Vangelis synthesizer score to lend the stiff-upper-lip track races a gliding-in-time modernist sheen. “The Boys in the Boat” has a musical score, by Alexandre Desplat, that’s thick with traditional cornball valor. And that matches the movie, which is heavy on inspiration and light on complexity. When Joe tries out for the rowing team, competing with 50 other young men for what will be nine slots, we can already see that he’s entering the athletic version of basic training. The coach, Al Ulbrickson, played by a meticulously poker-faced Joel Edgerton (the fact that Al never smiles is a running joke), tells the recruits, “Eight-man crew is the most difficult team sport in the world.” He’s talking about two things at once: the physical demands of it — a test of strength and respiratory endurance — and, the trickiest part, the synchronization of it. If the men are out of sync, even by a few imperceptible degrees, they’ll be rowing against each other. But if they’re as perfectly in sync as a row of Rockettes, it will increase their speed, for they’ll fuse into one machine. That’s the poetry of crew.

With Edgerton’s Al set up as the drill sergeant, I was ready for a showdown between him and Joe. At one point that happens, but quite benignly. There’s never too much strife among the oarsmen either, because the film’s drama is larger, almost allegorical: how these boys, mostly from the working class, became a championship team because they had a moxie that wasn’t there in the teams from Harvard and Yale — the traditional upper-crust crew teams who’d been rowing since they were kids, but were also soft products of privilege.   

Advertisement

I will not consider it a spoiler to say that the University of Washington rowing team beat all its competition to make it into the 1936 Olympics — the famous summer games in Berlin presided over by Adolf Hitler, the games where Jesse Owens won his races and showed the world who was boss. (Owens is briefly in the movie, portrayed by Jyuddah Jaymes, and he gets a pointed line about who he was really proving himself to.) If you’ve heard of this fabled team at all, you know just where the movie is heading, and there aren’t too many bumps in the road. In the college library, Joe meets Joyce (Hadley Robinson), who flirts with him madly, but we can tell in about five seconds that their love is going to be as pure and deep as the one between James Stewart and Donna Reed in “It’s a Wonderful Life.”  

The skill with which George Clooney directs this movie relates to how he lingers on the details of the journey: Joe’s bond with the assistant coach (Peter Guinness) who builds the hand-made boats, or the way that Al has to maneuver politically with the college brass to let the superior junior varsity team compete in place of the varsity. (It was the JV team that wound up going to the Olympics.) Along the way, Joe’s father shows up, triggering 15 minutes of mild Freudian trauma. The races are thrillingly shot and edited, as the camera tracks and circles the boats from every angle, including some striking vertical ones. The scenes get your pulse racing.

“The Boys in the Boat” is a gentleman’s sports movie, with Clooney working hard to make one “like they used to.” He brings it off, even if there’s a lingering quaintness to it all. It’s easily the best movie he’s directed since “The Ides of March,” a dozen years ago. Yet if “The Boys in the Boat” reminds you that Clooney, as a filmmaker, has always been a Hollywood classicist at heart, it’s also a testament to how out of time that kind of filmmaking now seems. Who would have guessed that the Oscars would now be far too hip for a movie like this one?

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Catherine Breillat Is Back, Baby

Published

on

Catherine Breillat Is Back, Baby

The transgressive French filmmaker is in fine, fucked-up form with Last Summer, about a middle-age lawyer who starts sleeping with her stepson.
Photo: Janus Films

When Anne (Léa Drucker) has sex with her 17-year-old stepson, she closes and sometimes covers her eyes. It’s a pose that brings to mind what people say about the tradition of draping a napkin over your head before eating ortolan, that the idea is to prevent God from witnessing what you’re about to do. Théo (Samuel Kircher) is as fine-boned as any songbird — “You’re so slim!” Anne gasps in what sounds almost like pain during one of their encounters, as she runs her hands up his rangy torso — and just as forbidden. And despite the fact that what she’s doing could blow up her life, she can’t stay away. It wouldn’t be fair to say that desire is a form of madness in Last Summer, a family drama as masterfully propulsive as a horror movie. Anne remains upsettingly clear-eyed about what’s happening, as though to suggest otherwise would be a cop-out. But desire is powerful, enough to compel this bourgeois middle-age professional into betraying everything she stands for in a few breathtaking turns.

Last Summer is the first film in a decade from director Catherine Breillat, the taboo-loving legend behind the likes of Fat Girl and Romance. Last Summer, which Breillat and co-writer Pascal Bonitzer adapted from the 2019 Danish film Queen of Hearts, could be described as tame only in comparison to Rocco Siffredi drinking a teacup full of tampon water in Anatomy of Hell, but there is a lulling sleekness to the way it lays out its setting that turns out to be deceptive. Anne and her husband Pierre (Olivier Rabourdin) live with their two adopted daughters in a handsome house surrounded by sun-dappled countryside, a lifestyle sustained by the business dealings that frequently require Pierre to travel. Anne’s sister and closest friend Mina (Clotilde Courau) works as a manicurist in town, and conversations between the two make it clear that they didn’t grow up in the kind of ease Anne currently enjoys. It’s a luxury that allows her to pursue a career that seems more driven by idealism than by financial concerns. Anne is a lawyer who represents survivors of sexual assault, a detail that isn’t ironic, exactly, so much as it represents just how much individual actions can be divorced from broader beliefs.

Advertisement

In the opening scene, Anne dispassionately questions an underage client about her sexual history. She informs the girl that she should expect the defense to paint her as promiscuous before reassuring her that judges are accustomed to this tactic. The sequence outlines how familiar Anne is with the narratives used to discredit accusers, but also highlights a certain flintiness to her character. Drucker’s performance is impressively hard-edged even before Anne ends up in bed with her stepson. There’s a restlessness to the character behind the sleek blonde hair and businesswoman shifts, a desire to think of herself as unlike other women and as more interesting than the buttoned-up normies her husband brings by for dinner. Anne enjoys her well-coiffed life, but she also feels impatient with it, and when Théo gets dropped into her lap after being expelled from school in Geneva for punching his teacher, he triggers something in her that’s not just about lust. Théo is still very much a kid, something Breillat emphasizes by showcasing the messes he leaves around the house as much as on his sulky, half-formed beauty. But that rebelliousness speaks to Anne, who finds something invigorating in aligning herself with callow passion and impulsiveness instead of stultifying adulthood — however temporarily.

This being a Breillat film, the sex is Last Summer’s proving ground, the place where all those tensions about gender and class and age meet up with the inexorability of the flesh. The first time Anne sleeps with Théo, it’s shot from below, as though the camera’s lying in bed beside the woman as she looks up at the boy on top of her. It’s a point of view that makes the audience complicit in the scene, but that also dares you not to find its spectacle hot. Breillat is an avid button-pusher responsible for some of the more disturbing depictions of sexuality to have ever been committed to screen, but Last Summer refuses to defang its main character by portraying her simply as a predatory molester. Instead, she’s something more complicated — a woman trying to have things both ways, to dabble in the transgressive without risking her advantageous perch in the mainstream, and to wield the weapons of the victim-blaming society she otherwise battles when they are to her advantage. It’s not the sex that harms Théo; it’s the mindfuck of what he’s subjected to. After dreamily playing tourist in Théo’s youthful existence, Anne drags him into the brutal realities of the grown-up world. The results are unflinching and breathtakingly ugly. You couldn’t be blamed for wanting to look away.

See All

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Kunddala Puranam’ Review | A simplistic tale featuring an in-form Indrans, Remya Suresh

Published

on

‘Kunddala Puranam’ Review | A simplistic tale featuring an in-form Indrans, Remya Suresh

‘Kunddala Puranam’, starring Indrans and Remya Suresh in the lead, is the kind of movie you might want to watch for its focus on village folk and their everyday lives, offering a break from the bustling city. However, its far too simplistic approach may not work for all, especially at a time when filmmakers are trying to break new ground with experimental storytelling, unique styles, and mixing genres.
‘Kunddala Puranam’, directed by Santhosh Puthukkunnu, is set in Kasaragod, where a family opens up their private well to their neighbors. The well is an often-used trope in Malayalam cinema, with women characters gathering around it for water and some gossip. Venu (Indrans) and Thankamani (Remya Suresh) have a school-going daughter who yearns to wear gold earrings but can’t because of an ear infection. When her condition improves, Venu, who works as a security guard at a local bar, decides to purchase a pair for her. The gold earrings soon become the source of both happiness and unhappiness for the family.

The Kasaragod dialect, explored in films since the latter half of the last decade, has a certain charm, but what is particularly interesting is how Indrans effortlessly mouths his dialogues in the dialect. He is a masterclass in emotional acting and nails his role as a resolute father in this film. Remya Suresh, who played a prominent role in last year’s acclaimed movie ‘1001 Nunakal’, performs exceptionally well in this movie. Unni Raja, best known for ‘Thinkalazhcha Nishchayam’, also plays an interesting character. However, it is the child actor Sivaani Shibin who manages to capture the audience’s hearts with her playful innocence, a quality sadly missing in characters written for children in recent years.
Though the writers have tried their hand at humor in the movie, most of the dialogues fall flat, except for some scenes involving a drunkard and the other villagers. The story, though interesting, is stretched too long for comfort. Sound designer and musician Blesson Thomas manages to capture the mood of the story well through his music.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Sharmajee Ki Beti Review: Out-of-depth film celebrates women without bashing men

Published

on

Sharmajee Ki Beti Review: Out-of-depth film celebrates women without bashing men

Feminism isn’t about bashing men; it’s about equality and empowering women to embrace their true selves. Tahira Kashyap drives this point home in her debut directorial film, ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’, now streaming on Prime Video. But, it’s not a groundbreaking story. It is a tale of ordinary women discovering themselves amidst the struggle against social norms and tired stereotypes, a narrative which has become quite common in Hindi cinema; the most recent being Kiran Rao’s brilliantly narrated and performed, ‘Laapataa Ladies’.

But, Tahira falls just short of achieving the benchmark of being the best as her film stumbles often, before getting back on track, though with relative ease.

Just as the name suggests, ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’ is about five women, who share a common last name. They are free-thinking women, with a voice of their own. Their only roadblock — people who they call their own.

The working woman, Jyoti Sharma (Sakshi Tanwar), has a daughter (Vanshika Taparia) who despises her for prioritising her career over herself. Homemaker Kiran Sharma (Divya Dutta), a native of Patiala, caught up in the bustling life of Mumbai, is best at managing the home, but those who live in it can barely spare a minute for her. Cricket enthusiast Tanvi Sharma (Saiyami Kher) knows how to give a tough time to her opponents with her bat, but gets stumped when her boyfriend tries to make her more “girl-like”.

Advertisement

The message of ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’ is an important one: Women are not superhumans. They can’t necessarily be a hands-on mother while being a top professional or, if they are not employed, it doesn’t mean they are ‘bekaar‘ and they can step away from conventional avatars to create a place for themselves.

Great! Good message. But a good message goes nowhere without a good film. Coming in, ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’ offers interesting perspectives and, most importantly, one can relate to the characters and their lives. There’s the quibbling mother and a daughter, there’s an unappreciated member of the household and another whose efforts are ridiculed when they don’t sit in with the societal narrative. But to bring the audience forward and in sharing their stories, Kashyap takes a while.

A still from Sharmajee Ki Beti.

There’s a potentially heartwarming, feel-good movie in here somewhere. There are moments (one where the school-going Gurveen confides in her best friend Swati about her identity is my favourite) which leave you with a smile. But it lumbers along, wasting its rich material and great performers who don’t get enough room to shine, and the movie suffers as a result. Over its nearly two-hour runtime, it takes some effort to sit through.

And when you do, while keeping aside the complaints, what you appreciate about ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’ is the absence of demonising a partner to highlight the imbalance in gender norms. The husband or boyfriend are not the villains, rather they’re appreciative of the roles played by their wives and girlfriends.

Advertisement

In this ensemble cast, child actor Vanshika Taparia, Sakshi Tanwar’s daughter in the film, gives perfect expression to the crippling insecurity of teenage girls about their appearance. Her portrayal of Swati, a girl who believes she is worthy of attention and love only if she looks ‘perfect,’ overshadows a seasoned actor like Tanwar.

Divya Dutta, known for her consistent comic performances, delivers many of the film’s best lines and brings depth to her performance, even in underwritten scenes. Saiyami Kher is missable. Sharib Hashmi, Parvin Dabas, and Ravjeet Singh ably carry equal weight in the plot.

Divya Dutta shines in Sharmajee Ki Beti.

Even though sometimes it feels like the film is nailing the common feelings of guilt in mothers and the teenage obsession of girls with their bodies, it just doesn’t go anywhere. ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’ could have used better dialogues and a bit more pace to secure a place in your heart.

2.5 out of 5 stars for ‘Sharmajee Ki Beti’.

Advertisement

Published By:

Arushi Jain

Published On:

Jun 28, 2024

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending