Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Sector 36’ movie review: Vikrant Massey, Deepak Dobriyal throw down in rancid thriller

Published

on

‘Sector 36’ movie review: Vikrant Massey, Deepak Dobriyal throw down in rancid thriller

Vikrant Massey as Prem in ‘Sector 36’
| Photo Credit: Netflix

This is a gloomy week to be watching Hindi movies. The quality of the individual films may vary, but their subject matters are uniformly bleak. Out in cinemas is The Buckingham Murders, about the disappearance of a young boy in a UK town. Closer home, in Sector 36, Vikrant Massey is Prem, a strange name for the psychopathic butcher he plays. Beyond these two titles and the everyday onslaught of horrifying news, your only oasis of hope is Berlin, a moody, claustrophobic spy thriller set in the 90s. Car chases and explosions are scant, but at least no minors, as far as I can tell, are sadistically slaughtered in Atul Sabharwal’s film.

While it is not made explicit, Sector 36, directed by debutant Aditya Nimbalkar and written by Bodhayan Roychaudhury, takes inspiration from the 2006 Noida serial murders, famously known as the Nithari killings. Heavily sensationalised at the time, the case squirmed with accusations of organ trafficking, cannibalism and necrophilia. The two accused — a wealthy businessman and his domestic help — were put on death row for rape and murder, but, in 2023, the Allahabad High Court acquitted them, citing a lack of sound evidence and slating the investigating agencies for a shoddy probe.

It’s perhaps the contentious nature of the story that compelled Netflix to lend it a fictional slant. Several children and young women have been disappearing from Rajiv Colony, a vast, populous slum of migrants in Delhi. Since the victims hail from impoverished backgrounds, the cops are accustomed to turning a blind eye, including Ram Charan Pandey (Deepak Dobriyal), a Newton-worshipping sub-inspector who bows to the “system”. However, when his own daughter, Vedu, is nearly abducted by Prem (in a Ravana mask), Ram springs into action. His change of heart feels sudden and convenient — this, though, might be the point, underlining an Indian attitude to take command when calamity brushes close.

Sector 36 (Hindi)

Director: Aditya Nimbalkar

Cast: Vikrant Massey, Deepak Dobriyal, Akash Khurana, Darshan Jairwala, Ipshita Chkraborty Singh

Advertisement

Run-time: 124 minutes

Storyline: A cynical sub-inspector shakes off his initial apathy to catch a serial killer

At once vague, violent and exploitative, Sector 36 offers no convincing analysis of the murders. The makers, it seems, parsed every strand of an incredibly murky investigation, then agreed to keep all possibilities open. Their reading of urban inequality and the plight of destitute children is to basically shrug and say, ‘Nobody cares’. Fatally for a crime thriller, this is a film of non-specifics. The scenes featuring Prem, alone in a large house, are an assortment of serial killer cliché. His slimy employer, Bassi, played by Akash Khurana, is a perverse transport baron who shuffles around in monogrammed housecoats. Weaker still are the digs at Delhi’s corrupt police apparatus: IPS, one character jokes, now stands for ‘In Politician’s Service’.

Saurabh Goswami was co-cinematographer on Pataal Lok (2021), which explains the slick dark look and mythology-fuelled imagery. ‘Man Kyun Behka’ wafts from old cassette players, a better sonic choice than the plinks and plonks of the background score. The mid-2000s are lightly conjured: A version of Kaun Banega Crorepati holds the nation in thrall, and, in one shot, we catch sight of a Nokia 6600, the precursor to an iPhone for most Indians back then.

There are flickers of campiness in Massey’s performance — he peers through the grills of a giant gate, baiting and taunting his enemy — that are diminished by Nimbalkar’s over-sincere telling. In one pivotal scene, Prem records his confession before Ram, in gratuitous detail, yet the exchange lacks the unsettling wickedness of Nawazuddin Siddiqui toying with Vicky Kaushal in Raman Raghav 2.0. A boring Deepak Dobriyal performance is a rarity, so in one sense, and in one sense only, Sector 36 is an event. It’s somewhat true-crime, and a lot of false notes.

Sector 36 is currently streaming on Netflix

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

‘Speak No Evil’ Collapses in Carnage

Published

on

‘Speak No Evil’ Collapses in Carnage
From start to finish, James McAvoy mesmerizes. Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Remakes are odious, but Speak No Evil, while thoroughly unneeded and unasked for, is an Americanized remake of a 2022 thriller from Denmark that services its original material well, thanks mostly to a sprawling, contradictory and totally galvanizing centerpiece performance by James McAvoy. He’s the fine Scottish actor best known for his outstanding work in The Last King of Scotland and Atonement, not to mention his memorable Cyrano de Bergerac on the New York stage. In Speak No Evil, McAvoy plays the villain, over the top and all over the place, and he has such a blast doing it that you can’t take your eyes off him for a minute.


SPEAK NO EVIL ★★★ (3/4 stars)
Directed by: James Watkins
Written by: James Watkins, Christian Tafdrup, Mads Tafdrup
Starring: James McAvoy, Mackenzie Davis, Scoot McNairy, Alix West Lefler, Aisling Franciosi, Dan Hough
Running time:  110 mins.


Despite some updates by writer-director James Watkins and a lot of savage violence to make it more palatable for an American movie audience, the plot begins in basically the same way as it did two years ago: Louise and Ben Dalton (Mackenzie Davis and Scoot McNairy) are an American couple living in London with their daughter, Agnes (Alix West Lefler), who meet a friendly British family during a getaway in Italy. Paddy (McAvoy), his wife Ciara (Aisling Franciosi) and their mute son Ant (terrific young newcomer Dan Hough) are all so charming that the Daltons accept an invitation to visit them for a weekend at their rambling farm in the British countryside. Things begin oddly.

Worried man and woman with their daughterWorried man and woman with their daughter
Why don’t they just leave? They try. Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Louise and Ben can’t hide their marital problems. Their daughter Agnes is almost 13 but still emotionally attached to a stuffed rabbit. Ben is an unemployed lawyer who feels emasculated by his inability to get a job in England. Paddy knows Ciara is a vegetarian but insists on feeding her a goose for dinner. Ciara pretends to perform oral sex on Paddy under the table. Louise is at first aghast by their role-playing, then annoyed when they lecture Agnes on how to behave publicly. Tensions turn to horror when Agnes and Ant, forced to share a bedroom, become intimate friends and the little boy confides in the little girl that the Daltons are not his parents at all, but two fiends who killed his real family, kidnapped him and cut out his tongue with a pair of scissors so he could never tell anyone the truth.

Why don’t they just leave? They try. Horrified, the Americans plan to escape in the middle of the night and save Ant in the process, but somebody always does something stupid in horror flicks like this, so they all foolishly return to fetch Agnes’ stuffed rabbit. From here on, Speak No Evil loses its claim to reality and goes berserk in an assault on the senses that defies credibility and collapses in carnage. It’s all rather far-fetched and silly. The thrills are contrived but effective enough to make your hair stand on end. I had a good time watching it, against my better judgment. And I especially applaud the relentless one-man show that is James McAvoy, from start to finish. He’s mesmerizing.

‘Speak No Evil’ Collapses in Carnage

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Transformers One – A Surprisingly Deep And Stunning Transformers Movie [Review]

Published

on

Transformers One – A Surprisingly Deep And Stunning Transformers Movie [Review]

What were my expectations going into Transformers: One? Whatever they were, it doesn’t really matter, because the movie blew away any and all ideas of what I thought it would be. This is a return to Transformers, thousands of years before we meet Optimus Prime on Earth. This time, most of the Autobots and Decepticons don’t even know each other yet. Optimus is Orion Pax, Megatron is D-16, Bumblebee is B-127. Enemies are still friends, the world hasn’t changed from constant war. Transformers One stars different voice actors than the normal Transformers films as well, Chris Hemsworth voices Optimus, Brian Tyree Henry voices Megatron, Scarlett Johansson voices Elita, Keegan-Michael Key voices Bee, Jon Hamm voices Sentinel Prime, and Laurence Fishburne voices Alpha Trion.

This is the first animated Transformers movie to hit theaters in 38 years since the original 1986 Transformers: The Movie. It’s really a tale of two excellent halves though. The first half shows the budding friendship between Orion and D-16. They’re trying to rise up the ranks of life on Cybertron, including entering a race that’s only for bots with a spark. They hold their own, but just miss out, enraging their superior officer in the process. This sends them down to the lowest levels of Cybertron where they meet Bee. As they hatch a plan to escape, they meet up with Elita, and unravel a conspiracy from the very top of society. It’s quite the stark difference from the sort of happy-go-lucky beginnings of the film. From there, the shape of both Optimus Prime and Megatron as characters forms into who we know today.

As it goes on, Transformers One shows itself to be a much more adult, thought-provoking film than it lets on. There are issues of class disparities, who should be leaders, how people are affected by stress, and how friendships can change over time. Combine that with the fact that it’s just a great movie for kids to watch, the screening I saw, the kids in the audience were going nuts for every moment. We don’t get enough great kids content these days, but Transformers One will satisfy the youngest and the oldest of fans.

With new voice actors taking over classic roles, the question comes up of how they stack up to previous voice actors. The most important is Chris Hemsworth. He already has an immediately recognizable voice. However, as the movie goes on, he resembles Peter Cullen’s timeless performance as Optimus. There are small changes throughout, but by the end, I was in awe. Same thing with Bryan Tyree Henry and Megatron. He’s sparky, upbeat, and somewhat higher pitched at the start of the film. By the end of it, it’s gravely, deeper, and just all around more menacing.

Those two combined with Keegan-Michael Key and Scarlett Johansson are excellent. Bee is the throughline for most of the comedy in the film and it just works hearing Keegan-Michael Key as Bee. He’s hilarious and upbeat, even when the film gets to its darkest moments. Fishburne might not be in the film for very long, but his performance is absolutely must-watch.

Advertisement

Optimus Prime in Transformers One

The third act of Transformers One is one of the most technically beautiful and thrilling animated sequences in recent memory. From when they return to Cybertron from the outskirts to the end of the film is a thrill ride. It might be presented as a bit of a kids movie, but make no mistake, Transformers One is just as entertaining for adults. The humor, the action, the animation, it all adds up to one of, if not, the best Transformers movies ever. You get interesting looks at how the characters we know and love became who they are. Seeing Optimus and Megatron as friends and then turning into enemies is heartbreaking. Watching Orion Pax turn into one of the cinema’s greatest heroes is a sight to behold.

Transformers One is a spectacular showcase for animation. It’s stunning in technical aspects, but also provides an excellent Transformers story.

Transformers One releases in theaters on September 20th.

For more Reviews, make sure to check back to That Hashtag Show.

Keep Reading:

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Is a Movie About Electing a Pope Allowed to Be This Entertaining?

Published

on

Is a Movie About Electing a Pope Allowed to Be This Entertaining?

Conclave combines the pulp velocity of a great airport read with the gravitas of high drama.
Photo: Focus Features/Everett Collection

Conclave begins with the image of a cardinal tensely making his way along a Roman highway late at night, his crimson biretta cap clasped tightly in his hand. It’s a stark, almost funny image, the elegant robes of this high priest trudging through a bleak, contemporary urban setting. The characters of Conclave won’t spend much time in the world at large — this is one of the few times we will see one outside in Edward Berger’s film — but the dissonance will continue to resonate. These are men carrying out what they view as an ancient function: electing a new Pope, now that the old one has died. They diligently shut out the modern world, but it’s still there, outside the windows and beyond the doors, constantly felt in everything they do.

At the center of the squall is Thomas Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes), the dean of the College of Cardinals, whose job it is to run the conclave, as cardinals from around the world gather inside the hallowed sanctuary of the Sistine Chapel to cast ballots for a new pontiff. It’s a perfect role for Fiennes, who can do both placidity and intensity — sometimes, somehow, all at once. Thomas exudes gentleness and tolerance. He’s a deeply conflicted man who admits, in an initial address to the conclave, that he values doubt and abhors certainty — and yet, as the picture proceeds, he becomes more obsessed with controlling the outcome.

Advertisement

Berger’s film is adapted, quite faithfully, from Robert Harris’s 2016 novel, and it combines the pulp velocity of a great airport read with the gravitas of high drama. It solemnly depicts the ornate rituals around the death of the Pope — the ribbons placed across his door and fastened with melted red wax, the seals clipped off his rings, the constant prayers and the secretive mutterings — with only a slight nod to the sheer pointlessness of it all. It means something to these men, and that’s enough. Same, too, with the lugubrious dance of the conclave itself, with its round after round of balloting and tallying and quiet reflecting.

Many film critics who participate in year-end awards voting will find themselves nodding with recognition during Conclave at how allegiances shift between ballots in response to who’s ahead, who’s likely to win, and whose support seems to be crumbling. I have no idea how accurate this is to the way cardinals actually vote, but both the book and the movie have the confident ring of truth, or at least truthiness. And it’s interesting to learn that the Very Serious Men who elect popes scheme as effectively as the New York Film Critics Circle did when it voted (well-deserving) underdog Rachel Weisz best actress in 2012 to prevent front-runners Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Lawrence from getting the prize instead; or when the warring camps of Days of Heaven and Deer Hunter supporters at the National Society of Film Critics in 1978 famously fought each other to a standstill and allowed Bertrand Blier’s Get Out Your Handkerchiefs to sneak in and win Best Picture that year.

Where was I? Oh, right, Conclave. Amid such stately ceremony, Berger finds ways to insert gradually escalating tumult and cattiness. Though he tries to be fair and balanced, Thomas is allied with Aldo Bellini (Stanley Tucci), a progressive candidate who wants to continue the Church’s liberalization and engagement with the world. Opposing them is Goffredo Tedesco (Sergio Castellitto), a reactionary Italian who thinks the Church has been on the wrong track ever since it got rid of the Latin Mass in the 1960s. But there are other candidates as well — chiefly, Joseph Tremblay (John Lithgow), a supreme politician who, for all his outward soft-spoken humility, clearly has great ambitions. And then there’s Joshua Adeyemi (Lucian Msamati), a charismatic cardinal from Nigeria who could become the first Black pope.

None of these people actively campaign for the papacy. Save maybe for the flamboyant Tedesco (a not very big role that Castellitto turns into a full, rollicking meal), they’re all lowered eyebrows and hushed whispers and collegial exchanges, soberly prostrating themselves before God and seeking His guidance…all the while quietly and viciously stabbing each other in the back. Such muted machinations present a wonderful showcase for these actors, as well as Isabella Rossellini, as a head nun who becomes more central to the plot, and the relatively unknown Mexican actor Carlos Diehz, as a heretofore unknown cardinal named Vincent Benitez. Secretly named the Archbishop of Kabul, Benitez shows up unannounced on the day of the conclave and sends what promised to be a predictable gathering into the first of its many entertaining tailspins.

Despite the fact that they’ve all been cocooned deep inside the Vatican, with the doors barred, the priests of Conclave are all quite aware of how everything they do will have real-world repercussions, particularly in the way the Church is perceived. That fragile isolation isn’t just a psychological element. We sense throughout that the outside world is undergoing turmoil of which these men are mostly unaware — though we suspect they soon will be, both metaphorically and physically. Berger expertly milks that anticipation, then nails several artfully heated and lively climaxes. My audience at the Telluride Film Festival began roaring with delight and surprise, and I’ve heard similar reports out of Toronto screenings as well. So, well, don’t be surprised if this sinfully entertaining movie wins a few awards.

Advertisement

See All

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending