Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Saramsha’ movie review: Surya Vasishta presents a gentle, interesting take on life and ambitions

Published

on

‘Saramsha’ movie review: Surya Vasishta presents a gentle, interesting take on life and ambitions

Sruthi Hariharan and Surya Vasishta in ‘Saramsha’
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

In a brilliant scene in Surya Vasishta’s Saramsha (Summary), a publisher, Raksha (Shweta Gupta), tells the protagonist, Tejas (Deepak Subramanya), about how she wants people to see her as a Kannadiga, even if she doesn’t speak the language fluently. “But psychologically, culturally… this (Karnataka) is my home. It (Kannada) is my literature and identity. Anywhere else, I will feel out of place,” she says.

A Bengaluru Kannadiga, who is well aware of Kannada’s legacy, yet finds it comfortable thinking in English, battles with the same identity crisis. The film, too, is about who you are and who people see you as, and has several gentle moments that make you smile. 

For instance, the scene where Tejas talks to his parents through a video call is another small gem. As soon as the conversation is over, he removes the picture of his parents as his laptop wallpaper and replaces it with that of the legendary Kannada poet Kuvempu. 

Saramsha (Kannada)

Director: Surya Vasishta

Advertisement

Cast: Surya Vasishta, Deepak Subramanya, Sruthi Hariharan, Shweta Gupta

Runtime: 130 minutes

Storyline: In the realm of magic realism, an emotional drama unfolds when Tejas, a chartered accountant and a passionate writer, meets Abhay, one of the characters of his story

The name Tejas is derived from Poornachandra Tejaswi, the renowned writer and son of Kuvempu. Apart from the subtle tribute to two literary greats, the scene reflects Tejas’ mental state. With no support for his writing dreams from his parents, Tejas seeks inspiration from the greats he grew up reading.

Tejas’ father wants his son to follow his path and become a chartered accountant. But Tejas loves writing, the world of imagination, and he is a misfit for jobs that require rational thinking and truth. 

Advertisement

One day, Tejas opens the bathroom door and walks into another world, where he meets Abhay (Surya Vasishta) and Maya (Sruthi Hariharan), the characters of the story he is writing. While Abhay always dreams of the future, Maya lives for today. Meeting the two contrasting personalities shapes Tejas’ character and thinking. 

Saramsha, with its unflashy filmmaking and minimalist background score, is a moody film. Hence, the film’s philosophical tone works for the most part. It shows the lives of interesting yet imperfect people with different life experiences. So there is ample drama, with dialogues (from Vasishta and Gantumoote director Roopa Rao) that sound relatable.

Deepak Subramanya in ‘Saramsha’

Deepak Subramanya in ‘Saramsha’
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

The film mirrors the psyche of a passionate writer. “Writing a book and publishing it feels like completing a life and being reborn again,” Abhay tells Tejas after sharing his love for the aroma of pages of a book. The actors are the film’s biggest strength, with Deepak Subramanya being the standout.

Advertisement

ALSO READ:‘KTM’ movie review: Dheekshith Shetty gives his all in a film stuck in a time warp

Saramsha talks about the need to mend your turbulent relationship with your parents. It is also a tale of a youngster coming of age. Perhaps the film could have taken more risks with the idea of surrealism, but the director’s well-meaning intention drives him to close all the chapters of his characters, denting the intriguing nature of the movie. That said, Saramsha has enough to offer an immersive experience for those who love to ruminate about life.

Saramsha is currently running in theatres.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Deadpool & Wolverine Movie Review: Ryan Reynolds brings the house down in this bloody spectacle

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine Movie Review: Ryan Reynolds brings the house down in this bloody spectacle
Story: Deadpool, aka Wade Wilson (Ryan Reynolds), pulls Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) back from the dead to save his own world from a powerful and diabolical enemy. But before they can save the world, will they end up killing each other?

Review: Deadpool has always been known for his wisecracks and witty comebacks, but this time, Ryan Reynolds (also a co-writer) takes it up several notches, making this Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) tentpole a riotous affair. His comedic punches are even more impactful than the physical ones, both of which land with an impact.

Director Shawn Levy, hailed by many as the saviour of the MCU’s troubled fortunes, delivers a self-aware, self-deprecating gag fest from the very first scene. This franchise outing spares no one, poking fun at everything – from Disney’s takeover of Fox to Hugh Jackman’s seemingly eternal association with the franchise as Wolverine. Even Captain America and Mad Max aren’t safe from Deadpool’s relentless jabs. It’s a no-holds-barred chaotic comedy that pulls out all the stops, and we are definitely not complaining.

The plot is straightforward yet engaging: one insanely powerful enemy against two superheroes, one of whom is desperate to become an Avenger. Deadpool’s world, consisting of the nine people he truly cares about, is in danger, and to save it, he ropes in a variant of the late James ‘Logan’ Howlett or the Wolverine. Logan, now stuck with Deadpool’s incessant chatter, finds himself in the Void, facing the formidable villain Cassandra Nova (Emma-Louise Corrin) alongside a slew of other superheroes, leading to bloody battles and relentless action.

Ryan Reynolds is the heartbeat of this movie. We expect Deadpool to be unfiltered and offensive, but Reynolds elevates it to another level. His relentless banter fuels the madness of this installment, making it clear that Deadpool is an equal-opportunity offender. Reynolds’ unhinged portrayal of Deadpool is a testament to the franchise’s desperate need for a course correction. The film shatters the fourth wall and even takes on the fans, with Deadpool addressing them as nerds and making cheeky comments about their “special sock” for the most anticipated fight scenes. This back-to-basics approach reminds us that at its core, this franchise is based on a comic book after all and should never have been more complicated.

Advertisement

Hugh Jackman plays it cool as Wolverine, but his character shows signs of weariness, which Deadpool humorously addresses by suggesting the MCU will keep Jackman in the role until he’s 90. Jackman takes the joke in his stride, and their on-screen chemistry flows organically. The mindless banter, sexual innuendos, and tension amid the bromance are complemented by intense action and bloodshed. There’s enough and more of it, but one wonders when to really feel worried about any of the characters because almost everyone is always immortal. Well almost. The film boasts spectacular visuals typical of a big-screen outing, and at just over two hours, it seldom feels like a drag. There are many noteworthy cameos, but we aren’t the ones to give spoilers of any kind. Emma Corrin stands out as the evil Cassandra Nova, her petite frame belying the raw power she wields.

Whether you’re a fan or not, ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ keeps you engaged with its constant stream of action and humor. It helps to be familiar with the legacy characters and storyline (as messy and complicated as it may be) to fully appreciate the experience, especially when watching it with an enthusiastic audience. ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ breaks barriers and goes where other MCU films haven’t, capturing nostalgia, humour, and most importantly, delivering oodles of entertainment. This is exactly what the franchise needs to stay relevant and enjoyable.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Kenda’ movie review: A sharp observation on the nexus between crime and politics

Published

on

‘Kenda’ movie review: A sharp observation on the nexus between crime and politics

Bharath B V in ‘Kenda’
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

In director Sahadev Kelvadi’s Kenda, the protagonist Keshava (B V Bharath) is playing cricket on the road with his neighbour, a school-going boy. He instructs the boy facing his deliveries to focus on the ball and not look at his hand. In the scene, the film’s aimless protagonist and a child with dreams find purpose in the game of cricket; this scene best describes the tone of the narrative. Kenda is intentionally minimalistic and consistently realistic, with scenes from the movie playing out exactly how you would see them happen in the real world.

From the makers of Gantumoote, the plotis set in a much simpler time. Back then, playing cricket matches on the roads passionately fuelled dreams of representing the country.

The film doesn’t reveal its timeline, but gives you enough clues to guess the period in which its story unfolds. A cricket match on TV shows Debasis Mohanty, the Indian pacer who caught attention for his open-chested action in the late 90s. A mobster in a dingy bar swoons over a poster of Urmila Matondkar in her heyday after Rangeela; it becomes evident that the film is set between the late 90s and early 2000s.

Kenda (Kannada)

Director: Sahadev Kelvadi

Cast: Bharath B V, Gopalkrishna Deshpande, Rekha Kudligi, Deepti Nagendra, Vinod Ravindran

Advertisement

Runtime: 135 minutes

Storyline: A young man’s journey through a web of crime and politics while he struggles to come to terms with his deep and dark desires

Keshava, who works in a factory, lives a mundane life until he gets caught up in the web of politics and crime due to Narasimha Shastry (Vinod Ravindran), a politically ambitious person who runs a small newspaper. Narasimha Shastry believes in “making news” and hires young men to stage protests and bandhs. His speeches have false promises, and he rattles off lines from the Bhagavad Gita, especially on death.

ALSO READ:Sahadev Kelvadi on turning director with ‘Kenda’

The film attempts to be a political satire, but Kenda’s triumph lies in its sharp observation of how the young walk onto the wrong path, without a point of return. Right from the starting point of hooliganism (being lured into the field) to showcasing the different aspects of the world, the story steadfastly proves how this nexus of crime and politics is carefully established by people in power using young men in need of financial support. 

Advertisement
A still from ‘Kenda’

A still from ‘Kenda’
| Photo Credit:
DBeatsMusicWorld/YouTube

For instance, it all begins with Keshava getting asked a simple question: How much does he make from his job in the factory? Money becomes a deciding factor for several youngsters, who are perhaps denied opportunities, to opt for jobs that put them on the list of miscreants.

The film also portrays the rise of electronic media. It feels like watching a different era as we see television journalists covering important issues (one being farmers’ protests), unlike now, where they run (literally) behind TRP-worthy news. However, the film shows the beginning of the downfall of TV reporting too when one of the news readers proudly claims “first on our channel” while displaying exclusive footage.

However, the film’s absurdist element makes Kenda less comprehensible towards the end. It’s as if the director wants to elevate the drama, but something holds him back from going for the final punch; his indulgence is evident in the philosophical portions involving a sex worker, as Kenda tends to get lost a bit with plenty of things in the mix.

Despite the complications, Kenda is more or less a solid outing which doesn’t resemble your typical heroic bloodshed film, as it doesn’t succumb to broad strokes. Simply put, it is about an innocent getting drawn to rowdyism, and the protagonist of Kenda looks and behaves like one of us. This practicality in writing is rare in Kannada cinema.

Kenda will hit the screens on July 26.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Frankie Freako’ Is a Fun Ode to ’90s Puppet Mayhem Movies [Fantasia Review]

Published

on

‘Frankie Freako’ Is a Fun Ode to ’90s Puppet Mayhem Movies [Fantasia Review]

Seeing isn’t always believing in The Chapel, the latest film from Piggy writer/director Carlota Pereda. Written by Pereda, as well as Albert Bertran Bas and Carmelo Viera, The Chapel is a supernatural drama about intergenerational trauma between mothers and their daughters.

The film opens in 1631 in a small Spanish town that is besieged by the Black Plague. Men in plague masks gather up sick individuals to lock them in the titular chapel to preserve the health of the community and, as the crowd watches, a young, infected Uxoa (Alba Hernández) is separated from her mother, who refuses to help.

The moment of familial discomfort is upended, however, when a member of the crowd raises a smartphone to shoot video of the event, shattering the authenticity of the moment. It turns out what we’re seeing is a historical reenactment: these are actors who are playing a part in an annual five day festival. Once a year the haunted church is opened up and the town becomes a debauchery-laden tourist destination.

A similar instance of visual questioning occurs only a few moments later when characters walk through town and arrive at a painted facade two-stories tall that mimics the real street behind it.

Because these moments are so close together – and occur so early in the film – it is clear that it’s a larger part of Pereda, Bas and Viera’s subtle agenda. The Chapel is clearly interested in exploring notions of life after death, spiritualism, and belief, but the screenwriters also seemingly want the audience to evaluate what we’re seeing and what constitutes truth.

Advertisement

The heroine of the film is young eight year old Emma (Maia Zaitegi), an aspiring medium who is bullied at school because it’s a well known fact that her mother (Loreto Mauleón) is dying of cancer. Although the woman is effectively in hospice, Emma can’t bear to be separated from her mother, so instead of being sent away to relatives or into foster care, Emma is regularly babysat by well-intentioned neighbors, Edurne (Elena Irureta) and Asier (Jon Olivares).

The kindly adults are no match for Emma’s strong will and her tendency to sneak out, however, so her de facto surrogate parent becomes police officer Jon Elorza (Josean Bengoetxea). He’s the one who typically finds Emma in the middle of the night, unaccompanied, and performing spells to try and speak with the spirit of Uxoa, who haunts the chapel.

The plot kicks in when Ivana Peralta (Nagore Aranburu), the old “witch” Emma was studying under, dies of natural causes on the eve of the festival. Concerned that if her mother dies during the five days, her spirit will be imprisoned inside the religious site, Emma befriends the witch’s daughter, Carol (Belén Rueda) who arrives in town to settle the estate and manage the funeral.

Rueda is eminently watchable as the scowling disbeliever with a tortured backstory. Carol makes a living as a fraudster mystic, she actively tells Emma she hates children, and she stalks through town in her mother’s fur coat like a fury. She also wears her history, quite literally, on her face: the entire left side is badly burned, a detail The Chapel mines for a narrative reveal in the last act.

Advertisement

The skeptical adult/precocious child partnership isn’t new, but it works exceptionally well here because both actors are great. Zaitegi is especially revelatory: the rare child actor who negotiates the fine line between cloying, annoying, and dangerously mature for their age. It’s the centerpiece performance of the film and it only works because Emma is inherently worth rooting for, even when she repeatedly sneaks out after dark, engages in risky spiritualist activities, and actively courts the attention of violent ghosts.

Alas the film loses its way roughly halfway through. While The Chapel makes a clear throughline between Uxoa, Carol, and Emma’s “abandonment” by their respective mothers, when it comes time to confront the literal ghosts of their past, there’s nothing else to explore. The climax is particularly muddled, as the aforementioned “question what you see” element comes roaring back in a poorly shot sequence featuring a fiery pyre. 

It’s even more disappointing considering the spectacle that Pereda creates only moments before: a mountain of mutilated plague bodies piled on top of each other. This is easily the most haunting visual in the entire film, but it stands out in stark contrast to earlier unconvincing CGI on the Plague Mask ghost that regularly attacks Emma.

Alas, it is the horror elements where The Chapel falls down. There’s more mood and tension in a scene when Carol stumbles drunk through the town in the middle of night than most of the overly familiar monster attack sequences. 

The film works best when it is investigating the nature of female relationships between Emma, her mother, and Carol or when it explores Emma’s inability to process her mother’s impending death (fans of J.A. Bayona’s A Monster Calls will find this to be a suitable companion piece). 

Advertisement

As a female-centric drama with genre-adjacent tones, this is a strong calling card for Pereda’s talent. As a horror film, though? The Chapel is muddled.

3 skulls out of 5

The Chapel made its North American debut at the Fantasia International Film Festival.

Continue Reading

Trending