Movie Reviews
Queen of the Ring (2025) – Movie Review
Queen of the Ring, 2025.
Directed by Ash Avildsen.
Starring Emily Bett Rickards, Marie Avgeropoulos, Walton Goggins, Josh Lucas, Gavin Casalegno, Kelli Berglund, Tyler Posey, Martin Kove, Damaris Lewis, Ash Avildsen, Jim Cornette, Trinity Fatu, Toni Rossall, Cara Buono, Deborah Ann Woll, Adam Demos, Francesca Eastwood, Brittany Baker, Kailey Dawn Latimer, Chaney Morrow, Barron Boedecker, Byron Johnson II, Cameren Jackson, Mickie James, and Marie Evans James.
SYNOPSIS:
In a time when pro wrestling for women was illegal all over the United States, a small town single mother embraces the danger as she dominates America’s most masculine sport and becomes the first million dollar female athlete in history.

Chronicling the trailblazing efforts of woman’s professional wrestler Mildred Burke (a driven, unflinching, muscular Emily Bett Rickards) from the 1930s and beyond, who would go on to be the first multimillion-dollar woman’s athlete, co-writer/director Ash Avildsen’s Queen of the Ring is yet another rousing story from the untapped well of that often overlooked and unfairly side-eyed world. Writing alongside Alston Ramsay and based on a book by Jeff Leen, this particular film also has an additional beneficial layer in that, while it is a biopic primarily focused on a landscape-changing athlete, it’s also a compelling look at the evolution of women’s wrestling which started as illegal across America, meaning that, much like how wrestling itself is inspired by carnival show antics, single mother Mildred Burke caught her first break taking down overconfident men inside a wrestling ring as part of a carnival show.
More intriguing is that this also means that while a good portion of men’s professional wrestling is staged to a degree, Mildred wasn’t afforded that same opportunity. She had to prove herself in these “shoot matches” (a blurring of the lines between reality and script inside the ring) against mostly sexist men who didn’t think she belonged and thought they would easily be able to bring her down to the mat and pin or submit her. Even her promoter/over-the-hill wrestler fiancé Billy Wolfe (Josh Lucas) essentially once laughed in her face at the diner she was serving in upon expressing her enthusiasm to train under him.

The air of misogyny over the industry isn’t necessarily surprising given the era, but it is infuriating, nonetheless. A complicated relationship also develops where Billy genuinely respects Mildred’s hardheaded, never-take-failure-as-an-option demeanor, interested in building a new breed of star out of her for both of them to reap rewards. There are also times his resentment over emotionally hurting her feels grounded in some truth, although it doesn’t stop him from being terrible to her. He still is unable to escape his misogynistic and chauvinistic tendencies, breaking her heart early and often, promising a championship (eventually, they do get a woman’s league of sorts running), and more to younger, more naive athletes willing to aleep with him and follow in Mildred’s footsteps.
However, Ash Avildsen and the company are smart enough not to reduce Mildred Burke to a woman tormented by a broken relationship. She is defiant every step of the way and unafraid to enter a legal marriage as a means to ensure he can’t screw her and her son over financially. At one point, she also has a championship belt, which becomes another chess piece in this tumultuous relationship-turned-business arrangement. Yes, Billy could book her to lose that belt, and perhaps other women deserve to hold it, but Mildred knows she must transition into shoot mode if anything unplanned or fishy begins happening in the ring. These two become bitter enemies inside and outside the industry, including depicted scenes of domestic violence that, to some, might feel unnecessary to show explicitly, but within this narrative and context depict the difference between in-ring athleticism and terror, causing Mildred to grapple with what message it sends to the audience and what it does to her character if she escapes Billy and expresses public vulnerability.

There is also a genuine love for professional wrestling beyond Mildred Burke, who paved the way for fellow notable women wrestlers such as Mae Young (Francesca Eastwood), who is unsurprisingly tough as nails and here leaning into her bisexuality. Industry veterans such as Jim Cornette pop up for a brief scene or two, with a cameo from Ash Avildsen himself as Vince McMahon Sr. Walton Goggins also has a small but critical role as tycoon Jack Pfefer, a force of support to Mildred Burke and women’s wrestling itself, while also credited as popularizing various storytelling techniques across wrestling, presenting it more as live theater. Also fascinating is that Mildred Burke contributed to the Gorgeous George gimmick, played here by Adam Demos.
As such, Queen of the Ring is loaded with authentic smashmouth wrestling (having modern-day wrestlers aboard such as Toni Storm, Trinity Fatu, Britt Baker, and more helps), gradually showcasing Mildred Burke’s escalating superstardom in tandem with a newfound respect and embracement of women’s wrestling. Sometimes, the passage of time can be a bit jarring (at least two times, I was shocked that Mildred’s son had aged dramatically, with everyone surrounding her primarily working the same.) Still, the film also thankfully isn’t getting overly ambitious trying to cover her entire life, which is where numerous biopics crash and burn. There is still a formulaic feel here with expected plotting, but the performances, period specificity, and love for the industry elevate the proceedings.

Queen of the Ring might be a lot of wrestling and movie for those not interested in this industry (running nearly 140 minutes), but it’s also inspiring and has a lot to marvel at. Above all else, it’s empowering and exciting to see how far women’s wrestling has come while getting a greater understanding of its pioneers.
Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★
Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association, Critics Choice Association, and Online Film Critics Society. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews and follow my BlueSky or Letterboxd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist
Movie Reviews
‘Project Hail Mary’ Review: Ryan Gosling and a Rock Make Sci-Fi Magic
In contrast to other sci-fi heroes, like Interstellar’s Cooper, who ventures into the unknown for the sake of humanity and discovery, knowing the sacrifice of giving up his family, Grace is externally a cynical coward. With no family to call his own, you’d think he’d have the will to go into space for the sake of the planet’s future. Nope, he’s got no courage because the man is a cowardly dog. However, Goddard’s script feels strikingly reflective of our moment. Grace has the tools to make a difference; the Earth flashbacks center on him working towards a solution to the antimatter issue, replete with occasionally confusing but never alienating dialogue. He initially lacks the conviction, embodying a cynicism and hopelessness that many people fall into today.
The film threads this idea effectively through flashbacks that reveal his reluctance, giving the story a tragic undercurrent. Yet, it also makes his relationship with Rocky, the first living thing he truly learns to care for, ever more beautiful.
When paired with Rocky, Gosling enters the rare “puppet scene partner” hall of fame alongside Michael Caine in The Muppet Christmas Carol, never letting the fact that he’s acting opposite a puppet disrupt the sincerity of his performance. His commitment to building a gradual, affectionate friendship with this animatronic creation feels completely natural, and the chemistry translates beautifully on screen. It stands as one of the stronger performances of his career.
Project Hail Mary is overly long, and while it can be deeply affecting, the film leans on a few emotional fake-outs that become repetitive in the latter half. By the third time it deploys the same sentimental beat, the effect begins to feel cloying, slightly dulling the powerful emotions it built earlier. The constant intercutting between past and present can also feel thematically uneven at times, occasionally undercutting the narrative momentum. At 2 hours and 36 minutes, the film feels like it’s stretching itself to meet a blockbuster runtime when a tighter cut might have served better.
FINAL STATEMENT
Project Hail Mary is a meticulously crafted, hopeful, and dazzling space epic that proves the most moving friendship in film this year might just be between Ryan Gosling and a rock.
Movie Reviews
Dan Webster reviews “WTO/99”
DAN WEBSTER:
It may now seem like ancient history, especially to younger listeners, but it was only 26 years ago when the streets of Seattle were filled with protesters, police and—ultimately—scenes of what ended up looking like pure chaos.
It is those scenes—put together to form a portrait of what would become known as the “Battle of Seattle” —that documentary filmmaker Ian Bell captures in his powerful documentary feature WTO/99.
We’ve seen any number of documentaries over the decades that report on every kind of social and cultural event from rock concerts to war. And the majority of them follow a typical format: archival footage blended with interviews, both with participants and with experts who provide an informational, often intellectual, perspective.
WTO/99 is something different. Like The Perfect Neighbor, a 2026 Oscar-nominated documentary feature, Bell’s film consists of what could be called found footage. What he has done is amass a series of news reports and personal video recordings into an hour-and-42-minute collection of individual scenes, mostly focused on a several-block area of downtown Seattle.
That is where a meeting of the WTO, the World Trade Organization, was set to be held between Nov. 30 and Dec. 3, 1999. Delegates from around the world planned to negotiate trade agreements (what else?) at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center.
Months before the meeting, however, a loose coalition of groups—including NGOs, labor unions, student organizations and various others—began their own series of meetings. Their objective was to form ways to protest not just the WTO but, to some of them, the whole idea of a world order they saw as a threat to the economic independence of individual countries.
Bell’s film doesn’t provide much context for all this. What we mostly see are individuals arguing their points of view as they prepare to stop the delegates from even entering the convention center. Meanwhile, Seattle authorities such as then-Mayor Paul Schell and then-Police Chief Norm Stamper—with brief appearances by Gov. Gary Locke and King County Executive Ron Sims—discuss counter measures, with Schell eventually imposing a curfew.
That decision comes, though, after what Bell’s film shows is a peaceful protest evolving into a street fight between people parading and chanting, others chained together and splinter groups intent on smashing the storefronts of businesses owned by what they see as corporate criminals. One intense scene involves a young woman begging those breaking windows to stop and asking them why they’re resorting to violence. In response a lone voice yells their reasoning: “Self-defense.”
Even more intense, though, are the actions of the Seattle police. We see officers using pepper spray, tear gas, flash grenades and other “non-lethal” means such as firing rubber pellets into the crowd. In one scene, a uniformed guy—not identified as a police officer but definitely part of the security crowd, which included National Guardsmen—is shown kicking a guy in the crotch.
The media, too, can’t avoid criticism. Though we see broadcast reporters trying to capture what was happening—with some affected like everybody else by the tear gas that filled the streets like a winter fog—the reports they air seem sketchy, as if they’re doctors trying to diagnose a serious illness by focusing on individual cells. And the images they capture tend to highlight the violence over the well-meaning actions of the vast majority of protesters.
Reactions to what Bell has put on the screen are bound to vary, based on each viewer’s personal politics. Bell revels his own stance by choosing selectively from among thousands of hours of video coverage to form the narrative he feels best captures what happened those two decades-and-change ago.
If nothing else, WTO/99 does reveal a more comprehensive picture of what happened than we got at the time. And, too, it should prepare us for the future. The way this country is going, we’re bound to see a lot more of the same.
Call it the “Battle for America.”
For Spokane Public Radio, I’m Dan Webster.
——
Movies 101 host Dan Webster is the senior film critic for Spokane Public Radio.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ – Catholic Review
NEW YORK (OSV News) – As its title suggests, “Scream 7” (Paramount) is the latest extension of a long-lived horror franchise, one that’s currently approaching its 30th anniversary on screen. Since each chapter of this slasher saga has been a bloodsoaked mess, the series’ longevity will strike moviegoers of sense as inexplicable.
Yet the slog continues. While the previous film in the sequence shifted the action from California to New York, this second installment, following a 2022 quasi-reboot, settles on a Midwestern locale and reintroduces us to the series’ original protagonist, Sidney Evans, nee Prescott (Neve Campbell).
Having aged out of the adolescent demographic on whom the various murderers who have donned the Ghostface mask that serves as these films’ dubious trademark over the years seem to prefer to prey, Sidney comes equipped with a teen daughter, Tatum (Isabel May). Will Tatum prove as resourceful in evading the unwanted attentions of Ghostface as Mom has?
On the way to answering that question, a clutch of colorless minor characters fall victim to the killer, who sometimes gets — according to his or her lights — creative. Thus one is quite literally made to spill her guts, while another ends up skewered on a barroom’s pointy beer tap.
Through it all, director Kevin Williamson and his co-writer Guy Busick try to peddle a theme of female empowerment in the face of mortal danger. They also take a stab, as it were, at constructing a plotline about intergenerational family tensions. When not jarring viewers with grisly images, however, they’re only likely to lull them into a stupor.
The film contains excessive gory violence, including disembowelment and impaling, underage drinking, mature topics, a couple of profanities, several milder oaths, pervasive rough and considerable crude language and occasional crass expressions. The OSV News classification is O — morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.
Read More Movie & TV Reviews
Copyright © 2026 OSV News
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Maryland1 week agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Miami, FL6 days agoCity of Miami celebrates reopening of Flagler Street as part of beautification project
-
Detroit, MI4 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year