Connect with us

Movie Reviews

My Dinner with Andre | Reelviews Movie Reviews

Published

on

My Dinner with Andre Poster

Some movies, no matter how highly regarded, can lose at
least some of their luster over the passage of time. When My Dinner with
Andre
was released in the fall of 1981, it was a critical sensation, garnering
raves from all corners including accolades from Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel
(both of whom named it among their Top 10 films of the 1980s). The years haven’t
necessarily been kind to it, however. When it first arrived in theaters, the French
New Wave was still firmly anchored in the minds of many art-house viewers. The
freshness of that aesthetic, which informs My Dinner with Andre, has
grown stale with the passage of decades and there are times when it’s hard to
view this film as more than a curiosity of another age.

Okay, I’ll admit it – there were times when, while I watching
My Dinner with Andre, I found myself becoming bored. Not “eyes glazed
over” bored, but restless. Although the movie works as a study in acting, shot
selection, and editing, it has lost its edge in terms of telling a story. So
much of the film’s relevance is tied to the era in which it was produced. Although
aspects of the culture clash – between activists who believe technology has
created a robot society and those who prefer to simply live their lives day-to-day
without drama – remain as relevant today as ever, the anecdotes used to express
this are dated. Andre Gregory’s adventures in Poland, the Sahara, and Findhorn
(Scotland) are as believable as Paul Bunyan’s Tall Tales and his philosophy is naïve
and simplistic.

Although the movie is narrated by Wallace Shawn (who would
be immortalized six years later as Vizzini in The Princess Bride), he has
considerably less dialogue than the title character. Yet, while Gregory does a
lion’s share of the talking, director Louis Malle maintains the fiction that this
is from Shawn’s perspective. He is the only one we see outside the restaurant
(during the prologue and epilogue). The background is simple: Shawn informs us
in a voiceover that he is going to have dinner with an old friend and
colleague, Gregory, who has become something of a recluse in recent years. 95%
of the film focuses on their dinner conversation with Gregory regaling Shawn
with tales of his years away from the theater, then the two engaging in a debate
over rationality vs. mysticism in criticizing modern society. The movie ends
with them parting as friends.

One of the most amazing things about My Dinner with Andre
is how it manages to capture the seemingly off-the-cuff approach one might
normally associate with improv – sort of the thing Mike Leigh was famous for. However,
every word was scripted and the two actors never deviated from what they wrote.
The improvisational “qualities” were a collaborative result of Gregory, Shawn,
and Malle working to achieve it. It’s also amazing that Gregory (making his
feature debut as an actor) was able to memorize so much dialogue. There are numerous
long takes in which his monologues go on for stretches without breaks. Although
it would be unfair to diminish Shawn’s contributions, the heavy lifting
undoubtedly falls to Gregory.

Although the actors use their real names and some of the biographical
details attributed to their characters come from real-life occurrences, both
men have repeatedly denied that they are playing themselves. Instead, they
created fictional avatars that were intentionally different from their true
personalities. In an interview, Shawn even joked that if the two were to embark
upon a remake (something highly unlikely although, at the time of this writing,
both are still alive), they could swap roles without the need to change even a
line of dialogue.

My Dinner with Andre has the look and feel of a stage
show, although it was never developed as such. From the beginning, it was
intended to be a movie. Gregory and Shawn, however, have deep roots in theater
and they bring this to the film. Additionally, before going in front of the
cameras, the pair hosted ten rehearsals on stage in front of live audiences
with Malle not always in attendance.

At the beginning of the movie, I focused on the words,
allowing myself to settle into the rhythms of the conversation between these
old friends getting re-acquainted. Over time, however, I found myself becoming less
interested in what the characters are saying and more intrigued by how Malle chooses
to present the conversation: shot selection, editing close-ups into the master
shots, etc. Expressions and reactions (especially Shawn’s, because much of his emoting
occurs without words) are of paramount importance. Although My Dinner with
Andre
may be of minimal interest to mainstream movie-going audiences in the
2020s, it should be required viewing for would-be actors and behind-the-camera
craftspeople. Although what Gregory and Shawn have to say may have lost a share
of its relevance, how it’s presented offers a clinic in the importance of the
non-verbal aspects of filmmaking.

Advertisement


My Dinner with Andre (United States, 1981)

Run Time: 1:50
U.S. Home Release Date: 2024-02-06
MPAA Rating: “PG”

Genre: Drama

Subtitles: none
Theatrical Aspect Ratio: 1.66:1




Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Published

on

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.


movie review

HOPPERS

Advertisement

Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.

Advertisement

“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine. 

Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”

Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”

What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence. 

Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.

What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”  

In Pixar’s “Hoppers,” a teen girl discovers a secret device that can turn her into a talking beaver. AP

Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity. 

The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared. 

So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.

Advertisement

From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out. 

Mabel (Piper Curda) meets King George (Bobby Moynihan). AP

Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power. 

Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”   

That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities. 

Mayor Jerry (Jon Hamm) plans to destroy a local pond to build an expressway. AP

No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression. 

Advertisement

Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it. 

But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.

AP

“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.

Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

Published

on

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

4/5 stars

Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.

The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.

Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.

Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.

Advertisement
“This is like Avatar,” Mabel coos, and, in truth, it is. Plugged into a headset, Mabel is reborn inside a robotic beaver. She plans to recruit a real beaver to help populate the glade, which is set to be destroyed by Jerry’s proposed road.
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘How to Make a Killing,’ ‘Pillion,’ and ‘Midwinter Break’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘How to Make a Killing,’ ‘Pillion,’ and ‘Midwinter Break’

‘How to Make a Killing’

Directed by John Patton Ford (R)

★★

Continue Reading

Trending