Connect with us

Movie Reviews

MOVIE REVIEWS: “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t,” “The Running Man,” “Trap House” and “Keeper” – Valdosta Daily Times

Published

on

MOVIE REVIEWS: “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t,” “The Running Man,” “Trap House” and “Keeper” – Valdosta Daily Times

“Now You See Me: Now You Don’t”

(Crime/Thriller: 1 hour, 53 minutes)

Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Dave Franco

Director: Ruben Fleischer

Rated: PG-13 (Strong language, violence and suggestive references. )

Movie Review:

Advertisement

This heist movie is the sequel to 2016’s “Now You See Me,” also directed Ruben Fleischer. It is entertaining just like his predecessor. However, more implausibility exists with “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” than its prequel.

This outing, The Horsemen illusionists and three new young magicians, Bosco (Dominic Sessa), Charlie (Justice Smith) and June (Ariana Greenblatt), set out to take down the Vanderbilt corporation led by Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike). Their task will not be easy, but the magician’s use of sleight of hand and tricks help with their mission.

Much like the “Fast and the Furious” movies, the antics here are not always tangible, though they are enjoyable. The entertaining action scenes, mixed with the comical banter, even when juvenile, make the film worth it.

Think of this movie as a reunion for the magicians and the initiation of three freshmen. The new magicians take the lead in this film and in some ways overshadow their older counterparts. Think of this as a passing of the torch to a new generation.

The problem is that the old cast members are still dynamic and not just generational cookie-cutter characters. Jesse Eisenberg and Woody Harrelson’s comedic repartee is still a highlight of this movie. While the younger cast is talented, the older cast members are the reason moviegoers return, and that is the razzle dazzle that makes “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” inviting.

Advertisement

Grade: B- (It is not as magical as it once was, but it still charms.)

“The Running Man”

(Action/Science-Fiction: 2 hours, 13 minutes)

Starring: Glen Powell, Colman Domingo and Josh Brolin

Director: Edgar Wright

Rated: R (strong violence, some gore, and strong language)

Advertisement

Movie Review:

“The Running Man” is a remake of the 1987 film with Arnold Schwarzenegger and directed by Paul Michael Glaser. Both screenplays feature a future dystopian America based on the novel by Stephen King. The 1987 movie was much more plausible than the current one, yet this version is still very entertaining thanks to the performance of Glen Powell, the newest action hero.

Glen Powell plays Ben Richards, a husband and father to a very sick young daughter. Richards decides the easiest way for his daughter and wife to remain healthy and have a secure future is to become a competitor on The Running Man reality show. Sponsored by the state-controlled Network, the show features a person trying to survive while violently hunted by several so-called patriots. Richards realizes he may have just made one of the biggest mistakes of his life, but after signing a contract, he cannot back out so he becomes a running man.

Again, the 1983 movie maintained a realistic appeal this new version misses. The original also had better lines such as a Schwarzenegger and Richard Dawson sequence. Schwarzenegger’s Ben Richards says, “Killian, I’ll be back,” and Damon Killian, played by former Family Feud host Richard Dawson, responds, “Only in a rerun.”

This new adaptation involves contestants like Richards out in the public where bystanders are killed — sounds like lawsuits waiting to happen all over the place. But the Network is more a part of the US government in this movie, so the Network has a modus operandi where people at home watching seem to enjoy the violence.

Advertisement

Not all citizens appreciate the running man show in this movie, and that at least is something tangible to hold on to. If America ever gets to this point in real life, we have hit a major low point of no point of return.

That aside, the other thing that makes this movie interesting is Glen Powell . He is believable as a leading man, and he works here. And, Powell is definitely athletic because he does plenty of running here.

Grade: B- (If you are in shape, run with him.)

“Trap House”

(Crime: 1 hour, 42 minutes)

Starring: Dave Bautista, Jack Champion and Bobby Cannavale

Advertisement

Director: Michael Dowse

Rated: R (Strong violence and bloody imagery)

Movie Review:

“Trap House” is an interesting movie mainly because it tries something different. That difference is not realistic in several scenes, but one must compliment the writers for trying. Part of the reason this movie seems unlikely is the missed opportunities for dramatic moments, which could help viewers get to know the characters better.

Dave Bautista plays Ray Seale a single father and DEA agent supervisor. He and his team have been tracking cartel crimes in El Paso, Texas. After his son Cody (Champion) sees some of the cartel information at his father’s office, the young man gathers three of his friends to rob cartel trap houses to raise money for the son of a murdered DEA agent who was killed in the line of duty. Soon, Ray must contemplate whether he should put duty above family when he finds out about his son‘s extracurricular activities.

Advertisement

“Trap House” finds a way to make it itself interesting, yet it remains a trap too. Characters keep doing the same thing even when it seems unusual for their very nature. Just when it looks like some of the characters are about to do the correct action, they do not, and this script misses key moments for the dramatic development of characters. This crime photoplay does rebound with a very engaging apex.

Grade: B- (It’s a trap, but it is an entertaining one).

“Keeper”

(Horror: 1 hour, 39 minutes)

Starring: Tatiana Maslany, Rossif Sutherland and Birkett Turton

Director: Osgood Perkins

Advertisement

Rated: R (Violent content/gore, strong language, and sexual references)

Movie Review:

“Keeper” is a horror movie by director Osgood Perkins (“Longlegs,” 2024), the son of famed actor Anthony Perkins. For a moment, it manages to create a neat psychological thriller. It has only a few frights, but they are effective. Then, writer Nick Lepard’s script becomes something similar to a women’s empowerment movie and loses the edge it had.

Liz, a painter, travels to a countryside estate with her boyfriend Malcom, a doctor, for a romantic getaway. He tells her he thinks she is the one. Malcom‘s brother Darren (Turton) agrees and tells him that Liz is a keeper. Supernatural occurrences happen to Liz, especially after her husband goes to see one of his clients and leaves her in the big house for a lengthy period of time.

“Keeper” is a movie you have to watch very closely, or it will seem like a character or two may go missing from scene to scene. Even more, audiences must understand what is happening, which is common in psychological thrillers. Still nothing seems to happen for long periods of runtime. Then, characters explain what is happening, and it becomes a less potent fairytale with visual monsters.

Advertisement

Grade: C+ (do not keep it.)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Project Hail Mary’ Review: Ryan Gosling and a Rock Make Sci-Fi Magic

Published

on

‘Project Hail Mary’ Review: Ryan Gosling and a Rock Make Sci-Fi Magic

In contrast to other sci-fi heroes, like Interstellar’s Cooper, who ventures into the unknown for the sake of humanity and discovery, knowing the sacrifice of giving up his family, Grace is externally a cynical coward. With no family to call his own, you’d think he’d have the will to go into space for the sake of the planet’s future. Nope, he’s got no courage because the man is a cowardly dog. However, Goddard’s script feels strikingly reflective of our moment. Grace has the tools to make a difference; the Earth flashbacks center on him working towards a solution to the antimatter issue, replete with occasionally confusing but never alienating dialogue. He initially lacks the conviction, embodying a cynicism and hopelessness that many people fall into today. 

The film threads this idea effectively through flashbacks that reveal his reluctance, giving the story a tragic undercurrent. Yet, it also makes his relationship with Rocky, the first living thing he truly learns to care for, ever more beautiful. 

When paired with Rocky, Gosling enters the rare “puppet scene partner” hall of fame alongside Michael Caine in The Muppet Christmas Carol, never letting the fact that he’s acting opposite a puppet disrupt the sincerity of his performance. His commitment to building a gradual, affectionate friendship with this animatronic creation feels completely natural, and the chemistry translates beautifully on screen. It stands as one of the stronger performances of his career.

Project Hail Mary is overly long, and while it can be deeply affecting, the film leans on a few emotional fake-outs that become repetitive in the latter half. By the third time it deploys the same sentimental beat, the effect begins to feel cloying, slightly dulling the powerful emotions it built earlier. The constant intercutting between past and present can also feel thematically uneven at times, occasionally undercutting the narrative momentum. At 2 hours and 36 minutes, the film feels like it’s stretching itself to meet a blockbuster runtime when a tighter cut might have served better.

FINAL STATEMENT

Project Hail Mary is a meticulously crafted, hopeful, and dazzling space epic that proves the most moving friendship in film this year might just be between Ryan Gosling and a rock.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dan Webster reviews “WTO/99”

Published

on

Dan Webster reviews “WTO/99”

DAN WEBSTER:

It may now seem like ancient history, especially to younger listeners, but it was only 26 years ago when the streets of Seattle were filled with protesters, police and—ultimately—scenes of what ended up looking like pure chaos.

It is those scenes—put together to form a portrait of what would become known as the “Battle of Seattle” —that documentary filmmaker Ian Bell captures in his powerful documentary feature WTO/99.

We’ve seen any number of documentaries over the decades that report on every kind of social and cultural event from rock concerts to war. And the majority of them follow a typical format: archival footage blended with interviews, both with participants and with experts who provide an informational, often intellectual, perspective.

WTO/99 is something different. Like The Perfect Neighbor, a 2026 Oscar-nominated documentary feature, Bell’s film consists of what could be called found footage. What he has done is amass a series of news reports and personal video recordings into an hour-and-42-minute collection of individual scenes, mostly focused on a several-block area of downtown Seattle.

Advertisement

That is where a meeting of the WTO, the World Trade Organization, was set to be held between Nov. 30 and Dec. 3, 1999. Delegates from around the world planned to negotiate trade agreements (what else?) at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center.

Months before the meeting, however, a loose coalition of groups—including NGOs, labor unions, student organizations and various others—began their own series of meetings. Their objective was to form ways to protest not just the WTO but, to some of them, the whole idea of a world order they saw as a threat to the economic independence of individual countries.

Bell’s film doesn’t provide much context for all this. What we mostly see are individuals arguing their points of view as they prepare to stop the delegates from even entering the convention center. Meanwhile, Seattle authorities such as then-Mayor Paul Schell and then-Police Chief Norm Stamper—with brief appearances by Gov. Gary Locke and King County Executive Ron Sims—discuss counter measures, with Schell eventually imposing a curfew.

That decision comes, though, after what Bell’s film shows is a peaceful protest evolving into a street fight between people parading and chanting, others chained together and splinter groups intent on smashing the storefronts of businesses owned by what they see as corporate criminals. One intense scene involves a young woman begging those breaking windows to stop and asking them why they’re resorting to violence. In response a lone voice yells their reasoning: “Self-defense.”

Even more intense, though, are the actions of the Seattle police. We see officers using pepper spray, tear gas, flash grenades and other “non-lethal” means such as firing rubber pellets into the crowd. In one scene, a uniformed guy—not identified as a police officer but definitely part of the security crowd, which included National Guardsmen—is shown kicking a guy in the crotch.

Advertisement

The media, too, can’t avoid criticism. Though we see broadcast reporters trying to capture what was happening—with some affected like everybody else by the tear gas that filled the streets like a winter fog—the reports they air seem sketchy, as if they’re doctors trying to diagnose a serious illness by focusing on individual cells. And the images they capture tend to highlight the violence over the well-meaning actions of the vast majority of protesters.

Reactions to what Bell has put on the screen are bound to vary, based on each viewer’s personal politics. Bell revels his own stance by choosing selectively from among thousands of hours of video coverage to form the narrative he feels best captures what happened those two decades-and-change ago.

If nothing else, WTO/99 does reveal a more comprehensive picture of what happened than we got at the time. And, too, it should prepare us for the future. The way this country is going, we’re bound to see a lot more of the same.

Call it the “Battle for America.”

For Spokane Public Radio, I’m Dan Webster.

Advertisement

——

Movies 101 host Dan Webster is the senior film critic for Spokane Public Radio.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – As its title suggests, “Scream 7” (Paramount) is the latest extension of a long-lived horror franchise, one that’s currently approaching its 30th anniversary on screen. Since each chapter of this slasher saga has been a bloodsoaked mess, the series’ longevity will strike moviegoers of sense as inexplicable.

Yet the slog continues. While the previous film in the sequence shifted the action from California to New York, this second installment, following a 2022 quasi-reboot, settles on a Midwestern locale and reintroduces us to the series’ original protagonist, Sidney Evans, nee Prescott (Neve Campbell).

Having aged out of the adolescent demographic on whom the various murderers who have donned the Ghostface mask that serves as these films’ dubious trademark over the years seem to prefer to prey, Sidney comes equipped with a teen daughter, Tatum (Isabel May). Will Tatum prove as resourceful in evading the unwanted attentions of Ghostface as Mom has?

On the way to answering that question, a clutch of colorless minor characters fall victim to the killer, who sometimes gets — according to his or her lights — creative. Thus one is quite literally made to spill her guts, while another ends up skewered on a barroom’s pointy beer tap.

Through it all, director Kevin Williamson and his co-writer Guy Busick try to peddle a theme of female empowerment in the face of mortal danger. They also take a stab, as it were, at constructing a plotline about intergenerational family tensions. When not jarring viewers with grisly images, however, they’re only likely to lull them into a stupor.

Advertisement

The film contains excessive gory violence, including disembowelment and impaling, underage drinking, mature topics, a couple of profanities, several milder oaths, pervasive rough and considerable crude language and occasional crass expressions. The OSV News classification is O — morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending