Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: THE WEDDING BANQUET

Published

on

Movie Review: THE WEDDING BANQUET

Fire Island director, Andrew Ahn, turns his sights on the classic Ang Lee-directed queer Asian dramedy The Wedding Banquet with his latest film. Updated for the 21st century, the remake focuses on an ensemble of queer characters, led by comedian Bowen Yang and Star Wars actor Kelly Marie Tran. This time around, however, the antics and hijinks are put on the back burner for an intense and confusing ride.

About The Wedding Banquet

The Wedding Banquet poster featuring Han Gi-chan, Bowen Yang, Kelly Marie Tran, and Lily Gladstone.
The Wedding Banquet – Photo credit: Bleecker Street

In The Wedding Banquet (2025), we follow two couples. There’s Angela (Kelly Marie Tran), a scientist with mother issues, and her partner, Lee (Lily Gladstone), who is desperately trying for a baby. But IVF is expensive, and Lee’s body can only take so many attempts at it. They need to act fast, but how?

We also have Chris (Bowen Yang), a birder and guide, and his partner, Korean art student Min (Han Gi-Chan). They live in Lee’s guesthouse. Their relationship hurdle is that Chris is … insecure? Honestly, I couldn’t tell you. Min is 1,000 percent committed to their relationship. He even plans to give up his family and his family fortune just to be with Chris. But Chris keeps turning him down, supposedly because he doesn’t want Min to lose his money, but it’s all a bit vague.

RELATED: Drop Spoiler Review

Seeing the predicament the four of them are in, Min hatches a plan—he and Angela will get married so that Min can get a green card and avoid working in his family business back in Korea, and Angela can get the money to pay for the IVF. It’s preposterous, but it could work. Everything is going swimmingly, until Min’s grandmother Ja-Young (Youn Yuh-jung) arrives from Korea expecting a big wedding bash.

So, Uh, Where Exactly Is the Comedy?

I feel lied to; I saw the trailer for this film and laughed uproariously throughout. I knew I had to watch The Wedding Banquet because I needed a laugh riot. But what did I get? Decidedly not a laugh riot. Even if you haven’t seen the original 1993 classic, the one thing you’d know about it is that it is funny, hilarious, even. That’s what I expected going in. And did I mention the trailer? How did the film marketed in that trailer turn into the drag I watched?

Advertisement

RELATED: Movie Review: Sinners

The biggest issue with the film is it can’t find the balance between the comedy (which is non-existent) and the drama—and this is because the pacing is completely off. It’s not even a rollercoaster; it’s a busted rollercoaster, screeching slowly up and down the tracks.

Andrew Ahn co-wrote this remake with one of the original’s writers and frequent Ang Lee collaborator, James Schamus. I’m certain that that’s where the great disconnect happens. This remake feels beholden to the original—it wants to meet and subvert the story beats of the OG, while also plotting a narrative of its own. The issue is, it does justice to neither path.

The Stakes Aren’t High Enough

Worse, the script tramples its ability to be funny. Everything is so dramatic and intense. Most of the film takes place without any music to underscore its potential for comedy. There are some funny moments, but, for the most part, The Wedding Banquet fights itself to be a remake and an original.

RELATED: Movie Review: The Amateur

Advertisement

The new film is set during a time when marriage is an option for all couples and sexuality is not taboo in the US (for now anyway), but the same can’t be said about several other countries, including South Korea. With that in mind, The Wedding Banquet would have worked if it were a clash between East and West. Yet that clash is significantly minimized since the spotlight is on the interpersonal issues of the characters. Min’s grandmother doesn’t arrive till late in the second act, and then, too, she’s not as big a threat as she was made out to be. The stakes are never high enough.

This Cast Deserved Better

I am struggling to rate the performances in The Wedding Banquet, because, again, I went in thinking this was going to be hilarious. This is why I don’t watch trailers, people. They lie.

Most of the cast does an incredible job, especially with the dramatic side of the story. Kelly Marie Tran handles what the script gives her really well—what would it have been like had she needed to lean into the comedic side? Who knows, but I would have loved to see it.

RELATED: Movie Review: The Ballad of Wallis Island

I was so excited to see Lily Gladstone in this film. They have a substantial role at the start, and of course, kill it as a mature, put-together woman looking to start a family, but then they get sidelined for the majority of the film. Gladstone also gets some of the funnier dialogue and reactions, and they’re just so good at everything.

Advertisement

Joan Chen as Angela’s mother, May Chen, is criminally underutilized. She’s got such a captivating presence and star power that the limited screen time and character development she was given made no sense.

Youn Yuh-jung is wonderful in her role. She’s an effortless scene-stealer. There’s one scene—honestly, a genius one that was the rare bright spark in this confusion of a film—where we follow Ja-Young as the chaotic foursome argue and run around and leave, and it’s fascinating watching her process this chaos. We needed more of her.

RELATED: Movie Review: Black Bag

Left on the Cutting Room Floor 

Someone explain what happened with Bowen Yang’s character, because he is underwritten to the point where he doesn’t make sense. Chris is there because he needs to be there as an obstacle. It feels like a lot of Chris’ scenes were left on the cutting room floor. His backstory is alluded to, and yet, nothing is revealed. This isn’t Yang’s best performance. He underplays Chris’s confusion and hurt—he’s like a cardboard cutout at times.

Han Gi-Chan is the only person in this film who acts like he’s in the movie The Wedding Banquet trailer claimed to be. He’s so funny, and over-the-top, and expressive. He’s the star of this show, and a delight every time he comes on screen. The loudest laughs were because of him. I hope he gets to be in more Hollywood fare now.

Advertisement

A Disappointing, Chaotic Mess

At the start of the screening I attended, they played a video of director Andrew Ahn talking about how he watched the Ang Lee film when he was eight and how it shaped his filmmaking. He was hesitant to remake the classic, but thought to approach it with a question about gay marriage—in a time when gay marriage is possible, should it be? Once you watch the remake, you realize that Ahn’s script is an attempt to answer that question. Except, I don’t understand who else is asking that question, and why they would. One doesn’t have to get married if they’re gay—all anyone wants is the same options and choices as everyone else. The premise of the film is moot, and that’s where it loses its way.

RELATED: Mickey 17 Spoiler Review

We love ourselves some disappointing, chaotic and messy characters, but The Wedding Banquet doesn’t know how to develop the characters as people. You don’t dislike the characters; you simply don’t understand them. The stakes feel sanded down; the comedy is virtually absent. The romance, when present, is cute, but the film is far more interested in answering a question no one is asking. Also, where’s the banquet?

The Wedding Banquet opened in theaters on April 18, 2025.

Movie Review: A NICE INDIAN BOY

Advertisement
Monita Roy MohanMonita Roy Mohan
Latest posts by Monita Roy Mohan (see all)

Movie Reviews

Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man review – Tommy Shelby returns for muddy, bloody big-screen showdown

Published

on

Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man review – Tommy Shelby returns for muddy, bloody big-screen showdown

After six TV series from 2013 to 2022, which caused a worrying surge in flat cap-wearing among well-to-do men in country pubs, Peaky Blinders is now getting a hefty standalone feature film, a muscular picture swamped in mud and blood. This is the movie version of Steven Knight’s global small-screen hit, based on the real-life gangs that swaggered through Birmingham from Victorian times until well into the 20th century. Cillian Murphy returns with his uniquely unsettling, almost sightless stare as Tommy Shelby, family chieftain of a Romani-traveller gang, a man who has converted his trauma in the trenches of the first world war into a ruthless determination to survive and rule.

As we join the story some years after the curtain last came down, it is 1940, Britain’s darkest hour and Tommy is the crime-lion in winter. He now lives in a huge, remote mansion, far from the Birmingham crime scene he did so much to create, alone except for his henchman Johnny Dogs, played by Packy Lee. Evidently wearied and sickened by it all, Tommy is haunted by his ghosts and demons: memories of his late brother, Arthur, and dead daughter, Ruby, and working on what will be his definitive autobiography. (Sadly, we don’t get any scenes of Tommy having lunch with a drawling London publisher or agent.)

But a charismatic and beautiful woman, played by Rebecca Ferguson, brings Tommy news of what we already know: his malign idiot son Erasmus Shelby, played by Barry Keoghan, is now running the Peaky Blinders, a new gen-Z-style group of flatcappers raiding government armouries for guns that should really belong to the military. And if that wasn’t disloyal and unpatriotic enough, Erasmus has accepted a secret offer from a sinister Nazi fifth-columnist called Beckett, played by Tim Roth, to help distribute counterfeit currency which will destroy the economy and make Blighty easier to invade. Doesn’t Erasmus know what Adolf Hitler is going to do to his own Romani people? (To be fair to Erasmus, a lot of the poshest and most well-connected people in the land didn’t either.)

Clearly, Tommy is going to have to come down there and sort this mess out. And we get a very ripe scene in which soft-spoken Tommy turns up in the pub full of raucous idiots who cheek him. “Who the faaaaaack is ‘Tommy Shelby’?” sneers one lairy squaddie, who gets horribly schooled on that very subject.

Advertisement

In this movie, Tommy Shelby is against the Nazis, and he can’t get to be more of a good guy than that. (Tommy has evidently put behind him memories of Winston Churchill from the first two series, when Churchill was dead set on clamping down on the Peaky Blinders.) The war and the Nazis are a big theme for a big-screen treatment and screenwriter Knight and director Tom Harper put it across with some gusto as a kind of homefront war film, helped by their effortlessly watchable lead. Maybe you have to be fully invested in the TV show to really like it, although this canonisation of Tommy is a sentimental treatment of what we actually know of crime gangs in the second world war. Nevertheless, it is a resoundingly confident drama.

Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man is in out on 6 March in the UK and US, and on Netflix from 20 March.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Here comes “THE BRIDE!”, audacious and wild – Rue Morgue

Published

on

Movie Review: Here comes “THE BRIDE!”, audacious and wild – Rue Morgue

That’s both a promise and a challenge she delivers, since what follows may rub some viewers the wrong way. Yet Gyllenhaal’s full-throttle commitment to her vision is compelling in and of itself, and she has marshalled an absolutely smashing-looking and -sounding production. The story proper begins in 1936 Chicago, which, like everything and everyplace else in the movie, has been luminously shot by cinematographer Lawrence Sher and sumptuously conjured by production designer Karen Murphy. Her involvement is appropriate given that her previous credits include Bradley Cooper’s A STAR IS BORN and Baz Luhrmann’s ELVIS, since among other things, THE BRIDE! is a nostalgic musical. Its Frankenstein (Christian Bale), who has taken the name of his maker, is obsessed with big-screen tuners, and imagines himself in elaborate song-and-dance numbers. (Considering the reception to JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX, one must applaud the daring of Warner Bros. for greenlighting another expensive film in which a tormented protagonist has that kind of fantasy life.)

THE BRIDE! may be revisionist on many levels, but its characterization of its “monster” holds true to past screen incarnations from Karloff’s to Elordi’s: His scarred appearance masks a lonely soul who desires companionship. Frankenstein has arrived in Chicago to seek out Dr. Cornelia Euphronious (Annette Bening), correctly believing she has the scientific know-how to create an appropriate mate for him. Rather than piece one together, Dr. Euphronious resurrects the corpse of Ida (Jessie Buckley), whose consorting with underworld types led to her brutal death. Previously chafing against the man’s world she inhabited in life, she becomes even more defiant and unruly as a revenant, apparently possessed by the spirit of Shelley herself, declaiming in free-associative sentences and quoting rebellious literature.

Buckley, currently an Oscar favorite for her very different literary-inspired role in HAMNET, tears into the role of the Bride (who now goes by the name Penny) with invigorating abandon that bursts off the screen. Unsure of her identity yet overflowing with self-confident bravado, she’s the opposite of the sensitive “Frank,” but they’re united by the world that stands against them. That becomes literal when a violent incident sends them on the lam, road-tripping to New York City and beyond, on a trail inspired by the films of Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal), Frank’s favorite song-and-dance-man star.

With THE BRIDE!, Gyllenhaal has made a film that’s at once her very own and a feverish homage to all sorts of cinema past and present. It’s a horror story, a lovers-on-the-run movie, a crime thriller, a musical and more, and historical fealty be damned if it makes for a good scene (as when Penny and Frank sneak into a 3D movie over a decade before such features became popular). In-references are everywhere: It might just be a coincidence that the couple’s travels take them past Fredonia, NY (cf. “Freedonia” in the Marx Brothers’ DUCK SOUP), but it’s certainly no accident that the former Ida is targeted by a crime boss named Lupino, referencing the actress and pioneering filmmaker whose works included noirs and women’s-issues stories. Penny’s exploits lead legions of admiring women to adopt her look and anarchic attitude, echoing the first JOKER (while a headline calls them “Twisted Sisters”), and the use of one Irving Berlin song in a Frankensteinian context immediately recalls a classic comedic take on the property.

Whether the audience should be put in mind of a spoof at a key point in a film with different goals is another matter. At times like these, Gyllenhaal’s pastiche ambitions overtake emotional investment in the story. As strong as the two lead performances are (Bale is quite moving, conveying a great deal of soul from behind his extensive prosthetics), it’s easier to feel for them in individual scenes than during the entire course of the just-over-two-hour running time. The diversions can be entertaining, to be sure, but they also result in an uncertainty of tone. The dissonance continues straight through to the end, where the filmmaker’s choice of closing-credits song once again suggests we’re not supposed to take all this too seriously.

Advertisement

There’s nonetheless much to admire and enjoy about THE BRIDE!, and this kind of risk-taking by a major studio is always to be encouraged (especially considering that we’ll see how long that lasts at Warner Bros. once Paramount takes it over). Beyond the terrific work by the aforementioned actors, there’s fine support from Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz as detectives on Penny and Frank’s heels, with Sandy Powell’s lavish costumes and Hildur Guðnadóttir’s rich, varied score vital to fashioning this fully imagined world. Kudos also to makeup and prosthetics designer Nadia Stacey and to Chris Gallaher and Scott Stoddard, who did those honors on Frank, for their visceral, evocative work. Uneven as it may be, THE BRIDE! is also as alive! as any film you’ll likely see this year.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’ movie review

Published

on

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’ movie review

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’

Advertisement

The action is relentless in the complex thriller In Cold Light, a tense combination of crime and fugitive tale and family drama. It is the third feature and first English language film by Maxime Giroux, best known for a very different kind of film, the critically acclaimed 2014 drama Felix & Meira.

The tension and high energy of In Cold Light almost overwhelm the film, but are relieved, barely, by moments of character development and introspection that keep the audience pulling for the restrained and outwardly cold main character. 

Speaking at the film’s Canadian premiere, director Giroux admitted he found creating an action film a challenge. Part of his approach was using very minimal dialogue, especially for the central character, letting the action speak for itself, and allowing silence to intensify suspense. Giroux has said he likes the lack of dialogue and speaks highly of the importance of silence in cinema; he prefers using “physical aspects of communication” in his films. 

Young Ava Bly (Maika Monroe) is a competent and businesslike drug dealer, working in partnership with her brother Tom (Jesse Irving) and a small team. As the film begins, Ava has just been released from a brief prison sentence. She is hoping to return to her former position, but her brother’s associates consider her a risk due to her recent incarceration. While she works to re-establish herself, a shocking encounter with a corrupt police officer sends Ava’s life into chaos and forces her to go on the run.

Ava’s fugitive experience introduces a new character, to whom Ava turns for help: her father, Will Bly, played by Troy Kotsur, known for his excellent performance in CODA. Their first interaction is handled in a fascinating way, as Will is deaf and the two communicate through sign language. This, of course, provides another form of the silent interaction the director prefers; he explained that much of the father-daughter interaction was rewritten with the actor in mind. Their conflict is nicely expressed through a scene in which their initial conversation is intermittently cut off by a faulty light which goes out periodically, making communication through sign momentarily impossible, nicely expressing the rift between father and daughter. 

Advertisement

As Ava continues to evade danger, her escape becomes complicated by new information, placing her in a painful dilemma. We gradually learn more about Ava, her background, and her character through occasional flashbacks and glimpses of her dreams. The plot becomes more complex and more poignant, and gains features of a mystery as well as an action tale, as she is pressed to choose from among equally unacceptable alternatives.

The climax of her efforts to protect both herself and those close to her comes to a head as she meets with the director of a rival drug gang. Veteran actress Helen Hunt is perfect in the minor but significant role of Claire, the rival drug lord, who plays odd mind games with Ava in an intriguing psychological fencing match. It’s an unusual scene, in which Ava’s personality is made clearer, and Claire’s understated dominance and casual speech do not quite conceal the threat she represents. 

The frantic pace and emotional turmoil are enhanced by the camera work, which tends to focus tightly on Ava, and by a harsh, minimal musical score that sets the tone without distracting from the action. Giroux chose to shoot the film in Super 60; he describes digital as “too perfect” for the look he was going for, and since “Ava is rough,” the film portrays her better. The director describes the entire movie as “rough,” in fact, and deliberately chose a dark, washed-out look for much of the footage, occasionally using light and colour, in the form of fireworks, lightning, or a colourful carnival, to both relieve and emphasise the darkness. 

The dynamic, intense story holds the attention in spite of the lengthy, sometimes repetitive chase scenes and subdued dialogue. Ava’s predicament, and the difficult decisions she is forced to make, are made surprisingly relatable, from the initial disaster that starts the action to the surprising flash-forward that concludes the film, on as high a note as the situation could allow. Fans of action movies will definitely enjoy this one.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending