Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Longlegs (2024) Horror Movie Review | The Film Magazine

Published

on

Longlegs (2024) Horror Movie Review | The Film Magazine

Longlegs (2024)
Director: Osgood Perkins
Screenwriter: Osgood Perkins
Starring: Maika Monroe, Nicolas Cage, Blair Underwood, Alicia Witt, Michelle Choi-Lee, Dakota Daulby

One would be remiss to ignore the pervasive presence of evil in humanity. The digital age bombards us with stark reminders of malevolence through social media feeds and news coverage, while many also confront the harsh realities of cruelty and violence in their own lives. Within this context, the serial killer genre in film and media emerges as a curious phenomenon. These stories take the grim realities of human cruelty and transform them into fictional narratives, aiming to capture and explore the nature of evil. Oftentimes these portrayals are hauntingly effective, drawing us into the darkest corners of the human psyche; other times, they provoke questions about our fascination with such macabre subjects and whether these stories offer anything more than mere spectacle. 

This conundrum lies at the center of Osgood Perkins’s latest horror film Longlegs (2024), where depictions of the human capacity for evil are plentiful. The film follows Lee Harker, a painfully anti-social FBI agent whose strange sense of psychic intuition lands her a role in solving the unresolved case of a local serial killer known as Longlegs. Although the presence of Longlegs at any of these brutal killings cannot be proven, mysterious letters reminiscent of the ones in David Fincher’s Zodiac are left as a sort of signature at each scene. Longlegs is known to conduct each murder in a systematic way, where the father of a family is seemingly coerced or convinced into killing his own. Through the investigation of each murder case, Harker uncovers a rather personal connection to Longlegs himself and is forced to race against time in order to stop him from taking more victims. 

There is an overarching tension that suffocates the film, partly due to its stellarly ambiguous marketing campaign. For the months leading up to Longlegs’ release, potential fans were teased with neck down depictions of Nicolas Cage in his role as the deranged killer. There were even teasers for the film that featured the recorded heartbeat of actress Maika Monroe as she first laid eyes on Cage’s unrecognizable bodily transformation, which only added to the speculation that this film would be regarded as one of the most frightening of the year. Perkins is indeed successful in transferring this sort of tension from the marketing to the screen, as we don’t truly get a look at the unnerving presentation of Cage’s character until further into the film than may be expected. This careful withholding of Longlegs’ true visage creates a poetic form of dread towards the fear of the unknown. It is this fear, the darkened void where the mind fills in the blanks with its own terrors, that often holds a more profound menace than what is eventually revealed. The anticipation builds like a slow-burning fuse, and though the film’s later scenes deliver genuine shocks, they are tempered by the eerie suspense that preceded them. The true horror lies not in the face we eventually see, but in the shadows of our imagination where the most sinister fears are born. 

That is not to say that both Maika Monroe and Nicolas Cage’s respective performances are unsuccessful in living up to the expectations set in anticipation of the film’s release, as both actors deliver truly career-defining work. In fact, in an alternate universe where The Academy Awards have not completely outlawed (in theory not in actuality) the inclusion of the horror genre, Monroe would certainly be in the running for her first Best Actress nomination. Her performance is as awkward as it is intriguing, where she is able to keep the audience’s attention even when placed in a scene with one of the most visually disturbing depictions of a villain in recent cinematic history. Nicolas Cage’s performance as Longlegs takes on an almost otherworldly intensity, creating a portrayal so deeply unsettling that it leaves a lasting impression long after the film concludes. His physical transformation into his ghostly character is so profound that he becomes nearly unrecognizable, and at times even becomes quite comedic in the pathetic characterization of him. This willingness of Cage to lean into the rather “silly” aspects of his character may remove some audience members from the drowning sense of fear the film intends to create, but it certainly does not take away from the terrifying depth and intensity he brings to the role. 

Advertisement

A sense of cold emptiness is quickly established in the visual language of the film, hearkening back to Perkins’ 2015 winter-toned film The Blackcoat’s Daughter. Wide shots of rather bland rural settings become menacing in their details, as devilish shadow figures appear at the very edge of frames in such a quiet manner that many audience members may miss them. The film opens with perhaps its most stunning composition, a 4:3 shot of Lee’s childhood home that feels like something pulled straight out of her family’s home video collection. Cinematographer Andres Arochi skilfully shifts between aspect ratios to denote flashbacks, enhancing the storytelling and drawing us deeper into the haunting memories and psychological depths of the characters. Arochi’s work is a huge asset to the film’s intention of unnerving as many people as possible and ultimately creates an aesthetic that fits perfectly into the large cinematic world of Osgood Perkins. 

Obvious comparisons to classic serial killer horror films like Jonathon Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs and David Fincher’s Se7en are valid up until the film’s final act. It is, unfortunately, in this act where the film loses its chance to reach the iconic status of its inspirations. Although the ending seeks to reveal profound themes, it ultimately leaves us with unanswered questions and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. 

Despite its occasional missteps and series of unresolved narrative threads, Longlegs emerges as Osgood Perkins’ most audacious vision; a haunting exploration of fear and darkness. The film, in its best moments, crafts an experience that lingers in the shadows of the mind. Perkins’ work suggests that the true face of darkness is not a distant nightmare but an omnipresent force, a reminder that the horrors we seek in fiction are often reflections of the fears we harbor in reality. In its evocative imagery and unsettling narrative, Longlegs both frightens and enlightens.

Score: 19/24


























Rating: 3 out of 5.

Recommended for you: 10 Times Nicolas Cage Went “Full Cage”

Advertisement

Written by Jake Fittipaldi


You can support Jake Fittipaldi in the following places:

Instagram: @jakefittipaldi
Letterboxd: /jakefittipaldi


Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA

Published

on

Movie Review – SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA
SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA is shared with the audience by investigator Steve Sue in a calm and charming manner, but this documentary tells a powerful, positive and fascinating story. The “hang loose” thumb, pinky sign that originated in Hawaii and carries many meanings is the focus of this film. I just learned this gesture is called a “Shaka” and has a worldwide impact.  And, there are Shaka Contests.  Who knew? And how do you throw a Shaka? For me, […]
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “I Was a Stranger” and You Welcomed Me

Published

on

Movie Review: “I Was a Stranger” and You Welcomed Me

Just when you think that you’ve seen and heard all sides of the human migration debate, and long after you fear that the cruel, the ignorant and the scapegoaters have won that shouting match, a film comes along and defies ignorance and prejudice by both embracing and upending the conventional “immigrant” narrative.

“I Was a Strranger” is the first great film of 2026. It’s cleverly written, carefully crafted and beautifully-acted with characters who humanize many facets of the “migration” and “illegal immigration” debate. The debut feature of writer-director Brandt Andersen, “Stranger” is emotional and logical, blunt and heroic. It challenges viewers to rethink their preconceptions and prejudices and the very definition of “heroic.”

The fact that this film — which takes its title from the Book of Matthew, chapter 25, verse 35 — is from the same faith-based film distributor that made millions by feeding the discredited human trafficking wish fulfillment fantasy “Sound of Freedom” to an eager conservative Christian audience makes this film something of a minor miracle in its own right.

But as Angel Studios has also urged churchgoers not just to animated Nativity stories (“The King of Kings”) and “David” musicals, but Christian resistence to fascism (“Truth & Treason” and “Bonheoffer”) , their atonement is almost complete.

Andersen deftly weaves five compact but saga-sized stories about immigrants escaping from civil-war-torn Syria into a sort of interwoven, overlapping “Babel” or “Crash” about migration.

Advertisement

“The Doctor” is about a Chicago hospital employee (Yasmine Al Massri of “Palestine 36” and TV’s “Quantico”) whose flashback takes us to the hospital in Aleppo, Syria, bombed and terrorized by the Assad regime’s forces, and what she and her tween daughter (Massa Daoud) went through to escape — from literally crawling out of a bombed building to dodging death at the border to the harrowing small boat voyage from Turkey to Greece.

“The Soldier” follows loyal Assad trooper Mustafa (Yahya Mahayni was John the Baptist in Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints”) through his murderous work in Aleppo, and the crisis of conscience that finally hits him as he sees the cruel and repressive regime he works for at its most desperate.

“The Smuggler” is Marwan, a refugee-camp savvy African — played by the terrific French actor Omar Sy of “The Intouchables” and “The Book of Clarence” — who cynically makes his money buying disposable inflatable boats, disposable outboards and not-enough-life-jackets in Turkey to smuggle refugees to Greece.

“The Poet” (Ziad Bakri of “Screwdriver”) just wants to get his Syrian family of five out of Turkey and into Europe on Marwan’s boat.

And “The Captain” (Constantine Markoulakis of “The Telemachy”) commands a Hellenic Coast Guard vessel, a man haunted by the harrowing rescues he must carry out daily and visions of the bodies of those he doesn’t.

Advertisement

Andersen, a Tampa native who made his mark producing Tom Cruise spectacles (“American Made”), Mel Gibson B-movies (“Panama”) and the occasional “Everest” blockbuster, expands his short film “Refugee” to feature length for “I Was a Stranger.” He doesn’t so much alter the formula or reinvent this genre of film as find points of view that we seldom see that force us to reconsider what we believe through their eyes.

Sy’s Smuggler has a sickly little boy that he longs to take to Chicago. He runs his ill-gotten-gains operation, profiting off human misery, to realize that dream. We see glimpses of what might be compassion, but also bullying “customers” and his new North African assistant (Ayman Samman). Keeping up the hard front he shows one and all, we see him callously buy life jackets in the bazaar — never enough for every customer to have one in any given voyage.

The Captain sits for dinner with family and friends and has to listen to Greek prejudices and complaints about this human life and human rights crisis, which is how the worlds sees Greece reacting to this “invasion.” But as he and his first mate recount lives saved and the horrors of lives lost, that quibbling is silenced.

Here and there we see and hear (in Arabic and Greek with subtitles, and English) little moments of “rising above” human pettiness and cruelty and the simple blessings of kindness.

Advertisement

“I Was a Stranger” was finished in 2024 and arrives in cinemas at one of the bleakest moments in recent history. Cruelty is running amok, unchecked and unpunished. Countries are being destabilized, with the fans of alleged “strong man” rule cheering it on.

Andersen carefully avoids politics — Middle Eastern, Israeli, European and American — save for the opening scene’s zoom in on that Chicago hospital, passing a gaudily named “Trump” hotel in the process, and a general condemnation of Syria’s Assad mob family regime.

But Andersen’s bold movie, with its message so against the grain of current events, compromised media coverage and the mostly conservative audience that has become this film distributor’s base, plays like a wet slap back to reality.

And as any revival preacher will tell you, putting a positive message out there in front of millions is the only way to convert hundreds among the millions who have lost their way.

star

Rating: PG-13, violence, smoking, racial slurs

Cast: Yasmine Al Massri, Yahya Mahayni, Ziad Bakri, Omar Sy, Ayman Samman, Massa Daoud, Jason Beghe and Constantine Markoulakis

Advertisement

Credits: Scripted and directed by Brandt Andersen. An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:43

Unknown's avatar

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Tank’ Review: A War Film More Abstract Than Brutal (Prime Video) – Micropsia

Published

on

‘The Tank’ Review: A War Film More Abstract Than Brutal (Prime Video) – Micropsia

The Tiger Is the Tank. Or rather, the type of German tank that gives the film its international title—just in case anyone might confuse this war story with an adventure movie involving wild animals. The tank itself is the film’s container, much as The Boat was in the legendary 1981 film it openly seeks to emulate in more than one respect, or as the more recent tank was in the Israeli film Lebanon (2009). Yes, much of Dennis Gansel’s movie unfolds inside a tank called Tiger, but what it is ultimately trying to tell goes well beyond its cramped metal walls.

This large-scale Prime Video war production has been described by many as the platform’s answer to Netflix’s success with All Quiet on the Western Front, the highly decorated German film released in 2022. In practice, it is a very different proposition. Despite the fanfare surrounding its release—Amazon even gave it a theatrical run a few months ago, something it rarely does—the film made a far more modest impact. Watching it, the reasons become clear. This is a darker, stranger movie, one that flirts as much with horror as with monotony, and that positions itself less as a traditional war film than as an ethical and philosophical meditation on warfare.

The first section—an intense and technically impressive combat sequence—takes place during what would later be known as the Battle of the Dnieper, which unfolded over several months in 1943 on the Eastern Front, as Soviet forces pushed back the Nazi advance. Der Tiger is the type of tank carrying a compact platoon—played by David Schütter, Laurence Rupp, Leonard Kunz, Sebastian Urzendowsky, and Yoran Leicher—that miraculously survives the aerial destruction of a bridge over the river.

Soon afterward—or so it seems—the group is assigned a mission that, at least in its initial setup, recalls Saving Private Ryan. Lieutenant Gerkens (Schütter) is ordered to rescue Colonel Von Harnenburg, stranded behind enemy lines. From there, the film becomes a journey through an infernal landscape of ruined cities, corpses, forests, and fog—a setting that, thanks to the way it is shot, feels more fantastical than realistic.

That choice is no accident. As the journey begins to echo Apocalypse Now, it becomes clear that the film is less interested in conventional suspense—mines on the road, the threat of ambush—than in the strangeness of its situations and environments. When the tank plunges into the water and briefly operates like a submarine, one may reasonably wonder whether such technology actually existed in the 1940s, or whether the film has deliberately drifted into a more extravagant, symbolic territory.

This is the kind of film whose ending is likely to inspire more frustration than affection. Though heavily foreshadowed, it is the sort of conclusion that tends to irritate audiences: cryptic, somewhat open-ended, and more suggestive than explicit. That makes sense, given that the film is less concerned with depicting the daily mechanics of war than with grappling with its aftermath—ethical, moral, psychological, and physical.

Advertisement

In its own way, The Tank functions as a kind of mea culpa. The platoon becomes a microcosm of a nation that “followed orders” and committed—or allowed to be committed—horrific acts in its name. The flashbacks scattered throughout the film make this point unmistakably clear. The problem is that, while these ideas may sound compelling when summarized in a few sentences (or in a review), the film never manages to turn them into something fully alive—narratively, visually, or dramatically.

Only in brief moments—largely thanks to Gerkens’s perpetually worried, anguished expression—do those ideas achieve genuine cinematic weight. They are not enough, however, to sustain a two-hour runtime that increasingly feels repetitive and inert. Unlike the films by Steven Spielberg, Wolfgang Petersen, Francis Ford Coppola, and others it so clearly references, The Tank remains closer to a concept than to a drama, more an intriguing reflection than a truly effective film.


Continue Reading

Trending