Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Indian 2 Movie Review: Go back, Indian

Published

on

Indian 2 Movie Review: Go back, Indian

Perhaps the idea was for Indian 2 to skip all personal angles and jump straight into becoming a ‘social’ film. Where then is the deep socio psychological commentary on our society and its people? From out of nowhere, Senapathy comes up with the brainwave of inspiring people to rat on their near and dear ones—and it’s an idea that could well have been the theme of this whole film. Senapathy thinks country first, but what’s a country if not its very-many units of people? For him, mind and heart are the same, but what of the likes of Chitra Aravindhan (an invested Siddharth)? How do you get them to look past their families? The portion that touches upon this late into the second half is the film’s best—and notably, Senapathy isn’t part of it for the most part. This got me wondering if Senapathy was even needed for this film. Were the gimmicky kills needed? Would it not have been sufficient to have the influence of Indian affect this film and its characters? But perhaps that’s a different film entirely. Shankar’s Indian deserved a sequel that was ready to sink into nuances, but Indian 2 doesn’t even address the fundamental question of whether a black-or-white extremist can understand/inspire the greyness of his country’s people.

Even the manner of Senapathy’s executions in this film is laughably childish. In the first film, you got the haunting image of a killed man, whose mouth fills up with rice spilling from a sack (a nod to a previous Manorama line). Here, one victim trots like a horse on the road. Another becomes feminine and director Shankar has him acting all coy and shy and covering his chest (like women are expected to do, apparently)—and all of this is supposed to make us laugh. Yet another leaks bodily fluids through his mouth, which Senapathy guides with his finger in zero gravity to form warning text. It’s like Senapathy, during his Taipei vacation, saw Anniyan, and decided that he could get gimmickier with his kills—and worse, that he could enjoy them too.

Bobby Simha, playing Pramod (son of Inspector Krishnaswamy from the first film), is restricted to looking rather irritated from start to finish. He’s a crafty cop who can’t hold his gun tight. If this were a film interested in anyone’s emotions, it would focus on telling us why for Pramod, catching Senapathy is a ‘life ambition’. Instead, we get a 100-something man racing along on a unicycle for what seems like eternity, before getting off and showing off his musculature to a group of topless, gym-going men. It seems Senapathy, during his vacation in Taipei, caught a screening of Shankar’s I as well.

The director’s films aren’t exactly remembered for well-informed politics, considering they aim to offer populist catharsis. But you still don’t expect a dig at government freebies. I suppose nuances of social equality are a tall ask for a film whose protagonist’s important dialogue comes with fundamental lip-sync issues. You know a film is not working when even the late Vivekh struggles to get going with his one-liners. The man, known for dropping nuggets of knowledge in his humour, uses light-year as a unit of time (when it’s a unit of distance)—but as I said, nothing really works in Indian 2.

You know how sometimes a sequel is called a ‘spiritual sequel’? Indian 2 can be called a deeply dispiriting sequel, I think; it’s a film that shows almost no understanding of the soul and strength of the first film and its protagonist. For these reasons, it’s really hard not to join the chorus of citizens in this film as they fling objects at the protagonist and yell, “Go back Indian!”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

It Ends with Us (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

It Ends with Us (2024) – Movie Review

It Ends with Us, 2024.

Directed by Justin Baldoni.
Starring Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni, Brandon Sklenar, Jenny Slate, Hasan Minhaj, Amy Morton, Isabela Ferrer, Alex Neustaedter, Kevin McKidd, Robin S. Walker, Emily Baldoni, Robyn Lively, Megan Elyse Robinson, Caroline Siegrist, Adam Mondschein, and Robert Clohessy.

SYNOPSIS:

Adapted from the Colleen Hoover novel, Lily overcomes a traumatic childhood to embark on a new life. A chance meeting with a neurosurgeon sparks a connection but Lily begins to see sides of him that remind her of her parents’ relationship.

Advertisement

Writer/director/co-lead Justin Baldoni’s directorial debut, It Ends with Us (based on the book by Colleen Hoover and adapted for the screen by Daddio writer/director Christy Hall), is a story about domestic abuse with an important message at the core, that becomes far too preoccupied with ridiculous soap opera love triangle nonsense. Also coming into question is how much of this relies on conveying that message through misleading visuals. Early on, our protagonist jokes that she is an unreliable narrator, which later on feels more like the film itself admitting it’s toying with perception disingenuously, albeit in a predictable way since there isn’t much doubt in where the story is headed.

Lily Blossom Bloom (Blake Lively with a wild hairstyle suggesting the film takes place in the 1980s rather than the present day) lives in Boston and has just opened up a, wait for it… flower shop. This comes following the sudden death of her father (played by Kevin McKidd in flashbacks), who routinely physically abused her mother (Amy Morton), making for an awkward funeral, to say the least. Lily walked out at the podium, unable to come up with anything positive to say about the man, still unsure of how her mom ever could have stayed with him. In that frustration, she also enters a nearby apartment to unwind, hanging out on the roof, where she has a meet-cute with the most handsome, buff neurosurgeon you have ever seen. His name is Ryle Kincaid (Justin Baldoni), and he is kicking a chair, upset that he was unable to save a life.

Perhaps he seems like a sweet guy. Well, within a few minutes, he is opening up “naked truths,” talking about being unfit for serious relationships and how he would casually like to have sex with Lily right there on this roof. To me (and maybe you), that’s pretty weird; it’s also far from the only case of Ryle getting a bit sexually sleazy, something that the film kind of lets him off the hook for. Lily also opens up about her first love and the first person she ever had sex with, a sensitive and kind homeless boy she gravitated to, with that relationship serving as the focal point of the flashbacks (a relationship we get a glimpse of in flashbacks, with the two played by Isabela Ferrer and Alex Neustaedter.) Since this is a movie, he immediately determines something is different about Lily and that he would like to give real love a shot.

Nevertheless, everything about this blossoming love between Lily and Ryle appears to be going well on the surface, even if it’s apparent to viewers his mask will come off (there wouldn’t be a movie, otherwise.) Again, that conflict (which takes roughly an hour to arrive finally) comes in the form of domestic abuse and, more specifically, how people perceive, rationalize, and chalk an incident up as an accident. That’s also something vital that should be explored, but the filmmakers seem more concerned with manifesting that drama in the most melodramatic, over-the-top manner possible while also inserting another guy into the equation (Brandon Sklenar), one who is fiercely protective over Lily.

Of course, there is also a lot of fortuity here, such as Ryle reconnecting with Lily after the initial meet-cute, all because his sister Allyssa (Jenny Slate) randomly stumbled into the flower shop looking for a job. She also has no idea that her brother is capable of some deplorable behavior, making for the scarily intriguing concept that not even some siblings know each other entirely. The problem is that the execution treats this entire story like a Lifetime film, charging headfirst into drama that never quite feels real. If anything, it’s often unintentionally hilarious, such as a restaurant fight between the two grown men battling over Lily. The specific reason that the fight occurs comes across as laughably dumb, something that could have been solved by two people talking to each other like adults. The thing is, people rarely feel real here.

Advertisement

There is also the feeling that anytime the film dares to become serious and dive into uncomfortable thematic material, it also pulls back as if it wants to be a sappy romantic love triangle above all else. And while I’m aware domestic abusers are capable of hiding that aspect of themselves well, here, there are constant jumps in times that leave one questioning the credulity of how long this man inexperienced with dating (presumably for good reason) would last without slipping up on his toxic side. The endless barrage of pop songs only serves to sanitize the material here. Even accounting for the flashbacks, there isn’t a single moment of actual conflict here until the one-hour mark, presumably because the romance is what sells to this demographic.

One possible read is that the filmmakers are aware of this, creating the usual cringe Hollywood love story playing into Lily’s oblivious nature that all is well in this relationship and that this is love. I would love to sit here and say that everything here is a stroke of subversive brilliance. However, even if that were the case, the execution isn’t there, often eliciting groans and laughs since the situations feel far-fetched. Coincidently, It Ends with Us does conclude with an emotional, believable exchange that needs to be heard by domestic abusers around the world. It’s a shame the rest of the film is outlandish and doesn’t cut nearly as deep.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Borderlands Movie Reviews Get Worrying Update

Published

on

Borderlands Movie Reviews Get Worrying Update

A new update regarding the Borderlands movie and its incoming reviews has some worried about the long-awaited film. 

Originally announced as an adaptation of Gearbox Software’s uber-popular looter shooter video game back in 2015, the road toward the Borderlands film has been a long and arduous one. 

Originally directed by Hostels Eli Roth, the movie underwent several spurts of extensive reshoots, with Deadpool director Tim Miller stepping in to finish up the movie in Roth’s stead. 

However, it should finally hit theater screens on Friday, August 9, taking fans on this R-rated romp through the wasteland. 

[ Borderlands: Who Is Cate Blanchett’s Lilith? Movie vs. Game Character Differences Explained ]

Advertisement

Borderlands Movie Reviews Are Not Looking Good

Lionsgate

According to some recently surfaced information, things may not be looking good when it comes to Borderlands movie reviews.

As posted by review aggregator Metacritic on X (formerly Twitter) fans should not expect to see reviews for the upcoming video game adaptation until after its release date. 

More specifically, reviews are reportedly set to go live after Thursday previews for the film have been screened at 3 p.m. ET on Thursday, August 8. 

While not a surefire sign of the movie’s quality, such a late review embargo usually signifies a lack of confidence in a product by the studio. 

Typically movie reviews usually drop anywhere from as far out as two weeks to a handful of days before release. Usually, if a studio knows it has a hit on its hands, it will want the press to talk about the movie as much as possible in the lead-up to its release date. 

Advertisement

At least for the Borderlands movie, that does not look to be the case. 

Previous to this, movies like Madame Web and Five Nights at Freddy’s shared a similarly delayed review-to-release timeline.

While Five Nights at Freddy’s (FNAF) found an audience thanks to the viral nature of its source material, both of those films flopped critically, with Madame Web earning 57% and FNAF 32% on Rotten Tomatoes. 

This does not bode well for the highly anticipated video game adaptation, especially after fans waited for nearly a decade since its announcement for the movie to see the light of day. 

As of writing, the film is tracking to make somewhere between $10-$15 million domestically during its opening weekend, which would be disastrous seeing as the film is reportedly carrying a sizeable $120 million budget (per Puck). 

Advertisement

Is Borderlands In Trouble?

Again, it is worth noting that the quality of the Borderlands movie is still yet to be determined. 

It could turn out to be a massive hit despite its delayed review release date; however, all signs are pointing to the contrary. 

As mentioned above, the movie has had plenty of ups and downs since its initial announcement. 

The biggest of these troubles came in January 2023, when extensive reshoots were ordered for the project, nearly two years after it had finished principal photography. 

And seeing as the film’s original director, Eli Roth, was busy at the time working on the holiday-themed horror film, Thanksgiving, Deadpool filmmaker Tim Miller was brought in to finish the project. 

Advertisement

Usually, this passing of the director’s chair at any point in production is not a good sign, but the fact that it happened as late as it did, could spell signs of the studio hoping to Frankenstein together a hit after it has been shot. 

This director switcheroo was not the only major creative shake-up the film had on its way to release. 

One of the movie’s original writers has since disowned the project after being brought on to help pen this film’s first draft. 

The Last of Us showrunner Craig Mazin was first attached to the Borderlands movie in 2020 when it was announced Roth would take on directing duties. 

However, as time has gone on, and the movie has seemingly gone through massive changes, Mazin has removed his credit from the title, telling Variety in July 2023 that he “cannot claim any kind of authorship of Borderlands:”

Advertisement

“I am not a credited writer on the film, so I cannot claim any kind of authorship of ‘Borderlands,’ much less ‘co-writing.’ I did see the report about the pseudonym, which is false. I did not use a pseudonym. If the name in question is indeed a pseudonym, all I can say is… it’s not mine.”

All this could make for a dangerous concoction of creative misfortune, potentially making Borderlands a disappointing effort for longtime fans. 


Borderlands comes to theaters on Friday, August 9. 

Read more about gaming on The Direct:

Sonic 3’s First Trailer Gets New Release Window (Report)

Here’s When the Nintendo Switch 2’s Release Is Expected to Happen

Advertisement

Sword of Convallaria Tier List: Best to Worst Characters Ranking

GTA 6 Trailer 2 Release: When Will New Footage Come Out?

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Borderlands’ Review: Game Movie is Just Alright

Published

on

‘Borderlands’ Review: Game Movie is Just Alright

Jakarta. “Borderlands”, the upcoming movie adaptation of the first-person shooter game of the same name, comes with a star-studded cast, but the final outcome is just alright. 

Directed by Eli Roth, “Borderlands” has a quite sluggish, boring start — as seen in a recent press screening. 

The story kicks off with outlaw Lilith (Cate Blanchett) embarking on a mission to find the missing daughter of the business titan (and the eventual big bad) Atlas (Edgar Ramirez). The girl supposedly holds the power to open a cave-like vault that holds lost treasure. 

The fun only starts when the six-person alliance takes shape, which includes ex-elite mercenary Roland (Kevin Hart), clumsy robot Claptrap (voiced by Jack Black), demolitionist, and the missing daughter Tiny Tina (Ariana Greenblatt) as well as her musclebound Krieg (Florian Munteanu). Scientist Tannis (Jamie Lee Curtis) also joins these unlikely heroes later in the movie as they fight evil bandits and alien monsters to protect the girl. 

“Borderlands” does not get too technical with the terms, meaning that those who have not played the game can still follow the storyline. Although the movie has great visual effects, the action sequences are just okay, but not enough to get your adrenaline pumped. And if you are an avid gamer, some scenes might feel familiar regardless of the titles you play. There will be times when you might think “if this were an actual game, this would definitely be the first boss fight. Or that part would be a cutscene.” 

Advertisement

“Borderlands” mainly relies on Claptrap for the humor department. The robot’s antics, coupled with Jack Black’s impressive voice acting, make Claptrap a good comic relief character. Blanchett suits the confident bounty hunter Lilith. Greenblatt does not get overshadowed despite acting with the veterans. Lilith and Tiny Tina’s mother-and-daughter-like chemistry is top-notch and surprisingly heartwarming — something that the audience might not expect out of such a movie.

But something feels like it is missing in “Borderlands”. The acting by the big names — and some heartwarming scenes — are not enough to make “Borderlands” memorable. The one-hour-and-a-half-long movie turns out to be your average sci-fi action comedy. And does “Borderlands” pique my curiosity into wanting to try out the game? Not really. 

“Borderlands” is scheduled for Indonesian release this Friday.

Tags:

Keywords:

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending