Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘In the Summers’ Review: A Quiet Debut Poetically Explores Forgiveness Between Parent and Child

Published

on

‘In the Summers’ Review: A Quiet Debut Poetically Explores Forgiveness Between Parent and Child

In the relationship between parents and children, memories can be ravaged battlefields. The validity of certain experiences is tested and accusations of wrongdoing are negotiated. It’s within this charged arena that Alessandra Lacorazza sets her quiet debut film, In the Summers. The feature is a visual poem, an enveloping four-stanza ode to experiences shared by a man and his daughters.

It starts in the summer when Violeta (Dreya Renae Castillo) and Eva (Luciana Quinonez) visit their father, Vincente (René Pérez Joglar) in Las Cruces, New Mexico. Their first encounter, in the parking lot of the tiny town airport, is thick with the stilted awkwardness of distance. Lacorazza, who also wrote the screenplay, avoids specifying why Vincente hasn’t seen his kids, but some information can be gleaned from their bilingual conversations. We know it’s been a minute — so long that Vincente can’t remember what year of school his kids have just finished, among other milestones.

In the Summers

The Bottom Line

An enveloping ode to fractious parent-child relationships.

Advertisement

Venue: Sundance Film Festival (U.S. Dramatic Competition)
Cast: René Pérez Joglar, Sasha Calle, Lío Mehiel, Leslie Grace, Emma Ramos, Sharlene Cruz
Director-screenwriter: Alessandra Lacorazza

1 hour 38 minutes

But the children are forgiving, as children tend to be when they are young. As Vincente drives Violeta and Eva around New Mexico, he regales them with stories of his own youth. He’s inherited a house from his mother, a gorgeous Spanish Adobe-style home with a pool in the backyard. Inside are the ephemera of generations: worn photos preserved in inherited frames, furniture so old it has its own secrets, and various containers, each with a story. Lacorazza and DP Alejandro Mejía tour the home. The details are important because later they will serve as evidence. 

Of what, exactly, Lacorazza takes her time to reveal. In the Summer moves at the speed of a July afternoon or an August morning — an unhurried and languorous pace. Like last year’s Sundance stunner All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt, In the Summer sways to its own rhythm. The story unfolds slowly and depends on the impressive cast assembled. It’s the subtleties of their performances — nervous exchanges, slight moments when a body recoils — that clue us in to the latent danger of this vacation. 

Advertisement

Vincente is a smart man who struggles to be a good father. He is an addict. His temper gets the best of him, and his thirst for thrill lands him in dangerous situations. Vincente wants to be better and, because of Joglar’s protective performance, you want that for him too. He buys the girls gifts, takes them stargazing and teaches them to play pool at his best friend Carmen’s bar. Played by Emma Ramos, Carmen becomes an immediate role model for Violeta, who can’t stop staring at her tapered cut. The next summer, when Violeta returns to New Mexico, she wears her own hair short. 

Lacorazza introduces each section of the film with a long take of ritual altars, filled with objects we’ll come to recognize. When Vincente challenges his daughters to a no-utensils pasta eating contest, we remember the mass of red sauce and noodles from the first chapter opener. 

The differences between Violeta and Eva become more apparent each summer, and there’s a charm to seeing the shot of the siblings waiting at the airport replicated every couple of years. Unlike Eva, Violeta doesn’t crave Vincente’s attention. She doesn’t even expect it. In this second summer, she’s preoccupied by Camila (Gabriella Elizabeth Surodjawan), the girl her father tutors for extra money. Violeta wonders if the curly haired New Mexico native has a boyfriend or if she has a real chance. Meanwhile, Eva pines for Vincente’s attention, which seems to be reserved for Violeta. At one point, he snarlingly demands why Eva can’t be smart like her sister.

Allison Salinas, who plays teenage Eva, captivates. After a traumatic incident during the second summer, her character comes to New Mexico alone for summer number three. These are a painful couple of months for Eva, who experiences the full heartbreak of unmet expectations from parents. Salinas communicates that pain with her eyes, which slightly tear up whenever Vincente directs his cruelty toward her.

By now we understand that Vincente is an alcoholic, frustrated by his inability to find work and anxious about proving himself. Eva also understands this, and spends most of her third summer wandering Las Crucas alone or helping her father’s new wife (Leslie Grace) care for their newborn. Against these disappointments, the house, so full of promise that first summer, falls into disrepair. With each reunion between father and children, Lacorazza gently guides our attention to the pool, clogged with leaves and dirt, the cluttered porch or the beer bottles accumulating on each surface. 

Advertisement

In the Summers closes with a fourth chapter that, despite its stirring moments and brisker pacing, feels less assured than the previous three. Violeta (Mutt star Lio Mehiel) and Eva (Sasha Calle) are adults when they return to New Mexico. Violeta has transitioned, and will be starting graduate school in the fall. Eva’s fate is more obscure, but from the sunglasses she refuses to take off, you can sense the pain of that lonely summer hasn’t left her. Vincente is also different; his changes are marked by no alcohol in the house, a revived pool and an endearing shyness around his kids. 

As Vincente tries to atone through insistent invitations, Violeta and Eva maintain firm boundaries with their father. They rent a place instead of staying at his house and a strained politeness blights their interactions with him. The presence of Vincente’s other child, Natalia (Indigo Montez), reveals the chasm between who Vincente was and who he is now. Some plotlines in this section — like the one between adult Violeta and Camila (now played by Sharlene Cruz) — are dogged by a lack of resolution.

But when Lacorazza focuses on the relationship between Violeta, Eva and Vincente, In the Summers feels steadier. In this space, Lacorazza considers the realities of forgiveness and wonders if healing is more about moving forward than it is about letting go. 

Full credits

Advertisement

Venue: Sundance Film Festival (U.S. Narrative Competition)
Production companies: Lexicon, Bluestone Entertainment, Exile Content Studio, Assembly Line Entertainment, 1868 Studios, Arci Films, Cinema Maquina, Luz Films
Cast: René Pérez Joglar, Sasha Calle, Lío Mehiel, Leslie Grace, Emma Ramos, Sharlene Cruz
Director-screenwriter: Alessandra Lacorazza
Producers: Alexander Dinelaris, Rob Quadrino, Fernando Rodriguez-Vila, Jan Suter, Daniel Tantalean, Janek Ambros, Lynette Coll, Sergio Alberto Lira, Cristóbal Güell, Cynthia Fernandez De La Cruz, Slava Vladimirov, Stephanie Yankwitt
Executive producers: Isaac Lee, Henry R. Muñoz III, Jules Buenabenta, Richard Saperstein, Brooke Saperstein, Erick Douat, Arturo Sampson, Alexandra Mishaan, Bradley Feig, Justin Brown
Director of photography: Alejandro Mejía, A.M.C.
Production designer: Estefania Larrain De La Cerda
Costume designer: Fernando A. Rodriguez
Editor: Adam Dicterow
Music: Eduardo Cabra
Casting director: Stephanie Yankwitt, C.S.A.
Sales: CAA, XYZ
In English, Spanish

1 hour 38 minutes

Movie Reviews

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Published

on

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Share this with a friend!

During the opening ceremony of the Fantasia International Film Festival, Her Private Hell director Nicolas Winding Refn was awarded a Cheval Noir Career Achievement Award for his contributions to cinema. He made an impassioned plea on the importance of a festival like Fantasia and genre cinema as a whole:

“In the mid-90s, when I began, we really couldn’t make genre movies; we had to make important movies. But we were like, f— that! How do you piss off your parents? Make a horror movie! How to tell the politicians to f— off? Make something violent! A little fun, some sexy stuff? It’s the best thing in the world! Genre is cinema!”

“Genre is cinema” may be the truest statement the Danish provocateur has ever made, which is why it felt so painful to follow such an electric and impassioned speech with one of the least impressive movies Refn has crafted. A movie that attempts to provoke and elicit strong reactions out of us but isn’t nearly as aesthetically and thematically interesting as it should be.

With characters soaked in bisexual lighting and neon colors, one would think that Refn would want to continue in the trajectory that has defined his eclectic body of work. But dying for twenty-five minutes before being brought back to life gives him a new outlook on the world, as he’s not only stated at Fantasia but during its Cannes world premiere as well.

Advertisement

In a way, the harrowing event he experienced mirrored a lot the character he portrayed in Hideo Kojima‘s Death Stranding, which he acknowledged during the Q&A session following the screening. Unfortunately, this shift in his thematic and aesthetic conventions yielded a movie that has nothing tangible to say about any of the images it presents or the movies it references.

Plot and critical reception of Her Private Hell

One even wonders why Her Private Hell received such vitriolic reactions at Cannes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not a very good movie, but it’s also not the kind of movie that will piss people off. People may be inclined to walk out of it, not because of its strong and explicit violence, both physical and sexual (none of them go as far as some of Refn‘s previous movies), but because of how boring it is. It attempts to morph the giallo into a cyberpunk/futuristic visual language while sprinkling in a dash of Hong Kong-inspired action, but none of these elements coalesce into anything meaningful or significant.

An astute moviegoer might notice his inspirations (Roger Vadim, Mario Bava, Seijun Suzuki, and even Kojima), but there isn’t a single one that feels decidedly singular or meaningful enough to yield a reaction from us. Oh, sure, there are plenty of scenes where the audience may be inclined to react, but once they see how little payoff it has, they might not react to them at all.

It’s even difficult to describe what Her Private Hell is about because Refn now prefers to throw the “three-act” structure out of the window and create movies that don’t necessarily adhere to preconceived audience expectations.

In fact, when pressed on this during a Q&A moderated by film critic Katie Rife the following day, Refn scoffed at the idea of a movie having an “ending,” simply stating, “What is an ending?” While some might have laughed at such a response worthy of David Lynch‘s greatest moments, it does reveal how one has to watch Her Private Hell; which is about letting yourself be absorbed by the hallucinatory images of Refn‘s storytelling and try to see the parallels he makes between the stories of Elle (Sophie Thatcher) and Private K (Charles Melton).

Advertisement

A perplexing and uninteresting film from Nicolas Winding Refn

Even then, the viewing experience of Her Private Hell remains perplexing. And from a purely thematic viewpoint, it isn’t a movie worth parsing or spending your time attempting to find meaning in what’s on screen.

It’s also very loud. Perhaps too loud. Definitely the loudest movie I’ve watched in a cinema since Christopher Nolan‘s Tenet. Unlike that movie, however, the sound isn’t a character but a deterrent. Refn is convinced he must make the audience suffer agonizingly to get a reaction out of us, but, again, there’s not much here that warrants any form of reaction. Sure, some of it is violent, and a lot of it is painfully unpleasant.

In fact, Her Private Hell might be extremely misogynistic and depicts many difficult scenes with such a regressive attitude. Again, he’ll present something provocative but never do anything with it. What changed for Refn after he died? He’s still doing the same old stuff, but with nary a thing to excavate beyond the graphic violence and depictions of alpha masculinity. That treads on similar ground to Refn‘s most well-known movies, the Pusher trilogy, Drive, and Only God Forgives. It’s violence for the sake of violence, à la Michael Winner, but without any point behind said violence.

Even the cast can’t save Her Private Hell

None of the performances from a star-studded ensemble is any good, either. Sophie Thatcher, Kristine Froseth, and Havana Rose Liu are all accomplished actors in their own right and have always been pretty great in everything they do. The latter, in particular, has such a magnetic screen presence and old-school appeal that it feels perfectly suited to Refn‘s vision for elevating her innate talents.

Advertisement

Charles Melton was recently nominated for an Emmy for his career-best work in the second season of Beef. Their talents are all wasted. If you like to see them howl like wolves, I’ve got the movie for you. Even when viewed through a giallo lens, their respective portrayals never seem fully in tune with the unwieldy, dense image-making at play.

Only Pino Donaggio‘s ethereal music gives Her Private Hell its only signs of life. At 84 years old, the Italian composer, mostly known for his collaborations with Brian De Palma (which, according to Fantasia’s Mitch Davis, is ongoing, as he’s working on his latest movie), delivers one of the most stirring and affecting scores of his entire career, one that words can barely describe. As someone who repeatedly listens to Donaggio’s Carrie and Blow Out soundtracks, Her Private Hell is destined to be relistened to on repeat in my household. However, I will never watch the movie again.

Also check out: Fantasia Fest 2026: Our Five Most Anticipated Films

 

Share this with a friend!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

Published

on

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

If you love movies, chances are you’ve read a review or two before deciding what to watch. Most people keep things pretty simple—they talk about the acting, the storyline, or whether the film is worth your time. But then there’s Letterboxd, a popular social platform where movie lovers log, rate, and review the films they watch. While plenty of reviews are thoughtful and insightful, others take a… much more chaotic approach.

That’s exactly what the Letterboxd Reviews With Threatening Auras account celebrates. It rounds up the platform’s funniest, most unhinged, and wonderfully cursed reviews—the kind that make you stop mid-scroll and wonder what was going through the reviewer’s mind. These definitely aren’t your standard “Loved it, 4 stars” takes. They radiate such a bizarrely threatening energy that it’s almost impossible not to keep scrolling to see what wild review comes next.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

We’ve all been there—sitting through a film, hoping it gets better, only for the credits to roll and leave you wondering what on earth you just watched. But if there’s one silver lining, it’s the internet’s reaction afterward. Sometimes the reviews are so funny, dramatic, or brutally honest that they’re more entertaining than the movie itself.

Advertisement

Whether it’s an accidental masterpiece of comedy or a hilariously savage one-liner, people have a remarkable talent for putting their thoughts into words. The truth is, movie reviews come in all shapes and sizes. They vary depending on who’s writing them, where they’re published, and what they’re hope to achieve. Some are designed to help you decide what to watch on a Friday night, while others dig deep into themes, symbolism, and filmmaking techniques.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

One of the most familiar formats is the capsule review. These are the short reviews you’ll often spot in newspapers, magazines, streaming platforms, or entertainment websites. Usually just one or two paragraphs long, they quickly summarize the story, highlight a few strengths and weaknesses, and end with a clear recommendation or star rating. They’re ideal for people who don’t want spoilers or lengthy analysis—they simply want to know whether a movie is worth their time. Writing one isn’t always as easy as it looks, though. Condensing an entire film into just a few sentences while still being informative takes real skill. That’s why some of the best capsule reviews manage to say more in 100 words than others do in 1,000.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Professional critics often take a different approach. Publications such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and major newspapers publish what are commonly known as trade reviews. These aren’t just personal opinions; they also consider a film’s broader impact, commercial appeal, performances, direction, cinematography, and where it fits within the industry. Their reviews are often read by moviegoers, filmmakers, studios, and even award voters. While audiences don’t always agree with the critics, these reviews provide a structured, informed perspective that goes beyond simply saying whether a movie was enjoyable. They aim to explain why a film succeeds—or why it falls flat.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Then there are academic film reviews, which take things to an entirely different level. These aren’t written for casual viewers but for students, researchers, and people who study cinema professionally. Rather than focusing on entertainment value, they examine symbolism, storytelling techniques, historical context, editing, cinematography, and cultural influence. It’s less about asking, “Was this movie good?” and more about exploring what the film is trying to communicate and how it fits into the history of cinema. They can be dense, detailed, and surprisingly fascinating, often revealing layers that the average viewer might never notice. Even a blockbuster superhero movie can become the subject of serious academic discussion.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Of course, not every review is carefully researched. Some of the most popular today are instant reaction reviews—the videos, podcasts, TikToks, or tweets people post immediately after leaving the theater. They’re fast, emotional, and completely unfiltered. You can usually tell within seconds whether someone loved the movie or absolutely hated it. Because there’s no time to overthink anything, these reactions often feel refreshingly genuine. Sure, opinions may change after a second viewing, but that’s part of the fun. They capture that immediate emotional response we all have after watching something memorable, whether it’s excitement, disappointment, confusion, or complete disbelief.

Advertisement

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And then there’s arguably the internet’s favorite category: user reviews. Platforms like Letterboxd, IMDb, and Rotten Tomatoes have given everyday movie lovers a place to share whatever is on their minds. Some people write thoughtful essays that rival professional critics, while others somehow manage to steal the spotlight with a single sentence. One review might offer a heartfelt personal story about how a film changed someone’s life, while the next simply says something so absurd that thousands of people can’t stop laughing. Because anyone can contribute, there’s an endless variety of voices, personalities, and senses of humor. That’s exactly what makes scrolling through user reviews so addictive.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

In recent years, these reviews have taken on a life of their own. Thanks to social media, the funniest ones are regularly shared far beyond the platforms where they were originally posted. Sometimes the review becomes more famous than the movie itself. A perfectly timed joke, an oddly specific observation, or an outrageously dramatic reaction can spread across the internet within hours. It’s a reminder that people aren’t just reviewing movies anymore—they’re entertaining each other in the process. For many film fans, reading the reviews afterward has become almost as enjoyable as watching the movie itself.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And that’s exactly where today’s collection comes in. Instead of looking at traditional movie criticism, we’re diving into the wonderfully chaotic world of Letterboxd, where movie lovers often express themselves in the most unpredictable ways imaginable. They aren’t polished critiques or carefully balanced opinions; they’re pure internet gold. Keep scrolling, Pandas, and see which review made you laugh the hardest—or left you wondering what on earth the reviewer had just watched.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

1986 Movie Reviews – Aliens and Vamp | The Nerdy

Published

on

1986 Movie Reviews – Aliens and Vamp | The Nerdy
by Sean P. Aune | July 18, 2026July 18, 2026 10:30 am EDT

Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1986 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was also the start to a major shift in cultural and societal norms, and some of those still reverberate to this day.

We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly four dozen.

Yes, we’re insane, but 1986 was that great of a year for film.

The articles will come out – in most cases – on the same day the films hit theaters in 1986 so that it is their true 40th anniversary. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory. In some cases, it truly will be the first time we’ve seen them.

Advertisement

This time around, it’s July 18, 1986, and we’re off to see Aliens and Vamp.

 

Aliens

Really, what can you say about a classic?

Advertisement

Set 57 years after the events of Alien, Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) finds herself heading back to LV-426 when a colony on the planet stops communicating with Earth. Teamed up with Colonial Marines, she is still unprepared for the new horrors she will find at the claws of the xenomorphs.

I’m going to do something I normally don’t do and talk about a deleted scene. Aliens, as it stands is a heck of a follow-up to the original film, but for the life of me I will never figure out why James Cameron cut the scene about Ripley’s daughter dying. For those unfamiliar with it, there is a scene after Ripley returns to Earth where she learns her daughter passed away at the age of 66, two years before Ripley made it home. She cries over the fact she had promised her daughter she would be home in time for eleventh birthday.

This scene does so much to frame some of Ripley’s decisions throughout the rest of the movie. This scene, when included, improves the film far beyond the theatrical cut and adds immense weight to several other scenes.

The theatrical version is great, the extended cut is even better.

Where to watch: Available to stream.

Advertisement

Vamp

The 1980s seem to have already been fed up with vampire films with far more of them tackling the tropes instead of being straight-faced about the bloodsuckers.

Keith (Chris Makepeace) and AJ (Robert Rusler) are rushing a fraternity when when the latter promises the frat a stripper for their party to help their chances of getting in. They head downtown and wander into a strip club that features a dancer named Katrina (Grace Jones) that they are mesmerized by and decide she is the one they need. Little do they know she is actually an ancient vampire.

Considering this wasn’t long after Fright Night, it seems everyone was tired of the same old vampire stories. If they only knew what was coming several years later.

It’s a fine movie, and I mean that in the sense of “it’s fine.” It doesn’t do anything that new per se, but it has some fun visuals and sight gags.

Advertisement

Where to watch: Available to stream.

1986 Movie Reviews will continue on July 25, 2026, with , Maximum Overdrive, and Out of Bounds.


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending