Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Shadow of Fire (2023) by Shinya Tsukamoto

Published

on

Film Review: Shadow of Fire (2023) by Shinya Tsukamoto

“Tomorrow for sure”

As one of the few (I don’t want to say one of the last) Japanese filmmakers who can still produce movies with tension, pointed comments and a no-punches-pulled cinematic approach, every new movie Shinya Tsukamoto comes up with is a must-watch. In “Shadow of Fire”, he continues his anti-war message that also appeared in “Fires on the Plain” and “Killing”, this time focusing on the chaos that ensued in Japan just after the ending of World War 2. 

In an area adjacent to a black market, a young woman whose family was lost during the war is selling her body to make a living in a Japanese pub diner that barely survived the bombings. One day, a young soldier appears as a customer, and the woman asks him to stay the night, kickstarting a series of his visits, every night, and a continuous promise that he will pay the next day. At the same time, a young boy who seems to always carry food with him, also starts appearing in the same establishment, and soon the three start resembling something of a family. Soon, however, the trauma they all carry comes knocking, and they follow their own paths, with the boy starting a journey with a black market vendor, who also carries his own wounds. 

Check also this video

Despite the in-your-face introductory scene, “Shadow of Fire” is actually much tamer in its presentation of violence than the two other parts of the trilogy, with Tsukamoto making his point this time in a different way. That people were lost and were trying to survive any way they could in a Japan that was completely devastated is the main comment here, with the director, however, highlighting that the trauma of the war would not let them move on in any way. As we watch the boy seeing nightmares in its sleep, the soldier being terrified every time he hears a loud noise, the woman searching for solace in the darkness, away from everyone’s eyes and the vendor being set on his horrifying goal, the comment becomes quite evident, with Tsukamoto essentially making fun of his protagonists’ notions of having something that resembles a family. 

Advertisement

At the same time, the kid personifies the impact the issues the grown up faced had on children, with the sheer cruelty of behaviors and overall violence he experiences highlighting that the people’s intense need for self-preservation had turned them into animals. Even the prostitute, who seems to care about the boy, is not able to treat him as she would probably like, with her behavior also mirroring that of the rest of the characters, to a point at least. 

At the same time, however, and by showing the kid continue moving on, against all odds, and perhaps as a metaphor for Japan itself, Tsukamoto sends a message of optimism, that even through all the hardships it experienced after the war, and even though some consequences did remain,  the country and its people actually survived and even thrived, due to sheer perseverance. 

Tsukamoto’s cinematography follows his usual style of intense coloring, and many close-ups particularly to the eyes of his protagonist, in order to highlight their emotion and overall psychological status. This approach is one of the main sources of tension here, along with his own crisp editing and the overall approach to the sound. At the same time, the framing showcases the claustrophobic setting the protagonists inhabit, particularly in the scenes that take place in the restaurant, while the voyeuristic scenes here aim to increase the tension and usually function as a sign that something bad is going to happen. Lastly, the transition from chamber drama to road movie also works quite well, inducing a sense of movement to a narrative that unfolds like a stage play for a large part of its duration, through a relatively fast pace, that fits the overall story nicely. 

Considering the aforementioned visual approach, Tsukamoto demanded a lot from his actors, and it is easy to say that they delivered in flying colors. The young Ouga Tsukao especially has a role that is shocking actually, considering what his character goes through, with the scene in the market in particular definitely staying on mind. That he manages to highlight his perplexity about the grown ups’ actions and his resolve throughout the movie, is a testament to his prowess in the role. Shuri in the role of the prostitute is also quite convincing, both in her will for something better and in her trauma that will not let her do so, while Hiroko Kono’s transformation is a true wonder to watch. Mirai Moriyama as the vendor presents his cold-heartedness in a way that can only be described as chilling, cementing the overall excellent job in the casting and acting here. 

Advertisement

Although on a level lower than his previous two films, particularly due to the difference in scope, “Shadow of Fire” is still an exceptional movie, from a filmmaker that continues on the unique road he paved by himself decades ago. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie review: 'Babygirl' gives Kidman intriguing sexual conflict – UPI.com

Published

on

Movie review: 'Babygirl' gives Kidman intriguing sexual conflict – UPI.com

1 of 6 | Harris Dickinson and Nicole Kidman star in “Babygirl,” in theaters Dec. 25. Photo courtesy of A24

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 22 (UPI) — Babygirl, in theaters Wednesday, is the kind of erotic drama they used to make a lot in the ’80s and ’90s. As such, it is refreshing in 2024, though perhaps still derivative of its genre predecessors.

Romy Mathis (Nicole Kidman) is the founder and CEO of Tensile, a robotics company developing automated drones for warehouses. She is married to a theater director, Jacob (Antonio Banderas), and they have two daughters.

When Tensile begins a mentorship program for interns, Samuel (Harris Dickinson) pushes Romy’s buttons to get one-on-one time with her. His power plays unlock Romy’s repressed sexual desires and they begin an affair.

Playing power games may be inherent to many sexual relationships, so it’s not like one movie invented them, but it’s hard not to think about 9½ Weeks. In that notorious 1986 film, Mickey Rourke played a man who seduces a woman (Kim Basinger) with sex games involving food, spanking and blindfolds.

Advertisement

Still, Babygirl doesn’t play Romy as a cliche of a powerful businesswoman who really likes to be submissive in bed and experience the adrenaline of risking exposure.

Not that the affair compromises Romy’s success, either, although it could if Samuel reports her. She also starts to blur the lines of being submissive in private and at the office, but she doesn’t let it interfere with business decisions.

The love scenes between Kidman and Dickinson are revealing, but not gratuitous. They are vulnerable and uncomfortable rather than titillating.

The way writer-director Halina Reijn approaches consent is interesting and seems realistic. Samuel does insist on consent before continuing, which is a fantastic portrayal of obtaining verbal consent, though the conditions of Romy’s consent remain nebulous.

Romy makes it clear that Samuel’s power games make her uncomfortable. Agreeing to continue while feeling uncomfortable seems like it adds a level of duress.

Advertisement

It’s 80 minutes into the movie before Samuel and Romy even discuss using a safe word, which would give either party, but especially Romy, a way to end a session at her discretion. Yet, this is believable because Romy and Samuel are amateurs at this, so they’re figuring it out.

Samuel may play the dominant role, but he is in many respects just a poser. He is a young intern and very emotional when things don’t go his way.

It seems like Samuel is imitating what he thinks a Casanova would act like, but whenever Romy goes off script, Samuel seems to be at a loss for words. It’s not natural to him, either, though he thinks of some clever workplace games that make Romy play along.

He’s probably watched 9½ Weeks, too, or more likely just read the Wikipedia summary.

The Jacob character is the film’s most stereotypical.

Advertisement

Jacob is a loving husband who just can’t excite Romy. Romy tries to teach him to play games in bed, but Jacob doesn’t enjoy experimenting. It’s odd that a person whose job is in the arts would lack any creativity with his partner, but he’s entitled to have traditional desires, too.

The lack of monogamy is an unmitigated betrayal, as even submissive relationships should respect loyalty unless they’ve discussed and agreed to having an open relationship. The film eventually explores how a couple navigates compatibility, but Romy has to own hers first.

Individual choices the characters make in Babygirl will provoke discussions, and won’t be spoiled in this review. The positive is that the film does show Romy’s growth through the experience.

So, even if a viewer disagrees with part of the journey, the film makes its case for the value of those experiences. That makes it an engaging, provocative film.

Advertisement

Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Pottel Movie Review

Published

on

Pottel Movie Review

Pottel, directed by Sahith Mothkuri and starring Ajay, Yuvachandra, and Ananya Nagalla in pivotal roles, is a rural drama that delves into the socio-cultural issues of the 1970s. The movie, which captivated audiences with its intriguing title, was released in theaters in October and recently debuted on OTT platforms Amazon Prima and Aha. With music by Sekhar Chandra, the film aims to strike an emotional chord with its thought-provoking narrative.

Plot Summary:
The story is set in a remote village during the 1970s, where the powerful Patel family dominates the region. Believing that education empowers people to question authority, the Patels discourage the villagers from pursuing it. Mallanna (Chatrapathi Sekhar), who recognizes the importance of education, dreams of educating his son Gangadharam (Yuvachandra). However, his efforts are thwarted when Patel (Ajay) kills him to maintain control over the village.

The villagers revere a local deity, Balamma, and Patel manipulates their beliefs to suppress dissent. Gangadharam grows up in this oppressive environment, determined to bring change. He marries Bujjamma (Ananya Nagalla), defying her brother and societal norms.

Meanwhile, the village observes a ritual every 12 years, offering a Pottel as a sacrifice to their deity. This time, Gangadharam is tasked with overseeing the ritual. The stakes are high, as failure to perform the ritual properly could have dire consequences for him. Caught between his goal of educating his daughter and empowering the villagers, and the ritualistic traditions, Gangadharam faces immense challenges from Patel. How he overcomes these obstacles forms the crux of the story.

Analysis:
The film effectively portrays the socio-political dynamics and superstitions prevalent in rural India during the 1970s. The director highlights the dominance of landlords like the Patels and their efforts to maintain control by keeping the marginalized sections uneducated. The screenplay weaves these themes with clarity, emphasizing the need for education as a tool for empowerment.

Advertisement

The movie also sheds light on superstitions and rituals like animal sacrifices, which were exploited by the powerful to manipulate the weak. The village itself feels like a character in the story, with its landscapes and traditions adding depth to the narrative. The realistic portrayal of the struggles and resilience of rural communities enhances the film’s authenticity.

Performances:
Yuvachandra delivers a compelling performance as Gangadharam, capturing the character’s struggle and determination effectively.
Ajay excels as the antagonist Patel, portraying the role with authority and menace.
Ananya Nagalla impresses with her portrayal of Bujjamma, adding emotional depth to the story.
The supporting cast, including Chatrapathi Sekhar, performs within the scope of their roles, contributing to the narrative’s strength.

Technical Aspects:
Cinematography by Monish Bhupathiraju stands out, beautifully capturing the rural and forest backdrops, adding an immersive visual quality.
Music by Sekhar Chandra complements the narrative well, with both songs and background score enhancing the emotional impact.
Editing by Karthik Srinivas ensures a cohesive flow, although some scenes feel slightly stretched.
The authentic depiction of rural settings and customs adds to the film’s credibility.

Final Verdict:
Pottel is a sincere attempt to address important social issues like education, empowerment, and superstition through a rural narrative. While the film’s pacing and predictability in certain areas might deter some viewers, its emotional core and relevant themes make it a worthwhile watch for those interested in rural dramas.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Reviews: ‘Blitz’

Published

on

Movie Reviews: ‘Blitz’

All content © copyright WFMJ.com News weather sports for Youngstown-Warren Ohio.

WFMJ | 101 W. Boardman Street | Youngstown, OH 44503

Continue Reading

Trending