Movie Reviews
Film Review: Reversi (2024) by Adrian Teh
“The only way to move is forward”
Films about the ability of a person to move back and forth in time are not exactly a rarity in cinema, with the concept of ‘second chances” working quite well in conjunction. Usually though, the concept is used in action films for the most part, which makes the family drama treatment Adrian Teh implements in “Reversi” a rather unusual one, for a number of reasons actually.
Akid is a police negotiator who moonlights as a time traveler, an ability he inherited from his father, whose accidental death actually scarred Akid forever. And although his ability has helped him intensely at his job, with him managing to repeat failed missions, turning them into success, it also comes with a rub. Every time he goes back in time, part of his lifespan perishes. Eventually, Akid meets Sarah, an Aikido instructor, and the two fall in love. Soon they get married and even have a child, but tragedy hits Akid’s life once more. As he obsesses with changing the past in order to prevent the tragedy, two rather impossible options are presented and he is forced to make a choice. Eventually, the truth about his father is also revealed.
Adrian Teh has come up with a very intriguing movie, as the aforementioned combination works quite well throughout the film, finding its peak after the tragedy. The message is also quite eloquent, in its metaphor: dwelling on the past makes no sense, the only way to move is forget and go forward. The way he presents this message, however, through time travel and intense repetition is quite smart, particularly since it also adds a sense of drama to the movie, which actually increases as time passes. Furthermore, the subtle comedy, which actually starts with the fact that the protagonist’s love interest is an aikido teacher, works quite well too, in entertainment terms.
These elements carry the movie from beginning to the finale; however, there are definitely moments when the whole thing falters. The repetition after the accident, for example, does get tiring after a point, even though it communicates the protagonist’s despair eloquently. It also stretches the movie to 140 minutes, which definitely overstays its welcome. Furthermore, the ending, and in general, the last part, although impactful in its revelations and dramatic premises, does move into melodramatic territory, with its tear-jerking approach not working particularly well.
The characters on the other hand, are both well-written and well-portrayed. Beto Kusyairy as Akid is excellent in the way he carries his sorrow and guilt, while Shiqin Kamal as Sarah is quite convincing both in her initial feistiness and her later sadness. The chemistry between the two is also great, in one of the movie’s best assets.
Danny Voon’s cinematography works well in the presentation of the various settings, without any particular exaltation. Chulat’s editing retains a mid-tempo that works well for the narrative, while a number of repetitious scenes are placed in a way that increases their impact and highlights the psychological status of the protagonist.
Although it could definitely be brief, “Reversi” emerges as a smart movie that communicates its comments well, headed by the excellent characterization and acting.
Movie Reviews
Hyperreal Film Club Review – ‘SHARP: Moving Picture II’
Vague Visages’ SHARP: Moving Picture II review contains minor spoilers. This article covers the films Obsidian, Over Herd and Burn. Check out the VV home page for more film criticism, movie reviews and film essays.
In the city of Austin, keeping it “weird” is the name of the game. The coroner’s report on the counterculture’s demise is indeed fake news based on my recent screening of SHARP: Moving Picture II, a showcase of 20 experimental shorts, video art and non-narrative works from up-and-coming artists/filmmakers via the Hyperreal Film Club. This cavalcade of ambitious eccentricities and diasporic dreamers isn’t after your validation, nor should it be considered “main character energy.” Superficiality takes a back seat as the artists, in most cases, communicate their beliefs with mere glimpses and “flickers.”
Joseph Gonzalez of The Austin Chronicle nails the SHARP: Moving Picture II vibe, characterizing the filmmakers as having “something different to say about jagged edges of experience.” Nowhere is this truer than in the work of Jay aka j4_qv and his meditative one-shot Obsidian (2026). In under five minutes, the filmmaker allows viewers to ruminate on their own sharp edges and half-dreamt truths. To amplify this spiritual energy, Jay uses three massive indigenous monoliths, whose aura evokes not an inhospitable presence but rather a beguiling prologue for additional works to come. If one finds a fault in the work, it’s the diehard, fanboy nature of it all. Key shots throughout evoke “The Final Messenger” episode of Neon Genesis Evangelion (1995-96), while the music and backdrop resemble Toluca Lake of the Silent Hill video game franchise. All are admirable choices, and yes, the sound mixing rocks. Yet the cost of Jay’s approach is the lack of a distinct vantage point. Nevertheless, the artist’s thought-provoking and druid imagery hints at a breakout that’s to come.
SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Short Film Review: Marcellus Cox’s ‘Jamarcus Rose & Da 5 Bullet Holes’
The midsection is where several films’ themes, though vivid and suggestive, begin to lose focus and become repetitive. Several vignettes appear under variations of SHARP, such as Sharps or Shaaarrrrp, which weakens the sense of uniqueness. The inclusion of miscellaneous cartoon cat videos is perhaps an effort to bolster the broader theme of transition. One notable short, Burn, near the end of this section, follows a man who is not yet ready to confront or reveal his identity. In the course of roughly 10 minutes, Burn immerses viewers into his internal struggle, approaching the subject in a distinctly Kafkaesque way. The camera remains in a fixed point-of-view position, while various objects of torture — kitchen torches, rough plastics and cigarette butts — are used to evoke the sense of an itch that just can’t be scratched. Parallel shots of a silhouette and an array of women interrupt these tortuous images. There’s a lack of emotional connection to the subject and zero continuity with the events that transpire, rendering the whole episode a booming cry for help that’s stifled by the lack of internal or external dialogue. Viewers simply receive a brief glimpse of the protagonist’s inner torment.
SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Review: 2026 Oscar Nominees for Animated Short Film
The film presentation ended in a typical Generation Z-type scenario, not with an emo millennial scoff but with a stare. Henna Chou’s smart stroke Over Herd (2026) circumnavigates the typical deer-in-headlights, coming-of-age lecture, but rather than spoofing these situations, the director allows their featured friend to remain anonymous, by way of a bison serving as the avatar. The whole conversation of their complex and queer-coded relationship/friendship with their boss evolves as a mash-up of MTV’s Girl Code (2013-2018) and Cartoon Network’s Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job! (2007-10). The deal seals itself largely because of the deliberate distortion of the vocal audio track. One can never be quite sure whether the audio comes from the bison or a non-diegetic source.
SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Borscht Belt Film Fest Review (Short): Joel Perez’s ‘Villa Encanto’
In the May 2026 issue of Time, Christopher Nolan suggests that all directors remain anonymous. Art should speak for itself and personalities should not overshadow the message. Given the lucrative yet superficial nature of Hollywood, such a statement may be wishful thinking. SHARP, however, may just hit the mark. The combination of teasing glimpses and the absence of titles and/or character names conveys the notion that “This is who I am — deal with it.” This isn’t to say that the feature creators are off the grid. The names of the artists/filmmakers can be found on the Hyperreal website, but the art trumps the personalities. In the spirit of philosopher John Locke, these individuals are not uniquely defined by their physical bodies but rather by their own conscious awareness and experiences. They should not need to round off any edges to suit others.
Peter Bell (@PeterGBell25) is a 2016 Master of Arts – Film Studies graduate of Columbia University School of Arts in New York City. His interests include film history, film theory and film criticism. Ever since watching TCM as a child, Peter has had a passion for film, always trying to add greater context to film for others. His favorite films include Chinatown, Blade Runner, Lawrence of Arabia, A Shot in the Dark and Inception. Peter believes movie theaters are still the optimal forum for film viewing, discussion and discovering fresh perspectives on culture.
SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Review: 2026 Oscar Nominees for Live-Action Short Film
Related
Categories: 2020s, 2026 Film Reviews, Drama, Featured, Film, Movies, Short Films
Movie Reviews
TODAY Film Critic Gene Shalit Dies After ‘100 Years of an Amazing Life’
Gene Shalit, the popular film critic who spent decades with TODAY, has died. He was 100 years old.
In a statement to NBC News, Shalit’s family said he “passed away peacefully today after 100 years of an amazing life.”
Born March 25, 1926, Shalit was an instantly recognizable personality. Along with his distinctive handlebar mustache, poofy hair, eyeglasses and bow ties, he is best remembered for his love of puns while doing reviews on the show’s “Critic’s Corner” segment.
A graduate of the University of Illinois, Shalit became a part-time TODAY personality in 1970 and was elevated to a full-time role in 1973, replacing Joe Garagiola. He remained with the show until he retired in 2010. “It’s enough already,” he said in a statement announcing his retirement.
In addition to his reviews, Shalit interviewed scores of celebrities during his TODAY tenure. His 1979 sit-down with Carol Channing is best remembered for the actor telling a story about having trouble understanding the British accent that left him in tears from laughing so hard.
“What’s the matter with him?” a smiling Channing said as Shalit tried to gather himself.
His movie reviews were often punctuated by his use of puns, which became his calling card.
Shalit made regular appearances on classic game shows “What’s My Line?” and “To Tell the Truth” and wrote for a wide range of newspapers and magazines, including The New York Times, Cosmopolitan, Glamour and TV Guide. He also wrote and broadcast a daily piece called “Man About Anything” on NBC’s radio network for over a decade.
In addition, he authored the 1987 anthology “Laughing Matters: A Celebration of American Humor.” He also compiled the book “Great Hollywood Wit” in 2002.
“Shalit has performed with the Boston Symphony Orchestra in Boston’s Symphony Hall and Tanglewood, played his bassoon on stage in Lincoln Center, and conducted the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra in a full concert of classical music. In none of these venues has he ever been invited back,” read a cheeky bio of Shalit in the 2007 book “Mazel Tov: Celebrities’ Bar and Bat Mitzvah Memories.”
He also lent his voice as a character named Gene Scallop in a 2007 episode of “SpongeBob SquarePants.”
He became pop culture fodder, often being lampooned on “Family Guy” and portrayed by Horatio Sanz on “Saturday Night Live.”
Shalit had six children with late wife Nancy, one of whom, Emily, died in 2012 from ovarian cancer.
Movie Reviews
Gene Shalit, longtime Today show movie critic, dies at 100
Gene Shalit, a movie critic and arts reporter for the Today show over four decades who was known for his puffy hair, oversized handlebar mustache and affection for groan-inducing puns, has died. He was 100.
Shalit’s family announced the death Friday to NBC News, saying in a statement that he “passed away peacefully today after 100 years of an amazing life”.
Shalit joined Today as a contributor in 1970 and became arts editor in 1973, later settling in for his segment, Critic’s Corner. When he left the show in 2010, he was one of the last high-profile film critics on a major network.
“What resonated above his unusual appearance was his incredible wit, his remarkable intelligence. But he didn’t pound you over the head with it. He amused you. He enlightened and amused whatever subject he was on,” Guy Ludwig, Shalit’s producer for more than 20 years, wrote in an essay.
It was no coincidence that Chicago critics Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel’s local “thumbs-up, thumbs-down” movie-review program, Sneak Previews, went national on PBS in the late 1970s and that Today show’s ABC rival, Good Morning America, hired Joel Siegel to be its movie critic in 1981.
“Shalit was instrumental in changing the balance of critical power in America. When he began his ‘Today’ tenure, newspapers and magazines were the primary sources for movie reviews. That’s where cinematic opinion was sparked and shaped,” the Plain Dealer wrote in 2010, calling Shalit “Daniel Boone in a bow tie and Groucho glasses”.
-
Texas3 minutes agoNBA star James Harden arrested in Texas on weapons charge
-
Utah5 minutes ago‘A beautiful location’: New state cemetery for military veterans coming to Washington Terrace
-
Vermont11 minutes agoBrattleboro’s Latchis Theatre: A Journey Through Cinema – Valley News
-
Virginia18 minutes agoPierce Keeps Rolling In West Virginia – SPEED SPORT
-
Washington20 minutes agoPolice investigate brutally beaten man dumped in alley; family suspects hate crime
-
Wisconsin24 minutes agoWisconsin basketball adds 7-foot-1 center Jack Thelen to 2027 recruiting class
-
West Virginia33 minutes agoCharlie Hanafin Testing Himself in West Virginia | WVU Football All 105
-
Wyoming35 minutes agoUp To 2,600 Pounds Each, Powder River Percherons Are Huge At Wyoming Parades