Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Record of A Tenement Gentleman (1947) by Yasujiro Ozu

Published

on

Film Review: Record of A Tenement Gentleman (1947) by Yasujiro Ozu

The stark reality of what Ozu saw around him: the fragmentation of both self and society, a theme that would haunt him throughout his cinematic life

“Record of A Tenement Gentleman” is one of Ozu’s great early films, and one which was also screened last year at Cannes as part of their Classics section.  

The plot outline of “Record”, like most of Ozu’s works, is deceptively simple (and also full of comic touches). In post-war Japan, a man living in an impoverished Tokyo tenement brings home an abandoned child (Kohei). O-Tane, a hard-hearted widow living in the same tenement, is forced to take care of Kohei. In what follows, we gradually see O-Tane’s change of heart, from her initial anger at Kohei’s bedwetting, her endless tricks to get rid of the boy, to finally growing fond of him.

What is most remarkable is how each scene, character, and setting is ingrained with the disastrous after-effects of WW2. Tashiro, Tamekichi, and O-Tane, the three residents of the tenement we are introduced to, each suffer from the economic consequences of the war: Tashiro is a street fortune teller, Tamekichi mends pots and pans, while O-Tane does odd jobs to make ends meet. Indeed, most conversations in “Record” centre around deprivation and hardship. When Tamekichi’s Americanised daughter suddenly turns up for lunch, Tamekichi reprimands her for not bringing anything and then wanting to eat his lunch. Moreover, the implications of societal turmoil here are not just economic but also moral: when the Kawayashis throw a dinner party for everyone with the money their son has won in the lottery, everyone unanimously agrees on how luck only falls on pure-minded and innocent children, unlike their adult counterparts. This thematic layer – the breakdown of traditional structures and the corresponding advent of modernity – is integral to Ozu’s cinema. These were for him events which had an irreversible impact on both Japanese society and individual morality.

Subscribe to AMP by clicking on the image below

Though “Record” features a wider variety of shots that one is used to in an Ozu film – more medium shots and long shots, an oftentimes panning camera – it also provides some nascent glimpses of what would go on to characterise his signature style of filmmaking. There is for instance the distinctive Tatami-mat shot, directly frontal, stationary, and filmed from a low height, as if from the eye level of a person kneeling on a tatami mat. “Record” is also replete with ‘pillow’ shots, those seemingly random cutaways of everyday life that provide a break from the narrative: clothes swaying in the breeze, smoke rising out of chimneys…

Equally intriguing to behold are the conscious experiments with pacing, with scenes ending always a beat or two later than they ought to. Early in the film, O-Tane warns Kohei not to wet the bed again, and ruminates on what kind of a cold-hearted father the kid must have. Throughout, the scene goes from mid shot coverage to individual close ups. And yet, it doesn’t end when the monologue ends. Instead, we goes back again to Kohei sleeping on a large bed, now accompanied by silence, and then see a deliberately stretched out shot of O-Tane staring at her nails and looking straight ahead. Here, we see an instance of plot points taking a backseat for what has been called ‘dead time’, something which will go on to form an integral part of Ozu’s famous Noriko Trilogy.

Advertisement

In similar fashion, there is very little sentimentality on display. There is for instance no major build up to the boy being found (or even when he runs away). It simply happens, and what we are studiously shown is the before-and-after of events. This lack of sentimentality also seeps into the acting.  Thus, Choko Iida plays O-Tane with a restrained expressivity, always keeping herself in check despite being prone to heightened emotions. There is a sense in which the action is directly acted out rather than being interpreted. When O-Tane scolds Kohei (Hohi Aoki) after another bedwetting session, he scrunches up his face and raises his hands to his eyes as if to wipe tears, even though there is no actual crying involved. It is the action rather than the interpretation that is important, something that might have more to do with traditional Japanese theatre performance than than what we today understand as realist acting.

Towards the end, just when O-Tane gets extremely attached to Kohei, and is almost beginning to treat him like her own son, the little kid’s father suddenly turns up to take him back. Kohei, it turns out, was merely lost and not abandoned. Later, Tashiro and Tamekichi visit O-tane and congratulate her for finally being free. Without no much as a warning, O-Tane, who for so long has kept up a restrained facade, suddenly breaks down. It is a singularly touching moment, in a film that has so far kept all things sentimental at bay (one is immediately reminded of other crying scenes in Ozu’s films, be it Noriko in “Late Spring” or Ayako in “Late Autumn”). O-tane remarks that she is crying not because she is sad, but because of how happy Kohei and his father were. The emotional outburst then leads to a realisation; being selfish won’t do, and one has to stop worrying only about oneself.

Yet again, we encounter a tendency strewn across Ozu’s works, of seemingly inconsequential everyday acts and events that acquire the magnitude of a soul-shattering revelation. Here, as in other places, it is the ephemerality of everything, and ultimately of life itself.

“Record” ends with a sobering image, a montage of boys orphaned and made homeless by the war, aimlessly wandering around the influential samurai Saigo Takamori’s statue. There is hope in O-Tane’s changed personality, but also the stark reality of what Ozu saw around him: the fragmentation of both self and society, a theme that would haunt him throughout his cinematic life.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

'Killer Heat' movie review: A mystic mystery

Published

on

'Killer Heat' movie review: A mystic mystery

Philippe Lacôte’s Killer Heat is a suspense thriller set on the tranquil island of Crete, Greece. The island’s stunning landscape, with rugged mountains and pristine beaches, creates the perfect setting for this atmospheric mystery. Initially, the film may feel too laid-back for its own good, but as the plot unfolds, it finds its groove, delivering a cohesive, engaging story. Much like its setting, Killer Heat is refreshingly straightforward, avoiding a forced sense of suspense. The mystery unravels at a measured pace, allowing the viewer to savour the journey.

The plot itself may not break new ground, with relatively low stakes, but what makes it work is the absence of unnecessary storytelling shortcuts. Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays Nick Bali, a private investigator hired to look into the mysterious death of Leo (Richard Madden), the heir of the wealthy Verdakis family.

The film opens with Leo climbing a cliff while Bali narrates the Greek myth of Icarus, the man who flew too close to the sun. Leo soon falls to his death, and the family—except for Leo’s sister-in-law, Penelope (Shailene Woodley)—considers it a tragic accident.

Penelope, however, is convinced otherwise, refusing to trust the local police, claiming her “family owns them”, and that “in Crete, no one goes against the gods”. The film’s integration of Greek metaphors adds a touch of mysticism.

What’s refreshing about Killer Heat is that it doesn’t trick the audience. From the first scene, it’s clear that the culprit isn’t an outsider, but that doesn’t take away from the suspense.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

When Amazon workers on Staten Island successfully voted to unionize in the spring of 2022, becoming the corporate retailer’s first American workplace to do so, it was hailed as one of the most important labor victories in the United States in nearly 100 years. 

For the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) to organize employees at the JFK8 warehouse to vote in favor of union representation was a David versus Goliath story for the age of globalization — and a rousing reminder that collective grassroots efforts can still succeed despite massive employer concentration, management intimidation, and other hindrances to building worker power. And that an independent, worker-led coalition led the drive at this 8,000-plus-employee facility, rather than an established union, made its victory all the more impressive, even as the vote to unionize brought organizers into uncharted territory and set up a protracted legal battle with Amazon, which has since refused to recognize the ALU or negotiate a contract. 

Telling the story of how the ALU reached this historic moment, “Union,” a new documentary co-directed by Brett Story (“The Hottest August”) and Stephen Maing (“Crime + Punishment”), takes a detail-driven, ground-level approach, following current and former Amazon employees in Staten Island as they mount a grassroots worker-to-worker campaign, standing their ground against one of the world’s powerful corporations all the while. 

No talking-head documentary but a keenly observational chronicle of the unionization push and its aftermath, “Union” often plays like a thriller by virtue of its sharp, smart editing rhythms. Early on, Story and Maing juxtapose Jeff Bezos blasting off into space on a rocket made by his Blue Origin company and Amazon workers trudging wearily into work; it captures the unimaginable scale of the company’s operations while foregrounding the human scale often concealed by breathless (yet inevitably compromised) reporting of Amazon’s designs on empire. 

Made over the course of three years, Story and Maing’s film explores the human cost of the convenience economy and illuminates oppressive working conditions in Amazon’s factories. From constant surveillance to high injury rates and a lack of breaks, the pressures of working in Amazon warehouses compound to create punishing environments for workers, ones Amazon has steadfastly refused to address or even accurately report. And the threat of retaliation against workers who organize is ever-present; in addition to pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into union-busting campaigns that include mandatory “captive audience” meetings (which have since been banned in the state of New York), Amazon issues warnings of possible termination to workers involved with the unionization drive. 

Advertisement

Bookended by footage of vast cargo ships transporting goods, a reminder of the slow, perpetual motion with which the gears of modern capitalism grind on, Story and Maing’s film is smart in how systematically its narrative lays out obstacles to the union’s success. It also insightfully depicts ground-level dialogue between workers as a powerful tool with which to overcome them. Some of the most remarkable footage, inside Amazon headquarters, covertly films one of those captive audience meetings; here, the company’s anti-union propaganda (One reads: “We’re asking you to do three simple things: get the facts, ask questions and vote no to the union”) is disrupted by ALU organizers, who successfully push back on Amazon managers just long enough to make their case to workers. 

One of the ALU organizers, Chris Smalls, takes center stage in “Union,” though the documentary largely sidesteps the temptation to cast him as a conquering hero. (That’d be an easy trap, given that he became the organization’s public face across the period “Union” depicts.) Smalls, fired from Amazon after protesting inadequate PPE provision during the pandemic (and besmirched by the company’s general counsel as “not smart or articulate” in an internal meeting of executive leaders), is a father of three who was moved to activism by the flagrant injustice of the company’s abusive labor practices. As a leader, he’s at once charismatic and hard-charging, dedicated to his fellow “comrades” but ever driven to push forward even in the face of inter-union dissent.

One of the film’s great strengths is its ability to surface the multiplicity of tensions between organizers working toward a shared cause. Take the world of difference separating the experiences of two subjects: Maddie, a white college graduate using her campus activism experience to help the cause, and Natalie, an older Latina woman living out of her car for years. In one charged exchange, Natalie pushes back on the suggestion, made by white male organizers, that Chris intentionally gets himself arrested by New York police officers to draw attention to the unionization drive. Ultimately, Natalie’s dissatisfaction with the ALU—due to her disagreements with leadership as much as her desire to wait for larger union support—leads her to leave the organization. It’s a testament to the complexity of individual motivations and the absence of easy triumph in this type of effort.

“Union” documents the internal debates and disagreements over governance, organizing, and leadership strategies that divided the ALU before its successful unionization vote and were compounded by its subsequent failed attempt to unionize a second warehouse. Though Smalls’ force of personality, passion, and determination fueled the fight to unionize JFK8, the film carefully depicts this as a collective victory. It rarely gives in to the temptation to single out Smalls for praise at the expense of others, and making it clear that his leadership style also contributed to internal rifts in the ALU that at various points may have weakened its ability to further the union’s mission. 

This becomes particularly important in the film’s latter half, after the unionization vote, at which point the sobering realities of the long work ahead come more fully into view. The heroism of the ALU organizers will never be in question. But with only one battle won in the war for workers’ rights, and Amazon continuing to contest or undercut its results by every means available, “Union” concludes on a note of weary fortitude rather than declarative victory. The film captures both the pain and the power of people at the base of a global infrastructure. By not departing from the frontlines of the fight against Amazon’s labor exploitation, Story and Maing bring the true face of their struggle into focus. 

Advertisement

“Union” will be self-distributed theatrically, starting on Oct. 18. This review was filed from the film’s New York premiere at the New York Film Festival. 

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

Published

on

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

CTRL movie audience review: CTRL started streaming on Netflix on October 4. The thriller, directed by ace Bollywood director Vikramaditya Motwane, stars Ananya Panday and Vihaan Samat.

The story is about Nella and Joe, who seem like the ideal influencer couple. However, when Joe cheats on Nella, she uses an AI app to erase him from her life — only for it to gain control over her.

The Netflix movie has received some highly-positive reviews from viewers, who posted their comments on social media. Let’s take a look at some of those.

CTRL public reviews

“CTRL is… terrific, absorbing and made with a lot of finesse… Do watch if you have time.”

“Found Vikramaditya Motwane’s new Netflix film #CTRL utterly fascinating. So much to admire. An ambitious, timely, deeply uncomfortable screenlife thriller that’ll make you want to change your passwords, cover your webcam and move to the hills.”

Advertisement

“This is quite good. Only 1 hour 40 minutes, and not gonna lie, I had underestimated Motwane a bit with this movie. Ananya did well because she nailed this genre. It starts off slow, happy, and lighthearted, but the tension builds as the story progresses. Give it a watch, it’s nice.”

“vikramdityamotwane Gives a nuanced and gripping narrative and @ananyapandayy has finally come into her own, and does a fine job.”

“As a big fan of Motwane’s films, I’ve always seen him set new standards in mainstream cinema. From Udaan to AK vs AK he has always proved his merit. However, #CTRL feels like just an okay film, despite good casting with Ananya Panday. It lacks a strong impact and becomes somewhat preachy about our relationship with technology, leaving you with little to think about afterward.”

“The movie is abt how social media, AI and corporates are controlling us and not vice versa. Ananya Panday is good. Vihaan Samat is brilliant. The movie cudve been much better. Esp the climax.Theres no closure!”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending