Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Fighter (2024) by Siddharth Anand

Published

on

Film Review: Fighter (2024) by Siddharth Anand

Hrithik Roshan takes to the skies in the first chapter of a new all-action franchise from Siddharth Anand.

Emotions and politics fly fast and hard in Siddharth Anand’s mega-budget Hindi-language “Fighter”, a new attempt at making the next big cinematic universe after his stints in Yash Raj Films’ Spy Universe, “War” and “Pathaan”. While “Pathaan” heralded the return of Bollywood legend Shah Rukh Khan, “War” saw him refine his partnership with the similarly beloved Hrithik Roshan, giving him another super-hunk super-spy role after “Bang Bang!”, a remake of the Tom Cruise/Cameron Diaz action rom-com “Knight & Day”. The shadow of Tom Cruise looms over Anand’s work with increasing prominence nowadays; “Pathaan” recruited “Top Gun: Maverick”‘s stunt coordinator Casey O’Neill as its second unit and action director, and now, Anand’s very own production company Marflix Pictures utilises Roshan’s lucrative leading man status into India’s very own “Top Gun” (complete with a villain modelled off Cruise’s hair and outfit in “Mission: Impossible II”). Spreading their wings from one extended universe into another is an exciting prospect for masala cinema, and with the billion dollar success of “Maverick” on the world stage, Roshan playing a pilot while Anand pilots behind the camera should send a heat-seeking missile towards the competition.

Follow our coverage of Hindi cinema by clicking on the image below

Their approach is as broad as they come. A crack team of IAF helicopter and jet pilots is assembled at Srinagar Airfield, bordering Kashmir, following a significant threat from Pakistani mujahideen working covertly under the funding of the Pakistani government. The squad is made up of some fun caricatures, including but not limited to the dorky rookie ‘Sukhi’ (Banveen Singh), wife-guy ‘Taj’ (Karan Singh Grover), no-nonsense girl-amongst-boys ‘Minni’ (Deepika Padukone), and (of course) their tortured but brilliant hotshot leader ‘Patty’ (Hrithik Roshan). They bicker, they train, they drink and party together, and gradually become a cohesive unit despite the inevitable ego growth that comes from knowing how to fly death machines worth the economy of a small country. But when a skirmish between Pakistan and India leaves some of our heroes behind enemy lines, faiths are shaken and tempers are flared as what was a national conflict becomes a deeply personal one.

Any alarm bells ringing about the shameless jingoism of making Pakistan an actively villainous presence in this narrative are absolutely real and legitimate, with Anand’s view on a current and long-running international conflict as deeply concerning, angry and reductive. The eventual fistfight between an aggrieved Patty and sadistic uber-bad guy Akhtar (first-time Rishabh Sawhney, excellent in a cartoonishly evil role) sees Hrithik seething his way through a monologue punctuated with suplexes and sucker punches about Kashmir’s ‘rightful’ Indian ownership, and how (if they’re not careful) Pakistan itself will become an Indian occupation. Given the touchiness of conflicts surrounding land ownership in this current moment, it’s difficult not to be left with a sour taste in the mouth with such vitriolic right-wing views being spouted by crowd-pleasing entertainment of this scale.

Ιt’s a film that’s not above its villains suicide-bombing a gang of flag-waving innocents as its initial conflict, and it somehow encourages both sides to play dirtier until the entire picture is practically vibrating with Islamophobia. Its highest emotional peaks come in the form of its Indian heroes screaming “Jai hind!” as they see their flag burning, which is inexplicably more painful than having their fingers snipped off. Bollywood deals in fantastic melodrama, we all know that, but there is a line that “Fighter” repeatedly crosses, becoming such a one-sided screech at its chosen enemies that it transforms into something unpleasant and just plain nasty.

Advertisement

It’s also no secret that action movies of this high a calibre can frequently be this politically reprehensible, yet also retain their towering status as exciting spectacles. Anand’s mission to give his country its first aviation action picture sees him take major inspiration from both “Top Gun” films, compounding their narrative beats into a single near-three hour epic, and also trying to apply some of the action tricks he learned from Casey O’Neill on “Pathaan”. His 250 crore budget has certainly given him the numbers to work with, and most of that goes towards some slick CG that thunderously establishes the mile-high world of the IAF. The training montages are engaging and the geography is initially tight, but the action does lose its way as each sequence becomes more repetitive than the last. In terms of proper stunt work with pilots and actors alike experiencing real G-force, “Top Gun” still has the upper hand, with too much of “Fighter”‘s aerial combat being obviously CGI, leaving the element of genuine, weighty danger to one side for most of the picture. 

Instead, “Fighter”‘s pleasures lie in its commitment to the yearning melodrama between its good-looking cast. Our introduction to Patty sees him fly a jet upside down whilst landing as a show-off tactic, and a simple cocked eyebrow from Minni is enough to get the ball rolling for some ripe (if ultimately chaste) romantic tension between Roshan and Padukone. Much of the interpersonal drama takes place on runways at golden hour, Roshan’s razor-sharp jawline being practically made to have the setting sun bounce off it as his teary eyes do the heavy lifting. The film’s love language is power ballads and motorbikes, sunset regret and near-miss kisses, and is directed with so much feeling and brio that it’s almost enough to forget the hatred the film is otherwise capable of.

There are also some excellent dance numbers where Roshan is completely at home, especially in a disco-influenced party sequence where Anil Kapoor’s hard-ass commander Rocky lets his hair down (metaphorically, of course: there is no force on earth that can fell his impressive quiff) with a glass of whisky and a tight-fitting turtleneck. Had “Fighter” simply been about the vibes shared by pilot pals and the COs who love throwing the book at them, it would be a far more successful film than the lumbering, surprisingly barbaric beast it turns into. 

While it’s a more grounded chance for Anand to flex his action muscles than his Yash Raj spy films, it’s a significant step backwards for him as a maker of lighthearted entertainment. His spy adventures were hardly unimpeachable as nationalistic manifestos, but they had a self-awareness that stopped them short of being actively offensive. His own franchise launch at Marflix crosses that rubicon and ends up as needlessly full of itself and drunk on the power of its nation, muddying the waters and speaking up unduly when the real world is experiencing its own agony at the same moment. Where the “Fighter” saga goes from here is unknowable, yet one can only hope these handsome people don’t get any more ugly than this.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Dhruv Vikram’s Bison Movie Review and Rating, Anupama

Published

on

Dhruv Vikram’s Bison Movie Review and Rating, Anupama
Movie Name : Bison

Release Date : Oct 24, 2025
123telugu.com Rating : 2.75/5
Starring : Dhruv Vikram, Anupama Parameswaran, Rajisha Vijayan, Pasupathy
Ameer
Director : Mari Selvaraj
Producers : Sameer Nair, Deepak Seigal, Pa. Ranjith, Aditi Anand
Music Director : Nivas K. Prasanna
Cinematographer : Ezhil Arasu K.
Editor :  Sakthi Thiru

Related Links : Trailer

Dhruv Vikram’s Bison Kaalamaadan (simply Bison) released in Tamil during Diwali, and its Telugu version hit the screens today, a week later. Directed by Mari Selvaraj, the film blends sports and social commentary and check out the review to know how it is.

Story:

Advertisement

Set in the 1990s, Bison follows Kittayya (Dhruv Vikram), a student who dreams of excelling in kabaddi. His father Velusamy (Pasupathy) disapproves, fearing for his son’s future. Their village is divided by caste, and Kittayya’s family belongs to a marginalised community that has endured oppression for generations. Despite resistance, he pursues kabaddi but faces harsh challenges at every step. Whether he achieves his dream and breaks these barriers forms the crux of the story.

Plus Points:

Mari Selvaraj once again explores oppression and social inequality, this time with kabaddi as the backdrop. He narrates it effectively, depicting inequality from local playgrounds to the national stage.

Dhruv Vikram puts his blood and sweat into the role. His physical transformation and emotional depth stand out, marking him as a promising talent.

Pasupathy is equally impressive, portraying a father torn between fear and affection. The bond between him and Dhruv forms the film’s emotional core.

Advertisement

Among others, Lal, Ameer, and Rajisha Vijayan perform well. Anupama Parameswaran, however, appears for less than 15 minutes and has little scope to perform.

Minus Points:

Bison draws inspiration from the life of Arjuna Award–winning kabaddi player Manathi Ganesan, balancing realism and emotion. While the discrimination is portrayed effectively, many scenes feel overstretched.

The emotional impact of Mari Selvaraj’s earlier works, such as Karnan and Pariyerum Perumal, is missing in Bison. Its length, repetitive sequences, and predictable narrative weaken the film’s overall grip.

The sports drama angle feels underused, with kabaddi serving more as a metaphor for social inequality than as a dramatic core.

Advertisement

In the Telugu dubbed version, poor localisation hurts the experience. Tamil signboards, newspapers, and tattoos remain untranslated, leaving viewers puzzled. It’s a clear case of negligence. The raw violence might also alienate family audiences.

Technical Aspects:

As a writer and director, Mari Selvaraj delivers a decent outing but not one matching the power of his earlier films. Bison struggles with uneven pacing and repetition. Ezhil Arasu K’s cinematography beautifully captures the rural backdrop and kabaddi action.

Nivas K. Prasanna’s music is decent but occasionally mismatched and loud. Sakthi Thiru’s editing could have been sharper, as trimming repetitive portions would have made it tighter. Production values are fine overall.

Verdict:

Advertisement

On the whole, Bison Kaalamaadan is a sports drama that addresses oppression and inequality. It works to an extent, largely due to Dhruv Vikram’s dedication and Pasupathy’s heartfelt performance. However, Mari Selvaraj’s narration lacks the sharpness and emotional impact of his earlier works. The prolonged runtime, predictable writing, and uneven emotional flow make Bison a below average flick. The film may not appeal to everyone, especially given its raw tone, but if you’re curious, watch it with modest expectations.

123telugu.com Rating: 2.75/5

Reviewed by 123telugu Team 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: “Bugonia” – A Delightfully Warped Night at the Movies – The Arts Fuse

Published

on

Film Review: “Bugonia” – A Delightfully Warped Night at the Movies – The Arts Fuse

By Michael Marano

There’s a profound catharsis in watching Bugonia, one that echoes the catharsis articulated by those who attended the ‘No Kings’ protests on the 18th.

Bugonia, directed by Yorgos Lanthimos. Screening in cinemas around New England

Emma Stone in a scene from Bugonia. Photo: Courtesy of Focus Features

Yorgos Lanthimos’ Bugonia is a remake of the 2003 South Korean movie Save the Green Planet!, which, for the sake of journalistic integrity, I gotta admit I haven’t seen. So, while I can’t talk about the connections of Bugonia to Green Planet!, I can comment on its connections to the whole subgenre of “Women Held Captive by Nut Jobs” movies.

Advertisement

And to the captivity we’re all enduring, right now.

Bugonia concerns two dumbfuck cousins (Jesse Plemons and Aidan Delbis), who’ve had whatever scant IQ points they had at birth lobotomized out of them by QAnon-type online conspiracies. The oddly loveable and shaggy nitwits kidnap a high-powered pharmaceutical company CEO (Emma Stone), convinced she’s an alien using the levers of capitalism to destroy the planet. The pair demand an audience with Stone’s Andromedan superiors to negotiate for the survival of Homo Sapiens.

The vibe here, especially in the context of the cousins’ ever-nuttier conspiracy theories and the gender issues present, echoes William Wyler’s 1965 adaptation of John Fowles’ The Collector. A vibe maybe amplified by the recent deaths of the two stars of The Collector,  Terence Stamp and Samantha Eggar? The Collector, which nabbed the premise of Beauty and the Beast, added the motif of the captor being crazy, making the beautiful woman prisoner not just a captive held in her kidnapper’s physical space, but his broken mental reality as well. Think of the physical and mental imprisonments of Split, 10 Cloverfield Lane, Boxing Helena, Room, the made-for-tv classics, Sweet Hostage and Bad Ronald, and the gender-swapped Misery.

There’s another dimension to this the post-Collector riff on the Beauty and the Beast captivity motif…  the site of captivity becomes a microcosm of larger, current societal issues. The mental illness of the captor echoes the mental illness of the culture. Where does the insanity of the captor end, and the insanity of society at large begin?

And here’s where Bugonia gets really interesting. Our whole culture enables and encourages billionaire plutocrats to kill the planet. When it comes to the delusions of Plemons and Delbis in Bugonia, does it matter whether or not Musk, Peter Theil, and company are hostile aliens — if what they’re doing to our species and the Earth is exactly what hostile aliens would do? Ever see the Twilight Zone episode “The Monsters are Due on Maple Street,” in which aliens pave the way for their invasion by fomenting paranoia and distrust among Earth communities? How’s that different from what mutant, slug-boy dodgeball victim Mark Zuckerberg does with 3 billion Facebook users a month? Stone’s character allegedly approves the use of unauthorized and untested methods and procedures on unsuspecting subjects and consumers. How’s that different from what Elizabeth Holmes did to trusting schmucks via her scumbag Theranos grifts?

Advertisement

By making the alleged crimes of Stone’s CEO plausible, Bugonia dodges the issue that hampered Evan Peters’ tech bro villain in Tron: Ares and the last two movie iterations of Lex Luthor. No supervillain tech bro can compete with the insanity and malignancy of the real things. Stone plays a person of real villainy… not someone trying to get their hands on a hunk of kryptonite.

So, if society nurtures these corporate aliens (and it doesn’t matter a whit that they’re not extraterrestrial aliens) to spread destruction that would be the envy of H.G. Wells’s Martians, who’s to say these dim bulb cousins are nuts? Yeah, they’re acting crazy. But the world is crazy, so maybe their responses aren’t? The actions of oligarchs and corporate assholes are making their lives unlivable. And desperate times do call for desperate measures.

This ambiguity creates a kind of Stockholm Syndrome among the kidnapping cousins and the abductee and the audience. For most of its runtime, Bugonia is a work of theater. The story is mostly contained in a couple of rooms. Outside that theatrical space, real-life tech bros are making our lives just as unlivable as are the lives of those kidnapping cousins. If Bugonia is a play, then current events lend it a Brechtian Alienation Effect. The fourth wall is broken and on some level, the audience of Bugonia is made to think as they watch the film, to consider the insane ideas and issues being raised — and to weigh whether or not they really are crazy.

Everyone’s a hostage in Bugonia… the dum-dum cousins, Stone’s pharmaceutical CEO, and the audience. It’s an Absurdist movie, and the absurdity it envisions isn’t the goofy absurdity of Alfred Jarry’s Ubu Roi. It’s the sadistic predicament of millions of people whose lives have been imperiled (in some cases ended) by a self-proclaimed DOGE master, a transphobic, apartheid, sci-fi obsessed nepo baby with a breeding kink who wants to die on Mars, whose obscene wealth is based on slave labor imposed in a jade mine owned by his incest-obsessed daddy.

All these weighty and thought-provoking factors feed into the utterly twisted black humor that makes Bugonia such a delightfully warped night at the movies. There’s not a lot of hyperbole in Bugonia (for the most part). Stone hilariously fakes empathy for her employees while telling them they can leave work at 5:30 while at the same time telling them they really shouldn’t rings painfully true for anybody who’s had to deal with a shitty job and a sociopathic boss (which is everyone).  There’s a profound catharsis in watching Bugonia, one that echoes the catharsis articulated by those who attended the ‘No Kings’ protests on the 18th. In part, the attendees responded to not feeling alone in their horror and dismay at what Trump is doing. I got the vibe that the people at the screening of Bugonia I attended felt the same way watching the twistedness of the movie reflect the twistedness of the world outside the movie theater.

Advertisement

The sharing of that kind of catharsis is a very human empathy, of a type that the CEO (and/or alien?) that Stone plays is incapable. Rush out and see Bugonia and share that empathy, before the tech bros and oligarchs make you pay a subscription fee for the oxygen you’ll burn nervously laughing at the cruel inanity it depicts, and that we are all living in.


Novelist, editor, writing coach and personal trainer Mike Marano has a new story called “Land of the Glass Pinecones” in the GenX-themed anthology 120 Murders: Dark Fiction Inspired by the Alternative Era.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Regretting You’ wastes Allison Williams in overwrought Colleen Hoover romance – Review

Published

on

‘Regretting You’ wastes Allison Williams in overwrought Colleen Hoover romance – Review


Love is complicated for Allison Williams and Dave Franco in ‘Regretting You,’ adapted from Colleen Hoover’s book.

play

Advertisement
  • “Regretting You,” adapted from Colleen Hoover’s best-selling book, arrives in movie theaters Oct. 24.
  • Allison Williams and Dave Franco are thrown together after their significant others die in a car crash.
  • Young stars Mckenna Grace and Mason Thames are the movie’s highlight in every way.

Like many Nicholas Sparks movies before her, here comes Colleen Hoover’s film, attempting to leave no tear unjerked.

While “It Ends With Us” was a hot mess in every way, at least the new romantic drama “Regretting You” (★★½ out of four; rated PG-13; in theaters Oct. 24) makes sure all its drama is on the screen. And the flick, based on Hoover’s bestselling novel, lays it on thick alongside a lacking narrative and cringey dialogue. On the plus side, the young acting talent and a welcome lightheartedness will keep the eye-rolling to a minimum.

The story follows two couples of high school sweethearts in a small North Carolina town. Morgan (Allison Williams) got pregnant at the end of senior year and married jock boyfriend Chris (Scott Eastwood), and they’re raising 17-year-old aspiring actress Clara (Mckenna Grace), who butts heads regularly with her overprotective mom.

The other pair is Morgan’s sister Jenny (Willa Fitzgerald) and Jonah (Dave Franco), who ghosted his old pals after graduation for several years before coming back to town – now these two have a newborn son and are thinking about a wedding.

Advertisement

Still with me? Because stuff’s about to get real. Chris and Jenny die in a car accident, and Morgan and Jonah quickly figure out that their loved ones were having a secret affair for years. That reveal drives a bigger wedge between Morgan and Clara, who gets together with Miller (Mason Thames), the movie-loving popular boy at school. (Morgan does NOT approve.) And to add some extra sauce to the mix, Jonah has been crushing on Morgan since they were kids.

“The Fault in Our Stars” director Josh Boone wades back into emotionally turbulent waters with “Regretting You,” which manages to tick off many boxes on the schmaltz-drama bingo card: abandonment issues, unrequited love, dead parents, cancer-ridden relatives and even one big, rain-soaked romantic moment.

Most of the adult side of the plot leans insufferable and overwrought: “There’s no version of you that’s boring,” one person says to the most boring character in the movie. Eastwood and Fitzgerald are barely in the movie long enough to register, Williams’ 30-something mom lacks any actual spirit, and Franco’s painfully earnest single dad can’t decide whether to keep his glasses on and off. (Neither way looks particularly cool for this broody nerd.) Oh, and fun fact: All four actors also play their teen selves, which is monumentally weird.

Advertisement

Fortunately, Grace and Thames are so cute together that the grown-ups don’t even need to matter. (The one exception: Clancy Brown as Miller’s extremely lovable grandpa.) The kids navigate plenty of teen-movie tropes, too, but their combined magnetism lifts the entire movie. In another era, these two would be the king and queen of rom-coms – of all the various love pairings, theirs feels the most genuine amid so much artificial sweetness.

Boone also sprinkles in some physical comedy and funny scenes that keep this Hoover film nimble instead of a completely contrived slog. (And get ready for more of the latest zeitgeisty author, with adaptations of her “Reminders of Him” and “Verity” coming in the new year.) Without its wryness and youthful bent, you’d really be regretting this particular cinematic life choice.

Continue Reading

Trending