Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Fighter (2024) by Siddharth Anand

Published

on

Film Review: Fighter (2024) by Siddharth Anand

Hrithik Roshan takes to the skies in the first chapter of a new all-action franchise from Siddharth Anand.

Emotions and politics fly fast and hard in Siddharth Anand’s mega-budget Hindi-language “Fighter”, a new attempt at making the next big cinematic universe after his stints in Yash Raj Films’ Spy Universe, “War” and “Pathaan”. While “Pathaan” heralded the return of Bollywood legend Shah Rukh Khan, “War” saw him refine his partnership with the similarly beloved Hrithik Roshan, giving him another super-hunk super-spy role after “Bang Bang!”, a remake of the Tom Cruise/Cameron Diaz action rom-com “Knight & Day”. The shadow of Tom Cruise looms over Anand’s work with increasing prominence nowadays; “Pathaan” recruited “Top Gun: Maverick”‘s stunt coordinator Casey O’Neill as its second unit and action director, and now, Anand’s very own production company Marflix Pictures utilises Roshan’s lucrative leading man status into India’s very own “Top Gun” (complete with a villain modelled off Cruise’s hair and outfit in “Mission: Impossible II”). Spreading their wings from one extended universe into another is an exciting prospect for masala cinema, and with the billion dollar success of “Maverick” on the world stage, Roshan playing a pilot while Anand pilots behind the camera should send a heat-seeking missile towards the competition.

Follow our coverage of Hindi cinema by clicking on the image below

Their approach is as broad as they come. A crack team of IAF helicopter and jet pilots is assembled at Srinagar Airfield, bordering Kashmir, following a significant threat from Pakistani mujahideen working covertly under the funding of the Pakistani government. The squad is made up of some fun caricatures, including but not limited to the dorky rookie ‘Sukhi’ (Banveen Singh), wife-guy ‘Taj’ (Karan Singh Grover), no-nonsense girl-amongst-boys ‘Minni’ (Deepika Padukone), and (of course) their tortured but brilliant hotshot leader ‘Patty’ (Hrithik Roshan). They bicker, they train, they drink and party together, and gradually become a cohesive unit despite the inevitable ego growth that comes from knowing how to fly death machines worth the economy of a small country. But when a skirmish between Pakistan and India leaves some of our heroes behind enemy lines, faiths are shaken and tempers are flared as what was a national conflict becomes a deeply personal one.

Any alarm bells ringing about the shameless jingoism of making Pakistan an actively villainous presence in this narrative are absolutely real and legitimate, with Anand’s view on a current and long-running international conflict as deeply concerning, angry and reductive. The eventual fistfight between an aggrieved Patty and sadistic uber-bad guy Akhtar (first-time Rishabh Sawhney, excellent in a cartoonishly evil role) sees Hrithik seething his way through a monologue punctuated with suplexes and sucker punches about Kashmir’s ‘rightful’ Indian ownership, and how (if they’re not careful) Pakistan itself will become an Indian occupation. Given the touchiness of conflicts surrounding land ownership in this current moment, it’s difficult not to be left with a sour taste in the mouth with such vitriolic right-wing views being spouted by crowd-pleasing entertainment of this scale.

Ιt’s a film that’s not above its villains suicide-bombing a gang of flag-waving innocents as its initial conflict, and it somehow encourages both sides to play dirtier until the entire picture is practically vibrating with Islamophobia. Its highest emotional peaks come in the form of its Indian heroes screaming “Jai hind!” as they see their flag burning, which is inexplicably more painful than having their fingers snipped off. Bollywood deals in fantastic melodrama, we all know that, but there is a line that “Fighter” repeatedly crosses, becoming such a one-sided screech at its chosen enemies that it transforms into something unpleasant and just plain nasty.

Advertisement

It’s also no secret that action movies of this high a calibre can frequently be this politically reprehensible, yet also retain their towering status as exciting spectacles. Anand’s mission to give his country its first aviation action picture sees him take major inspiration from both “Top Gun” films, compounding their narrative beats into a single near-three hour epic, and also trying to apply some of the action tricks he learned from Casey O’Neill on “Pathaan”. His 250 crore budget has certainly given him the numbers to work with, and most of that goes towards some slick CG that thunderously establishes the mile-high world of the IAF. The training montages are engaging and the geography is initially tight, but the action does lose its way as each sequence becomes more repetitive than the last. In terms of proper stunt work with pilots and actors alike experiencing real G-force, “Top Gun” still has the upper hand, with too much of “Fighter”‘s aerial combat being obviously CGI, leaving the element of genuine, weighty danger to one side for most of the picture. 

Instead, “Fighter”‘s pleasures lie in its commitment to the yearning melodrama between its good-looking cast. Our introduction to Patty sees him fly a jet upside down whilst landing as a show-off tactic, and a simple cocked eyebrow from Minni is enough to get the ball rolling for some ripe (if ultimately chaste) romantic tension between Roshan and Padukone. Much of the interpersonal drama takes place on runways at golden hour, Roshan’s razor-sharp jawline being practically made to have the setting sun bounce off it as his teary eyes do the heavy lifting. The film’s love language is power ballads and motorbikes, sunset regret and near-miss kisses, and is directed with so much feeling and brio that it’s almost enough to forget the hatred the film is otherwise capable of.

There are also some excellent dance numbers where Roshan is completely at home, especially in a disco-influenced party sequence where Anil Kapoor’s hard-ass commander Rocky lets his hair down (metaphorically, of course: there is no force on earth that can fell his impressive quiff) with a glass of whisky and a tight-fitting turtleneck. Had “Fighter” simply been about the vibes shared by pilot pals and the COs who love throwing the book at them, it would be a far more successful film than the lumbering, surprisingly barbaric beast it turns into. 

While it’s a more grounded chance for Anand to flex his action muscles than his Yash Raj spy films, it’s a significant step backwards for him as a maker of lighthearted entertainment. His spy adventures were hardly unimpeachable as nationalistic manifestos, but they had a self-awareness that stopped them short of being actively offensive. His own franchise launch at Marflix crosses that rubicon and ends up as needlessly full of itself and drunk on the power of its nation, muddying the waters and speaking up unduly when the real world is experiencing its own agony at the same moment. Where the “Fighter” saga goes from here is unknowable, yet one can only hope these handsome people don’t get any more ugly than this.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Controversy Surrounds ‘The Raja Saab’ as Makers Allegedly Offer Money for Positive Reviews | – The Times of India

Published

on

Controversy Surrounds ‘The Raja Saab’ as Makers Allegedly Offer Money for Positive Reviews | – The Times of India
Prabhas’s ‘The Raja Saab’ has hit theaters, but early social media reactions are mixed to negative. A netizen claims the film’s team offered him ₹14,000 to delete his critical review and post a positive one instead. The authenticity of this claim remains unverified, while fans continue to share their varied opinions online.

Prabhas-starrer ‘The Raja Saab’ is currently running in theaters; the much-awaited film was released today. The early reviews of the Maruthi-directed film have been receiving mixed to negative reviews on social media. However, a netizen has claimed that the makers of the film offered him money to delete his negative review.

Netizen alleges bribe by the makers

On Friday morning, an X user named @BS__unfiltered posted a screenshot online. He said he received a message from the official account of ‘The Raja Saab’ after posting his review. According to him, the film’s team offered him Rs 14,000. They reportedly asked him to post a positive review of the movie instead. Sharing the screenshot, the user wrote, “What the hell mannnnn!!!! They are offering me money to delete this!!! Nahi hoga delete #TheRajaSaab #Prabhas.” However, the screenshot shared by the user is in question for its authenticity and is not verified. At this time, it is not clear if the message was real or AI-generated. The claim is still unconfirmed.See More: The Raja Saab: Movie Review and Release Live Updates: Prabhas’ film to open big at the box office

Fans share their opinions online

Fans and netizens have been active on social media, sharing their opinions about the film. While some enjoyed it, many expressed disappointment. Another internet user wrote, “A horror-fantasy with a good idea but weak execution. Prabhas gives an energetic & comical performance, & the face-off with Sanjay Dutt is the main highlight. The palace setting is interesting at first, but the messy screenplay, dragged 2nd half, uneven VFX, & weak emotional payoff reduce the impact. @MusicThaman’s music & sounding are one of the positives. From the end of the first half, the story becomes slightly interesting. There are 3 songs featuring Prabhas & @AgerwalNidhhi. Nidhhi has performed well. Some scenes feel unintentionally funny, & the climax fails to impress. Overall, a one-time watch at best. This film gives a lead for The Raja Saab Circus—1935 (Part 2), where we may see Prabhas vs. Prabhas.”

Advertisement

About ‘The Raja Saab’

‘The Raja Saab’ is directed and written by Maruthi. The film stars Prabhas in the lead role. The cast also includes Malavika Mohanan, Nidhhi Agerwal, Riddhi Kumar, Sanjay Dutt, and Boman Irani.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Greenland 2: Migration’ Review: Gerard Butler in a Post-Apocalyptic Sequel That’s Exactly What You Expect

Published

on

‘Greenland 2: Migration’ Review: Gerard Butler in a Post-Apocalyptic Sequel That’s Exactly What You Expect

Desperate migrants are forced to leave Greenland after a malevolent force makes their island uninhabitable. No, it’s not tomorrow’s headline about Donald Trump, but rather the sequel to Ric Roman Waugh’s 2020 post-apocalyptic survival thriller. That film starring Gerard Butler and Morena Baccarin had the misfortune of opening during the pandemic and going straight to VOD. Greenland 2: Migration (now there’s a catchy title) has the benefit of opening in theaters, but it truly feels like an unnecessary follow-up. After all, how many travails can one poor family take?

That family consists of John Garrity (Butler), whose structural engineering skills designated him a governmental candidate for survival in the wake of an interstellar comet dubbed “Clarke” wreaking worldwide destruction; his wife Allison (Baccarin); and their son Nathan (now played by Roman Griffin Davis). At the end of the first film, the clan had endured numerous life-threatening crises as they made their way to the underground bunker in Greenland where survivors will attempt to make a new life.

Greenland 2: Migration

The Bottom Line

It’s the end of the world as we know it…again.

Advertisement

Release date: Friday, January 9
Cast: Gerard Butler, Morena Baccarin, Roman Griffin Davis, Amber Rose Revah, Sophie Thompson, Trond Fausa Aurvag, William Abadie
Director: Ric Roman Waugh
Screenwriters: Mitchell LaFortune, Chris Sparling

Rated PG-13,
1 hour 38 minutes

Five years later, things aren’t going so well. Fragments of the comet continue to rain down on the planet, causing catastrophic destruction. The contaminated air prevents people from going outside, and resources are becoming increasingly scarce. But there are some plus sides, such as the bunker’s inhabitants still being able to dance to yacht rock.

When their safe haven in Greenland is destroyed, the Garritys, along with a few other survivors, are forced to flee. Their destination is France, where there are rumors of an oasis at the comet’s original crash site. And at the very least, the food is bound to be better.

Advertisement

It’s a perilous journey, but anyone who saw the first film knows what to expect. The Garritys, along with the bunker’s Dr. Casey (Amber Rose Revah), run into some very bad people, undergoing a series of life-threatening trials and tribulations.

Unfortunately, while the thriller mechanics are reasonably well orchestrated by director Waugh (Angel Has Fallen, Kandahar) in his fourth collaboration with Butler, Greenland 2: Migration feels as redundant as its title. While the first film featured a relatively original premise and some genuine emotional dynamics in its suspenseful situations, this one just feels rote. And while it’s made clear that the crisis has resulted in people resorting to cutthroat, deadly means to ensure their survival, the Garritys have it relatively easy. All John has to do is adopt a puppy-dog look, put a pleading tone in his voice, beg for his family’s help, and people inevitably comply.

To be fair, the film contains some genuinely arresting scenes, including one set in a practically submerged Liverpool and another in a dried-up English Channel. The latter provides the opportunity for a harrowing sequence in which the family is forced to cross a giant ravine on a treacherously fragile rope ladder.

Butler remains a sturdy screen presence, his Everyman quality lending gravitas to his character. Baccarin, whose character serves as the story’s moral conscience (early in the proceedings she spearheads a fight to open the shelter to more refugees despite the lack of resources, delivering a not-so-subtle message), more than matches his impact. William Abadie (of Emily in Paris) also makes a strong impression as a Frenchman who briefly takes the family in and begs them to take his daughter Camille (Nelia Valery de Costa) along with them.

Resembling the sort of B-movie fantasy adventure, with serviceable but unremarkable special effects, that used to populate multiplexes in the early ‘70s, Greenland 2: Migration is adequate January filler programming. The only thing it’s missing is dinosaurs.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: A real-life ’70s hostage drama crackles in Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

Published

on

Movie Review: A real-life ’70s hostage drama crackles in Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

It plays a little loose with facts but the righteous rage of “Dog Day Afternoon” is present enough in Gus Van Sant’s “Dead Man’s Wire,” a based-on-a-true-tale hostage thriller that’s as deeply 1970s as it is contemporary.

In February 1977, Tony Kiritsis walked into the Meridian Mortgage Company in downtown Indianapolis and took one of its executives, Dick Hall, hostage. Kiritsis held a sawed-off shotgun to the back of Hall’s head and draped a wire around his neck that connected to the gun. If he moved too much, he would die.

The subsequent standoff moved to Kiritsis’ apartment and eventually concluded in a live televised news conference. The whole ordeal received some renewed attention in a 2022 podcast dramatization starring Jon Hamm.

But in “Dead Man’s Wire,” starring Bill Skarsgård as Kiritsis, these events are vividly brought to life by Van Sant. It’s been seven years since Van Sant directed, following 2018’s “Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot,” and one of the prevailing takeaways of his new film is that that’s too long of a break for a filmmaker of Van Sant’s caliber.

Working from a script by Austin Kolodney, the filmmaker of “My Own Private Idaho” and “Good Will Hunting” turns “Dead Man’s Wire” into not a period-piece time capsule but a bracingly relevant drama of outrage and inequality. Tony feels aggrieved by his mortgage company over a land deal the bank, he claims, blocked. We’re never given many specifics, but at the same time, there’s little doubt in “Dead Man’s Wire” that Tony’s cause is just. His means might be desperate and abhorrent, but the movie is very definitely on his side.

Advertisement

That’s owed significantly to Skarsgård, who gives one of his finest and least adorned performances. While best known for films like “It,” “The Crow” and “Nosferatu,” here Skarsgård has little more than some green polyester and a very ’70s mustache to alter his looks. The straightforward, jittery intensity of his performance propels “Dead Man’s Wire.”

Yet Van Sant’s film aspires to be a larger ensemble drama, which it only partially succeeds at. Tony’s plight is far from a solitary one, as numerous threads suggest in Kolodney’s fast-paced script. First and foremost is Colman Domingo as a local DJ named Fred Temple. (If ever there were an actor suited, with a smooth baritone, to play a ’70s radio DJ, it’s Domingo.) Tony, a fan, calls Fred to air his demands. But it’s not just a media outlet for him. Fred touts himself as “the voice of the people.”

Something similar could be said of Tony, who rapidly emerges as a kind of folk hero. As much as he tortures his hostage (a very good Dacre Montgomery), he’s kind to the police officers surrounding him. And as he and Dick spend more time together, Dick emerges as a kind of victim, himself. It’s his father’s bank, and when Tony gets M.L. Hall (Al Pacino) on the phone, he sounds painfully insensitive, sooner ready to sacrifice his son than acknowledge any wrongdoing.

Pacino’s presence in “Dead Man’s Wire” is a nod to “Dog Day Afternoon,” a movie that may be far better — but, then again, that’s true of most films in comparison to Sidney Lumet’s unsurpassed 1975 classic. Still, Van Sant’s film bears some of the same rage and disillusionment with the meatgrinder of capitalism as “Dog Day.”

There’s also a telling, if not entirely successful subplot of a local TV news reporter (Myha’la) struggling against stereotypes. Even when she gets the goods on the unspooling news story, the way her producer says to “chop it up” and put it on air makes it clear: Whatever Tony is rebelling against, it’s him, not his plight, that will be served up on a prime-time plate.

Advertisement

It doesn’t take recent similar cases of national fascination, such as Luigi Mangione, charged with killing a healthcare executive, to see contemporary echoes of Kiritsis’ tale. The real story is more complicated and less metaphor-ready, of course, than the movie, which detracts some from the film’s gritty sense of verisimilitude. Staying closer to the truth might have produced a more dynamic movie.

But “Dead Man’s Wire” still works. In the film, Tony’s demands are $5 million and an apology. It’s clear the latter means more to him than the money. The tragedy in “Dead Man’s Wire” is just how elusive “I’m sorry” can be.

“Dead Man’s Wire,” a Row K Entertainment release, is rated R for language throughout. Running time: 105 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending