Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Deva’ Review: Rosshan Andrrews Remakes His Own ‘Mumbai Police,’ with Lackluster Results

Published

on

‘Deva’ Review: Rosshan Andrrews Remakes His Own ‘Mumbai Police,’ with Lackluster Results

A police officer with memory loss re-investigating a case that he had solved, just before he had the head injury which made him unable to recall who the killer is. An ending twist so surprising and risky that it made you gasp. And a performance by a leading man vulnerable and layered enough to enable you to get past the problematic portrayal of identity. These were some of the aspects which made Rosshan Andrrews’ 2013 film Mumbai Police, starring a terrific Prithviraj Sukumaran, such a standout.

Now, 12 years later, the same director has reworked the delicious story by Bobby-Sanjay for Hindi audiences. But this version has little of that power. Deva is a diluted, labored retread.

Deva

The Bottom Line

A weak retread.

Advertisement

Release Date: Friday, Jan. 31
Cast: Shahid Kapoor, Pooja Hegde, Pavail Gulatie, Kubbra Sait, Pravessh Rana
Director: Rosshan Andrrews
Screenwriters: Bobby Sanjay, Hussain Dalal, Abbas Dalal, Arshad Sayed, Sumit Arora

2 hours 36 minutes

The biggest fault line is that the remake writers — Hussain Dalal and Abbas Dalal, with Arshad Syed and Sumit Arora — have expanded and changed the narrative to serve the stardom of its lead actor. 

Shahid Kapoor is a strong actor who has delivered a range of solid performances in films such as Kaminey, Haider, Udta Punjab and Kabir Singh. Here, too, he seamlessly moves between the two avatars of police officer Dev Ambre. One is arrogant, trigger-happy, struggling with daddy issues and alcohol and therefore borderline unhinged; imagine Kabir as a Mumbai cop. The other post-accident Dev is quieter, less cocky and more willing to listen. Kapoor is robust as both. 

Advertisement

But because he is a star, the screenplay must include an unnecessary love angle — Pooja Hegde makes a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it appearance as Diya, a journalist. There are several action sequences which underline his leading man status. And the swag is in overdrive, especially in the song “Bhasad Macha” (the title translates to “create a ruckus”). Kapoor is an excellent dancer, but the song has little connection to the plot. 

Cigarettes also play a starring role. Dev smokes near constantly and cigarettes are part of his toxic hero act. While Sukumaran’s character in Mumbai Police, ACP Antony Moses, was also hyper-masculine, there was a reason for his posturing.

In short, Andrrews plays it safe. The original film featured a scene in which a female officer, who is Antony’s junior, harshly criticizes him for being abusive to a woman. This isn’t repeated in the remake. Although Dev crosses several lines, his hooliganism is seen as a slightly skewed version of heroism — in one scene, Diya says about Dev that his methods might be wrong, but he isn’t. Those methods include Dev shoving his elbow into a bullet hole in the arm of a man to get him to talk. 

But the unkindest cut is that the ending has been changed, lessening its impact considerably. The climax in Deva is suitably grim, but the writers give Dev a convenient but not very convincing backstory to justify all that we have seen. An attempt is made to address class and generational abuse, but it feels halfhearted.

On a more positive note, Pavail Gulatie and Pravessh Rana provide competent support to Kapoor’s blistering act. Other striking aspects include the background score by Jakes Bejoy and the way in which Andrrews and cinematographer Amit Roy use Mumbai, especially in the action sequences. 

Advertisement

Some scenes include bad digital renderings of the city’s landmarks, but Andrrews also places his story on roads and narrow lanes teeming with people and traffic. He and Roy take advantage of the Mumbai rains to create slick streets and a sense of gloom. Some of their overhead shots, like one of two local trains moving in opposite directions, are stunning.

Vijay from Deewaar, one of Amitabh Bachchan’s most iconic roles, looms large as a life-sized mural near Deva’s home. A key scene takes place in a tunnel similar to the one where Vijay and Ravi have the conversation that includes the immortal line, “Mere paas maa hai” (“I have my mother”).

Like Vijay, Dev is very much the “Angry Young Man.” However, as good as Kapoor is, he can’t give the character the layers that Sukumaran could Vijay, because the writing for Deva is so much more generic.

If you haven’t seen Mumbai Police, Deva might work as a whodunit. But for admirers of the original, this rendition is far from satisfying. 

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Millie Bobby Brown leads frothy sleuthing caper

Published

on

Millie Bobby Brown leads frothy sleuthing caper

A still from ‘Enola Holmes 3’
| Photo Credit: Netflix

Enola Holmes 3sees Philip Barantini (Adolescence) take over direction from Fleabag’s Harry Bradbeer while Jack Thorne (another Adolescence alum) continues as writer from the first two films. The supposed darker take is not very apparent in this tale featuring the consultant detective’s sister.

Based on Nancy Springer’s charming The Enola Holmes Mysteries, Enola Holmes 3 opens with a wedding in Malta. Enola (Millie Bobby Brown), the younger sister of Sherlock (Henry Cavill), and a detective in her own right, as we have seen from the earlier films, is getting married to sweet, idealistic Lord Tewkesbury (Louis Partridge).

Sherlock is in Malta for the wedding which he strongly disapproves, believing Enola will not be able to pursue her career as a detective once she marries and becomes Lady Tewkesbury. Enola has her own doubts about the marriage — not about Tewkesbury but about his world, the people in it and their expectations.

Enola Holmes 3 (English)

Director: Philip Barantini

Cast: Millie Bobby Brown, Louis Partridge, Himesh Patel, Sharon Duncan-Brewster, Henry Cavill, Helena Bonham Carter, Susan Wokoma

Advertisement

Runtime: 105 minutes

Storyline: As Enola prepares to marry Lord Tewkesbury in Malta, her brother goes missing and the game is afoot

When she finally gets into the carriage for her wedding, she realises she is being followed by a masked rider. After a thrilling chase involving the dropping of many bridal veils, the pursuer is revealed to be Dr Watson (Himesh Patel), Sherlock’s flatmate, friend and chronicler (not yet, though). The mask, the good doctor explains, is for allergies.

He was thundering after Enola because Sherlock has vanished, probably kidnapped, as he was working on another case. When Enola’s future mother-in-law, Lady Tewkesbury (Hattie Morahan) also goes missing, the wedding is forgotten as Enola races against time to solve the mystery.

A still from ‘Enola Holmes 3’

A still from ‘Enola Holmes 3’
| Photo Credit:
Netflix

The pieces of the puzzle include the Battle of Khost in Afghanistan, looted gold, the Maltese fight for independence in the person of Mikiel Mizzi (Joe Azzopardi) from the Partito Anti-Riformista, and the criminal mastermind Moriarty (Sharon Duncan-Brewster).

Advertisement

Enola’s mother, Eudoria (Helena Bonham Carter) and her friend Edith (Susan Wokoma) are skulking around giving Enola invisible support as Eudoria is in trouble with the law for her dynamite-forward ways.

Enola Holmes 3 zips by in a series of frantic action sequences, quips and callbacks. The storybook look is propped up by those amazing pop-ups. Darker themes arrive in lines such as Moriarty saying “There are few British names that are not tarnished with the pain of its empire.”

Brown has created an endearing heroine in her Enola, even if her habit of breaking the fourth wall, while definitely reduced, has gone way beyond twee to be outright annoying. Cavill’s Sherlock is brave and beautiful and just that little bit cross, while Carter’s Eudoria walks the line between gently eccentric and decidedly odd as she dispenses gems of wisdom including “the puzzle is always as devious as the setter.”

Fast, fun and eminently forgettable, this is popcorn entertainment at its most efficient.

 Enola Holmes 3 is currently streaming on Netflix

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Sender

Published

on

Sender

In Sender, writer-director Russell Goldman’s high-anxiety debut, the filmmaker expands on his 2022 short Return to Sender, in which Allison Tolman starred as a woman who receives packages she didn’t order. That may not sound like a premise that would result in a paranoid, darkly comedic thriller, much less a feature. But in extending his story from 18 minutes to just over 90, Goldman follows a maddening scenario involving an online retailer called Smirk, a fictionalized Amazon counterpart. More significantly, he captures the frenzied mindset of his protagonist, who grapples with staying sober and several other major life changes—all compounded by a layer of justifiable paranoia brought on by the endless packages. Goldman’s tweaky style and elusive scripting create a peculiar, out-of-whack presentation that destabilizes the viewer, firmly placing us in his main character’s perspective. However, by the end, the journey through this cine-manic headspace doesn’t add up to much, and the potential character study at the center feels somewhat lost in the mechanics of the conspiracy. 

Britt Lower (AppleTV’s Severance) stars as Julia, who has just lost her job and moved into a rental home to get her life on track. She is backed financially by her overbearing sister Tatiana (Anna Baryshnikov), who occasionally comes nosing around to verify that Julia doesn’t backslide. And she doesn’t. Julia attends regular Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, where she meets the steely Whitney (Rhea Seehorn), who isn’t interested in being her sponsor. But at home, Julia receives a Smirk package with her brand of lipstick. The problem? She didn’t order it. She calls customer service, and the representative doesn’t help much before telling her, “Be sure to stay alert and aware.” Wait, what? Sender is loaded with nagging, unplaceable details like this. They’re often amusing, intriguing, and exasperating in the same moment. But these pieces don’t complete a whole picture, at least not a narratively satisfying one. 

The Smirk packages, delivered by the outwardly helpful, nice-guy driver Charlie (David Dastmalchian), contain a random assortment of objects, from drum kits to protein powder. The squirrelly Julia, already coming apart at the seams from her recent drama, doesn’t know what to make of it. She’s convinced there’s some plot against her, perhaps by someone at Smirk. To what end, she doesn’t know. But Goldman gives us a glimpse of the long-term consequences of her ordeal in the prologue, which features Jamie Lee Curtis (also a producer) as Lisa, a woman in circumstances similar to Julia’s. Lisa’s response to receiving a box of soil with a broken shin pad (with “Can’t Can’t Can” scrawled on it) entails an attempt to suffocate herself with the bubble wrap, only to do far worse with a sharp edge of the shin pad. To show Lisa’s fate, Goldman’s imagery becomes twisted and surreal but also cryptic. 

Sender’s disorienting mood is matched by a skewed formal presentation. Cinematographer Gemma Doll-Grossman’s wide-angle lenses and arch angles might feel at home in a Ken Russell or Terry Gilliam feature such as The Devils (1971) or 12 Monkeys (1996). Julia’s half-remembered drinking binges, accented by blurry close-ups, suggest she may have slept with any number of coworkers. She can’t remember, and it embarrasses her. Her rental is dressed in simple if shabby décor, which gives way to Julia’s erratic collage-like overhaul. Melisa Myers’ stuffed production design makes the most of heightened colors and banal, cluttered rooms that lend a normality to the bizarre, ever more disturbing predicament. Nathan Ruyle’s erratic music delivers what must be described as a soundscape rather than a traditional score, with collusive sound effects and tones driving our certainty that Julia is onto something. Along with Marco Rosas’ discordant editing, Goldman’s technical approach effectively reflects Julia’s fragmented, sleep-deprived mind. But his work as a writer hasn’t done enough to justify this level of technique. 

After Julia makes a revelatory discovery that small cameras have been embedded in the products from those mysterious packages, the eventual explanation about what has been happening and why strains logic and underwhelms. It also raises even more unanswered questions. Although well-made and acted—Lower and Seehorn should be on track to movie stardom—Goldman’s script could have used another draft to better work through what unfolds. Sender doesn’t give us enough of its characters’ inner lives beyond the situation at hand, so Julia, Charlie, Tatiana, and Whitney feel like devices in a scenario rather than well-drawn human beings. Even so, Goldman fills his film with deeply broken people who try to gain control of their lives by controlling others, exposing and preying on their weaknesses. Despite the material’s potential resonance, Goldman’s style is overpowering. Still, his kernel of an idea and the way he explores it demonstrate his clear skill, and for much of Sender, its sheer oddball energy earns admiration.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Neil’s Movie Reviews

Published

on

Neil’s Movie Reviews

Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

WKRN is provided by Nexstar Media Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending