Connect with us

News

What the SCOTUS campaign finance ruling means, according to an expert

Published

on

What the SCOTUS campaign finance ruling means, according to an expert

Former Federal Election Commission Chairman Trevor Potter testifies during a Senate Rules and Administration Committee hearing on artificial intelligence and the future of elections on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., Sept. 27, 2023.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The Supreme Court struck down limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with their candidates in a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines. The ruling is the latest in a series of Supreme Court decisions that have loosened campaign finance restrictions, overturning a 2001 precedent that upheld the spending limits.

Former Federal Election Commission Chairman Trevor Potter, who now serves as president of the Campaign Legal Center, joined NPR’s Morning Edition to break down the ruling. Speaking to NPR’s Michel Martin, Potter discussed why the court reversed its earlier precedent, how the ruling changes campaign finance rules and whether greater transparency could address concerns about corruption.

Listen to the full interview by clicking on the blue play button above. And read takeaways from the conversation below.

Advertisement

The post-Watergate limits were meant to prevent corruption

Potter said they were designed to stop donors from routing large contributions through national party committees to directly fund a favored candidate’s campaign. The restrictions were intended to prevent “an obvious way around” campaign contribution limits.

The court previously upheld the same limits

Asked why the Supreme Court upheld the law about 20 years ago, Potter said the justices concluded the restrictions were a constitutional way to prevent corruption. He said the court viewed them as an “anti-circumvention measure” to stop donors from using political parties to bypass contribution limits.

Potter rejects the majority’s rationale

Potter rejected the majority’s view that political parties have less political power than outside groups, saying earlier Supreme Court decisions allowing unlimited outside spending created that imbalance. He pointed to Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in support of that argument.

Disclosure wouldn’t necessarily reveal private fundraising arrangements

Potter said disclosure alone would not address his concerns because it cannot reveal private agreements between candidates and donors. While campaign donations to political parties are public, he said voters would not see behind-the-scenes requests from candidates asking donors to contribute to party committees that later support their campaigns.

“We’re never going to see that,” Potter said. “I don’t think there’s a way to practically disclose those backroom deals.”

Advertisement

This interview was written for the web by Majd Al-Waheidi and edited by Treye Green.

News

US Democrats finalise major shakeup to 2028 presidential primary calendar

Published

on

US Democrats finalise major shakeup to 2028 presidential primary calendar

Democrats in the United States have approved a shakeup to their 2028 presidential primary calendar as the party looks to take back the White House.

During a meeting on Saturday in Austin, Texas, Democratic National Committee (DNC) members voted to overhaul which states have the first say in picking the party’s presidential nominee.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

South Carolina will once again take centre stage as the party’s first official nominating contest, with its Democratic primary scheduled for January 22, 2028.

Nevada will go second on February 1, followed by New Hampshire on February 8. New Mexico, Michigan and Virginia will round out the early states over the course of that month.

The new calendar formalises a change that began during the last presidential election cycle in 2024, when the national Democratic Party similarly put South Carolina at the front of its primary lineup.

Advertisement

The 2028 primaries set up a more competitive calendar for Democrats, giving greater influence to states with more racial diversity, in an effort to better represent the party’s key constituencies.

Debate over primary calendar

But plans to reshape the primary calendar have been met with controversy in the past.

In 2024, for instance, local leaders in New Hampshire defied party leaders by holding a state-run primary ahead of the first party-led vote in South Carolina. As justification, New Hampshire officials cited a state law requiring their primary to be the first in the nation.

There was also pushback in Iowa, whose state caucus had ushered in the primary season for decades.

Iowa Democrats warned that moving the state lower in the party’s calendar could send the wrong signal to rural voters, who often feel overlooked in national politics and tend to lean rightward.

Advertisement

Still, proponents of the calendar change argue that it will help the Democratic primaries better mirror the overall population of the US.

South Carolina has normally been Democrats’ first contest in the southern US, and it has a significant population of Black voters. Roughly a quarter of the state identifies as Black, according to census estimates.

Nevada and New Mexico, meanwhile, have large Latino or Hispanic populations, with 31 percent and 49 percent of their residents identifying as such, respectively. All three states will be at the forefront of the primary calendar, come 2028.

DNC Chairman Ken Martin took to social media on Saturday to tout the changes as capturing the demographic shifts in the country.

“These states reflect the diversity of America and will help ensure our nominee is best positioned to take back the White House in 2028,” Martin wrote on X.

Advertisement

Ongoing party feud

Iowa and New Hampshire both have overwhelmingly white electorates, and critics have long argued the two states have played outsized roles in shaping presidential elections.

Notching early victories in the party primaries can help a candidate build momentum, and that, in turn, can help presidential hopefuls secure party nominations.

Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean, who led the DNC from 2005 to 2009, told The Associated Press (AP) news agency that the calendar changes will make for a more representative nominating process.

“These states look more like the country,” Dean said, pointing to places like South Carolina and Nevada, “whereas Iowa and New Hampshire don’t”.

But it remains uncertain how the new calendar could affect the growing intra-party feud between progressive and more moderate, establishment candidates.

Advertisement

Democrats in Michigan, one of the states given a boost in the calendar shakeup, narrowly voted earlier this month to select progressive Abdul El-Sayed as their Senate nominee.

Given that Michigan will now have an earlier say in the voting process, some experts have speculated that the swing state could help progressives assert greater influence over the party overall.

But other states given more prominence in the 2028 lineup have a more moderate streak.

South Carolina, for instance, favoured then-candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 primaries over his more progressive opponents, Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

“I think our primary voters up north are probably a little different than primary voters in South Carolina,” Boyd Brown, a former DNC member from South Carolina, told AP.

Advertisement

Here is the full list of the six states that will have the first say in Democrats’ 2028 presidential primaries:

  • South Carolina: January 22, 2028
  • Nevada: February 1, 2028
  • New Hampshire: February 8, 2028
  • New Mexico: February 15, 2028
  • Michigan: February 22, 2028
  • Virginia: February 29, 2028
Continue Reading

News

The Midwest braces for more heavy flooding, as Indiana seeks federal aid

Published

on

The Midwest braces for more heavy flooding, as Indiana seeks federal aid

This aerial photo provided by the Indianapolis Fire Department shows flooding in northern Indianapolis, Ind., Saturday, Aug. 15, 2026.

Indianapolis Fire Department via AP/Indianapolis Fire Department


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Indianapolis Fire Department via AP/Indianapolis Fire Department

A relentless stretch of thunderstorms has brought devastating flooding across the Midwest, with additional bouts of heavy rainfall expected through at least Sunday, the National Weather Service said.

The NWS is predicting widespread storms this weekend through the Ohio Valley, Midwest and central Appalachians, bringing additional precipitation to already saturated areas that had just started to see floodwater recede. At least three people have died and more than 150,000 were without power as of Saturday afternoon.

Indiana and Ohio have been among the hardest-hit states, with rainfall totaling more than 11 inches in some areas over the past week. The White River in Anderson, Ind., rose to a record 24.9 feet, surpassing a flood mark that has stood since 1913.

Advertisement

Flash flood and flood warnings were in effect across central Illinois and central Indiana, the NWS said Saturday, and flood watches were in effect from Iowa and Missouri eastward to central West Virginia.

“I will do everything in my power to protect Hoosier lives and livelihoods as we respond to this historic severe weather,” said Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, who has requested a presidential emergency declaration through FEMA for federal funding and resources. “I have mobilized state and local resources, declared a Statewide Disaster Emergency and deployed the Indiana National Guard.”

In addition to the deluge of rain, parts of Indiana have also endured periodic tornadoes and a derecho over the past several days.

Cyndee Gillmore, who owns and operates the Cornerstone Campground and Retreat Center in New Castle, Ind., said 5 feet of water swept across the property flooding the kitchen, banquet hall, youth center and all the center’s mobile campers.

“I’m standing in my house right now and it smells to high heaven, but it’s just stuff,” Gillmore said. “Everybody is pitching in and the community is supporting one another and it’s beautiful to see. We’re going to keep our focus on God.”

Advertisement

Still, she said, she worries about how the area will recover. Neither she nor most of her neighbors have flood insurance, and property insurance does not cover flooding.

Continue Reading

News

Has your vehicle been searched by Flock cameras? Here’s how to check

Published

on

Has your vehicle been searched by Flock cameras? Here’s how to check

(Gray News) – A website is allowing drivers to see if Flock surveillance cameras have searched for their vehicle.

HaveIBeenFlocked allows users to type their license plate number into a search bar to run through a series of “audit logs” within the Flock system, according to the website.

The data from the cameras is made available through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Those sources are made publicly available.

The results do not show if a vehicle passed by any of the Flock cameras, or what the devices may have returned, but rather what searches of a license plate were performed by agencies that use Flock cameras.

HaveIBeenFlocked also tracks reasons for Flock searches, still based on public records. The most common reason appeared to be related to drugs, closely followed by motor vehicle theft.

Advertisement

According to the website, license plate numbers entered in are not saved.

License plate reader camera.(AZFamily)

A growing controversy

The website was created in 2025 as Flock readers grow in popularity throughout the country, often used by law enforcement – and not without controversy.

According to the Associated Press, concerns have arisen about whether immigration enforcement can access the cameras.

Meanwhile, multiple reports of law enforcement officers misusing the cameras for personal searches have come to light. In North Carolina, for example, an officer was arrested for using the Flock system to track her boyfriend’s ex-wife more than 30 times.

She has since been fired.

Advertisement

Flock CEO Garrett Langley announced changes would be coming to the system, to be implemented by Jan. 1. Those changes include a tool to flag “abnormal search behavior,” AP reported.

The American Civil Liberties Union called it a “step in the right direction” in a blog post about the announcement, but also said that “Although Flock may not technically be the one unlocking the door to months of people’s private location data, it is responsible for building the door and handing out the keys.”

Copyright 2026 Gray Local Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending