Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Boston Strangler’ movie review: Highly stylised but serviceable

Published

on

‘Boston Strangler’ movie review: Highly stylised but serviceable

Keira Knightley in a scene from ‘Boston Strangler’

Was one man accountable for the homicide and rape of 13 ladies within the age group of 19 to 85, from June 14, 1962 to January 4, 1964? Had been there copycat killers concerned? Loretta McLaughlin (Keira Knightley), a reporter on the life-style desk of the Boston File American, sees a connection between three killings—all of the victims have their stockings tied in a double hitch bow round their necks.

Boston Strangler (English)

Director: Matt Ruskin

Forged: Keira Knightley, Carrie Coon, Alessandro Nivola, Chris Cooper

Runtime: 112 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: A reporter within the Sixties cracks a serial killer story whilst she fights sexism at residence and at work

Although her editor, Jack MacLaine (Chris Cooper), isn’t too eager on Loretta engaged on a criminal offense story, he runs the story a lot to the chagrin of the police division and different reporters. When the strangler claims one other sufferer, MacLaine tells Loretta to work with Jean Cole (Carrie Coon), a troublesome, no-nonsense reporter.

Whereas the 2 ladies doggedly pursue the story revealing procedural lapses within the Boston Police Division, they’re the goal of sexism from the police, the general public (clean calls and heavy respiration) and at residence. Although Loretta’s husband, James (Morgan Spector), is initially supportive, her continued lengthy hours and unladylike obsession with serial killers places a pressure on the wedding.

Loretta cash the identify, Boston Strangler, and later, Stranglers, whereas positing the idea of the preliminary six murders being the work of Paul Dempsey, and different males hiding underneath the umbrella of the serial killer to do away with inconvenient ladies. There may be the boss who will get his secretary pregnant or the vengeful dumped boyfriend. As a personality feedback about one of many suspects, Albert DeSalvo (David Dastmalchian), “Males kill ladies. It didn’t begin with Albert and it positive received’t finish with him.”

Detective Conley (Alessandro Nivola), the one one keen to assist Loretta and Jean, offers up after he realises his life is getting consumed by the case whereas nobody else appears to care. He quits the police to turn out to be a guide for the flicks.

Advertisement

Additionally Learn: ‘Daisy Jones & The Six’ sequence assessment: A straightforward-peasy, lemon-squeezy watch

There’s something disengaging concerning the extremely stylised Boston Strangler. It doesn’t have the ratcheting stress of a film a few hunt for a serial killer. There may be none of that hunted-becoming-the-hunter, the abyss staring again while you stare lengthy sufficient at it, and all the opposite issues that include an obsession for the seamier facet of life. The place are the lambs that screamed for Clarise Starling or the birds prepared to tear at Marion Crane whereas Norman Bates watched her take small bites of her sandwich or that good physician who loved his sufferer’s “liver with some fava beans and a pleasant Chianti”?

The interval particulars are splendidly recreated together with the fascinating manufacturing of a newspaper on the time of “cut-paste” plates and the newspaper rolling off the enormous presses. Keira Knightley is great as Loretta with the correct hair and garments, smoking and ingesting with the boys to be one of many boys.

Director Matt Ruskin, who additionally wrote the screenplay, has created a serviceable movie which whereas concentrating on sexism, feminism and plenty of different “isms”, forgets the fundamentals of telling an exhilarating story.

Boston Strangler is at present streaming on Disney+Hotstar.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

'Kenda' movie review: Intense drama with an allegorical twist

Published

on

'Kenda' movie review: Intense drama with an allegorical twist

Sahadev Kelvadi’s ‘Kenda’ is set against the gritty backdrop of the late 1990s and early 2000s, the film plunges into the turbulent world of a young man adrift. Unemployed and without direction, he finds himself entangled in a complex web of crime and politics. As he navigates this treacherous landscape, he must confront the dark and primal desires that lurk within, threatening to consume him. Will he find redemption or succumb to the shadows that haunt him?

Protagonist Keshava’s (B V Bharath) humdrum existence is disrupted when he crosses paths with Narasimha Shastry (Vinod Ravindran), a leader with a hidden political agenda. Behind the façade of a respected newspaper owner, Shastry harbors a duplicitous nature, his words and actions a stark contrast.

Once he takes the fateful step, there’s no turning back, and Keshava’s fate becomes inextricably linked to the consequences of his choices.

At its core, Kenda is a powerful allegory for the eternal struggle to find purpose and authenticity in a chaotic world. The film also masterfully deconstructs the toxic effects of rigid masculinity, revealing the impact it has on individuals and society as a whole.

The film is a scathing critique of the establishment’s failures. Delving deeper, it masterfully explores the complex and often blurred lines between crime and politics, revealing the toxic symbiosis that can exist between the two.

Advertisement

This film draws inspiration from the likes of Albert Camus, Theatre of the Absurd and the French New Wave movement.

As a result, the film’s dialogue is infused with rich philosophical and literary references.

‘Kenda’ stands out for its grounded and realistic depiction of characters and the crime world, remarkably achieved without relying on explicit violence or gore.

While the first half of the film unfolds at a leisurely, the narrative gears up significantly in the second half. Ritwik Kaikini’s soft-rock soundtrack deserves a mention, so does the performance of lead artistes.

While ‘Kenda’ may have some minor flaws, that can be overlooked, the film meets the expectations.

Advertisement

Produced by Roopa Rao (‘Gantumoote’ fame). The film received an award for direction at Dada Saheb Phalke Film Festival. 

Published 26 July 2024, 20:13 IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

'Deadpool & Wolverine' movie review: Fox's last dance, Deadpool & Wolverine bromance

Published

on

'Deadpool & Wolverine' movie review: Fox's last dance, Deadpool & Wolverine bromance

Superhero fatigue is real. With no good movies recently, Marvel has lost its course. But brace yourselves — straight from 20th Century Fox, sorry, Disney — a hero makes his grand MCU entrance. He’s the messiah, the merc with a mouth; he is… The Marvel Jesus. Buckle up, peanut, because this isn’t your average cape-and-tights movie — or is it?

Directed by Shawn Levy (‘Free Guy’), this third instalment is a hot mess —kind of like Wade Wilson himself on a bad hair day. Just as the world’s falling apart (again), the Time Variance Authority’s Paradox (Matthew Macfyden) recruits him to put his timeline out of its misery. Deadpool refuses and drags the worst variant of the Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) out of retirement to help stop this crazy scheme. They are sent to the ‘Void’ — yes, the same one from ‘Loki’ season one, episode five, now ruled by Cassandra Nova (Emma Corrin), Professor Charles Xavier’s evil twin.

The film takes you on a wild ride with surprise appearances from the Fox Universe. The plot is a bit shaky with jokes that sometimes fall flat, but it’s saved by some really cool action sequences, with slow-motion effects set to popular ’90s tunes. It’s a fun, if messy, farewell to the Fox universe, offering a peek at what mutant battles might look like in the MCU — and it doesn’t look too bad. Ryan Reynolds keeps it lively with his snappy humour, and Hugh Jackman proves yet again why he’s the ultimate Wolverine, leaving us with a touching montage of his ‘X-Men’ moments during the end credits.

So, does this Marvel messiah live up to the hype? Well, yes and no. Deadpool doesn’t exactly ace it. He’s the irritating but quirky hero we didn’t even know we needed, flipping the MCU on its head and turning multiversal crises into comedy gold. Marvel dug deep into the Fox universe, like scraping the last bits of chicken from a biryani pot.

The movie might do well at the box office, but they really need to sort out their timelines (pun intended) before they kick off the Mutant Saga.

Advertisement

Published 26 July 2024, 20:20 IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

Published

on

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

The strange case of Mothers’ Instinct.
Photo: Neon

There’s a new movie starring Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway out this week, which is normally the sort of thing you’d expect to have heard about. But, after its release in the U.K. months ago, Mothers’ Instinct is slipping into U.S. theaters with as little splash as an Olympic diver nailing a triple somersault tuck. The film, a thriller directed by Benoît Delhomme, is getting the treatment typically reserved for a disaster, which is a shame, because I’ve been dying to discuss it with someone, and that’s hard when no one has any idea what you’re on about. Mothers’ Instinct is, indeed, pretty terrible, and not in the so-bad-it’s-good sense, and yet there’s something strangely moving about it. It’s a poignant example of how what looks like rich material to actors can turn out to be lousy material for audiences. Mothers’ Instinct is a remake of a 2018 Belgian film adapted from a novel by Barbara Abel, and watching it, you can appreciate exactly why these two major actors signed on to star in it. Funnily enough, those same qualities go a long way toward explaining why the movie doesn’t work.

Mothers’ Instinct isn’t camp, but it’s close enough that if you squint, you can almost see a version of the film that tips into something broader. Of course, if you squint, you wouldn’t be able to appreciate how immaculately Chastain and Hathaway are costumed. They look incredible — not like two 1960s housewives, which is what they’re playing, so much as two people who keep switching outfits because they can’t decide what to wear to the high-end Mad Men–themed party they’re headed to later. As Alice, Chastain is styled like a Hitchcock blonde in pin-curled ash updos and cardigan sets, while as Alice’s neighbor and friend Céline, Hathaway is given a Jackie O. look that involves a shoulder-length bouffant, pillbox hats, and gloves. They’re cosplayers in a gorgeous, airless setting, adjoining houses on a street that might as well be floating in space, the husbands (played by Anders Danielsen Lie and Josh Charles) vanishing to work for long stretches. The artificiality of this intensely manicured re-creation isn’t to any particular end, which gives the whole movie the air of a Don’t Worry Darling situation in which no one ever wakes up to the twist, instead sleepwalking through a stylized dream of Americana.

Advertisement

In fact, while Alice is restless over having given up her job as a journalist to take care of her son Theo (Eamon O’Connell), and Céline gets ostracized by the community after the death of her son, Max (Baylen D. Bielitz), Mothers’ Instinct isn’t actually all that interested in the pressures of living under a repressive 1960s patriarchy. Instead, it’s about another time-tested theme, one that’s best summed up as: Bitches be crazy. The perfect sheen of its surfaces — Delhomme, who’s making his directorial debut, is a cinematographer who started his career with The Scent of Green Papaya and has since worked with everyone from Tsai Ming-liang to Anton Corbijn — is paired with a score that shrieks unease from the opening scene, in which Céline is thrown a surprise birthday party. The source of this suspense isn’t revealed until later, after Max takes an unintended swan dive off the porch and the women’s friendship is threatened by grief, guilt, and suspicion. Is Céline in mourning, or does she actually irrationally blame Alice for what happened while developing an alarming fixation on Theo? Is Alice right to be suspicious of her bestie, who’s unable to have another baby, or is she being paranoid because the mental illness that previously resulted in her hospitalization has returned? Is it odd that two feminist actors jumped to participate in a film that traffics so freely in unexamined stereotypes about women and hysteria?

Not, it seems, when the opportunities to stare coldly into space or look on in glassy betrayal are this good. I’m not trying to sound snide here — the characters in Mothers’ Instinct have no convincing inner lives at all, but the exterior work of the actors playing them is choice stuff. When Alice and Céline are getting along, Chastain and Hathaway nuzzle together supportively like long-necked swans. When things start to go south, Chastain opts for an aloof distance with stricken eyes, while Hathaway prefers a labored smile that drops as soon as she’s alone. Theirs is a brittle-off no one can win, but both try their hardest anyway. The effort reaches its crescendo at Max’s funeral, where Hathaway’s enormous eyes glimmer through the barrier of a black lace veil and Chastain tilts her face up so that the elegant tracks of past tears can gleam in the light. The scene ends with Céline collapsing in anguish while Alice rushes her tantrumming child out of the church, an explosion of drama that would be so much more effective if the movie had left any room for modulation instead of starting at 10 and staying there. Mothers’ Instinct gets much sillier before it ends, but given how little it establishes as its baseline tone, it doesn’t feel fair to say it goes off the rails. Rather, as Hathaway stares brokenly into the dark and Chastain tears apart her nightstand drawer in panic, what comes to mind is how great a set of GIFs this movie will make someday. That’s not much, but I guess it’s something?

See All

Continue Reading

Trending