Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Beauty’: Film Review

Published

on

‘Beauty’: Film Review

The protagonist of the brand new Netflix movie written by Lena Waithe, Magnificence, is an enigma. Her facial expressions aren’t any compass for her emotions. Her eyes keep huge, lips perpetually parted. Tonal variations are scarce too: Grace Marie Bradley, the actress who performs the titular character, delivers her traces in a husky, suggestive whisper. It’s troublesome to inform how intentional all this thriller is, which makes the occasional raised eyebrow, playful smirk or tear streaming down the face arduous to interpret.

You surprise: Who’s Magnificence? Is she merely a sheltered lady groomed by domineering mother and father for stardom? A younger grownup navigating the bounds of a secret relationship together with her girlfriend? A gifted singer completely all for honing her musical abilities?

Magnificence

The Backside Line

Dreamy and enigmatic to a fault.

Advertisement

Launch date: Wednesday, June 29 (Netflix)
Forged: Niecy Nash, Giancarlo Esposito, Sharon Stone, Aleyse Shannon, Gracie Marie Bradley, Kyle Bary, Micheal Ward
Director: Andrew Dosunmu
Screenwriter: Lena Waithe


Rated R,
1 hour 35 minutes

After which: What’s Magnificence? Is it a portrait of a younger lady balancing household, love and profession? An allegory in regards to the perils of a parasitic music business? Or a touch upon fame and the way it modifications Magnificence and everybody round her?

Stylishly directed by Andrew Dosunmu (Mom of George, The place Is Kyra, Stressed Metropolis), Magnificence, like its protagonist, is looking — for itself and its function. The movie broadly tells the story of a younger singer mere steps away from the highlight. When provided a profitable contract by an overzealous label govt (Sharon Stone), Magnificence should severely think about if she is able to be a star. Fame — even the expectation of it — will alter the already fragile dynamics of her insular world.

Advertisement

Her mother and father take opposing stances. Mom (a pointy Niecy Nash), a singer who by no means broke out commercially, needs to guard her daughter from a thirsty business. She warns Magnificence that these white individuals are simply in search of their subsequent goal, that they don’t care about her. “You’ll be a fantasy,” she says to her daughter. Father (a slicing Giancarlo Esposito) sees Magnificence as a money cow, a prized possession he’s poured assets into. Her brothers, Abel (Kyle Bary) and Cain (Michael Ward), belief her to do what’s greatest for the household. It’s Magnificence’s girlfriend, Jasmine (Aleyse Shannon), who worries about our protagonist essentially the most. She warns the naïve chanteuse about folks benefiting from her and in regards to the chasm that can inevitably open up between them ought to Magnificence signal that contract.

Magnificence tries to do lots with this simple story, however struggles in execution. It’s too billowy to be a examine of a younger lady on the cusp of fame. The characters — particularly Magnificence — are obscure sketches, their interactions predictable and perfunctory. They’re higher suited to an allegory, however Magnificence isn’t fairly that both. The movie comprises strokes of well-known tales of younger Black artists and their warped, typically deadly, relationships with the music business; Whitney Houston is the obvious comparability, however there are hints of Michael Jackson, too. However in the end, this can be a movie of impressions relatively than a bigger level or extra centered thesis.

In lieu of a throughline, Magnificence gives lovely, indulgent vignettes — aesthetically pleasing and immersive episodes missing in concepts however stuffed with vibes. Dosunmu’s fashion is distinguished by a smooth colour palette dictated by the orange-red glow of nightfall and close-ups of Magnificence’s immutable face. Scene breaks within the type of muted flash-forwards (and the occasional flashback) and archival footage of the central character’s favourite performers — Donna Summers, the Clark Sisters — add to the movie’s ethereal, unreal high quality.

A workaday script casts these prospers in a suspicious gentle. From what are they attempting to divert our consideration? Look previous them and extra questions emerge: What are the stakes of Magnificence’s story? Why does her character’s improvement really feel so superficial? And most bizarrely, why, in a drama about music, will we by no means hear a single observe from the star herself?

Magnificence indicators the contract with Colony Information, which units off a torrent of recent points between her and her household. She strikes to an unspecified metropolis with Jasmine, and this chapter within the couple’s life is fed to us like flashes from a music video. The moments bleed into each other: Cuddling and teasing in mattress fade into studio rehearsals; metropolis excursions give approach to the star’s supervisor teaching her on methods to keep away from questions on race, relationships and sexuality.

Advertisement

As Magnificence begins to really feel extra stress from her label, the movie alerts a cataclysmic occasion on the horizon. However it by no means comes; Magnificence doesn’t decide to any form of breathtaking climax. The devastating modifications telegraphed early within the movie are delicate and creeping. Magnificence turns into extra confident, which helps her wrest management of her life and stand as much as her father. However she additionally turns into extra alienated from Jasmine and her household. Bradley’s gauzy efficiency obfuscates as an alternative of clarifies the route of the starlet’s improvement.

Fame is a noxious, haunting circumstance in Magnificence, however the movie doesn’t supply convincing evaluation or observations of that phenomenon. It teases and suggests the horrors of the parasitic business in a way that leaves one craving. Had Magnificence’s character been extra outlined, she may have been bridged the hole between what the movie clearly itches to say and its extra impressionistic formal ambitions. Because it stands, Magnificence feels too distant, treating its mercurial protagonist simply as her mom feared — like a fantasy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Barroz Twitter Review: Is Mohanlal’s directorial debut with the fantasy film worth a watch? Check out these 11 tweets to know

Published

on

Barroz Twitter Review: Is Mohanlal’s directorial debut with the fantasy film worth a watch? Check out these 11 tweets to know

Mollywood icon, Mohanlal has now ventured into the director’s chair and his directorial debut film Barroz has made its theatrical release today, December 25, 2024. The Malayalam fantasy movie, within hours of release, has gotten some vivid reviews from fans, who have highlighted their opinions on social media.

Well, it seems that Barroz has received mixed opinions from some fans, who have significantly highlighted how the film has not lived up to the expectations considering it being the senior actor’s directorial debut.

Fans have expressed disappointment at the fact that the film’s storyline is weaker, and it is only the specialised use of VFX that has been pulling it all together.

On the other hand, some other fans have appreciated the impeccable acting chops of Mohanlal himself, with special mention to the excellent 3D presentation appealing to mass audiences for more than one reason.

Advertisement

There have been specific references to a few underwater scenes, which have been touted as an epitome of masterclass cinematic presentation, not to forget how it would not hit as a mass entertainer.

Check out the fans’ reviews about Barroz on Twitter:











Mohanlal has left no stone unturned when it comes to the jam-packed promotional spree for Barroz. The film’s cinematography has been done by the talented Santosh Sivan, while the musical score is handled by Mark Killian.

Coming to the plot of the film, it is said to revolve around the conquest undertaken by Barroz, the guardian of a treasure which has been hidden for over 400 years. This wealth has been trusted to only a true descendant of Da Gama. 

Advertisement

It is inspired as an adaptation of Jijo Punnoose’s novel Barroz: Guardian of D’Gama’s Treasure. However, the scenes were rewritten by Mohanlal and Thazhathupurakkal Karunakara Panicker, including characters and locations, leading to the exit of the novelist, forfeiting his credits.

Speaking of the cast of Barroz, besides Mohanlal, it stars Maya Rao West, Cesar Lorente Raton, Kallirroi Tziafeta, Daniel Caltagirone, Aadukalam Naren, Tuhin Menon  and others.

ALSO READ: Nayanthara enjoys ‘best holiday’ in Europe with Vignesh Shivan and twins; sunsets, long walks and Eiffel Tower sum up her travel diaries; PICS

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: The Fire Inside – SLUG Magazine

Published

on

Film Review: The Fire Inside – SLUG Magazine

Film

The Fire Inside
Director: Rachel Morrison
Michael De Luca Productions, PASTEL
In Theaters: 12.25

I’m not a fan of combat sports in real life, yet I find that movies about them are nearly irresistible. Whether it’s Rocky, The Karate Kid, Warrior or the upcoming wrestling flick Unstoppable, the underdog who comes out swinging and bests their bigger, more experienced opponent always plays. It’s also nearly always the same movie, and that’s what makes The Fire Inside a knockout.

In this fact–based story, Claressa Shields (Ryan Destiny, A Girl Like Grace, Oracle) is a young woman from Flint, Michigan, who has one skill and one passion: boxing. Despite limited support from her family, Claressa is taken under the wing of Jason Crutchfield (Brian Tyree Henry, If Beale Street Could Talk, Godzilla vs. Kong), a coach at a local gym. As Jason becomes as much a surrogate father as a coach, Claressa trains with a ferocious determination and earns a spot on the 2012 Summer Olympic team —  Claressa “T-Rex” Shields becomes the first American woman to take home the gold in the sport at age 16. From there, Claressa goes from being a poor inner city kid with nothing to … a poor inner city kid with a gold medal overnight.  There are no endorsement deals, no professional career and seemingly no new worlds to conquer. As Claressa fights discouragement, she must find a path to lead her beyond a one time victory into a lasting better life.

Advertisement

Rachel Morrison, the first woman to be nominated for an Academy Award for her work on Black Panther, makes a strong directorial debut, coming out swinging. She’s ably assisted by a terrific script by Barry Jenkins (Moonlight). The Fire Inside transcends the tropes of the genre by reaching the rush of climactic fight and then daring not to end there, instead delving into the reality that in Shields’  life, one triumph in the sports world doesn’t change your circumstances, especially for an uncouth young woman with no interest in playing the public relations game and selling a softer, more traditionally feminine image. We’ve heard the cliche “this isn’t just a movie about sports, it’s about life,” but such a candid look at a life-changing moment that does nothing to change your life, and learning how to face this, was something refreshingly new and honest. The often bleak and at times stunningly beautiful cinematography by Rina Yang, along with the stirring score by Tamar-kali, lift the sensory experience and go a long way to making this one a winner. 

Destiny shows potential as a breakout star, commanding the screen as effortlessly as Claressa commands the ring. Henry is the highlight of any film he’s in, and The Fire Inside is no exception, with his grounded performance keeping the film moving along and setting the tone for a story about learning that you can still lean on others while you’re believing in yourself. The sizzling chemistry between these two actors drives a poignant and entertaining story to a satisfying and believable conclusion that’s not the one you’re expecting.

The Fire Inside is a breath of fresh air in a genre that far too often settles for stale and dank. It provides enough inspirational warmth to fulfill its duties as an uplifting sports movie, but its got the stamina and the drive to go a few extra rounds and push its own limits. Unlike most boxing films, this champ doesn’t pull any punches. –Patrick Gibbs

Read more film reviews here:
Film Review: A Complete Unknown
Film Review: Babygirl 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Reverence to source material drains life from ‘Nosferatu’

Published

on

Movie review: Reverence to source material drains life from ‘Nosferatu’

Passion projects are often lauded simply for their passion, for the sheer effort that it took to bring a dream to life. Sometimes, that celebration of energy expended can obfuscate the artistic merits of a film, as the blinkered vision of a dedicated auteur can be a film’s saving grace, or its death knell. This is one of the hazards of the passion project, which is satirically explored in the 2000 film “Shadow of the Vampire,” a fictionalized depiction of the making of F.W. Murnau’s 1922 silent horror film “Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror,” in which John Malkovich plays the filmmaker obsessed with “authentic” horror.

This meta approach is a clever twist on the iconic early horror movie that looms large in our cultural memory. Inspired by Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel “Dracula” (with names and details changed in order to skirt the lack of rights to the book), “Nosferatu” is a landmark example of German Expressionism, and Max Schreck’s performance as the vampire is one of the genre’s unforgettable villains.

“Nosferatu” has inspired many filmmakers over a century — Werner Herzog made his own bleak and lonely version with Klaus Kinski in 1979; Francis Ford Coppola went directly to the source material for his lushly Gothic “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” in 1992. Now, Robert Eggers, who gained auteur status with his colonial horror film “The Witch,” the Edgar Allen Poe-inspired two-hander “The Lighthouse,” and a Viking epic “The Northman,” delivers his ultimate passion project: a direct remake of Murnau’s film.

His first non-original screenplay, Eggers’ version isn’t a “take” on “Nosferatu,” so much as it is an overly faithful retelling, so indebted to its inspiration that it’s utterly hamstrung by its own reverence. If “Shadow of the Vampire” is a playful spin, Eggers’ “Nosferatu” is an utterly straight-faced and interminably dull retread of the 1922 film. It’s the exact same movie, just with more explicit violence and sex. And while Eggers loves to pay tribute to the style and form of cinema history in his work, the sexual politics of his “Nosferatu” feel at least 100 years old.

Advertisement

“Nosferatu” is a story about real estate and sexual obsession. A young newlywed, Thomas Hutter (Nicholas Hoult) is dispatched from his small German city to the Carpathian Mountains in order to execute the paperwork on the purchase of a rundown manor for a mysterious Count Orlok (an unrecognizable Bill Skarsgård), a tall, pale wraith with a rumbling voice that sounds like a beehive.

Thomas has a generally bad time with the terrifying Count Orlok, while his young bride at home, the seemingly clairvoyant Ellen (Lily-Rose Depp) is taken with terrifying nightmares and bouts of sleepwalking, consumed by psychic messages from the Count, who has become obsessed with her. He makes his way to his new home in a rat-infested ship, unleashing a plague; Ellen weighs whether she should sacrifice herself to the Count in order to save the town, which consists of essentially three men: her husband, a doctor (Ralph Ineson) and an occultist scientist (Willem Dafoe).

There’s a moment in the first hour of “Nosferatu” where it seems like Eggers’ film is going to be something new, imbued with anthropological folklore, rather than the expressionist interpretation of Murnau. Thomas arrives in a Romanian village, where he encounters a group of jolly gypsies who laugh at him, warn him, and whose blood rituals he encounters in the night. It’s fascinating, fresh, culturally specific, and a new entry point to this familiar tale. Orlok’s mustachioed visage could be seen as a nod to the real Vlad the Impaler, who likely inspired Stoker.

But Eggers abandons this tack and steers back toward leaden homage. The film is a feat of maximalist and moody production design and cinematography, but the tedious and overwrought script renders every character two-dimensional, despite the effortful acting, teary pronunciations and emphatically delivered declarations.

Depp whimpers and writhes with aplomb, but her enthusiastically physical performance never reaches her eyes — unless they’re rolling into the back of her head. Regardless of their energetic ministrations, she and Hoult are unconvincing. Dafoe, as well as Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Emma Corrin, as family friends who take in Ellen, bring a winking campiness, breathing life into the proceedings, while Simon McBurney devilishly goes for broke as the Count’s familiar. However, every actor seems to be in a different movie.

Advertisement

Despite the sex, nudity and declarations of desire, there’s no eroticism or sensuality; despite the blood and guts, there’s nothing scary about it either. This film is a whole lot of style in search of a better story, and without any metaphor or subtext, it’s a bore. Despite his passion for the project, or perhaps because of it, Eggers’ overwrought “Nosferatu” is dead on arrival, drained of all life and choked to death on its own worship.

‘Nosferatu’

GRADE: C

Rated R: for bloody violent content, graphic nudity and some sexual content

Running time: 135 minutes

In theaters Dec. 25

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending