Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Argylle (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Argylle (2024) – Movie Review

Argylle, 2024.

Directed by Matthew Vaughn.
Starring Bryce Dallas Howard, Sam Rockwell, Henry Cavill, Bryan Cranston, Catherine O’Hara, Dua Lipa, Ariana DeBose, John Cena, Samuel L. Jackson, Sofia Boutella, Toby Haycock, Rob Delaney, Jason Fuchs, Jing Lusi, Alaa Habib, Alfredo Tavares, Tomás Paredes, and Richard E. Grant.

SYNOPSIS:

A reclusive author who writes espionage novels about a secret agent and a global spy syndicate realizes the plot of the new book she’s writing starts to mirror real-world events in real-time.

During a Q&A for her latest entry in her spy novel series Argylle, a reader asks if Elly Conway (Bryce Dallas Howard, giving a performance that, without spoiling anything, demands physicality that she capably pulls off) is also a real spy, much like how James Bond author Ian Fleming and others were. She shoots down the theory, assuring the fan that she is a regular person who puts much research into her writing.

Advertisement

Directed by Matthew Vaughn, this is an adaptation of the recently released book of the same name (written for the screen by Jason Fuchs), which is penned by a seemingly unknown woman named Elly Conway. There is a massively unhinged conspiracy theory that it is a pseudonym for Taylor Swift, something that I don’t believe for a second and that Matthew Vaughn has gone on record denying, but there are so many silly plot twists here that if the worldwide pop sensation did show up at some point here, somehow it would have fit right in.

Remember that none of this necessarily means Argylle is a smart film. Elly Conway, the character, just also happens to be a writer in the narrative here, finding herself wrapped up in danger and hunted by a nefarious spy organization similar to the one in her stories (there are four books in the fictional universe, and one she is currently writing.) Elly thinks she has the ending of her fifth novel in the series all figured out, ready to send it to print with a cliffhanger ending (Henry Cavill is who she visualizes as Agent Argylle, with John Cena portraying his sidekick Wyatt), except it turns out she will have to keep the story going as there are good and bad spies tracking her who believe that her mind and wherever she takes the story next is the solution to finding the real-life master list of scandalous details regarding career criminals.

While riding the train to visit her mother (Catherine O’Hara), a bearded, unkempt, and invasive but otherwise well-meaning man named Aidan (Sam Rockwell) sits down to read one of Elly’s novels before informing her that he is a spy despite his rugged appearance and that she will have to follow his lead to escape a horde of bad guys. The film immediately launches into a refreshing, creative burst of action that sees Sam Rockwell’s average dude spy battling several generic henchmen, while Elly occasionally sees her Argylle, Henry Cavill, engaged in the same combat, all of which feels like a challenging feat in editing and choreography to pull off, not to mention pleasingly stylistic. 

Would I have preferred if the narrative was far less intentionally stupid and more interested in deconstructing spies as characters and the default, handsomely charming appearances we give them in our minds? Sure, but Matthew Vaughn is still having playful fun during these action sequences, juxtaposing not only fantasy and reality, but Elly and the audience’s perception of what and who a spy can be. Regarding visual flair, it also fits in as a constant reminder that her fiction is coming to life.

However, Argylle is unquestionably a nonsensical movie with so many outlandish reveals that one of the twists is essentially a common trope just so the film can do a hard reset on who and what these characters are and want. From there, several more twists occur but with different characters in the action while inside an entirely different subgenre. The most that can be said is this: it is frustrating that even when everything is seemingly revealed about Argylle, Elly, Aidan, and the rest of her spy characters (played by an ensemble made up of exciting names such as the aforementioned John Cena, Ariana DeBose, and Samuel L. Jackson), it also feels like nothing is learned about any of them as people. Bryan Cranston also leads the rogue spy organization with an army of assassins searching for Elly, who brings his impeccable comedic skills to the villainous character.

Advertisement

Certain story beats that Matthew Vaughn goes for just feel impossible to properly land amidst all this insanity. There is also no denying that Argylle sags in the middle when it is doing that reset, entering the realm of seemingly endless exposition. Once past that, Matthew Vaughn is alert to how nuts this all is, with characters even commenting so. 

Vaughn also uses this to his advantage to crank the action up to further outrageously gonzo levels, such as a sequence where a character skates with knives placed underneath their shoes, shooting hordes of enemies, or one that incorporates impressively choreographed dance moves and brightly colored smoke bombs into a thrilling shootout. Like most Matthew Vaughn films, there is also an upbeat licensed soundtrack playing to the violence. Admittedly, there is also some shoddy CGI, including a truly rough-looking car chase opening.

Argylle most definitely isn’t Matthew Vaughn’s strongest work as a storyteller, lacking the raw emotional hook from something such as Kingsman: The Secret Service or the political subtext found within X-Men: First Class, but he knows how to take something preposterous and amplify what makes it immensely fun. There are certainly some mixed thoughts to be had here, but there is one glaring positive: bold, bonkers action. He knows how the plant a character trait and pay that off later with some ludicrous and electrifying set pieces. 

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Advertisement

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie review: 'Babygirl' gives Kidman intriguing sexual conflict – UPI.com

Published

on

Movie review: 'Babygirl' gives Kidman intriguing sexual conflict – UPI.com

1 of 6 | Harris Dickinson and Nicole Kidman star in “Babygirl,” in theaters Dec. 25. Photo courtesy of A24

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 22 (UPI) — Babygirl, in theaters Wednesday, is the kind of erotic drama they used to make a lot in the ’80s and ’90s. As such, it is refreshing in 2024, though perhaps still derivative of its genre predecessors.

Romy Mathis (Nicole Kidman) is the founder and CEO of Tensile, a robotics company developing automated drones for warehouses. She is married to a theater director, Jacob (Antonio Banderas), and they have two daughters.

When Tensile begins a mentorship program for interns, Samuel (Harris Dickinson) pushes Romy’s buttons to get one-on-one time with her. His power plays unlock Romy’s repressed sexual desires and they begin an affair.

Playing power games may be inherent to many sexual relationships, so it’s not like one movie invented them, but it’s hard not to think about 9½ Weeks. In that notorious 1986 film, Mickey Rourke played a man who seduces a woman (Kim Basinger) with sex games involving food, spanking and blindfolds.

Advertisement

Still, Babygirl doesn’t play Romy as a cliche of a powerful businesswoman who really likes to be submissive in bed and experience the adrenaline of risking exposure.

Not that the affair compromises Romy’s success, either, although it could if Samuel reports her. She also starts to blur the lines of being submissive in private and at the office, but she doesn’t let it interfere with business decisions.

The love scenes between Kidman and Dickinson are revealing, but not gratuitous. They are vulnerable and uncomfortable rather than titillating.

The way writer-director Halina Reijn approaches consent is interesting and seems realistic. Samuel does insist on consent before continuing, which is a fantastic portrayal of obtaining verbal consent, though the conditions of Romy’s consent remain nebulous.

Romy makes it clear that Samuel’s power games make her uncomfortable. Agreeing to continue while feeling uncomfortable seems like it adds a level of duress.

Advertisement

It’s 80 minutes into the movie before Samuel and Romy even discuss using a safe word, which would give either party, but especially Romy, a way to end a session at her discretion. Yet, this is believable because Romy and Samuel are amateurs at this, so they’re figuring it out.

Samuel may play the dominant role, but he is in many respects just a poser. He is a young intern and very emotional when things don’t go his way.

It seems like Samuel is imitating what he thinks a Casanova would act like, but whenever Romy goes off script, Samuel seems to be at a loss for words. It’s not natural to him, either, though he thinks of some clever workplace games that make Romy play along.

He’s probably watched 9½ Weeks, too, or more likely just read the Wikipedia summary.

The Jacob character is the film’s most stereotypical.

Advertisement

Jacob is a loving husband who just can’t excite Romy. Romy tries to teach him to play games in bed, but Jacob doesn’t enjoy experimenting. It’s odd that a person whose job is in the arts would lack any creativity with his partner, but he’s entitled to have traditional desires, too.

The lack of monogamy is an unmitigated betrayal, as even submissive relationships should respect loyalty unless they’ve discussed and agreed to having an open relationship. The film eventually explores how a couple navigates compatibility, but Romy has to own hers first.

Individual choices the characters make in Babygirl will provoke discussions, and won’t be spoiled in this review. The positive is that the film does show Romy’s growth through the experience.

So, even if a viewer disagrees with part of the journey, the film makes its case for the value of those experiences. That makes it an engaging, provocative film.

Advertisement

Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Pottel Movie Review

Published

on

Pottel Movie Review

Pottel, directed by Sahith Mothkuri and starring Ajay, Yuvachandra, and Ananya Nagalla in pivotal roles, is a rural drama that delves into the socio-cultural issues of the 1970s. The movie, which captivated audiences with its intriguing title, was released in theaters in October and recently debuted on OTT platforms Amazon Prima and Aha. With music by Sekhar Chandra, the film aims to strike an emotional chord with its thought-provoking narrative.

Plot Summary:
The story is set in a remote village during the 1970s, where the powerful Patel family dominates the region. Believing that education empowers people to question authority, the Patels discourage the villagers from pursuing it. Mallanna (Chatrapathi Sekhar), who recognizes the importance of education, dreams of educating his son Gangadharam (Yuvachandra). However, his efforts are thwarted when Patel (Ajay) kills him to maintain control over the village.

The villagers revere a local deity, Balamma, and Patel manipulates their beliefs to suppress dissent. Gangadharam grows up in this oppressive environment, determined to bring change. He marries Bujjamma (Ananya Nagalla), defying her brother and societal norms.

Meanwhile, the village observes a ritual every 12 years, offering a Pottel as a sacrifice to their deity. This time, Gangadharam is tasked with overseeing the ritual. The stakes are high, as failure to perform the ritual properly could have dire consequences for him. Caught between his goal of educating his daughter and empowering the villagers, and the ritualistic traditions, Gangadharam faces immense challenges from Patel. How he overcomes these obstacles forms the crux of the story.

Analysis:
The film effectively portrays the socio-political dynamics and superstitions prevalent in rural India during the 1970s. The director highlights the dominance of landlords like the Patels and their efforts to maintain control by keeping the marginalized sections uneducated. The screenplay weaves these themes with clarity, emphasizing the need for education as a tool for empowerment.

Advertisement

The movie also sheds light on superstitions and rituals like animal sacrifices, which were exploited by the powerful to manipulate the weak. The village itself feels like a character in the story, with its landscapes and traditions adding depth to the narrative. The realistic portrayal of the struggles and resilience of rural communities enhances the film’s authenticity.

Performances:
Yuvachandra delivers a compelling performance as Gangadharam, capturing the character’s struggle and determination effectively.
Ajay excels as the antagonist Patel, portraying the role with authority and menace.
Ananya Nagalla impresses with her portrayal of Bujjamma, adding emotional depth to the story.
The supporting cast, including Chatrapathi Sekhar, performs within the scope of their roles, contributing to the narrative’s strength.

Technical Aspects:
Cinematography by Monish Bhupathiraju stands out, beautifully capturing the rural and forest backdrops, adding an immersive visual quality.
Music by Sekhar Chandra complements the narrative well, with both songs and background score enhancing the emotional impact.
Editing by Karthik Srinivas ensures a cohesive flow, although some scenes feel slightly stretched.
The authentic depiction of rural settings and customs adds to the film’s credibility.

Final Verdict:
Pottel is a sincere attempt to address important social issues like education, empowerment, and superstition through a rural narrative. While the film’s pacing and predictability in certain areas might deter some viewers, its emotional core and relevant themes make it a worthwhile watch for those interested in rural dramas.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Reviews: ‘Blitz’

Published

on

Movie Reviews: ‘Blitz’

All content © copyright WFMJ.com News weather sports for Youngstown-Warren Ohio.

WFMJ | 101 W. Boardman Street | Youngstown, OH 44503

Continue Reading

Trending