Movie Reviews
1984 Movie Reviews – Dreamscape, Sheena, Tightrope, and The Woman in Red | The Nerdy
Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1984 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. Imagine a world where This is Spinal Tap and Repo Man hit theaters on the same day. That is the world of 1984.
We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly three dozen.
Yes, we’re insane, but 1984 was that great of a year for film.
The articles will come out on the same day the films hit theaters in 1984 so that it is their true 40th anniversaries. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory.
This time around it’s August 10, 1984, and we’re off to see Dreamscape, Sheena, Tightrope, and The Woman in Red.
Dreamscape
It seems in the 1980s, everyone has super mental powers and the government wanted to use them for black ops.
Dreamscape follows Alex Gardner (Dennis Quaid) as he is pulled back into a program to study his psychic abilities. This time it’s to see if he can enter people’s dreams and help them get through phobias and cure them of sleep issues. What he doesn’t know is that certain operatives in the government want someone in this program to assassinate the President of the United States via a recurring nightmare he has of nuclear war.
Dreamscape isn’t a bad movie, but it somehow came off feeling a bit too much like Firestarter.
I also want to know how Kate Capshaw is in her third movie in four months! We’ve seen here in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom in May, and Best Defense in July, and here she is back as Jane, Alex’s love interest. Kudos to her for working 1984 like she owned it.
And speaking of Jane, there is one scene that was definitely an issue for me. Alex enters her dreams and makes out with her there. When she wakes up she figures it out and gets made at him for about a total of 20 seconds before she decides she’s in love with him. To say it felt a bit rapey would be an understatement.
It’s an entertaining enough movie, but nothing spectacular, and an easy one to skip. Especially due to the dream intrusion scene.

Sheena
Imagine Tarzan, but with breasts.
Sheena had existed as a comic book character since the late 1930s, and it seemed inevitable somebody would one day turn it into a film. What we ended up with was an excuse for Tanya Roberts to be topless a couple of times while running around a movie with horrible special effects.
The back story of Sheena is quite similar to Tarzan, except that she is raised by a tribe in Africa as their savior from a prophecy. (At least they put the trope on Front Street) When Shaman is arrested for a crime she didn’t commit, Sheena kicks into action and ends up in a battle to save her people while falling in love with the first white man she has seen since she was a very small child.
The plot is nonsense, as is most of the acting. That being said, it is so beautifully shot that it’s hard to look away from it.
Sheena is a tough film to review. It’s not good to be sure, but it’s also not bad. It just simply exists. I’m not sure I have ever walked away from a film with such an absolute feeling of neutrality.

Tightrope
Clint Eastwood spent much of the 1970s and 80s being best-known for the Dirty Harry franchise of police films. In Tightrope he returns to playing a cop, but this time it is Det. Wes Block, a homicide detective with a complicated life that only sets out to become even more so.
Set in New Orleans, a series of murders of women has landed on Block’s desk. It takes him into the seedy underworld of the city filled with prostitutes, sex clubs, and every other form of debauchery. What you learn throughout the course of the film is that Block is not exactly opposed to indulging some of these vices throughout the course of his work, but it isn’t entirely clear if he hates himself for it.
Over the course of the film, the killer learns it’s Block hunting for him and uses his vices against him to raise the body count ever higher. This puts him in a bad position because now everything could lead back to him as opposed to the actual killer.
Eastwood had become very one-note in this period of his career. The fact that he used another detective role to try to break out of that is intriguing because it works. While I have not seen all of his films, I would rate Tightrope as one of his best performances. This is a heavily flawed man that end of the day wants to do good, but he is also human. Alison Eastwood playing his daughter in the film also really helped to drive home the relationship with his children.
Tightrope isn’t for everyone, but it’s a tense thriller that kept me engaged throughout. This is an easy recommendation on multiple fronts.

The Woman in Red
There it is.
It seems in every batch of films I do there has to be one where I don’t root for any of the characters and I can’t even begin to fathom how anyone thought this movie would somehow be endearing.
Ted Pierce (Gene Wilder) is a married father of two children who works for the city of San Francisco. One day, he sees a beautiful woman—Charlotte (Kelly LeBrock)—walk across a vent and take the Marilyn Monroe dress scene a step further. He is immediately infatuated with her and sets about trying to cheat on his wife with her.
The rest of the film is about the insane lengths Ted goes to to try to get some time with Charlotte. First, he even has to officially meet her, and then he needs to try to convince her to sleep with him. He inevitably does meet her, and they’re just about to hit the sack when you learn, oh, oops, Charlotte is married as well, meaning that both of these people are horrible.
Even after everything that happens, Ted is immediately infatuated with another woman and looks set to go through the whole scenario once again.
There are two standouts in the film: Gilda Radner as Ms. Milner who does indeed want to sleep with Ted, and Charles Grodin as Buddy, Ted’s secretly gay friend. While it’s no surprise Radner is entertaining, I have never been a fan of Grodin. However, in this film he actually plays a fairly layered character while also having an immensely amusing slapstick scene where he pretends to be blind to amuse his friends.
The 1980s trend of unlikeable characters just doesn’t seem to end. This reminds me in a lot of ways of Blame It on Rio, and that’s mainly in the fact I can’t stand the leads, hate the premise, and both have Joseph Bologna as a co-star.
1984 Movie Reviews will return on August 24 with Cal, Love Streams, Old Enough, and Oxford Blues!
Movie Reviews
‘Project Hail Mary’ Review: Ryan Gosling and a Rock Make Sci-Fi Magic
In contrast to other sci-fi heroes, like Interstellar’s Cooper, who ventures into the unknown for the sake of humanity and discovery, knowing the sacrifice of giving up his family, Grace is externally a cynical coward. With no family to call his own, you’d think he’d have the will to go into space for the sake of the planet’s future. Nope, he’s got no courage because the man is a cowardly dog. However, Goddard’s script feels strikingly reflective of our moment. Grace has the tools to make a difference; the Earth flashbacks center on him working towards a solution to the antimatter issue, replete with occasionally confusing but never alienating dialogue. He initially lacks the conviction, embodying a cynicism and hopelessness that many people fall into today.
The film threads this idea effectively through flashbacks that reveal his reluctance, giving the story a tragic undercurrent. Yet, it also makes his relationship with Rocky, the first living thing he truly learns to care for, ever more beautiful.
When paired with Rocky, Gosling enters the rare “puppet scene partner” hall of fame alongside Michael Caine in The Muppet Christmas Carol, never letting the fact that he’s acting opposite a puppet disrupt the sincerity of his performance. His commitment to building a gradual, affectionate friendship with this animatronic creation feels completely natural, and the chemistry translates beautifully on screen. It stands as one of the stronger performances of his career.
Project Hail Mary is overly long, and while it can be deeply affecting, the film leans on a few emotional fake-outs that become repetitive in the latter half. By the third time it deploys the same sentimental beat, the effect begins to feel cloying, slightly dulling the powerful emotions it built earlier. The constant intercutting between past and present can also feel thematically uneven at times, occasionally undercutting the narrative momentum. At 2 hours and 36 minutes, the film feels like it’s stretching itself to meet a blockbuster runtime when a tighter cut might have served better.
FINAL STATEMENT
Project Hail Mary is a meticulously crafted, hopeful, and dazzling space epic that proves the most moving friendship in film this year might just be between Ryan Gosling and a rock.
Movie Reviews
Dan Webster reviews “WTO/99”
DAN WEBSTER:
It may now seem like ancient history, especially to younger listeners, but it was only 26 years ago when the streets of Seattle were filled with protesters, police and—ultimately—scenes of what ended up looking like pure chaos.
It is those scenes—put together to form a portrait of what would become known as the “Battle of Seattle” —that documentary filmmaker Ian Bell captures in his powerful documentary feature WTO/99.
We’ve seen any number of documentaries over the decades that report on every kind of social and cultural event from rock concerts to war. And the majority of them follow a typical format: archival footage blended with interviews, both with participants and with experts who provide an informational, often intellectual, perspective.
WTO/99 is something different. Like The Perfect Neighbor, a 2026 Oscar-nominated documentary feature, Bell’s film consists of what could be called found footage. What he has done is amass a series of news reports and personal video recordings into an hour-and-42-minute collection of individual scenes, mostly focused on a several-block area of downtown Seattle.
That is where a meeting of the WTO, the World Trade Organization, was set to be held between Nov. 30 and Dec. 3, 1999. Delegates from around the world planned to negotiate trade agreements (what else?) at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center.
Months before the meeting, however, a loose coalition of groups—including NGOs, labor unions, student organizations and various others—began their own series of meetings. Their objective was to form ways to protest not just the WTO but, to some of them, the whole idea of a world order they saw as a threat to the economic independence of individual countries.
Bell’s film doesn’t provide much context for all this. What we mostly see are individuals arguing their points of view as they prepare to stop the delegates from even entering the convention center. Meanwhile, Seattle authorities such as then-Mayor Paul Schell and then-Police Chief Norm Stamper—with brief appearances by Gov. Gary Locke and King County Executive Ron Sims—discuss counter measures, with Schell eventually imposing a curfew.
That decision comes, though, after what Bell’s film shows is a peaceful protest evolving into a street fight between people parading and chanting, others chained together and splinter groups intent on smashing the storefronts of businesses owned by what they see as corporate criminals. One intense scene involves a young woman begging those breaking windows to stop and asking them why they’re resorting to violence. In response a lone voice yells their reasoning: “Self-defense.”
Even more intense, though, are the actions of the Seattle police. We see officers using pepper spray, tear gas, flash grenades and other “non-lethal” means such as firing rubber pellets into the crowd. In one scene, a uniformed guy—not identified as a police officer but definitely part of the security crowd, which included National Guardsmen—is shown kicking a guy in the crotch.
The media, too, can’t avoid criticism. Though we see broadcast reporters trying to capture what was happening—with some affected like everybody else by the tear gas that filled the streets like a winter fog—the reports they air seem sketchy, as if they’re doctors trying to diagnose a serious illness by focusing on individual cells. And the images they capture tend to highlight the violence over the well-meaning actions of the vast majority of protesters.
Reactions to what Bell has put on the screen are bound to vary, based on each viewer’s personal politics. Bell revels his own stance by choosing selectively from among thousands of hours of video coverage to form the narrative he feels best captures what happened those two decades-and-change ago.
If nothing else, WTO/99 does reveal a more comprehensive picture of what happened than we got at the time. And, too, it should prepare us for the future. The way this country is going, we’re bound to see a lot more of the same.
Call it the “Battle for America.”
For Spokane Public Radio, I’m Dan Webster.
——
Movies 101 host Dan Webster is the senior film critic for Spokane Public Radio.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ – Catholic Review
NEW YORK (OSV News) – As its title suggests, “Scream 7” (Paramount) is the latest extension of a long-lived horror franchise, one that’s currently approaching its 30th anniversary on screen. Since each chapter of this slasher saga has been a bloodsoaked mess, the series’ longevity will strike moviegoers of sense as inexplicable.
Yet the slog continues. While the previous film in the sequence shifted the action from California to New York, this second installment, following a 2022 quasi-reboot, settles on a Midwestern locale and reintroduces us to the series’ original protagonist, Sidney Evans, nee Prescott (Neve Campbell).
Having aged out of the adolescent demographic on whom the various murderers who have donned the Ghostface mask that serves as these films’ dubious trademark over the years seem to prefer to prey, Sidney comes equipped with a teen daughter, Tatum (Isabel May). Will Tatum prove as resourceful in evading the unwanted attentions of Ghostface as Mom has?
On the way to answering that question, a clutch of colorless minor characters fall victim to the killer, who sometimes gets — according to his or her lights — creative. Thus one is quite literally made to spill her guts, while another ends up skewered on a barroom’s pointy beer tap.
Through it all, director Kevin Williamson and his co-writer Guy Busick try to peddle a theme of female empowerment in the face of mortal danger. They also take a stab, as it were, at constructing a plotline about intergenerational family tensions. When not jarring viewers with grisly images, however, they’re only likely to lull them into a stupor.
The film contains excessive gory violence, including disembowelment and impaling, underage drinking, mature topics, a couple of profanities, several milder oaths, pervasive rough and considerable crude language and occasional crass expressions. The OSV News classification is O — morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.
Read More Movie & TV Reviews
Copyright © 2026 OSV News
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Maryland1 week agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year
-
Miami, FL6 days agoCity of Miami celebrates reopening of Flagler Street as part of beautification project
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death