Connect with us

Entertainment

‘Magpie Murders’ has everything you want in a British mystery

Published

on

‘Magpie Murders’ has everything you want in a British mystery

Earlier than the streaming warriors mined the world for content material, British tv made its manner into the American lounge nearly solely by the use of PBS and its associates. “Masterpiece Theater” was the community’s residence for literary variations and fashionable historic dramas, and “Thriller!” the place for the … mysteries.

These venues now share prime time as “Masterpiece” and “Masterpiece Thriller!” whose newest presentation, premiering Sunday, is “Magpie Murders,” tailored by Anthony Horowitz (“Foyle’s Struggle,” “Midsomer Murders”), from his personal 2016 novel. It’s a tightly plotted, handsomely offered, well acted, completely gratifying and structurally uncommon piece — a thriller centered round a thriller novel, two tales enacted in parallel in alternating and rhyming scenes, that between them, over the course of six episodes, offer you virtually all the things you come to British mysteries for.

An English village (instances two). A baronial mansion (instances two). A sufferer many individuals could be glad to see useless (instances two). Within the framing narrative, an beginner sleuth, drawn by circumstance into the thriller; within the story throughout the story, knowledgeable detective, a international gentleman not precisely within the mildew of Hercule Poirot however one thing of that sort (with out the tics). The native constabulary (antagonistic within the “actual world,” comical and cooperative within the “fictional”). A pleasing younger sidekick. A brand new will. A puzzle unrecognized as a puzzle. A chilly case heating up. And the previous query: Did he/she fall or was he/she pushed?

Lesley Manville performs Susan Ryeland, an editor at a small publishing home whose money cow is Alan Conway (Conleth Hill), a globally profitable writer of thriller novels set within the Fifties that characteristic a courtly non-public detective and German refugee named Atticus Pünd (Tim McMullan). Conway’s eight books and the ninth he has simply delivered — additionally referred to as “Magpie Murders” — are driving an impending sale of the corporate by writer Charles Clover (Michael Maloney) to a much bigger firm; the publication of the brand new ebook, we’re repeatedly informed, can be all that retains the corporate from potential destroy. (Although Horowitz clearly is aware of extra about publishing than I do, having written many, many books for kids, younger adults and grownup adults, together with two Sherlock Holmes and three James Bond novels, the concept an organization can reside or die on a single quantity did ring false to me. That’s my solely objection, your honor.)

Susan, simply again from the Frankfurt E book Truthful, settles right down to learn the manuscript. Going slowly sufficient to let the ebook scenes play out at leisure, she discovers that the final chapter is lacking from her copy, and from all different copies. It’s an annoyance that turns into a disaster as Conway — a prickly type with a behavior of turning individuals in his life into characters in his books, in an unflattering manner — is found useless on the backside of a tower connected to his massive nation home. (“A whodunit with out the answer,” wails Clover. “It’s not even well worth the paper it gained’t be printed on.”)

Advertisement

Lesley Manville within the present-day storyline of “Magpie Murders.”

(Bernard Walsh / Eleventh Hour Movies)

First deemed an accident, suicide is suspected as a be aware is produced — however it’s homicide, in fact, or we wouldn’t be right here. There’s a deadly fall in Conway’s ebook as effectively, that of a housekeeper whose employer, Sir Magnus Pye (Lorcan Cranitch), will flip up useless himself presently, decapitated in his lounge, or nice corridor or no matter it’s.

As knowledgeable editor, Susan is alert to discordance and senses one thing will not be fairly proper. Though she claims to be no good at fixing mysteries — “This stuff are at all times too sophisticated for me,” she tells boyfriend Andreas Patakis (Alexandros Logothetis), a disaffected classics instructor who has his personal connection to the sufferer — she is going to flip detective herself, heading right down to the scene of the crime, at first simply in quest of the lacking chapter, then making an attempt to work out the true circumstances of Conway’s loss of life. On this she is aided by Pünd himself, who in a little bit of magical realism — not performed as a hallucination — pops in from the fictional world to assist her focus.

Advertisement

Directed by Peter Cattaneo (“The Full Monty”), “Magpie Murders” works effectively on the display screen, the visible distinction between the 1955 and 2022 settings serving to to maintain issues clear and permitting for intelligent cuts between the 2 eras. (Some actors play roles in each tales.) It’s not straightforward to maintain a thriller over six hours, however that is two mysteries aspect by aspect, and there are sufficient attention-grabbing aspect plots and well-drawn characters (together with Claire Rushbrook as Susan’s sister and Matthew Beard as each Pünd’s assistant and Conway’s former boyfriend), to maintain issues vigorous. Above all, it performs as a pleasant sport, with — as in any whodunit well worth the identify — the clues in plain sight. The conventions of the style spring to mind solely with affection. Alan Conway might specific contempt for the style that made him wealthy, however Horowitz has written it a love letter.

Certainly, the Atticus Pünd half of the story is so effectively realized that I lengthy for a sequence constructed across the character — in keeping with the story, there are Conway’s eight earlier volumes ready to be tailored. In fact, they nonetheless must be written. However I’ve little question that the writer is as much as it.

Thanks prematurely.

‘Magpie Murders on Masterpiece’

The place: PBS

Advertisement

When: Sunday, 9 p.m.

Ranking: TV-14 (could also be unsuitable for kids underneath the age of 14)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

When Amazon workers on Staten Island successfully voted to unionize in the spring of 2022, becoming the corporate retailer’s first American workplace to do so, it was hailed as one of the most important labor victories in the United States in nearly 100 years. 

For the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) to organize employees at the JFK8 warehouse to vote in favor of union representation was a David versus Goliath story for the age of globalization — and a rousing reminder that collective grassroots efforts can still succeed despite massive employer concentration, management intimidation, and other hindrances to building worker power. And that an independent, worker-led coalition led the drive at this 8,000-plus-employee facility, rather than an established union, made its victory all the more impressive, even as the vote to unionize brought organizers into uncharted territory and set up a protracted legal battle with Amazon, which has since refused to recognize the ALU or negotiate a contract. 

Telling the story of how the ALU reached this historic moment, “Union,” a new documentary co-directed by Brett Story (“The Hottest August”) and Stephen Maing (“Crime + Punishment”), takes a detail-driven, ground-level approach, following current and former Amazon employees in Staten Island as they mount a grassroots worker-to-worker campaign, standing their ground against one of the world’s powerful corporations all the while. 

No talking-head documentary but a keenly observational chronicle of the unionization push and its aftermath, “Union” often plays like a thriller by virtue of its sharp, smart editing rhythms. Early on, Story and Maing juxtapose Jeff Bezos blasting off into space on a rocket made by his Blue Origin company and Amazon workers trudging wearily into work; it captures the unimaginable scale of the company’s operations while foregrounding the human scale often concealed by breathless (yet inevitably compromised) reporting of Amazon’s designs on empire. 

Made over the course of three years, Story and Maing’s film explores the human cost of the convenience economy and illuminates oppressive working conditions in Amazon’s factories. From constant surveillance to high injury rates and a lack of breaks, the pressures of working in Amazon warehouses compound to create punishing environments for workers, ones Amazon has steadfastly refused to address or even accurately report. And the threat of retaliation against workers who organize is ever-present; in addition to pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into union-busting campaigns that include mandatory “captive audience” meetings (which have since been banned in the state of New York), Amazon issues warnings of possible termination to workers involved with the unionization drive. 

Advertisement

Bookended by footage of vast cargo ships transporting goods, a reminder of the slow, perpetual motion with which the gears of modern capitalism grind on, Story and Maing’s film is smart in how systematically its narrative lays out obstacles to the union’s success. It also insightfully depicts ground-level dialogue between workers as a powerful tool with which to overcome them. Some of the most remarkable footage, inside Amazon headquarters, covertly films one of those captive audience meetings; here, the company’s anti-union propaganda (One reads: “We’re asking you to do three simple things: get the facts, ask questions and vote no to the union”) is disrupted by ALU organizers, who successfully push back on Amazon managers just long enough to make their case to workers. 

One of the ALU organizers, Chris Smalls, takes center stage in “Union,” though the documentary largely sidesteps the temptation to cast him as a conquering hero. (That’d be an easy trap, given that he became the organization’s public face across the period “Union” depicts.) Smalls, fired from Amazon after protesting inadequate PPE provision during the pandemic (and besmirched by the company’s general counsel as “not smart or articulate” in an internal meeting of executive leaders), is a father of three who was moved to activism by the flagrant injustice of the company’s abusive labor practices. As a leader, he’s at once charismatic and hard-charging, dedicated to his fellow “comrades” but ever driven to push forward even in the face of inter-union dissent.

One of the film’s great strengths is its ability to surface the multiplicity of tensions between organizers working toward a shared cause. Take the world of difference separating the experiences of two subjects: Maddie, a white college graduate using her campus activism experience to help the cause, and Natalie, an older Latina woman living out of her car for years. In one charged exchange, Natalie pushes back on the suggestion, made by white male organizers, that Chris intentionally gets himself arrested by New York police officers to draw attention to the unionization drive. Ultimately, Natalie’s dissatisfaction with the ALU—due to her disagreements with leadership as much as her desire to wait for larger union support—leads her to leave the organization. It’s a testament to the complexity of individual motivations and the absence of easy triumph in this type of effort.

“Union” documents the internal debates and disagreements over governance, organizing, and leadership strategies that divided the ALU before its successful unionization vote and were compounded by its subsequent failed attempt to unionize a second warehouse. Though Smalls’ force of personality, passion, and determination fueled the fight to unionize JFK8, the film carefully depicts this as a collective victory. It rarely gives in to the temptation to single out Smalls for praise at the expense of others, and making it clear that his leadership style also contributed to internal rifts in the ALU that at various points may have weakened its ability to further the union’s mission. 

This becomes particularly important in the film’s latter half, after the unionization vote, at which point the sobering realities of the long work ahead come more fully into view. The heroism of the ALU organizers will never be in question. But with only one battle won in the war for workers’ rights, and Amazon continuing to contest or undercut its results by every means available, “Union” concludes on a note of weary fortitude rather than declarative victory. The film captures both the pain and the power of people at the base of a global infrastructure. By not departing from the frontlines of the fight against Amazon’s labor exploitation, Story and Maing bring the true face of their struggle into focus. 

Advertisement

“Union” will be self-distributed theatrically, starting on Oct. 18. This review was filed from the film’s New York premiere at the New York Film Festival. 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

Published

on

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

In 2017, the film “Wonder” was a surprise critical and commercial hit for Lionsgate. Adapted from a children’s novel by R.J. Palacio, the film starred Jacob Tremblay as young Auggie, a boy with the facial deformities of Treacher Collins syndrome who teaches his family and peers about the importance of kindness. (Julia Roberts and Owen Wilson co-starred as his parents.) Naturally, a sequel, adapted from one of Palacio’s “Wonder” spinoff books, was quickly green-lighted by the studio.

It’s now been seven years since “Wonder” came out, and the long-awaited sequel, “White Bird: A Wonder Story,” which has been plagued by delays both pandemic- and strike-related, is finally hitting theaters. Directed by Marc Forster and written by Mark Bomback, “White Bird” is very loosely connected to the original film, but it takes a more global, historical approach to the same message about the importance of small but high-stakes gestures of kindness.

Bryce Gheisar returns as Julian, Auggie’s bully from “Wonder,” who has been expelled from school for his cruelty. Now himself the new kid at a new school, he struggles to fit in. But Julian has the opportunity to reinvent himself, which is underscored by a surprise visit — and lesson — from his grandmother Sara (Helen Mirren) that completely changes his perspective on how to move through the world.

Thus unfolds the real story of “White Bird,” which isn’t about Julian, who serves merely as a framing device and a tenuous link to the world of “Wonder.” “White Bird” is actually Sara’s story of her childhood in Nazi-occupied France and the harrowing events she experienced as a young Jewish girl there.

If you’ve ever watched (or read) young-adult Holocaust films or fiction, “White Bird” will feel familiar. It takes a similar tack to real-life stories such as Anne Frank’s. Teen Sara (Ariella Glaser) is the adored and privileged daughter of a professor and a doctor (Ishai Golen) living an idyllic life in a small French village. Drawn to the handsome Vincent (Jem Matthews), she and her friends scoff at quiet Julien (Orlando Schwerdt), who is disabled from polio. Insulated from the harsh realities of occupation until laws limiting the freedom of Jews encroach on her town, Sara’s family makes plans to escape, though they are unable to outrun the Nazi roundups.

Advertisement

Sara, though, manages to escape into the snowy woods, and Julien escorts her through the underground sewers away from the school to his family’s barn where he stows her away, and where he and his parents (Gillian Anderson and Jo Stone-Fewings) care for her. She will remain there, in hiding, until the forces of fascism that have infected her community must be reckoned with. But the story is about the connection she forges with Julien, and the circumstances that allow her to learn to evaluate character through shared humanity and bravery, not status and power.

The strength of “White Bird” lies in its performers, especially Glaser and Schwerdt, who deliver complex, nuanced takes on young people experiencing global atrocities on an intimate scale, while also trying to navigate the complications of connecting as teenagers. They are both excellent and keep the film emotionally grounded.

Forster presents a somewhat sanitized view of the Holocaust that is sobering but digestible for younger audiences. The pastoral setting remains picturesque and almost fairy-tale-like. As recounted through Sara’s memories, it has a kind of glowing haze about it, almost too beautiful at times. Computer-generated flowers bloom before our eyes. A cranberry-red coat stands out starkly against a snowy winter background. It’s an interesting stylistic choice (and one you may have seen in another much-celebrated Holocaust movie), but it speaks to the storytelling element of the film, the way our brains craft memories that might be more vivid and lovely, even after decades.

As a “Wonder Story” and a Holocaust story, the messaging of “White Bird” is unsurprising though important: Empathy matters, especially in action, and that often, caring for others can mean putting one’s own self in danger, but we should do it anyway. In the grand tapestry of human existence, we are all connected. It may be a message we’ve heard time and again, but it’s one that bears repeating.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.

Advertisement

‘White Bird: A Wonder Story’

Rating: PG-13, for some strong violence, thematic material and language

Running time: 2 hours

Playing: In wide release Friday, Oct. 4

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

Published

on

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

CTRL movie audience review: CTRL started streaming on Netflix on October 4. The thriller, directed by ace Bollywood director Vikramaditya Motwane, stars Ananya Panday and Vihaan Samat.

The story is about Nella and Joe, who seem like the ideal influencer couple. However, when Joe cheats on Nella, she uses an AI app to erase him from her life — only for it to gain control over her.

The Netflix movie has received some highly-positive reviews from viewers, who posted their comments on social media. Let’s take a look at some of those.

CTRL public reviews

“CTRL is… terrific, absorbing and made with a lot of finesse… Do watch if you have time.”

“Found Vikramaditya Motwane’s new Netflix film #CTRL utterly fascinating. So much to admire. An ambitious, timely, deeply uncomfortable screenlife thriller that’ll make you want to change your passwords, cover your webcam and move to the hills.”

Advertisement

“This is quite good. Only 1 hour 40 minutes, and not gonna lie, I had underestimated Motwane a bit with this movie. Ananya did well because she nailed this genre. It starts off slow, happy, and lighthearted, but the tension builds as the story progresses. Give it a watch, it’s nice.”

“vikramdityamotwane Gives a nuanced and gripping narrative and @ananyapandayy has finally come into her own, and does a fine job.”

“As a big fan of Motwane’s films, I’ve always seen him set new standards in mainstream cinema. From Udaan to AK vs AK he has always proved his merit. However, #CTRL feels like just an okay film, despite good casting with Ananya Panday. It lacks a strong impact and becomes somewhat preachy about our relationship with technology, leaving you with little to think about afterward.”

“The movie is abt how social media, AI and corporates are controlling us and not vice versa. Ananya Panday is good. Vihaan Samat is brilliant. The movie cudve been much better. Esp the climax.Theres no closure!”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending