Connect with us

Entertainment

How Park Chan-wook channeled Hitchcock with ‘the James Stewart of Korea’

Published

on

How Park Chan-wook channeled Hitchcock with ‘the James Stewart of Korea’

Warning: The next comprises spoilers from “Resolution to Go away.”

For celebrated South Korean director Park Chan-wook, the method of falling in love resembles a felony investigation: Each are an try to grasp the motivations behind one other particular person’s actions.

“Simply how a detective wants proof with a view to resolve a case, once you’re in love, you are also always searching for proof of whether or not this particular person loves you or doesn’t love you,” defined Park, 59, through an interpreter throughout a current interview in Los Angeles. “For each the detective and for somebody in love, the essential factor is to eliminate any prejudices.”

His newest cinematic confection, the amorous thriller “Resolution to Go away” (in theaters Friday), follows detective Hae-jun (Park Hae-il) as he probes a person’s seemingly unintentional loss of life. The deceased’s spouse, Search engine optimization-rae (Tang Wei), now a widow from China residing in South Korea, cooperates along with his inquiry. However quickly their interactions transcend the skilled and their mutual attraction muddles the reality.

Well-known for the dazzling brutality of his seminal revenge thriller “Previous Boy” and the eroticism of his lush lesbian interval piece “The Handmaiden,” Park maintains that, regardless of the style, all his motion pictures are tales of affection. With “Resolution to Go away,” he aimed to suggest it — however by no means outright specific it.

Advertisement

“I needed to make a movie telling a love story with out saying the phrases ‘I really like you,’” he stated.

Park Hae-il and Tang Wei turn out to be tangled in a posh relationship within the film “Resolution to Go away.”

(CJ ENM Co. / Moho Movie)

The thriller style, Park’s chosen conduit this time round, scratches an existential itch within the human situation, he thinks. Since our lives overflow with enigmas — the which means of our delivery, what comes after loss of life, why the folks round us behave as they do — we lengthy for certainty.

Advertisement

“Within the thriller style, the authors provide the reply to the query. To not your private questions, however they reply the query that’s central to the story, and it’s defined clearly for us,” Park defined. “We’re all the time hungry for that as a result of our personal questions are by no means fairly answered.”

Nonetheless, “Resolution to Go away” is much less a whodunit than a whydunit: Though we be taught the id of the perpetrator, we aren’t aware of that particular person’s reasoning. And that’s solely one of many methods through which Park subverts or manipulates the tropes of the style.

Uninterested in how violent detective characters have turn out to be in standard tradition, Park conceived Hae-jun as a possibility to depict a civil servant whose sole mission is to serve the folks honorably.

“If you happen to take a look at basic Hollywood movies, the detective characters in these movies are very completely different from these in up to date media,” Park stated. “There wasn’t lots of violence in these characters. Not simply Hollywood movies, however movies all over the world about detectives.”

However the movie doesn’t focus solely on the occupational duties of its male protagonist. In any case, it’s additionally a romance. For Park, Hae-jun was the important thing to create one unified story connecting the investigation course of and the method of falling in love.

Advertisement

“There aren’t two completely different tracks the place one is to research the suspect and the opposite is to satisfy the lady,” he stated “It’s one singular monitor the place each tales are advised on the identical time. He doesn’t meet the lady in his off time.”

Ardour and police work are additionally intertwined within the subplot that Park options as homage to the works of Martin Beck and Ed McBain. When Hae-jun tries to deescalate a tricky scenario with a delinquent he has been after, his therapeutic chatter to consolation the felony doubles as a illustration of his emotions towards Search engine optimization-rae. And the extra Hae-jun enters Search engine optimization-rae’s world, the extra hints seem pointing us to suspect he may die identical to her two husbands.

A woman stares into a man's eyes.

Tang Wei and Park Hae-il within the film “Resolution to Go away.”

(Mubi)

Regardless of the challenges of crafting a thriller set in our digital current, through which cellphones and CCTV surveillance cameras have computerized a lot detective work, Park in the end determined in opposition to making the movie a interval piece.

Advertisement

“I’d’ve most popular to have a pleasant high quality paper with somebody writing in stunning handwriting with their ink pen to one another,” Park famous. “But when the story was advised that method, it could not mirror our fashionable society and would come off as quite compelled.”

As an alternative, the director embraced modernity, devising a brand new strategy to textual content messaging on display — a shot of the gadget with the textual content within the foreground and the face of the particular person on the opposite finish of the dialog within the background — that has no precise correspondent in actual life.

“When the male character is texting, his eyes aren’t really on the telephone however are on the lady,” he stated. “That’s the reason, regardless of using fashionable expertise, I really feel these scenes got here off as much more romantic than writing letters in a Victorian-era setting.”

The interaction of two voices is woven into Park’s inventive course of: Since 2005’s “Girl Vengeance,” he has collaborated with Jung Search engine optimization-Kyoung on all of his screenplays. Recruiting her, he says, is among the greatest selections he’s made in his profession. As a result of they sit right down to put each single letter on the web page collectively, Park sees their particular person contributions to the narrative as almost indistinguishable.

“I needed some change to my principally male-centric works, which is why I wanted a feminine co-writer,” Park recalled. “Femininity is one thing that’s tough to elucidate, however you may really feel it within the works ever since we began working collectively as a group.”

Advertisement

Though the pair have historically averted writing with particular casting in thoughts, as the concept for this seductive homicide thriller brewed of their minds, Park requested Jung to think about actor Park Hae-il for instance of the kind of man detective Hae-jun is, even when they didn’t have any concrete intention of giving him the half.

To place it in Hollywood-friendly phrases, Park describes Park Hae-il as “the James Stewart of Korea.” Park and Jung additionally envisioned the character of the widow as a Chinse girl exactly so they might deliver on Tang, whom they each had liked since seeing her in Ang Lee’s “Lust, Warning.” Fortuitously, each performers signed on for the mission early within the improvement journey.

“For the primary time in my filmmaking profession, I had my two lead actors forged earlier than I began engaged on the script,” Park stated.

A man looks over his shoulder.

Park Hae-il portrays the investigator within the film “Resolution to Go away.”

(Mubi)

Advertisement

Search engine optimization-rae’s background faucets into the advanced historical past between China and Korea. It additionally afforded Park one other alternative to experiment with fashionable expertise in an old style romance: Though her Korean pronunciation is nice sufficient for native audio system to grasp, and her grammar whereas texting in Korean is ideal, folks nonetheless discover it isn’t her first language. In accordance with Park, she makes use of phrases {that a} Korean particular person wouldn’t usually use within the context of the conditions she encounters.

Park makes use of this distinct problem in communication by way of translation apps. Even when Search engine optimization-rae’s Korean is excellent, at any time when she has an excessive amount of to say or needs to say it rapidly, she says it in Chinese language for a translation app to relay her message to Hae-jun. This frustrates him as a result of the tone and emotion of her phrases is misplaced within the flat digital voice.

“Each Hae-jun and the viewers should assume again to some moments earlier than and keep in mind the tone and the face she had when she was talking,” Park stated. “They’ve to tug these photographs out of their head and mix them with the content material of what the app is saying. I consider this can be a new method of movie-watching that was not seen in earlier movies earlier than.”

As “Resolution to Go away” has traveled the world because it premiered in Could on the Cannes Movie Competition, the place Park received one of the best director prize, the seasoned South Korean grasp has come throughout writing that compares his sensual thriller to the work of Alfred Hitchcock.

“’Vertigo’ is the movie that made me wish to turn out to be a filmmaker. As somebody who didn’t go to movie faculty, Hitchcock was my movie faculty,” Park stated. “That affect undoubtedly does exist, however I didn’t consider ‘Vertigo’ after I was writing ‘Resolution to Go away.’ Studying the articles by Western critics mentioning that movie I did perceive the place they got here from.” (Whereas some viewers may assume that Park lifted Search engine optimization-rae’s worry of heights from “Vertigo,” as an example, he confessed he was channeling his personal extreme aversion to heights.)

Advertisement

Within the effort to reinvent the trimmings of the cinematic traditions he’s borrowing from quite than dispense with them totally, Park feels he has principally succeeded — particularly how he concludes his characters’ intense and unsafe love affair with Search engine optimization-rae’s loss of life.

“This romantic ending the place the lady commits suicide as a result of she can not get the center of the person is a clichéd factor in romance movies,” Park stated. “However in a method, this ending can also be completely different from conventional romance endings as a result of the suicide in my movie is attributable to the lady’s need to ceaselessly stay an unresolved case within the man’s life.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

When Amazon workers on Staten Island successfully voted to unionize in the spring of 2022, becoming the corporate retailer’s first American workplace to do so, it was hailed as one of the most important labor victories in the United States in nearly 100 years. 

For the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) to organize employees at the JFK8 warehouse to vote in favor of union representation was a David versus Goliath story for the age of globalization — and a rousing reminder that collective grassroots efforts can still succeed despite massive employer concentration, management intimidation, and other hindrances to building worker power. And that an independent, worker-led coalition led the drive at this 8,000-plus-employee facility, rather than an established union, made its victory all the more impressive, even as the vote to unionize brought organizers into uncharted territory and set up a protracted legal battle with Amazon, which has since refused to recognize the ALU or negotiate a contract. 

Telling the story of how the ALU reached this historic moment, “Union,” a new documentary co-directed by Brett Story (“The Hottest August”) and Stephen Maing (“Crime + Punishment”), takes a detail-driven, ground-level approach, following current and former Amazon employees in Staten Island as they mount a grassroots worker-to-worker campaign, standing their ground against one of the world’s powerful corporations all the while. 

No talking-head documentary but a keenly observational chronicle of the unionization push and its aftermath, “Union” often plays like a thriller by virtue of its sharp, smart editing rhythms. Early on, Story and Maing juxtapose Jeff Bezos blasting off into space on a rocket made by his Blue Origin company and Amazon workers trudging wearily into work; it captures the unimaginable scale of the company’s operations while foregrounding the human scale often concealed by breathless (yet inevitably compromised) reporting of Amazon’s designs on empire. 

Made over the course of three years, Story and Maing’s film explores the human cost of the convenience economy and illuminates oppressive working conditions in Amazon’s factories. From constant surveillance to high injury rates and a lack of breaks, the pressures of working in Amazon warehouses compound to create punishing environments for workers, ones Amazon has steadfastly refused to address or even accurately report. And the threat of retaliation against workers who organize is ever-present; in addition to pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into union-busting campaigns that include mandatory “captive audience” meetings (which have since been banned in the state of New York), Amazon issues warnings of possible termination to workers involved with the unionization drive. 

Advertisement

Bookended by footage of vast cargo ships transporting goods, a reminder of the slow, perpetual motion with which the gears of modern capitalism grind on, Story and Maing’s film is smart in how systematically its narrative lays out obstacles to the union’s success. It also insightfully depicts ground-level dialogue between workers as a powerful tool with which to overcome them. Some of the most remarkable footage, inside Amazon headquarters, covertly films one of those captive audience meetings; here, the company’s anti-union propaganda (One reads: “We’re asking you to do three simple things: get the facts, ask questions and vote no to the union”) is disrupted by ALU organizers, who successfully push back on Amazon managers just long enough to make their case to workers. 

One of the ALU organizers, Chris Smalls, takes center stage in “Union,” though the documentary largely sidesteps the temptation to cast him as a conquering hero. (That’d be an easy trap, given that he became the organization’s public face across the period “Union” depicts.) Smalls, fired from Amazon after protesting inadequate PPE provision during the pandemic (and besmirched by the company’s general counsel as “not smart or articulate” in an internal meeting of executive leaders), is a father of three who was moved to activism by the flagrant injustice of the company’s abusive labor practices. As a leader, he’s at once charismatic and hard-charging, dedicated to his fellow “comrades” but ever driven to push forward even in the face of inter-union dissent.

One of the film’s great strengths is its ability to surface the multiplicity of tensions between organizers working toward a shared cause. Take the world of difference separating the experiences of two subjects: Maddie, a white college graduate using her campus activism experience to help the cause, and Natalie, an older Latina woman living out of her car for years. In one charged exchange, Natalie pushes back on the suggestion, made by white male organizers, that Chris intentionally gets himself arrested by New York police officers to draw attention to the unionization drive. Ultimately, Natalie’s dissatisfaction with the ALU—due to her disagreements with leadership as much as her desire to wait for larger union support—leads her to leave the organization. It’s a testament to the complexity of individual motivations and the absence of easy triumph in this type of effort.

“Union” documents the internal debates and disagreements over governance, organizing, and leadership strategies that divided the ALU before its successful unionization vote and were compounded by its subsequent failed attempt to unionize a second warehouse. Though Smalls’ force of personality, passion, and determination fueled the fight to unionize JFK8, the film carefully depicts this as a collective victory. It rarely gives in to the temptation to single out Smalls for praise at the expense of others, and making it clear that his leadership style also contributed to internal rifts in the ALU that at various points may have weakened its ability to further the union’s mission. 

This becomes particularly important in the film’s latter half, after the unionization vote, at which point the sobering realities of the long work ahead come more fully into view. The heroism of the ALU organizers will never be in question. But with only one battle won in the war for workers’ rights, and Amazon continuing to contest or undercut its results by every means available, “Union” concludes on a note of weary fortitude rather than declarative victory. The film captures both the pain and the power of people at the base of a global infrastructure. By not departing from the frontlines of the fight against Amazon’s labor exploitation, Story and Maing bring the true face of their struggle into focus. 

Advertisement

“Union” will be self-distributed theatrically, starting on Oct. 18. This review was filed from the film’s New York premiere at the New York Film Festival. 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

Published

on

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

In 2017, the film “Wonder” was a surprise critical and commercial hit for Lionsgate. Adapted from a children’s novel by R.J. Palacio, the film starred Jacob Tremblay as young Auggie, a boy with the facial deformities of Treacher Collins syndrome who teaches his family and peers about the importance of kindness. (Julia Roberts and Owen Wilson co-starred as his parents.) Naturally, a sequel, adapted from one of Palacio’s “Wonder” spinoff books, was quickly green-lighted by the studio.

It’s now been seven years since “Wonder” came out, and the long-awaited sequel, “White Bird: A Wonder Story,” which has been plagued by delays both pandemic- and strike-related, is finally hitting theaters. Directed by Marc Forster and written by Mark Bomback, “White Bird” is very loosely connected to the original film, but it takes a more global, historical approach to the same message about the importance of small but high-stakes gestures of kindness.

Bryce Gheisar returns as Julian, Auggie’s bully from “Wonder,” who has been expelled from school for his cruelty. Now himself the new kid at a new school, he struggles to fit in. But Julian has the opportunity to reinvent himself, which is underscored by a surprise visit — and lesson — from his grandmother Sara (Helen Mirren) that completely changes his perspective on how to move through the world.

Thus unfolds the real story of “White Bird,” which isn’t about Julian, who serves merely as a framing device and a tenuous link to the world of “Wonder.” “White Bird” is actually Sara’s story of her childhood in Nazi-occupied France and the harrowing events she experienced as a young Jewish girl there.

If you’ve ever watched (or read) young-adult Holocaust films or fiction, “White Bird” will feel familiar. It takes a similar tack to real-life stories such as Anne Frank’s. Teen Sara (Ariella Glaser) is the adored and privileged daughter of a professor and a doctor (Ishai Golen) living an idyllic life in a small French village. Drawn to the handsome Vincent (Jem Matthews), she and her friends scoff at quiet Julien (Orlando Schwerdt), who is disabled from polio. Insulated from the harsh realities of occupation until laws limiting the freedom of Jews encroach on her town, Sara’s family makes plans to escape, though they are unable to outrun the Nazi roundups.

Advertisement

Sara, though, manages to escape into the snowy woods, and Julien escorts her through the underground sewers away from the school to his family’s barn where he stows her away, and where he and his parents (Gillian Anderson and Jo Stone-Fewings) care for her. She will remain there, in hiding, until the forces of fascism that have infected her community must be reckoned with. But the story is about the connection she forges with Julien, and the circumstances that allow her to learn to evaluate character through shared humanity and bravery, not status and power.

The strength of “White Bird” lies in its performers, especially Glaser and Schwerdt, who deliver complex, nuanced takes on young people experiencing global atrocities on an intimate scale, while also trying to navigate the complications of connecting as teenagers. They are both excellent and keep the film emotionally grounded.

Forster presents a somewhat sanitized view of the Holocaust that is sobering but digestible for younger audiences. The pastoral setting remains picturesque and almost fairy-tale-like. As recounted through Sara’s memories, it has a kind of glowing haze about it, almost too beautiful at times. Computer-generated flowers bloom before our eyes. A cranberry-red coat stands out starkly against a snowy winter background. It’s an interesting stylistic choice (and one you may have seen in another much-celebrated Holocaust movie), but it speaks to the storytelling element of the film, the way our brains craft memories that might be more vivid and lovely, even after decades.

As a “Wonder Story” and a Holocaust story, the messaging of “White Bird” is unsurprising though important: Empathy matters, especially in action, and that often, caring for others can mean putting one’s own self in danger, but we should do it anyway. In the grand tapestry of human existence, we are all connected. It may be a message we’ve heard time and again, but it’s one that bears repeating.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.

Advertisement

‘White Bird: A Wonder Story’

Rating: PG-13, for some strong violence, thematic material and language

Running time: 2 hours

Playing: In wide release Friday, Oct. 4

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

Published

on

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

CTRL movie audience review: CTRL started streaming on Netflix on October 4. The thriller, directed by ace Bollywood director Vikramaditya Motwane, stars Ananya Panday and Vihaan Samat.

The story is about Nella and Joe, who seem like the ideal influencer couple. However, when Joe cheats on Nella, she uses an AI app to erase him from her life — only for it to gain control over her.

The Netflix movie has received some highly-positive reviews from viewers, who posted their comments on social media. Let’s take a look at some of those.

CTRL public reviews

“CTRL is… terrific, absorbing and made with a lot of finesse… Do watch if you have time.”

“Found Vikramaditya Motwane’s new Netflix film #CTRL utterly fascinating. So much to admire. An ambitious, timely, deeply uncomfortable screenlife thriller that’ll make you want to change your passwords, cover your webcam and move to the hills.”

Advertisement

“This is quite good. Only 1 hour 40 minutes, and not gonna lie, I had underestimated Motwane a bit with this movie. Ananya did well because she nailed this genre. It starts off slow, happy, and lighthearted, but the tension builds as the story progresses. Give it a watch, it’s nice.”

“vikramdityamotwane Gives a nuanced and gripping narrative and @ananyapandayy has finally come into her own, and does a fine job.”

“As a big fan of Motwane’s films, I’ve always seen him set new standards in mainstream cinema. From Udaan to AK vs AK he has always proved his merit. However, #CTRL feels like just an okay film, despite good casting with Ananya Panday. It lacks a strong impact and becomes somewhat preachy about our relationship with technology, leaving you with little to think about afterward.”

“The movie is abt how social media, AI and corporates are controlling us and not vice versa. Ananya Panday is good. Vihaan Samat is brilliant. The movie cudve been much better. Esp the climax.Theres no closure!”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending