Connect with us

Entertainment

Halloween season brings out the best in L.A. immersive scene with ‘The Willows’ and ‘Witch!’

Published

on

Halloween season brings out the best in L.A. immersive scene with ‘The Willows’ and ‘Witch!’

Simply as a current manufacturing of “The Willows” was beginning to reveal its intentions round a dinner desk, the immersive theater endeavor ripped me away from the motion. I used to be being scolded by the matriarch of the home, and the butler was fast to order me out of my seat. My offense? Resting my elbows on a dinner desk. I didn’t even have time to nod a goodbye to my accomplice as I used to be instructed to face, go away the eating room and sit alone in a cramped, red-lit closet.

The very first thing that caught my eye was a crumpled paper, which learn, “I’m dangerous as a result of I put elbows on the desk.” Whereas I wasn’t requested to jot down a confession, such a intelligent element made it clear that I used to be now a part of a lineage of poorly mannered company at this haunted home.

As lights and audio flickered, the setting was eerie — bordering on sinister. I used to be informed I had two minutes to sit down and ponder my actions, and whereas I knew this meant I used to be lacking out on extra plot-building motion that was occurring within the eating room, I needed to watch out to profit from my time in solitude.

Earlier than me, on the again of the closet door and scribbled in damaged sketch strains, was a household tree, which was designed to look hurriedly drawn. Whereas “The Willows” is about in a residence close to Koreatown, what I used to be wasn’t crafted out of familial love. This was family tree laid out as if a puzzle, the work of somebody attempt to make sense of 1 household’s ancestry quite than have a good time it. Extra than simply creating a way of presence, it gave “The Willows” a sense of lived-in historical past.

What had begun as dinner theater with murder-mystery trappings was now beginning to subtly shift. There was a puzzle laid out in the beginning of the night. A son and a husband, Jonathan, had all of a sudden and unexpectedly died. However “The Willows” shouldn’t be a whodunit. “The Willows” as an alternative goals to disorient the viewers, via improvisation and lightweight video games, till the thriller facilities on us. Set to accommodate fewer than 20 viewers members at a time, “The Willows” will divide and break up teams till everyone seems to be receiving intimate encounters with actors, the one widespread denominator among the many varied tracks is that every will deal with us because the protagonists.

Advertisement

First staged in 2017, JFI Productons’ “The Willows” has turn out to be a staple of Los Angeles’ immersive scene, a group that sometimes springs to life with eerie enthusiasm every Halloween season. Every fall sees more and more story-driven haunts at theme parks reminiscent of Knott’s Berry Farm and Common Studios Hollywood, the latter of which expanded its scare-palate this 12 months with a walk-through attraction influenced by the Weeknd, in addition to a bunch of extra long-form theatrical productions. This 12 months that features a revival of “The Willows,” in addition to the Downtown Repertory Theater Firm’s “Witch!,” staged in Altadena’s Mountain View Mausoleum. Each “The Willows” and “Witch!” run via early November.

“With horror, we are able to instantly put folks on the protection, construct their nerves up, and make them be actually alert and really feel current,” says JFI founder Justin Repair. “The Willows” follows the corporate’s current revival of its ‘70s’-themed disco immersive present “Night time Fever,” which targeted extra on a communal really feel quite than the intimacy current in “The Willows.” The latter, as an example, has seven distinct tracks that viewers members can comply with, relying on which actors they get paired up with and infrequently leads to encounters with only one or two different folks. The 2022 revival, says Repair, can also be meant to be a proof-of-concept, as he hopes to have the present begin touring different cities in 2023.

Actor Melinda Dekay in “The Willows,” an immersive theater present by which forged and viewers will intently work together.

(Hatbox Images / JFI Productions)

Advertisement

Throughout one second in “The Willows,” I discovered myself trapped below a mattress with an actor, Jacob Miller’s character named Conrad, and a stranger as we eavesdropped on one other group. Because the scene went on, it turned borderline traumatic as I attempted to not be found whereas alternately calming the fears of the panicked Conrad, a personality grieving the lack of his member of the family whereas additionally masking his intentions for the dinner company. Such moments, says Repair, assist the viewers to improvise and let go of any awkwardness they could have introduced with them that night. “The worry begins to stay, and the strain begins to construct, and also you naturally end up dwelling in a horror film,” says Repair.

“Witch!,” too, follows a multi-act construction by which the manufacturing flips the deal with its viewers by play’s finish. The present, set amongst a number of areas out and in of the Altadena mausoleum — I noticed an earlier manufacturing at Heritage Sq. Museum — is impressed by the true-life witch trials within the Pendle Hill space of England in 1612. It begins merely, with the viewers seated within the spherical as we study of spiritual fervor and the way it’s intertwined with discrimination, however step by step segues into extra themes. The trials are framed, partly, as the results of class divisions and financial desperation amid households jockeying for energy and fearing threats to their establishment.

Jahnavi Alyssa as Anne Redferne in the immersive theater production “Witch!”

Jahnavi Alyssa as Anne Redferne within the immersive theater manufacturing “Witch!”

(Downtown Repertory Theater Firm)

The energy of each exhibits is that they pivot from conventional Halloween-season frights — no bounce scares, nothing that overly stresses forged or viewers members — to as an alternative attempt to personalize the experiences. “It speaks to sorrow, and it’s heavy on grief,” says Repair of “The Willows,” however I noticed a present about an upper-crust household who tried to wall themselves off from society to the purpose that they lived solely in worry and denial. Likewise in “Witch!,” the place worshiping in personal can turn out to be trigger for conspiracy theories to run rampant. In every, the viewers step by step transitions from mystery-seekers or problem-solvers into roles of feeling othered.

Advertisement

A way of playfulness additionally permeates each. Early in “Witch!” we watch, as an example, a quick puppet present, one by which different forged members will be a part of and converse with the viewers, and there are moments in “The Willows” once they play mild video games, reminiscent of mimicry or deception workouts to loosen viewers members up and foster participation. Repair has usually stated escape rooms are a major affect on JFI’s immersive work, which usually contains marketing-focused pop-ups for movie and tv properties, and he sought to create an expertise that will encourage escape room-level participation with out turning into a pure puzzle expertise.

The trick is making the video games really feel built-in into the story, to the purpose that video games advance the story. Whereas a ghost story like “The Wilows” can have, relying in your monitor, a seance scene and even one which alludes to torture, there can even be moments by which a mom remembers time along with her son by talking of the video games they might play collectively.

“The primary 45 minutes places our viewers in a state of improv, and who they need to be for the night time and befriend and align with,” Repair says. “Once we transfer to puzzle video games, it’s about discovering out how we converse to our viewers. How can we preserve them lively within the expertise. How do you get them to play? It’s so simple as reminiscing about childhood video games about how a son would comply with every part the mom did. It’s a storytelling mechanism.”

And it creates a way of guardrails and guidelines. Once I was given at one level in “The Willows” a doll, and instructed to take care of it as if it had been my very own baby, I didn’t dare deviate, although I used to be curious how the forged would react if I didn’t comply with their orders. The following day, I assumed I maybe shouldn’t have performed my position so dutifully. In spite of everything, even a timeout room is a part of the present.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Union movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

When Amazon workers on Staten Island successfully voted to unionize in the spring of 2022, becoming the corporate retailer’s first American workplace to do so, it was hailed as one of the most important labor victories in the United States in nearly 100 years. 

For the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) to organize employees at the JFK8 warehouse to vote in favor of union representation was a David versus Goliath story for the age of globalization — and a rousing reminder that collective grassroots efforts can still succeed despite massive employer concentration, management intimidation, and other hindrances to building worker power. And that an independent, worker-led coalition led the drive at this 8,000-plus-employee facility, rather than an established union, made its victory all the more impressive, even as the vote to unionize brought organizers into uncharted territory and set up a protracted legal battle with Amazon, which has since refused to recognize the ALU or negotiate a contract. 

Telling the story of how the ALU reached this historic moment, “Union,” a new documentary co-directed by Brett Story (“The Hottest August”) and Stephen Maing (“Crime + Punishment”), takes a detail-driven, ground-level approach, following current and former Amazon employees in Staten Island as they mount a grassroots worker-to-worker campaign, standing their ground against one of the world’s powerful corporations all the while. 

No talking-head documentary but a keenly observational chronicle of the unionization push and its aftermath, “Union” often plays like a thriller by virtue of its sharp, smart editing rhythms. Early on, Story and Maing juxtapose Jeff Bezos blasting off into space on a rocket made by his Blue Origin company and Amazon workers trudging wearily into work; it captures the unimaginable scale of the company’s operations while foregrounding the human scale often concealed by breathless (yet inevitably compromised) reporting of Amazon’s designs on empire. 

Made over the course of three years, Story and Maing’s film explores the human cost of the convenience economy and illuminates oppressive working conditions in Amazon’s factories. From constant surveillance to high injury rates and a lack of breaks, the pressures of working in Amazon warehouses compound to create punishing environments for workers, ones Amazon has steadfastly refused to address or even accurately report. And the threat of retaliation against workers who organize is ever-present; in addition to pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into union-busting campaigns that include mandatory “captive audience” meetings (which have since been banned in the state of New York), Amazon issues warnings of possible termination to workers involved with the unionization drive. 

Advertisement

Bookended by footage of vast cargo ships transporting goods, a reminder of the slow, perpetual motion with which the gears of modern capitalism grind on, Story and Maing’s film is smart in how systematically its narrative lays out obstacles to the union’s success. It also insightfully depicts ground-level dialogue between workers as a powerful tool with which to overcome them. Some of the most remarkable footage, inside Amazon headquarters, covertly films one of those captive audience meetings; here, the company’s anti-union propaganda (One reads: “We’re asking you to do three simple things: get the facts, ask questions and vote no to the union”) is disrupted by ALU organizers, who successfully push back on Amazon managers just long enough to make their case to workers. 

One of the ALU organizers, Chris Smalls, takes center stage in “Union,” though the documentary largely sidesteps the temptation to cast him as a conquering hero. (That’d be an easy trap, given that he became the organization’s public face across the period “Union” depicts.) Smalls, fired from Amazon after protesting inadequate PPE provision during the pandemic (and besmirched by the company’s general counsel as “not smart or articulate” in an internal meeting of executive leaders), is a father of three who was moved to activism by the flagrant injustice of the company’s abusive labor practices. As a leader, he’s at once charismatic and hard-charging, dedicated to his fellow “comrades” but ever driven to push forward even in the face of inter-union dissent.

One of the film’s great strengths is its ability to surface the multiplicity of tensions between organizers working toward a shared cause. Take the world of difference separating the experiences of two subjects: Maddie, a white college graduate using her campus activism experience to help the cause, and Natalie, an older Latina woman living out of her car for years. In one charged exchange, Natalie pushes back on the suggestion, made by white male organizers, that Chris intentionally gets himself arrested by New York police officers to draw attention to the unionization drive. Ultimately, Natalie’s dissatisfaction with the ALU—due to her disagreements with leadership as much as her desire to wait for larger union support—leads her to leave the organization. It’s a testament to the complexity of individual motivations and the absence of easy triumph in this type of effort.

“Union” documents the internal debates and disagreements over governance, organizing, and leadership strategies that divided the ALU before its successful unionization vote and were compounded by its subsequent failed attempt to unionize a second warehouse. Though Smalls’ force of personality, passion, and determination fueled the fight to unionize JFK8, the film carefully depicts this as a collective victory. It rarely gives in to the temptation to single out Smalls for praise at the expense of others, and making it clear that his leadership style also contributed to internal rifts in the ALU that at various points may have weakened its ability to further the union’s mission. 

This becomes particularly important in the film’s latter half, after the unionization vote, at which point the sobering realities of the long work ahead come more fully into view. The heroism of the ALU organizers will never be in question. But with only one battle won in the war for workers’ rights, and Amazon continuing to contest or undercut its results by every means available, “Union” concludes on a note of weary fortitude rather than declarative victory. The film captures both the pain and the power of people at the base of a global infrastructure. By not departing from the frontlines of the fight against Amazon’s labor exploitation, Story and Maing bring the true face of their struggle into focus. 

Advertisement

“Union” will be self-distributed theatrically, starting on Oct. 18. This review was filed from the film’s New York premiere at the New York Film Festival. 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

Published

on

Review: Kindness is the takeaway in the Holocaust-era-set 'White Bird: A Wonder Story'

In 2017, the film “Wonder” was a surprise critical and commercial hit for Lionsgate. Adapted from a children’s novel by R.J. Palacio, the film starred Jacob Tremblay as young Auggie, a boy with the facial deformities of Treacher Collins syndrome who teaches his family and peers about the importance of kindness. (Julia Roberts and Owen Wilson co-starred as his parents.) Naturally, a sequel, adapted from one of Palacio’s “Wonder” spinoff books, was quickly green-lighted by the studio.

It’s now been seven years since “Wonder” came out, and the long-awaited sequel, “White Bird: A Wonder Story,” which has been plagued by delays both pandemic- and strike-related, is finally hitting theaters. Directed by Marc Forster and written by Mark Bomback, “White Bird” is very loosely connected to the original film, but it takes a more global, historical approach to the same message about the importance of small but high-stakes gestures of kindness.

Bryce Gheisar returns as Julian, Auggie’s bully from “Wonder,” who has been expelled from school for his cruelty. Now himself the new kid at a new school, he struggles to fit in. But Julian has the opportunity to reinvent himself, which is underscored by a surprise visit — and lesson — from his grandmother Sara (Helen Mirren) that completely changes his perspective on how to move through the world.

Thus unfolds the real story of “White Bird,” which isn’t about Julian, who serves merely as a framing device and a tenuous link to the world of “Wonder.” “White Bird” is actually Sara’s story of her childhood in Nazi-occupied France and the harrowing events she experienced as a young Jewish girl there.

If you’ve ever watched (or read) young-adult Holocaust films or fiction, “White Bird” will feel familiar. It takes a similar tack to real-life stories such as Anne Frank’s. Teen Sara (Ariella Glaser) is the adored and privileged daughter of a professor and a doctor (Ishai Golen) living an idyllic life in a small French village. Drawn to the handsome Vincent (Jem Matthews), she and her friends scoff at quiet Julien (Orlando Schwerdt), who is disabled from polio. Insulated from the harsh realities of occupation until laws limiting the freedom of Jews encroach on her town, Sara’s family makes plans to escape, though they are unable to outrun the Nazi roundups.

Advertisement

Sara, though, manages to escape into the snowy woods, and Julien escorts her through the underground sewers away from the school to his family’s barn where he stows her away, and where he and his parents (Gillian Anderson and Jo Stone-Fewings) care for her. She will remain there, in hiding, until the forces of fascism that have infected her community must be reckoned with. But the story is about the connection she forges with Julien, and the circumstances that allow her to learn to evaluate character through shared humanity and bravery, not status and power.

The strength of “White Bird” lies in its performers, especially Glaser and Schwerdt, who deliver complex, nuanced takes on young people experiencing global atrocities on an intimate scale, while also trying to navigate the complications of connecting as teenagers. They are both excellent and keep the film emotionally grounded.

Forster presents a somewhat sanitized view of the Holocaust that is sobering but digestible for younger audiences. The pastoral setting remains picturesque and almost fairy-tale-like. As recounted through Sara’s memories, it has a kind of glowing haze about it, almost too beautiful at times. Computer-generated flowers bloom before our eyes. A cranberry-red coat stands out starkly against a snowy winter background. It’s an interesting stylistic choice (and one you may have seen in another much-celebrated Holocaust movie), but it speaks to the storytelling element of the film, the way our brains craft memories that might be more vivid and lovely, even after decades.

As a “Wonder Story” and a Holocaust story, the messaging of “White Bird” is unsurprising though important: Empathy matters, especially in action, and that often, caring for others can mean putting one’s own self in danger, but we should do it anyway. In the grand tapestry of human existence, we are all connected. It may be a message we’ve heard time and again, but it’s one that bears repeating.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.

Advertisement

‘White Bird: A Wonder Story’

Rating: PG-13, for some strong violence, thematic material and language

Running time: 2 hours

Playing: In wide release Friday, Oct. 4

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

Published

on

CTRL movie audience review: Ananya Panday’s Netflix thriller is ‘terrific’; OTT film gets thumbs-up from viewers | Today News

CTRL movie audience review: CTRL started streaming on Netflix on October 4. The thriller, directed by ace Bollywood director Vikramaditya Motwane, stars Ananya Panday and Vihaan Samat.

The story is about Nella and Joe, who seem like the ideal influencer couple. However, when Joe cheats on Nella, she uses an AI app to erase him from her life — only for it to gain control over her.

The Netflix movie has received some highly-positive reviews from viewers, who posted their comments on social media. Let’s take a look at some of those.

CTRL public reviews

“CTRL is… terrific, absorbing and made with a lot of finesse… Do watch if you have time.”

“Found Vikramaditya Motwane’s new Netflix film #CTRL utterly fascinating. So much to admire. An ambitious, timely, deeply uncomfortable screenlife thriller that’ll make you want to change your passwords, cover your webcam and move to the hills.”

Advertisement

“This is quite good. Only 1 hour 40 minutes, and not gonna lie, I had underestimated Motwane a bit with this movie. Ananya did well because she nailed this genre. It starts off slow, happy, and lighthearted, but the tension builds as the story progresses. Give it a watch, it’s nice.”

“vikramdityamotwane Gives a nuanced and gripping narrative and @ananyapandayy has finally come into her own, and does a fine job.”

“As a big fan of Motwane’s films, I’ve always seen him set new standards in mainstream cinema. From Udaan to AK vs AK he has always proved his merit. However, #CTRL feels like just an okay film, despite good casting with Ananya Panday. It lacks a strong impact and becomes somewhat preachy about our relationship with technology, leaving you with little to think about afterward.”

“The movie is abt how social media, AI and corporates are controlling us and not vice versa. Ananya Panday is good. Vihaan Samat is brilliant. The movie cudve been much better. Esp the climax.Theres no closure!”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending