Connect with us

Entertainment

DGA’s board backs tentative contract with major studios

Published

on

DGA’s board backs tentative contract with major studios

The Directors Guild of America’s national board on Friday unanimously recommended its membership vote in favor of a four-year contract with the major studios that would increase wages, boost contributions to its health plan and establish guardrails surrounding AI technology.

“We entered this negotiation with three main priorities: secure our Health Plan, protect jobs, and ensure that our members remain secure as AI continues to impact our industry,” DGA President Christopher Nolan said in a statement. “We succeeded in these areas and gained in many others.”

Under the proposed contract, major studios would increase their contributions to the DGA’s health plan by 24.4% over four years, the largest since the plan was founded. In return, the DGA would recommend changes to its plan’s trustees including “modest” increases to the eligibility threshold and annual premiums, the DGA said on Friday.

The contract also increases minimum salaries for most jobs by 2.5% in the first year and up 3% for each of the following years in the agreement. Directors of network non-prime time strip dramatic programs will see their minimum salaries increase 2.5% for each year .

Advertisement

The union, which represents more than 19,500 directors and their teams in movies, TV and commercials, said the agreement creates support for a federal production incentive to keep filming jobs in the U.S.

The proposed agreement secures a commitment that senior management at the major studios “would engage in meaningful advocacy for a federal production incentive above and beyond the ongoing lobbying efforts of the Motion Picture Association,” according to the DGA.

The contract also adds more rules around the use of AI technology, including requiring that directors oversee any footage created by artificial intelligence .

Studios will also be required to notify the DGA if an employer decides to license a director’s work to train a generative AI system to create new work. The agreement also establishes an employer-funded program to enhance directors’ AI skills, the union said.

“With these gains, a four-year Agreement was both appropriate and necessary to provide stability and potential for growth at a moment when the industry has been experiencing contraction,” Nolan said in a note to members on Friday.

Advertisement

The DGA and Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers reached the tentative contract earlier this week. At that time, AMPTP said “we appreciate the hard work and commitment of our guild partners in achieving a fair deal that helps advance a stable and successful entertainment industry.”

DGA members will have until June 25 at 5 p.m. to vote on the plan. If approved, the contract would go into effect July 1 and run through June 30, 2030.

Movie Reviews

Hyperreal Film Club Review – ‘SHARP: Moving Picture II’

Published

on

Hyperreal Film Club Review – ‘SHARP: Moving Picture II’

Vague Visages’ SHARP: Moving Picture II review contains minor spoilers. This article covers the films Obsidian, Over Herd and Burn. Check out the VV home page for more film criticism, movie reviews and film essays.

In the city of Austin, keeping it “weird” is the name of the game. The coroner’s report on the counterculture’s demise is indeed fake news based on my recent screening of SHARP: Moving Picture II, a showcase of 20 experimental shorts, video art and non-narrative works from up-and-coming artists/filmmakers via the Hyperreal Film Club. This cavalcade of ambitious eccentricities and diasporic dreamers isn’t after your validation, nor should it be considered “main character energy.” Superficiality takes a back seat as the artists, in most cases, communicate their beliefs with mere glimpses and “flickers.”

Joseph Gonzalez of The Austin Chronicle nails the SHARP: Moving Picture II vibe, characterizing the filmmakers as having “something different to say about jagged edges of experience.” Nowhere is this truer than in the work of Jay aka j4_qv and his meditative one-shot Obsidian (2026). In under five minutes, the filmmaker allows viewers to ruminate on their own sharp edges and half-dreamt truths. To amplify this spiritual energy, Jay uses three massive indigenous monoliths, whose aura evokes not an inhospitable presence but rather a beguiling prologue for additional works to come. If one finds a fault in the work, it’s the diehard, fanboy nature of it all. Key shots throughout evoke “The Final Messenger” episode of Neon Genesis Evangelion (1995-96), while the music and backdrop resemble Toluca Lake of the Silent Hill video game franchise. All are admirable choices, and yes, the sound mixing rocks. Yet the cost of Jay’s approach is the lack of a distinct vantage point. Nevertheless, the artist’s thought-provoking and druid imagery hints at a breakout that’s to come.

SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Short Film Review: Marcellus Cox’s ‘Jamarcus Rose & Da 5 Bullet Holes’

Advertisement

The midsection is where several films’ themes, though vivid and suggestive, begin to lose focus and become repetitive. Several vignettes appear under variations of SHARP, such as Sharps or Shaaarrrrp, which weakens the sense of uniqueness. The inclusion of miscellaneous cartoon cat videos is perhaps an effort to bolster the broader theme of transition. One notable short, Burn, near the end of this section, follows a man who is not yet ready to confront or reveal his identity. In the course of roughly 10 minutes, Burn immerses viewers into his internal struggle, approaching the subject in a distinctly Kafkaesque way. The camera remains in a fixed point-of-view position, while various objects of torture — kitchen torches, rough plastics and cigarette butts — are used to evoke the sense of an itch that just can’t be scratched. Parallel shots of a silhouette and an array of women interrupt these tortuous images. There’s a lack of emotional connection to the subject and zero continuity with the events that transpire, rendering the whole episode a booming cry for help that’s stifled by the lack of internal or external dialogue. Viewers simply receive a brief glimpse of the protagonist’s inner torment.

SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Review: 2026 Oscar Nominees for Animated Short Film

The film presentation ended in a typical Generation Z-type scenario, not with an emo millennial scoff but with a stare. Henna Chou’s smart stroke Over Herd (2026) circumnavigates the typical deer-in-headlights, coming-of-age lecture, but rather than spoofing these situations, the director allows their featured friend to remain anonymous, by way of a bison serving as the avatar. The whole conversation of their complex and queer-coded relationship/friendship with their boss evolves as a mash-up of MTV’s Girl Code (2013-2018) and Cartoon Network’s Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job! (2007-10). The deal seals itself largely because of the deliberate distortion of the vocal audio track. One can never be quite sure whether the audio comes from the bison or a non-diegetic source.

SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Borscht Belt Film Fest Review (Short): Joel Perez’s ‘Villa Encanto’

In the May 2026 issue of Time, Christopher Nolan suggests that all directors remain anonymous. Art should speak for itself and personalities should not overshadow the message. Given the lucrative yet superficial nature of Hollywood, such a statement may be wishful thinking. SHARP, however, may just hit the mark. The combination of teasing glimpses and the absence of titles and/or character names conveys the notion that “This is who I am — deal with it.” This isn’t to say that the feature creators are off the grid. The names of the artists/filmmakers can be found on the Hyperreal website, but the art trumps the personalities. In the spirit of philosopher John Locke, these individuals are not uniquely defined by their physical bodies but rather by their own conscious awareness and experiences. They should not need to round off any edges to suit others.

Advertisement

Peter Bell (@PeterGBell25) is a 2016 Master of Arts – Film Studies graduate of Columbia University School of Arts in New York City. His interests include film history, film theory and film criticism. Ever since watching TCM as a child, Peter has had a passion for film, always trying to add greater context to film for others. His favorite films include Chinatown, Blade Runner, Lawrence of Arabia, A Shot in the Dark and Inception. Peter believes movie theaters are still the optimal forum for film viewing, discussion and discovering fresh perspectives on culture.

SHARP: Moving Picture II Review: Related — Review: 2026 Oscar Nominees for Live-Action Short Film

Categories: 2020s, 2026 Film Reviews, Drama, Featured, Film, Movies, Short Films

Advertisement

Tagged as: 2026, Drama Movie, Film Actors, Film Actresses, Film Critic, Film Criticism, Film Director, Film Essay, Film Explained, Film Journalism, Film Publication, Film Summary, Journalism, Movie Actors, Movie Actresses, Movie Critic, Movie Director, Movie Essay, Movie Explained, Movie Journalism, Movie Plot, Movie Publication, Movie Summary, Peter Bell, Rotten Tomatoes, SHARP: Moving Picture II, Short Film Essay, Streaming

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

TODAY Film Critic Gene Shalit Dies After ‘100 Years of an Amazing Life’

Published

on

TODAY Film Critic Gene Shalit Dies After ‘100 Years of an Amazing Life’

Gene Shalit, the popular film critic who spent decades with TODAY, has died. He was 100 years old.

In a statement to NBC News, Shalit’s family said he “passed away peacefully today after 100 years of an amazing life.”

Born March 25, 1926, Shalit was an instantly recognizable personality. Along with his distinctive handlebar mustache, poofy hair, eyeglasses and bow ties, he is best remembered for his love of puns while doing reviews on the show’s “Critic’s Corner” segment.

A graduate of the University of Illinois, Shalit became a part-time TODAY personality in 1970 and was elevated to a full-time role in 1973, replacing Joe Garagiola. He remained with the show until he retired in 2010. “It’s enough already,” he said in a statement announcing his retirement.

In addition to his reviews, Shalit interviewed scores of celebrities during his TODAY tenure. His 1979 sit-down with Carol Channing is best remembered for the actor telling a story about having trouble understanding the British accent that left him in tears from laughing so hard.

Advertisement

“What’s the matter with him?” a smiling Channing said as Shalit tried to gather himself.

His movie reviews were often punctuated by his use of puns, which became his calling card.

Shalit made regular appearances on classic game shows “What’s My Line?” and “To Tell the Truth” and wrote for a wide range of newspapers and magazines, including The New York Times, Cosmopolitan, Glamour and TV Guide. He also wrote and broadcast a daily piece called “Man About Anything” on NBC’s radio network for over a decade.

In addition, he authored the 1987 anthology “Laughing Matters: A Celebration of American Humor.” He also compiled the book “Great Hollywood Wit” in 2002.

“Shalit has performed with the Boston Symphony Orchestra in Boston’s Symphony Hall and Tanglewood, played his bassoon on stage in Lincoln Center, and conducted the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra in a full concert of classical music. In none of these venues has he ever been invited back,” read a cheeky bio of Shalit in the 2007 book “Mazel Tov: Celebrities’ Bar and Bat Mitzvah Memories.”

He also lent his voice as a character named Gene Scallop in a 2007 episode of “SpongeBob SquarePants.”

He became pop culture fodder, often being lampooned on “Family Guy” and portrayed by Horatio Sanz on “Saturday Night Live.”

Shalit had six children with late wife Nancy, one of whom, Emily, died in 2012 from ovarian cancer.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Gene Shalit, beloved and bushy film critic on the ‘Today’ show, dies at 100

Published

on

Gene Shalit, beloved and bushy film critic on the ‘Today’ show, dies at 100

Gene Shalit, the fast-talking funnyman who reviewed films, plays and books for NBC’s “Today” show has died. He was 100.

Shalit’s family confirmed the longtime critic’s death Friday, telling NBC that he “passed away peacefully after 100 years of an amazing life.”

According to a 2010 interview with Guy Ludwig, Shalit’s producer for more than 20 years, Shalit was hired as a contributor at “Today” in 1968. He reviewed books once a month or so, but audiences were so fascinated by his eccentric personality and equally unconventional looks that NBC ramped up the critic’s on-air appearances.

In January 1973, on the same day he was promoted to arts editor, Shalit debuted “Critic’s Corner,” the segment that would ultimately make him a household name. In 2010, Shalit retired as one of the last regular film critics on a major network.

Ludwig referred to Shalit as the “foxy grandpa” of the “Today” show.

Advertisement

While Shalit’s quirky film reviews cemented his TV star status, his interview style made him a favorite among Hollywood’s biggest figures. Warren Beatty, Barbra Streisand and Robert De Niro were among the A-listers whom Ludwig said “only would talk to Gene.”

According to Shalit’s longtime former producer, Sophia Loren “so trusted Gene as a television personality” that after she’d gone through legal troubles and a scandal, she went to Shalit exclusively.

“She knew her story would be fairly told but also that Gene would be sensitive to some of the things about it that were sensitive to her,” Ludwig said. “Gene was articulate and sensitive, but also got the story.”

In March, “Today” posted a 100th birthday tribute to Shalit narrated by Al Roker, who said, “Even Sophia Loren couldn’t resist putting her hands into Gene’s hair. I mean, just a legend.”

Eugene Shalit was born March 25, 1926, in New York City and grew up in Morristown, N.J. He launched his elementary school’s first newspaper, “The Spotlight,” and purchased a fedora to seal his fate as a journalist. In Morristown High School he wrote the school newspaper’s humor column “The Broadcaster.” In 1949, he graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Advertisement

Shalit cut his teeth in media as an entertainment columnist for McCall’s magazine, eventually landing the role of senior film critic for Look magazine in 1968 and writing a humor column for Ladies’ Home Journal. His quick wit, punchy puns and unique voice came through even on the page, and NBC took notice.

“No one at NBC had seen him. They’d only read his stuff. So he walked into this executive’s office and the executive took one look at him and said, ‘Mr. Shalit, have you ever thought of radio?’” Ludwig told “Today.”

“They didn’t know how the public would react to someone who looked so different from people who were typically on TV in 1967.”

On “Critics Corner,” Shalit favored humor over the highfalutin. He was an everyman’s critic. Of 1997’s action-thriller “Face/Off,” he said, “Now, ‘Face/Off’ is a literal title, because both of their faces are taken off. Then each face is put onto the other’s head. Even their voices are switched with microchip implants. In other words, this is an entirely reasonable, rational movie!”

During his tenure, he was known to bust up his colleagues, and “Today” anchors ranging from Edwin Newman, Barbara Walters and Jane Pauley to Tom Brokaw, Bryant Gumbel, Katie Couric, Meredith Vieira and Roker.

Advertisement

But not everyone appreciated Shalit’s style. In 1989, a leaked in-house memo from Gumbel, then a “Today” show co-host, to Marty Ryan, the former executive producer of the NBC program, complained that Shalit’s film reviews “are often late and his interviews aren’t very good.”

During an interview promoting his 1987 book “Laughing Matters: A Celebration of American Humor,” Eileen Prose asked Shalit who he respected as a reviewer.

“Gene Shalit,” he responded.

“I don’t think there’s any critic that believes a word that any other critic says, because you have to be so individualistic when you’re a critic,” he continued. “Sometimes you’ll read somebody else, but I rarely do.”

While Shalit brought a sense of humor to his reviews and interviews with stars — some of which would go haywire because Shalit would keel over laughing — he took the critic gig seriously. He told Prose that while most people see only a handful of movies a year, and often only the buzziest ones, he sees “the stuff that’s the stuffing, that they wouldn’t want to see.”

Advertisement

“I have to suffer through that, and I will never leave a movie before it’s over, no matter how bad it is,” he said, noting that he only does it because he loves it.

Shalit’s larger-than-life persona was parodied in popular culture — not just by Jon Lovitz and Horatio Sanz on “Saturday Night Live,” but by Shalit himself, who voiced his own parody “Gene Scallop” on “SpongeBob Squarepants.” Eyebrow doppelganger Eugene Levy also took a crack at the critic on “Second City Television,” and Shalit was parodied in multiple episodes of “Family Guy.”

Shalit was married to Nancy Lewis for 28 years until her death in 1978 and never remarried. The couple had six children: Peter, Willa, Emily, Amanda, Nevin and Andrew. Emily died from ovarian cancer in 2012.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending