Story: Sindhu (Vedhika), a young woman, finds herself spiralling into a world of fear and paranoia after her boyfriend, Sampath (Arvind Krishna), travels for work. Strange occurrences plague her life, leaving her questioning the boundary between reality and her imagination. The story weaves through Sindhu’s past, uncovering childhood traumas and their psychological ramifications, as she battles her inner demons, the narrative attempts to unearth the root of her fears, spanning multiple timelines to present a complex psychological puzzle.

Review: Director Dr. Haritha Gogineni takes a brave step into the realm of psychological thrillers, a genre rarely explored in Telugu cinema. However, Fear struggles to hold the audience’s attention due to its disjointed screenplay and uneven pacing. While the premise holds promise, the film falters in execution, with abrupt timeline shifts that confuse rather than intrigue.

Vedhika delivers a compelling performance, carrying the film’s weight on her shoulders, particularly in the pre-climactic and climactic scenes where her portrayal of Sindhu’s psychological unraveling feels authentic. Unfortunately, the supporting cast, including Arvind Krishna and Pavitra Lokesh, is underutilised, with their characters lacking the depth needed to make a significant impact. Anish Kuruvilla takes on the role of a doctor who provides insights into the condition. The ensemble cast also features Sayaji Shinde, Jayaprakash, Satya Krishnan, and Sahithi Dasari.

The technical aspects are a mixed bag. The cinematography and background score, though serviceable, fail to create the eerie atmosphere essential for a psychological thriller. The editing, too, leaves much to be desired.

Fear raises important issues surrounding mental health but fails to present them with the sensitivity or depth they deserve. What could have been a gripping exploration of the human psyche instead ends up as a muddled narrative.

Despite Vedhika’s earnest performance, Fear is let down by its underwhelming execution. A more polished output could have transformed this film into a memorable psychological thriller. For now, it remains an ambitious effort that misses the mark.

Soufflé is almost ready at the Paiva household just across the street from the beach in sultry Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. From the unmistakably festive atmosphere within the home’s airy rooms, one wouldn’t guess the country is under a ferocious military dictatorship.

That Walter Salles, the acclaimed director of “Central Station” and “The Motorcycle Diaries,” first depicts the tight-knit family of “I’m Still Here” at their most ebullient, before tragedy strikes, pays off dramatic dividends in this remarkably life-affirming drama largely set in 1971 and based on the 2015 memoir by Marcelo Paiva (the Paivas’ only son). A contender for the upcoming international feature Oscar, “I’m Still Here” brilliantly distills an agonizing chapter of a nation’s recent past into a sophisticated portrait of communal endurance.

Already lauded for her quietly shattering performance with a surprise Golden Globes win (the first Brazilian actress to ever receive the prize), Fernanda Torres portrays Eunice Paiva, a mother of five who is married to former Congressman Rubens Paiva (Selton Mello). We see the pent-up worry on her face signaling incipient danger: Helicopters roam the city while news of kidnapped ambassadors pours from the radio.

Within the walls of the Paiva residence, Salles and his cast of both seasoned and fresh-faced actors create a vibrant, lived-in dynamic radiating with affection and carefree liberty. And because we’ve been so wonderfully immersed in the exuberance they are all about to lose, when the darkness reaches their doorstep, in the form of henchmen who take Rubens in for questioning, the contrast between who they were and who they become feels stark.

By that point, Mello has potently established the fatherly warmth his family will sorely miss. In that absence, memory becomes central to “I’m Still Here.” The narrative is interspersed with home movies shot on a 8 mm camera, immortalizing candid instances of leisure and love, the ones that truly matter. Not only are they indelible in the minds of the Paivas, but they are forever preserved in still photos, in Marcelo Paiva’s writing and now onscreen through Salles’ filmic rendition.

The director and cinematographer Adrian Teijido also make the home a shifting co-star and a physical metaphor for Brazil as a whole. Once a place where friends and family entered through perpetually open doors, the space becomes hermetic and airless when curtains are drawn to hide the men who have come to disrupt this idyllic refuge. Through them, the dictatorship instills fear and distrust to maintain power. Salles communicates the state-sanctioned distress by focusing on the family’s upended quotidian rituals.

Eunice responds by offering these goons lunch — maybe in the hope that their ordeal will end sooner, but also as a statement of the type of person she is even to those who might hurt her. (Eventually, she and one of her daughters are detained and interrogated, then released.) Those seemingly muted details about her rich personality come from Marcelo Paiva’s intimate reminiscences about his mother and the Paivas’ collective experience in the aftermath of Rubens’ disappearance, expertly adapted by screenwriters Murilo Hauser and Heitor Lorega.

Torres exudes the unflashy fortitude of a woman unable and unwilling to surrender to despair as the days and weeks go by. How can she when she must raise her children and seek justice for her husband, who may still be alive? Imparting masterful restraint, Torres makes Eunice’s few outbursts feel believably contained. As distanced from melodrama as possible, her performance is one of internalized grief.

And yet, in the midst of her hidden mourning, Eunice treats those around her with loving understanding, empathetic to their respective fears and the limitations of what they can do for her. She moves through the world with a humble resolve, unafraid of doing what needs to be done, never dwelling on what could or should have been done. At every turn, we recognize her desire to spare her kids from the sorrow she carries. A guardian of their tender hearts, she can only hide so much in an authoritarian reality.

Even mere moments after receiving crushing news, Eunice musters up a smile for her youngest daughter and the energy to take the whole gang out for ice cream, seeking to regain a semblance of what they used to have. That amalgamation of a graceful pride during a crisis and superhuman determination is crucial to Torres’ embodiment of Eunice’s inner force. And because she’s perceived as nearly unbreakable, when sorrow does slip through her eyes in a lost stare or a weighted silence, Torres’ expression is beautifully gutting.

Acting of this subtle caliber is rarely celebrated, but Torres unassuming turn has proved undeniable to anyone who watches it. For a film like “I’m Still Here” to emerge on the other side of the repressive Jair Bolsonaro presidency and be embraced at home and abroad so earnestly (it’s Brazil’s highest grosser since the pandemic) is testament to Salles’ assured directorial hand that treats the delicate subject matter with the seriousness it merits while highlighting humanity rather than brutality. There’s a striking elegance to his images in how they bring us closer to the people, not the horrors.

When a photographer suggests that the family pose with a somber demeanor for a shot that will be featured in an article about Rubens’ disappearance, Eunice refuses, instructing her children to smile broadly. Joy proves defiant to the shadowy oppressors who wish to see their “enemies” suffer. Eunice’s victory, as witnessed by Marcelo Paiva and resurrected by Torres (and, briefly, by Brazilian legend Fernanda Montenegro, Torres’ Oscar-nominated mother), is not just about survival but fostering a family united in adversity.

Resistance takes the form of lives well lived. In every laugh shared, in every new memory made and family photo taken, this clan honors those no longer physically present.

Story: Sai (Dharma), a wealthy orphan whose life spirals into alcoholism following the demise of his parents. His days are consumed by drinking and unruly behaviour, often leading to altercations and run-ins with the law, from which his uncle (Srikanth Iyengar) frequently rescues him. An accidental encounter with Bhagi (Aishwarya Sharma), a disciplined medical student and firm believer in naturopathy, ignites a one-sided love affair. Despite Bhagi’s initial disinterest and feigned affection out of fear, Sai’s relentless pursuit challenges both their lives, culminating in a narrative that explores themes of love, addiction, and personal transformation.

Review: Drinker Sai attempts to blend a youthful love story with a cautionary tale about the perils of alcoholism. Dharma delivers a commendable performance as Sai, embodying the character’s descent into addiction with a natural ease and handling emotional scenes adeptly. Aishwarya Sharma, in her debut role as Bhagi, brings a refreshing presence to the screen, portraying her character’s conflict with conviction. The film’s music, composed by Sri Vasanth, offers pleasant melodies, though their placement within the narrative occasionally disrupts the pacing. Prashanth Ankireddy’s cinematography captures the essence of the story well, contributing to the film’s overall visual appeal.

However, the film is hindered by a predictable storyline and a screenplay that lacks the necessary depth to fully engage the audience. The narrative’s pacing suffers from filler scenes that add little value, and the second half, in particular, feels protracted with unnecessary subplots. The depiction of certain characters and situations, especially involving junior artistes, raises questions about the film’s sensitivity and awareness. While the movie aims to deliver a social message, the execution is marred by clichéd dialogues and a lack of subtlety.

In conclusion, Drinker Sai presents a familiar tale with earnest performances but falters in its storytelling and execution. The film may resonate with audiences seeking a message-oriented drama, but it falls short of offering a fresh cinematic experience.