Connect with us

Education

Student Loans Decision Unravels One of Biden’s Signature Efforts

Published

on

Student Loans Decision Unravels One of Biden’s Signature Efforts

The Supreme Court’s rejection on Friday of President Biden’s student debt relief plan instantly unravels one of the president’s signature efforts and ratchets up the pressure on him to find a new way to make good on a promise to a key constituency as the 2024 presidential campaign gets underway.

When Mr. Biden announced last summer that his government would forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt, student advocacy groups and many progressives cheered the move, which was projected to help 40 million people and cost $400 billion.

“People can start finally to climb out from under that mountain of debt,” Mr. Biden said.

His plan, which came after months of agonizing about who it would benefit and whether it was too costly, would have been a centerpiece of his argument to voters that his economic agenda is designed to help low- and middle-income Americans blaze a path to greater prosperity.

Instead, a majority of the justices agreed with critics who said the president’s debt relief plan went beyond the president’s authority under congressional legislation allowing changes to student loans during a public emergency.

Advertisement

A White House official said Friday that Mr. Biden would soon denounce the court ruling and make it clear that he would continue to fight for debt relief. The official said that the president would “announce new actions to protect student loan borrowers.”

The official, who asked for anonymity to discuss strategy ahead of Mr. Biden’s remarks, said the White House would blame Republicans for being responsible for denying relief to those who have federal student loans.

That challenge for Mr. Biden and his advisers is exactly how to respond to the disappointment of millions of his supporters who again face the daunting prospect of paying back tens of thousands of dollars in debt they accumulated for college.

For much of the last year, administration officials have refused to say whether they were working on a “Plan B” in the event the Supreme Court rejected the president’s plan.

Even after several justices expressed deep skepticism during oral arguments earlier this year, Mr. Biden and his aides continued to insist that they had confidence in the legality of the debt relief plan and would not say whether they were working on an alternative.

Advertisement

In fact, advocates believe there are ways for the federal government to provide debt relief to some students even in the wake of the court’s ruling. The administration has already been offering help to some students using Public Service Loan Forgiveness, a program which provides debt relief to people who work full time for state, local, federal or non-profit organizations.

The administration has already said it will make more use of existing programs that allow lower-income people to adjust their repayment plans based on their income.

But the existing debt relief programs are more targeted and affect a far smaller population of people. They are not likely to satisfy the frustrations of tens of millions of people who had expected their financial situation to improve dramatically under Mr. Biden’s plan.

And millions of people with federal student loans are about to get another financial shock this fall, when the years long pause on repayment of existing loans ends.

The federal government, under former President Donald J. Trump, imposed the pause on repayments at the beginning of the pandemic, as businesses shut their doors and millions of people lost their jobs. Mr. Biden renewed the pause several times since taking office, but has said it will not be renewed again now that the pandemic has largely ended.

Advertisement

Payments are set to resume in October, putting new pressure on the very debt-holders that Mr. Biden’s forgiveness plan was designed to help.

One question for Mr. Biden is whether those who are disappointed will blame him or the Supreme Court when the go to the ballot box next year.

During his 2020 campaign, Mr. Biden vowed to eliminate some student debt, saying during a town hall even that “I’m going to make sure that everybody in this generation gets $10,000 knocked off of their student debt as we try to get out of this God awful pandemic.”

Once in office, many Democrats — including Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the top congressional Democrat — implored Mr. Biden to go even further, urging the president to wipe away as much as $50,000 per person in student debt as a way of helping middle-income people who are struggling financially.

After Mr. Biden announced his plan last summer, student activists said the plan would energize young people to support the president. That support could be in doubt in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire

Published

on

Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire

Four fraternity members at San Diego State University are facing felony charges after a pledge was set on fire during a skit at a party last year, leaving him hospitalized for weeks with third-degree burns, prosecutors said Monday.

The fire happened on Feb. 17, 2024, when the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity held a large party at its house, despite being on probation, court documents show. While under probation, the fraternity was required to “demonstrate exemplary compliance with university policies,” according to the college’s guidelines.

Instead, prosecutors said, the fraternity members planned a skit during which a pledge would be set on fire.

After drinking alcohol in the presence of the fraternity president, Caden Cooper, 22, the three younger men — Christopher Serrano, 20, and Lars Larsen, 19, both pledges, and Lucas Cowling, 20 — then performed the skit, prosecutors said.

Mr. Larsen was set on fire and wounded, prosecutors said, forcing him to spend weeks in the hospital for treatment of third-degree burns covering 16 percent of his body, mostly on his legs.

Advertisement

The charges against Mr. Cooper, Mr. Cowling and Mr. Serrano include recklessly causing a fire with great bodily injury; conspiracy to commit an act injurious to the public; and violating the social host ordinance. If convicted of all the charges, they would face a sentence of probation up to seven years, two months in prison.

Mr. Larsen himself was charged. The San Diego County District Attorney’s office said that he, as well as Mr. Cooper and Mr. Cowling, also tried to lie to investigators in the case, deleted evidence on social media, and told other fraternity members to destroy evidence and not speak to anyone about what happened at the party.

All four men have pleaded not guilty.

Lawyers representing Mr. Cooper and Mr. Cowling did not immediately respond to messages requesting comment on Tuesday. Contact information for lawyers for Mr. Serrano and Mr. Larsen was not immediately available.

The four students were released on Monday, but the court ordered them not to participate in any fraternity parties, not to participate in any recruitment events for the fraternity, and to obey all laws, including those related to alcohol consumption.

Advertisement

The university said Tuesday that it would begin its own administrative investigation into the conduct of the students and the fraternity, now that the police investigation was complete.

After it confirmed the details, the dean of students office immediately put the Phi Kappa Psi chapter on interim suspension, which remains in effect, college officials confirmed on Tuesday.

Additional action was taken, but the office said it could not reveal specifics because of student privacy laws.

“The university prioritizes the health and safety of our campus community,” college officials said in a statement, “and has high expectations for how all members of the university community, including students, behave in the interest of individual and community safety and well-being.”

At least half a dozen fraternities at San Diego State University have been put on probation in the last two years, officials said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Education

Video: Several Killed in Wisconsin School Shooting, Including Juvenile Suspect

Published

on

Video: Several Killed in Wisconsin School Shooting, Including Juvenile Suspect

new video loaded: Several Killed in Wisconsin School Shooting, Including Juvenile Suspect

transcript

transcript

Several Killed in Wisconsin School Shooting, Including Juvenile Suspect

The police responded to a shooting at a private Christian school in Madison, Wis., on Monday.

Around 10:57 a.m., our officers were responding to a call of an active shooter at the Abundant Life Christian School here in Madison. When officers arrived, they found multiple victims suffering from gunshot wounds. Officers located a juvenile who they believe was responsible for this deceased in the building. I’m feeling a little dismayed now, so close to Christmas. Every child, every person in that building is a victim and will be a victim forever. These types of trauma don’t just go away.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Guns & Gun Violence

Continue Reading

Education

Video: Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children

Published

on

Video: Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children

new video loaded: Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children

transcript

transcript

Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children

President Biden offered a formal apology on Friday on behalf of the U.S. government for the abuse of Native American children from the early 1800s to the late 1960s.

The Federal government has never, never formally apologized for what happened until today. I formally apologize. It’s long, long, long overdue. Quite frankly, there’s no excuse that this apology took 50 years to make. I know no apology can or will make up for what was lost during the darkness of the federal boarding school policy. But today, we’re finally moving forward into the light.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Politics

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending