Connect with us

Culture

NFL combine standouts: Which QBs are rising? Who else helped their draft stock?

Published

on

NFL combine standouts: Which QBs are rising? Who else helped their draft stock?

INDIANAPOLIS — Realistically, the 2024 NFL Draft cycle has been active for months, dating back to when teams set their initial boards last offseason. In reality, though, arguably the biggest step between the end of the college football season and the draft happened over the weekend, as 321 prospects headed to the annual NFL Scouting Combine.

Which players did the most to help themselves? Our draft team of Dane Brugler, Nick Baumgardner and Diante Lee discuss the standouts …

1. The projected top three QBs (Caleb Williams, Drake Maye and Jayden Daniels) all sat out on-field workouts. Did anyone else at that position move the needle, one way or the other?

Dane Brugler:  This is a boring answer, but nothing really happened on the field at the combine that will drastically alter how I view these quarterbacks. I set up shop at the 30-yard line and had a good view of every throw — there wasn’t anything too surprising.

The seven-step rollout and pocket-movement drills are especially interesting to get a sense of a player’s on-field mobility and how the ball comes off his hand, and I thought Michigan’s J.J. McCarthy had a strong outing. You have to go back five years to find a quarterback who posted a better three-cone time at the combine than his 6.82-second mark.

Nick Baumgardner: We saw some solid performances from McCarthy, Bo Nix and Michael Penix Jr. Some of the throws with which McCarthy was inconsistent Saturday, like intermediate corners and outs to his left, show up on tape. But his deep throws (and middle shots) were mostly on the money. He also hit 61 miles per hour on the radar gun, just behind Tennessee’s Joe Milton (62 mph), and that three-cone time confirmed his movement skills.

Advertisement

The drills helped verify that McCarthy’s a better athlete than Nix, who is a better athlete than Penix. QB-needy teams outside picks 1-3 are looking for reasons to draft McCarthy in the top half of the first based on his size, age and athletic traits. It’s hard to say he gave them a reason not to.

Diante Lee: I wouldn’t say it “moved the needle,” per se, but I enjoyed Penix’s throwing session. His timing and accuracy were mostly on point. There were other QBs clearly aiming the ball or throwing late/inside to ensure completions, so it was nice to watch a guy be clean, without apprehension, while working with new faces.

I’m usually the wet blanket with quarterbacks, though, so I don’t mind being that guy again. I don’t think anyone had expectations that Sam Hartman would blow up at the combine, but you can see a pretty clear difference between his arm talent and the guys I’d expect to be selected in the top 100 or 150. His resume is still enough to get him drafted, and he can carve out a career like Nick Mullens, but watching him in comparison to the others did stand out.

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

Russini: What I’m hearing at the NFL combine on the Bears, Kirk Cousins and more

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Drake Maye or Jayden Daniels? What film shows about 2 of the draft’s top QB prospects

2. The receivers put on a show, highlighted by Xavier Worthy’s record-breaking 4.21-second 40. Call your shot, post-combine: How many WRs will go in Round 1?

Brugler: The record for receivers in the first round is seven (2004), and I think we’ll match that in April. One of the reasons I’m not guessing more than seven is I think several teams will opt for offensive linemen (because those positions aren’t as deep) and wait on receiver — a loaded group that will stretch into Rounds 2, 3 and beyond.

I’m fascinated with this question, though: After Saturday’s workout, who will be the first Texas receiver drafted? Adonai Mitchell has athletic X traits; Worthy is the fastest player in combine history. Get ready for debates.

Baumgardner: I’ll cheat and say five to seven. The top three (Marvin Harrison Jr., Malik Nabers and Rome Odunze) plus Brian Thomas Jr. and Mitchell, for sure, and I wouldn’t rule out a team falling in love with Georgia’s Ladd McConkey or perhaps Worthy — though the latter’s size is still a concern. By the end of Round 3, though? At least 20.

Some people seemed down on Keon Coleman after he ran a 4.62, but I’d caution against freaking out too much. Coleman’s 10-yard split (1.54 seconds) was good and, most importantly, his on-field testing looked smooth. Coleman ran a cleaner and faster gauntlet drill than Oregon’s Troy Franklin, who had a 40 time of 4.41.

Coleman’s size, burst and body control still make for a very intriguing combination. Remember: Puka Nacua ran a 4.57 40 (with a 1.62 split) last year.

Lee: I’m setting the number at 6.5 — and I think it will be decided by what the NFL thinks of speedy prospects like Franklin and Worthy. Both guys are lightweight but explosive (and those are understatements for Worthy), and they both have concerning issues with drops, in ways that betray their ball-tracking skills. There also are legitimate reasons to wonder whether these guys can add the necessary refinement to their route running to win on a down-to-down basis.

Advertisement

But some teams at the end of Round 1 (Buffalo, Baltimore, Kansas City) will be looking to add instant offense.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What did we learn at the NFL combine about teams with top-10 draft picks?

3. Which defensive prospect(s) impressed you the most?

Brugler: At defensive tackle, Florida State’s Braden Fiske crushed the testing, ranking in the 94th percentile in weight-adjusted 40-yard dash (4.78 seconds). Somehow, his positional workout was even more impressive. He won’t be a fit for every scheme because of his size, but he cemented himself in the second round for those teams considering him. Texas’ Byron Murphy II was a close second at the position and reinforced why many believe he is the top DT prospect this year.

Among the edge rushers, Alabama’s Dallas Turner showed why he is the favorite to be the first defensive player drafted. He has a rare wingspan, and his explosiveness was clear, both during testing (4.47-second 40, 40.5-inch vertical) and positional drills. The word “freak” can get overused, but there might not be a player in this draft more deserving — and seeing him move up close only confirmed that status. Houston Christian’s Jalyx Hunt is another pass rusher who was moving just a little differently than everyone else. With his long arms and explosive strides, he dominated the hoop drill. Hunt’s tape says late rounds, but top 100 is possible.

In the secondary, my top-ranked cornerbacks, Terrion Arnold and Quinyon Mitchell, confirmed (in my eyes) they should be the first CBs drafted. One of my personal favorite prospects, Kentucky’s Andru Phillips, was loose and springy in his movements and attacked each drill with a little extra juice than others — he reinforced my belief that he should be a top-75 pick. South Dakota’s Myles Harden was considered a late-rounder coming into the week, but his arrow is pointing up after his workouts.

Advertisement

Among the safeties, Utah’s Cole Bishop was the top performer I saw. Not only did he test well, but his speed translated to the positional drills. His athletic versatility will stand out in a safety class without a clear-cut top guy.

Baumgardner: Fiske was out-of-this-world good Thursday in just about everything he did. His 4.37 short shuttle was elite, and he posted a 33 1/2-inch vertical. On the field, Fiske was routinely the fastest — and smoothest — turning corners against the bags. He is a small DT, but athletically, he’s on par with Michigan’s Kris Jenkins and Clemson’s Ruke Orhorhoro — two of the best in the group.

Michigan talked an awful lot last week about having 18 guys at the combine. Only one of the Wolverines’ skill-position guys competed in every test, though: DB Mike Sainristil, an All-American and two-time captain. He’s small (5-9, 182), but he was at or above expectation on nearly every test, showing good speed, burst and agility (and putting up 14 bench reps). Not saying I’d predict this, but I won’t be shocked if Sainristil is the first Michigan defender selected.

Lee: Chop Robinson showed up and accomplished everything he set out to do, ranking second among edges in the 40 (4.48) and short shuttle (4.25) while tying for first in the 10-yard split (1.54) and broad jump (10 feet, 8 inches). He’s going to have a steep learning curve as an NFL run defender, but he should be ranked alongside or ahead of others who are pure pass-rushing commodities.

Sainristril is just as athletic as he is competitive. He ran a sub-4.5 40, jumped 40 inches in the vertical and nearly 11 feet in the broad and met the necessary thresholds in agility testing. Teams should be excited about the kind of slot defender he can be.

I’m more enthused about Murphy and Jenkins after this week, too. Their explosiveness was impressive, and both guys can probably carry more weight in season than they brought to Indianapolis. I’m confident in their ceilings as versatile defensive tackles.

4. Beyond the O-line names we’ve heard about the most (Olu Fashanu, Joe Alt, Jackson Powers-Johnson, etc.), give us a prospect or two from that group that you’re banging the table for after Sunday’s workout.

Brugler: If I made a list of my draft crushes, Washington’s Troy Fautanu might be the first name I’d write down. Sure, Penix and the Huskies receivers created fireworks, but the real highlight was Fautanu’s movement skills on pin-pull blocks. He was outstanding in each of the combine’s position drills (wave, pass-pro mirror, short-pull power and long pull). He is one of the best offensive linemen in this draft and a lock for the top 25.

Similarly, it was love at first sight this past summer when I watched Amarius Mims (No. 5 overall in my August top 50). He didn’t disappoint this weekend. At 6-7 3/4, 340 with 36-inch arms, he looks like he was built in a lab and has barely any fat on his frame. He is the most fascinating player in the draft because the traits are off the charts but the body of work isn’t there (eight career starts).

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

NFL Mock Draft: Our college football writers project Round 1

Baumgardner: There are a lot, actually. It’s a loaded class.

Wisconsin center Tanner Bortolini came into the combine with a reputation as a top-notch athlete, and he delivered. The former Badger — a center-only at 6-3, 305 with 31 5/8-inch arms — ran a 4.99 40 with a 1.69 split. He also registered a 32 1/2-inch vertical and moved very well throughout drills as expected. Another guy people need to take a longer look at is TCU guard Brandon Coleman, who put together a great workout (4.99 40 with a 1.73 split, 34-inch vertical and a 9-foot, 6-inch broad jump).

It was a good day, in general, for the top tackles. Fautanu, Tyler Guyton and Mims all looked impressive moving around. Former South Dakota State teammates Garrett Greenfield and Mason McCormick also are very solid prospects.

Lee: People know about Mims, but I’m concerned he’s becoming more of an afterthought among the first-round prospects. He nearly cracked a sub-5.0 40-yard dash, and he has already flashed incredible power and foot speed in his limited time as a starter. He needs time to develop, but there’s scary potential.

Advertisement

There will be quite a few guys with the potential to play multiple spots in the NFL, and that’s a major plus for those who don’t project to be instant starters. One is Coleman, who worked inside at the Senior Bowl and held his own both inside and out during his career. I like his hands and anchor, and this week’s testing showed the lower-body explosiveness is there.

Washington’s Roger Rosengarten is an interesting swing-tackle prospect. A lighter guy, he’s fluid and strong as a right tackle. He led all offensive linemen in the 40 (4.92), and those movement skills are apparent when you watch him play. He needs to add weight to his frame, but I expect one of the Shanahan-tree guys to take and develop him.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

2024 NFL Mock Draft: Trades shake up Round 1; QBs, WRs dominate early

(Top photo of Michael Penix Jr.: Kevin Sabitus / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Published

on

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

new video loaded: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Artificial intelligence has made pirated audiobooks faster to make and harder to detect. Our reporter Alexandra Alter tells us about the latest threat to the publishing industry.

By Alexandra Alter, Léo Hamelin and Laura Salaberry

May 20, 2026

Continue Reading

Culture

Kennedy Ryan on ‘Score,’ Her TV Deal, and Finding Purpose

Published

on

Kennedy Ryan on ‘Score,’ Her TV Deal, and Finding Purpose

At 53, and after more than a decade in the industry, things are happening for the romance writer Kennedy Ryan that were not on her bingo card.

The most recent: a first look deal with Universal Studio Group that will allow her to develop various projects, including a Peacock adaptation of her breakout 2022 novel “Before I Let Go,” the first book in her Skyland trilogy, which considers love and friendship among three Black women in a community inspired by contemporary Atlanta.

With a TV series in development, Ryan — who published her debut novel in 2014 and subsequently self-published — joins Tia Williams and Alanna Bennett at a table with few other Black romance writers.

“What I am most excited about is the opportunity to identify other authors’ work, especially marginalized authors, and to shepherd those projects from book to screen,” said Ryan, a former journalist. (Kennedy Ryan is a pen name.) “We are seeing an explosion in romance adaptations right now, and I want to see more Black, brown and queer authors.”

Her latest novel, “Score,” is set to publish on Tuesday. It’s the second volume in her Hollywood Renaissance series, after “Reel,” about an actress with a chronic illness who falls for her director on the set of a biopic set during the Harlem Renaissance. The new book follows a screenwriter and a musician, once romantically involved, working on the same movie.

Advertisement

In a recent interview (edited and condensed for clarity), Ryan shared the highs and lows of commercial success; her commitment to happy endings; and her north star. Spoiler: It isn’t what readers think of her books on TikTok.

Your work has been categorized as Black romance, but how do you see yourself as a writer?

I see myself as a romance writer. I think the season that I’m in right now, I’m most interested in Black romance, and that’s what I’ve been writing for the last few years. It doesn’t mean that I won’t write anything else, because I don’t close those doors. But the timeline we’re in is one where I really want to promote Black love, Black art and Black history.

What intrigued you about the period of history you capture in the Hollywood Renaissance series?

I’ve always been fascinated by the Harlem Renaissance and the years immediately following. It felt like a natural era to explore when I was examining overlooked accomplishments by Black creatives. I loved the art as agitation and resistance seen in the lives of people like James Baldwin or Zora Neale Hurston, but also figures like Josephine Baker, Lena Horne and Dorothy Dandridge, who people may not think of as “revolutionary.” The fact that they were even in those spaces was its own act of rebellion.

Advertisement

What about that period feels resonant now?

The series celebrates Black art and Black history and love at a time when I see all three under attack. Our art is being diminished and our history is being erased before our very eyes. I don’t hold back on the relationship between what I see going on in the world and the books I write.

How does this moment in your career feel?

I didn’t get my first book deal until I was in my 40s, so I think this is the best job I’ve ever had. I’m wanting to make the most of it, not just for myself, but for other people, and I think the temptation is to believe that it will all go away because that’s my default.

Why would it all go away?

Advertisement

Part of it is because we — my family, my husband and I — have had some really hard times, especially early in our marriage when my son was diagnosed with autism, my husband lost his job, and we experienced hard times financially. I’ll never forget that.

When I say it could all go away, I mean things change, the industry changes, what people respond to changes, what people buy and want to consume changes. So I don’t assume that what I am doing is always going to be something that people want.

Why are you so firmly committed to defending the “happy ending” in romance novels?

It is integral to the definition of the genre that it ends happily. Some people will say it’s just predictable every one ends happily. I am fine with that, living in a world that is constantly bombarding us with difficulty, with hurt, with challenge.

I write books that are deeply curious about the human condition. In “Score,” the heroine has bipolar disorder, she’s bisexual, there’s all of this intersectionality. For me, there is no safer genre landscape to unpack these issues and these conditions because I know there is guaranteed joy at the end.

Advertisement

You have a pretty active TikTok account. How do you engage with reviews and commentary on the platform about you or the genre?

First of all, I believe that reader spaces are sacred. Sometimes I see authors get embroiled with readers who have criticized them. I never ever comment on critical reviews. I definitely do see the negative. It’s impossible for me not to, but I just kind of ignore it. I let it roll off.

How does this apply to being a very visible Black author in romance?

I am very cognizant of this space that I’m in right now, which is a blessing, and I don’t take it for granted. I see a lot of discourse online where people are like, “Kennedy’s not the only one,” “Why Kennedy?,” “There should be more Black authors.” And I’m like, Oh my God, I know that. I am constantly looking for ways to amplify other Black authors. I want to hold the door open and pull them along.

How do you define success for yourself at this point?

Advertisement

I have a little bit of a mission statement: I want to write stories that will crater in people’s hearts and create transformational moments. Whether it’s television or publishing, am I sticking true to what I feel like is one of the things I was put on this earth to do? I’m a P.K., or preacher’s kid. We’re always thinking about purpose. And for me, how do I fit into this genre? What is my lane? What is my legacy? Which sounds so obnoxious, you know, but legacy is very important to me.

Continue Reading

Culture

How Many of These Books and Their Screen Versions Do You Know?

Published

on

How Many of These Books and Their Screen Versions Do You Know?

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights the screen adaptations of popular books for middle-grade and young adult readers. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. Scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending