Connect with us

Culture

Meet the MIT physicist turned Marlins coach behind the ‘torpedo’ bats used by the Yankees

Published

on

Meet the MIT physicist turned Marlins coach behind the ‘torpedo’ bats used by the Yankees

NEW YORK — The New York Yankees’ bats were the story of the team’s franchise-record nine-home run day against the Milwaukee Brewers on Saturday. Then came the discussion about the actual bats used by some players in the 20-9 win.

The uniquely shaped lumber is the result of two years of research and experimentation with a former Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist-turned-coach at the helm.

The question at its center?

“Where are you trying to hit the ball?” Aaron Leanhardt said in a phone interview Sunday morning. “Where are you trying to make contact?”

Leanhardt, 48, began his work when he was a member of the Yankees’ minor-league hitting department in 2022 and brought it to the major leagues last season when he was the team’s lead analyst, with some players, including shortstop Anthony Volpe, trying them in games. Now, as many as five Yankees will be using them in games at least early this season, according to outfielder Cody Bellinger.

Advertisement

The bats — with their torpedo-like shape — are custom-made to player preferences and are designed so that the densest part of the bat is where that particular hitter most often makes contact with the baseball, said Leanhardt, who became a field coordinator with the Miami Marlins in the offseason.

“Really,” he said. “It’s just about making the bat as heavy and as fat as possible in the area where you’re trying to do damage on the baseball.”


Anthony Volpe (holding a “torpedo” bat) congratulates Jazz Chisholm during the Yankees’ 20-9 win on Saturday. (Mike Stobe / Getty Images)

A Major League Baseball spokesman told The Athletic that the bats don’t break any rules. MLB Rule 3.02 states that a bat “shall be a smooth, round stick not more than 2.61 inches in diameter at the thickest part and not more than 42 inches in length. The bat shall be one piece of solid wood.” It also says that “experimental” bats can’t be used “until the manufacturer has secured approval from Major League Baseball of his design and methods of manufacture.”

Asked whether he was the inventor of the technology, Leanhardt said it was a group effort, the results coming from conversations with coaches, players, MLB and bat makers.

“Credit goes to those who take it,” Leanhardt said. “But if people want to ascribe credit to different people, then I’ll take some cut of it.”

Advertisement

A Yankees official, however, said Leanhardt deserves “a lot” of the credit. Retired infielder Kevin Smith, who spent parts of four seasons in the majors, also credited Leanhardt as the inventor.

Leanhardt took an unorthodox route to baseball.

He has a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. in physics from MIT. He was a physics professor at the University of Michigan from 2007 to 2014.

Leanhardt began coaching in the Atlantic League in 2017 and coached at a Montana community college before joining the Yankees in 2018. In the majors in 2024, the club said he was its first “major league analyst” and “responsible for integrating the use of quantitative information with on-field performance and preparation.”

Advertisement

Why leave academia for baseball?

“I think that’s one of the cool things about sports is it’s very competitive,” he said. “Guys are willing to push the envelope. It’s just an opportunity to take my background to an area and find ways to innovate.”

Talking to players over the years revealed that their biggest concerns were twofold, Leanhardt said. They wanted to make more contact with pitches and they wanted to strike the ball more often with the bat’s “sweet spot,” or the densest area.

“They’re going to point to a location on the bat that is probably six or seven inches down from the tip of the bat,” he said. “That’s where the sweet spot typically is. It’s just through those conversations where you think to yourself, why don’t we exchange how much wood we’re putting on the tip versus how much we’re putting in the sweet spot? That’s the original concept right there. Just try to take all that excess weight and try to put it where you’re trying to hit the ball and then in exchange try to take the thinner diameter that used to be at the sweet spot and put that on the tip.”

Leanhardt said he didn’t see many drawbacks to redistributing the weight of the bat.

Advertisement

“The bat speed should stay the same,” he said. “Maybe the bat speed can even increase a little bit depending on how you want to redesign the bat. But ultimately you’re getting a fatter barrel, a heavier barrel at the sweet spot. So in some sense, you can have your cake and eat it here too. You can get some gains without actually making sacrifices.”

Leanhardt said he didn’t want to talk about individual players’ experiences with the new bat. Yankees designated hitter Giancarlo Stanton told reporters earlier this month that it was “probably some bat adjustments”  last season that caused the ligament tears in both of his elbows that led to his current stay on the injured list, though he didn’t place specific blame on anybody. Then he added: “I don’t know why it happened.” Leanhardt declined to comment on Stanton’s situation.

“You’d have to ask the Yankees’ medical personnel about that,” he said. “I’ll defer all those questions to the Yankees’ medical guys.”

Leanhardt said it was “the nature of our business” that it took years for a radically new bat design to come along.

“People back in the day swung very heavy bats made out of hickory and then someone had this genius idea to swing something lighter, something like ash, and that was revolutionary back in the 1920s, ’30s, ’40s kind of in that transition, and then the industry kind of stayed the course for quite some time,” he said. “Ultimately, it just takes people asking the right questions and being willing to be forward-thinking.”

Advertisement

He got a kick out of seeing the social media fervor the bats caused Saturday. He said that while some players began to use them last season, “the entire industry kind of caught wind of it” and “it exploded in the offseason.”

“Which is why you see it in the hands of so many guys right now,” he said. “Obviously, (Saturday’s) performance threw a whole lot of attention to it.”

It took a lot of coordination for the bats to go from the design stage to being manufactured. Leanhardt said he would “guarantee” he’s on a first-name basis with officials at MLB who oversee bat regulation and “everyone who operates the lathe for every bat manufacturer in baseball.”

“You really just are communicating with each company and trying to find the person who really knows the wood and knows how to turn the wood on a lathe. You just build a relationship with those guys and convince them that this is something that’s in their best interest to produce for their players. They want their players to be as successful as possible. Some guys buy in and it gains traction,” he said. “That’s really how it got built up.”

(Top photo of Aaron Leanhardt, right, with Marlins manager Clayton McCullough: Jasen Vinlove / Miami Marlins / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Video: ‘Flesh’ by David Szalay Wins 2025 Booker Prize

Published

on

Video: ‘Flesh’ by David Szalay Wins 2025 Booker Prize

new video loaded: ‘Flesh’ by David Szalay Wins 2025 Booker Prize

transcript

transcript

‘Flesh’ by David Szalay Wins 2025 Booker Prize

David Szalay became the first British Hungarian to win the prestigious Booker Prize for his novel “Flesh.”

“I think fiction can take risks. I think it’s one of the things that it can do. It can take aesthetic risks, formal risks, perhaps even moral risks, which many other forms, narrative forms, can’t quite do to the same extent.” “I think all six of the books in the short list really, you know, not — it’s not saying this is the headline theme, but there is that theme of reaching out, wanting a connection.”

Advertisement
David Szalay became the first British Hungarian to win the prestigious Booker Prize for his novel “Flesh.”

By Shawn Paik

November 11, 2025

Continue Reading

Culture

Test Yourself on the Settings Mentioned in These Novels About Road Trips

Published

on

Test Yourself on the Settings Mentioned in These Novels About Road Trips

A strong sense of place can deeply influence a story, and in some cases, the setting can even feel like a character itself. This week’s literary geography quiz highlights the starting points or destinations of five novels about road trips. (Even if you aren’t familiar with the book, most questions offer an additional hint about the location.) To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the books if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Culture

This Poem About Monet’s “Water Lilies” Reflects on the Powers and Limits of Art

Published

on

This Poem About Monet’s “Water Lilies” Reflects on the Powers and Limits of Art

Advertisement

In the midst of the world’s unrelenting horribleness, it’s important to make room for beauty. True! But also something of a truism, an idea that comes to hand a little too easily to be trusted. The proclamation that art matters — that, in difficult times, it helps — can sound like a shopworn self-care mantra.

So instead of musing on generalities, maybe we should focus our attention on a particular aesthetic experience. Instead of declaring the importance of art, we could look at a painting. Or we could read a poem.

A poem, as it happens, about looking at a painting.

Advertisement

Hayden did not take the act of seeing for granted. His eyesight was so poor that he described himself as “purblind”; as a child he was teased for his thick-framed glasses. Monet’s Giverny paintings, whose blurriness is sometimes ascribed to the painter’s cataracts, may have revealed to the poet not so much a new way of looking as one that he already knew.

Read in isolation, this short poem might seem to celebrate — and to exemplify — an art divorced from politics. Monet’s depiction of his garden, like the garden itself, offers a refuge from the world.

Advertisement

Claude Monet in his garden in 1915.

Advertisement

“Ceux de Chez Nous,” by Sacha Guitry, via Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

But “Selma” and “Saigon” don’t just represent headlines to be pushed aside on the way to the museum. They point toward the turmoil that preoccupied the poetry of Hayden and many of his contemporaries.

Advertisement

“Monet’s ‘Waterlilies’” was published in a 1970 collection called “Words in the Mourning Time.” The title poem is an anguished response to the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and to the deepening quagmire in Vietnam. Another poem in the volume is a long elegy for Malcolm X. Throughout his career (he died in 1980, at 66), Hayden returned frequently to the struggles and tragedies of Black Americans, including his own family.

Advertisement

Robert Hayden in 1971.

Jack Stubbs/The Ann Arbor News, via MLive

Born in Detroit in 1913, Hayden, the first Black American to hold the office now known as poet laureate of the United States, was part of a generation of poets — Gwendolyn Brooks, Dudley Randall, Margaret Danner and others — who came of age between the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s and the Black Arts movement of the ’60s.

Advertisement

A poet of modernist sensibilities and moderate temperament, he didn’t adopt the revolutionary rhetoric of the times, and was criticized by some of his more radical peers for the quietness of his voice and the formality of his diction.

But his contemplative style makes room for passion.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending