Culture
Indiana Fever loss offers Caitlin Clark a chance to grow as a leader
A commemoration of Caitlin Clark’s meteoric career at Iowa and evaluation of the start of her WNBA rookie season.
A commemoration of Caitlin Clark’s meteoric career at Iowa and evaluation of the start of her WNBA rookie season.
Buy
INDIANAPOLIS — The game was going on, but Caitlin Clark chose not to be a part of it.
The Indiana Fever superstar wasn’t watching from the sideline Friday against the Minnesota Lynx; she wasn’t stuck in foul trouble or nursing an injury. She was in the middle of the action, lying on the court, and had simply given up. It was as if Clark was in a video game and the game player’s controller died. But this wasn’t virtual. This was the real thing.
This was a matchup — and a potential first-round playoff preview — between a pair of MVP candidates and their teams. Yet Clark’s composure had evaporated. After Lynx superstar Napheesa Collier blocked Clark’s shot and sent her to the floor, Clark didn’t get back up. She didn’t even try. Instead, she stared up at the Gainbridge Fieldhouse rafters for a couple of seconds while the Lynx played five-on-four on the other end, resulting in a midrange jumper by Courtney Williams that extended Minnesota’s lead to 10 points.
Clark thought she’d been fouled. A foul wasn’t called. And the Fever’s disastrous third quarter continued as the Lynx held on for a 99-88 victory. That rage-filled sequence from Clark, one in which she vehemently complained to the refs and had to be subbed out, didn’t decide the outcome of the game. But it certainly wasn’t helpful.
“I think I could have done a little bit better job controlling my emotions,” said Clark, who finished with 25 points, 8 assists and 8 rebounds.
Caitlin Clark congratulating the ref for getting a call right.
She’s fed up 😭pic.twitter.com/91BViQWD4E
— BricksCenter (@BricksCenter) September 7, 2024
Fever coach Christie Sides, though appreciative of Clark’s fiery nature, was more direct.
“It reminds me of Diana Taurasi,” Sides said. “So when she’s upset or mad, that’s what we’ve been working on, trying to figure out how to get past those moments. I was worried she was going to pick up a (technical foul) in that third quarter, and thank goodness she didn’t. But that’s growth, and she’s gotta learn that in those moments, I need my point guard to have a cool head.”
Clark wasn’t the only one.
Fever forward Aliyah Boston was assessed a technical foul early in the third quarter after she argued with an official over what she believed was a missed foul call. Of course, that didn’t change the ref’s mind, and Sides acknowledged that the Fever became too consumed by the officiating. The Lynx were quick to pounce on the Fever’s disarray, flipping a 5-point deficit at the beginning of the frame into a 12-point lead heading into the fourth quarter.
What could the Fever learn from their lack of composure? Kelsey Mitchell didn’t mince words.
“I think from a leadership standpoint, we huddle ourselves together as a group to say, ‘Shut up and work. Leave the refs out of it,’ obviously,” said Mitchell, the Fever’s longest-tenured player. “Get to the next play. Get to the next action. Get to the next set.”
And, in theory, get to the next level.
Three nights ago, the Fever clinched a playoff berth for the first time since 2016, and from Sides’ perspective, Friday felt like a playoff atmosphere. The crowd was loud, and the play was physical. Nothing came easy, and in the fourth quarter, the Fever responded like a team that finally understood that.
Mitchell scored 8 of her 23 points in the final frame. Boston chipped in with 6 of her 20 points and recorded a block. However, it was Clark who emerged as the main catalyst in the last 10 minutes.
After she regained her equanimity, she changed the game. Clark scored or assisted on 14 points in the fourth quarter, helping the Fever pull within a point, but that was as far as Indiana would climb. With the Fever trailing 78-77, Clark blocked Alanna Smith’s jumper and secured the loose ball on the ensuing fast break, but she threw an ill-advised pass toward Temi Fagbenle that was easily intercepted by Natisha Hiedeman.
“Honestly, I thought we played really good in the fourth,” Clark said. “My turnover in transition is what I felt like really kind ended the momentum for us.”
Caitlin Clark makes it a 3-point game in INDY 🍿
The arena ERUPTS!
Lynx-Fever on ION 📺 pic.twitter.com/rConwYDwAA
— WNBA (@WNBA) September 7, 2024
Williams responded on the other end with a 3-pointer to push the Lynx’s lead back to 4 points en route to handing the Fever their second defeat in nine post-Olympics games. Both of Indiana’s losses came at the hands of Minnesota and Collier, who was brilliant yet again. The four-time All-Star finished with a game-high 26 points, 10 rebounds and 2 blocks.
Clark called the Lynx “the hardest team in the league to guard” because of how well they move the ball, noting that it wasn’t just Collier who made big plays. Bridget Carleton nailed three 3-pointers in the fourth quarter to extinguish a potential Fever comeback.
Mitchell said the Fever can learn from Minnesota’s play and the level-headedness it displayed at Gainbridge Fieldhouse, which doubled as a pressure cooker when Indiana made its late surge. The Lynx didn’t blink, and it’s a huge reason they’re now slated as the No. 2 seed in the WNBA playoff standings.
“(Minnesota) is the standard,” Mitchell said. “And if you want to compete at that next level and be a part of that playoff run — not just getting there, not just being a part of it, but making a run and making an impact — we’re gonna have to use this as leverage and know that they’re the best. And in order to beat the best, you gotta compete every night.”
And on every play.
Clark was reminded of that lesson Friday when, for a brief moment, she failed to compete to the fullest extent.
“Yeah, I think there’s a line and sometimes, your passion, your emotion can get to you,” Clark said. “But that’s never something I would ever change.”
And as Sides said, the Fever aren’t asking her to change. They’re just asking her to grow.
(Photo: Emilee Chinn / Getty Images)
Culture
Kennedy Ryan on ‘Score,’ Her TV Deal, and Finding Purpose
At 53, and after more than a decade in the industry, things are happening for the romance writer Kennedy Ryan that were not on her bingo card.
The most recent: a first look deal with Universal Studio Group that will allow her to develop various projects, including a Peacock adaptation of her breakout 2022 novel “Before I Let Go,” the first book in her Skyland trilogy, which considers love and friendship among three Black women in a community inspired by contemporary Atlanta.
With a TV series in development, Ryan — who published her debut novel in 2014 and subsequently self-published — joins Tia Williams and Alanna Bennett at a table with few other Black romance writers.
“What I am most excited about is the opportunity to identify other authors’ work, especially marginalized authors, and to shepherd those projects from book to screen,” said Ryan, a former journalist. (Kennedy Ryan is a pen name.) “We are seeing an explosion in romance adaptations right now, and I want to see more Black, brown and queer authors.”
Her latest novel, “Score,” is set to publish on Tuesday. It’s the second volume in her Hollywood Renaissance series, after “Reel,” about an actress with a chronic illness who falls for her director on the set of a biopic set during the Harlem Renaissance. The new book follows a screenwriter and a musician, once romantically involved, working on the same movie.
In a recent interview (edited and condensed for clarity), Ryan shared the highs and lows of commercial success; her commitment to happy endings; and her north star. Spoiler: It isn’t what readers think of her books on TikTok.
Your work has been categorized as Black romance, but how do you see yourself as a writer?
I see myself as a romance writer. I think the season that I’m in right now, I’m most interested in Black romance, and that’s what I’ve been writing for the last few years. It doesn’t mean that I won’t write anything else, because I don’t close those doors. But the timeline we’re in is one where I really want to promote Black love, Black art and Black history.
What intrigued you about the period of history you capture in the Hollywood Renaissance series?
I’ve always been fascinated by the Harlem Renaissance and the years immediately following. It felt like a natural era to explore when I was examining overlooked accomplishments by Black creatives. I loved the art as agitation and resistance seen in the lives of people like James Baldwin or Zora Neale Hurston, but also figures like Josephine Baker, Lena Horne and Dorothy Dandridge, who people may not think of as “revolutionary.” The fact that they were even in those spaces was its own act of rebellion.
What about that period feels resonant now?
The series celebrates Black art and Black history and love at a time when I see all three under attack. Our art is being diminished and our history is being erased before our very eyes. I don’t hold back on the relationship between what I see going on in the world and the books I write.
How does this moment in your career feel?
I didn’t get my first book deal until I was in my 40s, so I think this is the best job I’ve ever had. I’m wanting to make the most of it, not just for myself, but for other people, and I think the temptation is to believe that it will all go away because that’s my default.
Why would it all go away?
Part of it is because we — my family, my husband and I — have had some really hard times, especially early in our marriage when my son was diagnosed with autism, my husband lost his job, and we experienced hard times financially. I’ll never forget that.
When I say it could all go away, I mean things change, the industry changes, what people respond to changes, what people buy and want to consume changes. So I don’t assume that what I am doing is always going to be something that people want.
Why are you so firmly committed to defending the “happy ending” in romance novels?
It is integral to the definition of the genre that it ends happily. Some people will say it’s just predictable every one ends happily. I am fine with that, living in a world that is constantly bombarding us with difficulty, with hurt, with challenge.
I write books that are deeply curious about the human condition. In “Score,” the heroine has bipolar disorder, she’s bisexual, there’s all of this intersectionality. For me, there is no safer genre landscape to unpack these issues and these conditions because I know there is guaranteed joy at the end.
You have a pretty active TikTok account. How do you engage with reviews and commentary on the platform about you or the genre?
First of all, I believe that reader spaces are sacred. Sometimes I see authors get embroiled with readers who have criticized them. I never ever comment on critical reviews. I definitely do see the negative. It’s impossible for me not to, but I just kind of ignore it. I let it roll off.
How does this apply to being a very visible Black author in romance?
I am very cognizant of this space that I’m in right now, which is a blessing, and I don’t take it for granted. I see a lot of discourse online where people are like, “Kennedy’s not the only one,” “Why Kennedy?,” “There should be more Black authors.” And I’m like, Oh my God, I know that. I am constantly looking for ways to amplify other Black authors. I want to hold the door open and pull them along.
How do you define success for yourself at this point?
I have a little bit of a mission statement: I want to write stories that will crater in people’s hearts and create transformational moments. Whether it’s television or publishing, am I sticking true to what I feel like is one of the things I was put on this earth to do? I’m a P.K., or preacher’s kid. We’re always thinking about purpose. And for me, how do I fit into this genre? What is my lane? What is my legacy? Which sounds so obnoxious, you know, but legacy is very important to me.
Culture
How Many of These Books and Their Screen Versions Do You Know?
Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights the screen adaptations of popular books for middle-grade and young adult readers. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. Scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.
Culture
Ellen Burstyn on Her Favorite Books and Her Love of Poetry
In an email interview, she talked about why she followed up a memoir with “Poetry Says It Better” — and when and why she leans on the “For Dummies” series. SCOTT HELLER
Describe your ideal reading experience.
Next to a warm fire in a house in the woods. Barring that, at home in bed.
How have your reading tastes changed over time?
When I first began reading, I read fiction. My favorite novel was “The Magic Mountain,” by Thomas Mann. Over the years I find that I am less interested in fiction and more interested in trying to learn about science and mathematics. I love the “For Dummies” series. I remember reading or hearing many years ago, maybe in high school, that the first law of thermodynamics is that energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only change form. So, I was thrilled to learn there was such a book as “Thermodynamics for Dummies.” It was interesting reading, but I’m afraid I could not quote you anything from that book.
What’s the best book you’ve ever received as a gift?
I received the “Rubaiyat” of Omar Khayyám from someone, probably from my first husband, Bill. It stimulated my love of poetry, beautifully illustrated books and also my fascination with the East and the Mideast.
Why write “Poetry Says It Better” rather than, say, a follow-up to your 2006 memoir?
“Poetry Says It Better” has some references to my life, but I feel I wrote enough about myself in my memoir, and I include some of my personal history in this book.
You write that you’ve memorized poems your whole adult life. What’s the last poem you memorized?
I am working on “Shadows,” by D.H. Lawrence. I am trying to get that securely in my memory. Of course, at 93 I am not as good at memorizing as I used to be, or at holding on to what I have already memorized. But it is good exercise for the memory to use it.
You quote a line from Kaveh Akbar: “Art is where what we survive survives.” Why does that line resonate so much for you?
That line is so meaningful to me because I know that the difficult first 18 years of my life is the emotional library I descend into for every part I’ve ever played, and every poem that has landed in my heart.
Of all the characters you’ve played across different media, which role felt the richest — the most novelistic?
I would have to say Lois in “The Last Picture Show.” She was a character I didn’t really understand right away. I had to dig for her. She was multidimensional. I feel literary characters are like that.
What’s the best book about acting, or the life of an actor, you’ve ever read?
I have to name two. “My Life in Art,” by Konstantin Stanislavsky, and “A Dream of Passion,” by Lee Strasberg.
How do you organize your books?
I’ve collected my library for 70 years. All my classic literature is together, on two facing walls in the front of my living room. On the other end of the room, I have my art books. Facing them are my travel and music books. On the fourth wall are some of my science books.
In the large entrance hall, I have one standing bookcase of the complete Carl Jung collection, and near it another bookcase of poetry anthologies. In my kitchen office are all the books about food. Then I have a writing room that contains books of poetry and science, and my Sufi books. In my bedroom are my spiritual and religious books.
What books are on your night stand?
Currently: “Anam Cara: Spiritual Wisdom From the Celtic World,” by John O’Donohue; “Prayers of the Cosmos,” by Neil Douglas Klotz; “The Courage to Create,” by Rollo May; “Radical Love,” by Omid Safi; Pema Chödrön’s “How We Live Is How We Die”; “The Trial of Socrates,” by I.F. Stone; “Our Green Heart: The Soul and Science of Forests,” by Diana Beresford-Kroeger; and “On Living and Dying Well,” by Cicero.
What book might people be surprised to find on your shelves?
Probably Ken Wilber’s “A Brief History of Everything” and Michio Kaku’s “Physics of the Future.” These are two of my favorite books. I love to read books on science that are not written for scientists but for curious readers like me.
You’re organizing a literary dinner party. Which three writers, dead or alive, do you invite?
Oh, definitely Mary Oliver, my favorite poet of all time, and Edgar Allan Poe. The thought of those two people talking to each other. Finally, Tennessee Williams, who’s written some of the greatest plays ever.
-
Lifestyle2 minutes ago10 minutes backstage with Bilal at Blue Note
-
Politics8 minutes agoIn growing fight, Steyer’s campaign says pro-Becerra influencers didn’t disclose pay
-
Sports20 minutes agoHigh school softball: Southern Section Tuesday playoff scores and upcoming schedule
-
World32 minutes agoJones, Jackson move to Republican primary run-off in Georgia governor race
-
News1 hour agoSchool board member who hugged teen and called her ‘hot’ is charged with assault
-
Los Angeles, Ca3 hours agoViolent multi-vehicle crash leaves L.A. firetruck overturned, 2 firefighters injured
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoAfter back-to-back days of severe storms in Metro Detroit, cooler, calmer weather arrives mid-week
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoSurveillance video shows pickpocket crew targeting victims in SF’s Chinatown