Connect with us

Culture

Football has never been more popular to watch, but are there fewer players?

Published

on

Football has never been more popular to watch, but are there fewer players?

Follow live coverage of Georgia Tech vs Florida State in college football’s season opener today

ATHENS, Ga. — Kirby Smart made it sound dire. On paper, Smart coaches the most talented college football team in America. But as he has surveyed his roster this month — deep down the roster — it’s confirmed a fear: Fewer people are playing football, and that is affecting the quality of the game.

“I feel like we have less depth than we’ve ever had, and that’s kind of a common theme talking to other coaches,” Smart said. “I call it the deterioration of football.”

A Georgia high school coach echoed the feeling.

“There is definitely a decline in the number of kids that are playing the game,” said Adam Carter, the coach at Lowndes High in Valdosta. “I think there are multiple reasons. Football is hard work, it is over the summer and the number of parents in this generation who will not let their kids play at an early age. This means they only play baseball, basketball, soccer, etc., and never make it to a football field once they get older.”

Advertisement
The Pulse Newsletter

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Sign UpBuy The Pulse Newsletter

So are they right? Even as football never has been more popular to watch and has never made more money, are fewer people playing? And is this a giant warning sign for the future of the game?

The data tells a complex story (and several other high school coaches contacted say they have record numbers of players).

“We’re encouraged by the numbers that are out there and the numbers of people that are playing,” said Steve Hatchell, the head of the National Football Foundation.

Advertisement

Kirby Smart is entering his ninth season as Georgia’s coach. (Todd Kirkland / Getty Images)

Whatever the case, stewards of the game acknowledge the concerns and say they will continue to make moves to make the game safer.

“There’s just a general awareness that we needed to make player behavior changes for the good of the athletes and to keep the game viable,” said Steve Shaw, the NCAA’s coordinator of officials and head of the football rules committee. “I would tell you that nothing is more important.”

First, a look at the data:

• Participation in high school football, after trending down from 2015 through 2022, slightly has increased each of the past two years: 1,031,508 played 11-man football during the 2023 season, an increase of about 3,000 from the previous season, per data compiled by the National Federation for High Schools.

• The downside: The numbers are still down from the 1,136,301 recorded in 2009, and when you account for population growth, it’s a lower percentage of the available talent pool.

Advertisement

• At the same time, the number of colleges and universities sponsoring football teams has continued to climb: 774 this season, including six new ones this fall, with 51 new programs since 2008, per the National Football Foundation. And the number of FBS (formerly Division I-A) schools has grown from 112 in 1998 to 134 this year, as more schools chase the dollars in the game.

So there are more college teams but a static amount of talent. The obvious conclusion: Smart and fellow coaches may be right because the supply of talent hasn’t kept up with the demand.

Another factor, as Carter pointed to, is children not playing football, or at least tackle football, until later, whether it was middle school or even high school. Smart pointed to regulations at the high school level, aimed at safety, for the number of practices per week and the amount of tackling and physical contact.

“High school’s not having as much of an opportunity to develop kids because their practice regimen and practice schedule is tougher,” Smart said. “It’s a trickle-up effect, so we get the guys coming from the high school level.”

Smart, it should be pointed out, doesn’t necessarily have a problem with that. He often has talked about wanting the game to be safe for his son, who is 12 and has played football. Smart is on the NCAA rules committee and has been a part of making rules aimed at making the game safer.

Advertisement

The NCAA’s most tangible change was the targeting rule, which went into effect as a 15-yard penalty in 2013, then an automatic ejection a year later. Fans, coaches and players have maligned the rule, but it’s not going anywhere because it’s working.

“I know a lot of times fans don’t love targeting. But honestly this is one of the best rules we’ve instituted,” Shaw said.

The rule intended to change behavior, away from headhunting and dangerous hits, and Shaw pointed to data as well as anecdotal evidence that it has worked. The number of targeting calls has trended down the last four years and was at 0.16 per game last season. And it’s not because officials are looking the other way but because players have adjusted their play because of the rule.

“That’s really good for our game,” Shaw said. “What we’ve seen is it’s changed player behavior, in their technique, how they block, how they tackle, their approach, how they use their helmet.”

Beyond targeting, the rules committee constantly has studied changes for safety purposes. It made changes to rules on blocking below the waist, to lessen knee injuries and eliminated blindside blocks.

Advertisement

It looked at the number of plays per game, phrasing them as “exposures.” There was a push to get fewer of them, mainly for safety reasons, but it gets more attention for making game times shorter.  The committee took 4.5-5 plays out of games, on average, thanks to the changes, most notably not stopping the clock on first downs. Fans complained about shorter games, but the aim of fewer exposures was hit, so that’s also not changing.

“The progress we’ve made there has been really good for our game, maybe saving our game,” Shaw said.

There also has been a focus on equipment, especially helmet technology. Shaw predicts that in a few years, there will be position-specific helmets, using data being compiled right now about what kind of impacts to the head each position takes. A safety needs a different helmet from a lineman, for instance, because they don’t have the repetitive hits of a lineman, but the safety needs a helmet to account for hits while on the run.

All of this, of course, followed years of bad publicity over safety in the game. And while it had a tangible impact on participation, the data says it may be reversing, not just at the high school level.

The Sports and Fitness Industry Association, which tracks participation at all youth levels, provided data that showed:

Advertisement

• Participation rates for 13-17-year-olds in tackle football declined from 2012 to 2017 but then increased the next six years.

• Participation rates for 6-12-year-olds in tackle football were “flat to slightly up” during the past 12 years.

• Tackle football participation did decline after 2010, “but the decline has stopped and participation stabilized in recent years” and participation has gone up each year since 2020.

“This set of data show conclusively that the discussion of tackle football participation being down dramatically and on a consistent downward trajectory is simply not true,” Tom Cove of the SFIA wrote in a report.  “And, in fact, after some challenges around the concussion issues in 2011-17 time period, tackle football participation numbers have been pretty stable and overall good.”

Hatchell pointed to flag football as a growing sport. The sport will be in the 2028 Olympics, and the number of high school girls playing flag football more than doubled last year to just fewer than 43,000.

Advertisement

“It’s exploding. Not just growing but exploding,” Hatchell said.

Hatchell said he and other football advocates don’t see flag football as a long-term replacement for tackle football but rather working in conjunction with it. There is agreement throughout tackle football to keep making the game safer so parents are willing to let their children play. The popularity of the game, at least in TV ratings and attendance, puts the sport in a good spot to risk those changes and sacrifice parts of the game if it means fewer injuries.

That’s not changing. And the game is not going back to the way it was.

“As the parent of someone who played, you encourage them to play tough and strong. But you want it to be safe,” Hatchell said. “That’s the No. 1 thing. And I think the rule changes have been really good about that.”

(Top photo: Andrew Nelles / USA Today)

Advertisement

Culture

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Published

on

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

new video loaded: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Artificial intelligence has made pirated audiobooks faster to make and harder to detect. Our reporter Alexandra Alter tells us about the latest threat to the publishing industry.

By Alexandra Alter, Léo Hamelin and Laura Salaberry

May 20, 2026

Continue Reading

Culture

Kennedy Ryan on ‘Score,’ Her TV Deal, and Finding Purpose

Published

on

Kennedy Ryan on ‘Score,’ Her TV Deal, and Finding Purpose

At 53, and after more than a decade in the industry, things are happening for the romance writer Kennedy Ryan that were not on her bingo card.

The most recent: a first look deal with Universal Studio Group that will allow her to develop various projects, including a Peacock adaptation of her breakout 2022 novel “Before I Let Go,” the first book in her Skyland trilogy, which considers love and friendship among three Black women in a community inspired by contemporary Atlanta.

With a TV series in development, Ryan — who published her debut novel in 2014 and subsequently self-published — joins Tia Williams and Alanna Bennett at a table with few other Black romance writers.

“What I am most excited about is the opportunity to identify other authors’ work, especially marginalized authors, and to shepherd those projects from book to screen,” said Ryan, a former journalist. (Kennedy Ryan is a pen name.) “We are seeing an explosion in romance adaptations right now, and I want to see more Black, brown and queer authors.”

Her latest novel, “Score,” is set to publish on Tuesday. It’s the second volume in her Hollywood Renaissance series, after “Reel,” about an actress with a chronic illness who falls for her director on the set of a biopic set during the Harlem Renaissance. The new book follows a screenwriter and a musician, once romantically involved, working on the same movie.

Advertisement

In a recent interview (edited and condensed for clarity), Ryan shared the highs and lows of commercial success; her commitment to happy endings; and her north star. Spoiler: It isn’t what readers think of her books on TikTok.

Your work has been categorized as Black romance, but how do you see yourself as a writer?

I see myself as a romance writer. I think the season that I’m in right now, I’m most interested in Black romance, and that’s what I’ve been writing for the last few years. It doesn’t mean that I won’t write anything else, because I don’t close those doors. But the timeline we’re in is one where I really want to promote Black love, Black art and Black history.

What intrigued you about the period of history you capture in the Hollywood Renaissance series?

I’ve always been fascinated by the Harlem Renaissance and the years immediately following. It felt like a natural era to explore when I was examining overlooked accomplishments by Black creatives. I loved the art as agitation and resistance seen in the lives of people like James Baldwin or Zora Neale Hurston, but also figures like Josephine Baker, Lena Horne and Dorothy Dandridge, who people may not think of as “revolutionary.” The fact that they were even in those spaces was its own act of rebellion.

Advertisement

What about that period feels resonant now?

The series celebrates Black art and Black history and love at a time when I see all three under attack. Our art is being diminished and our history is being erased before our very eyes. I don’t hold back on the relationship between what I see going on in the world and the books I write.

How does this moment in your career feel?

I didn’t get my first book deal until I was in my 40s, so I think this is the best job I’ve ever had. I’m wanting to make the most of it, not just for myself, but for other people, and I think the temptation is to believe that it will all go away because that’s my default.

Why would it all go away?

Advertisement

Part of it is because we — my family, my husband and I — have had some really hard times, especially early in our marriage when my son was diagnosed with autism, my husband lost his job, and we experienced hard times financially. I’ll never forget that.

When I say it could all go away, I mean things change, the industry changes, what people respond to changes, what people buy and want to consume changes. So I don’t assume that what I am doing is always going to be something that people want.

Why are you so firmly committed to defending the “happy ending” in romance novels?

It is integral to the definition of the genre that it ends happily. Some people will say it’s just predictable every one ends happily. I am fine with that, living in a world that is constantly bombarding us with difficulty, with hurt, with challenge.

I write books that are deeply curious about the human condition. In “Score,” the heroine has bipolar disorder, she’s bisexual, there’s all of this intersectionality. For me, there is no safer genre landscape to unpack these issues and these conditions because I know there is guaranteed joy at the end.

Advertisement

You have a pretty active TikTok account. How do you engage with reviews and commentary on the platform about you or the genre?

First of all, I believe that reader spaces are sacred. Sometimes I see authors get embroiled with readers who have criticized them. I never ever comment on critical reviews. I definitely do see the negative. It’s impossible for me not to, but I just kind of ignore it. I let it roll off.

How does this apply to being a very visible Black author in romance?

I am very cognizant of this space that I’m in right now, which is a blessing, and I don’t take it for granted. I see a lot of discourse online where people are like, “Kennedy’s not the only one,” “Why Kennedy?,” “There should be more Black authors.” And I’m like, Oh my God, I know that. I am constantly looking for ways to amplify other Black authors. I want to hold the door open and pull them along.

How do you define success for yourself at this point?

Advertisement

I have a little bit of a mission statement: I want to write stories that will crater in people’s hearts and create transformational moments. Whether it’s television or publishing, am I sticking true to what I feel like is one of the things I was put on this earth to do? I’m a P.K., or preacher’s kid. We’re always thinking about purpose. And for me, how do I fit into this genre? What is my lane? What is my legacy? Which sounds so obnoxious, you know, but legacy is very important to me.

Continue Reading

Culture

How Many of These Books and Their Screen Versions Do You Know?

Published

on

How Many of These Books and Their Screen Versions Do You Know?

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights the screen adaptations of popular books for middle-grade and young adult readers. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. Scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending