Culture
As Juan Soto embarks on $765M future, Ted Williams’ shadow lingers: Where could he end up?
DALLAS — So perhaps you’re wondering this week: What would I have to do to get some baseball team to pay ME $700 million?
Hey, excellent question. And I think we’ve figured that out.
On one hand, you could be a unicorn — a once-in-a-lifetime home run hero/Cy Young starter/make-the-impossible-seem-possible kind of guy. Like Shohei Ohtani, for instance. Or …
You could just be Ted Williams.
All right, let’s take a deep breath now. It always seems sacrilegious to call Juan Soto — or anyone else — a modern-day Ted Williams. But this is the story where we let you know that it’s not as crazy as you want to believe it is.
The Mets obviously think so, since they just agreed to deposit $765 million in Soto’s money market account over the next 16 years. But you should know that they’re not the only team that sees this Juan Soto/Ted Williams thing. Far from it.
Consider the response from one big-league coach this week when we asked for his reaction to Soto’s staggering new contract.
“What it says to me,” he replied, laughing, “is that Ted Williams would make a hell of a lot of money if he was playing today.”
True!
Then there’s this story, told by an executive of a team that had interest in trading for Soto in 2022, when the Nationals were dangling him. Just to make sure he had the go-ahead, this exec and another high-ranking member of his front office decided they’d better run it past their owner first. This is how the exec remembers the conversation going:
“He (the owner) said something like: ‘I understand he’s great. But can you put in context how great he is?’
“And I said: ‘I think he’s Ted Williams.’
“And he just gave me a look like: ‘You’re a freaking lunatic.’ But I just said, ‘No, that’s kind of what he is.’”
We couldn’t have said it any better. That’s kind of what he is. He’s not Ted Williams 2.0 because nobody is. That isn’t possible. Williams finished his career with a 1.116 OPS and a .344 career batting average. Nobody is doing that in this era. Nobody.
But is Juan Soto kind of the 21st-century version of Ted Williams? There’s no getting around that.
If the question is more like — What hitter in the history of baseball is the most comparable to Soto through age 25? — there is only one answer. And you guessed it, Ted Williams is that answer.
Let’s show you why. It starts with …
On-base IQ at a young age
Juan Soto has a career .419 on-base percentage over seven seasons. (Luke Hales / Getty Images)
In the history of this sport, only two hitters have ever had a walk rate above 18 percent through their age-25 seasons (with at least 2,500 plate appearances). Guess who?
Ted Williams — 18.9 percent
Juan Soto — 18.8 percent
(Source: Baseball Reference)
Or we could look at the full array of on-base skills. To do that, let’s use a metric from Baseball Reference called OBP+ — which takes on-base percentage and adjusts it to the context of a player’s hitting environment in his era. Here’s that leaderboard through age 25:
Ted Williams — 137
Juan Soto — 131
In other words, the only two young hitters who were on-base machines at a rate that was at least 30 percent better than league average were … Williams and Soto. (Next on that list: Ty Cobb and Shoeless Joe Jackson, tied at 129.)
Or we could just consider the early-career narratives of these two guys — minus the part where Williams went off to war at age 24 and became a war-hero fighter pilot.
Before he turned 26, Williams led his league in walks twice and OBP three times, despite missing two seasons during that span in the service. Since then, only one left-handed hitter has led his league in both of those departments at least twice by age 25. Hmmm, who might that be?
Juan Soto would be a great guess.
There’s more, of course. But what do you think? Are we authorized to go on? Do we at least have the go-ahead to mention Soto and Williams in the same breath? We asked Diamondbacks manager Torey Lovullo for permission to do so this week, since he’s a history lover and once coached in Boston. In retrospect, he might not have been the right choice.
“I mean, Ted Williams?” Lovullo said. “My dad taught me everything about Ted Williams. That’s a tough one for me. He’s probably the greatest hitter of all time.”
So Lovullo wasn’t ready to apply that Ted Williams stamp of approval. But once he got that out of the way, Lovullo began painting the portrait of what he does see in Soto, from the perspective of a manager who has been trying to figure out how to contain him since Soto arrived in the big leagues.
“The first time I saw him, he was 20 years old,” Lovullo said. “I could not believe he was 20 years old. He carried himself like he was 30, like he had been around the league for a long time.”
And Lovullo means that in a way that explains why the free-agent bidding for Soto reached another orbit this winter.
“I think Soto is on a different level than the rest of the league at times,” he said. “I mean, 41 home runs, the OPS, the numbers that he has, are not lucky. It’s because he has an incredible ability to impact the baseball, and he understands what each at-bat is asking for.”
He understands what each at-bat is asking for.
With those words, Lovullo is telling us this is not a hitter who is prepared for each at-bat in the sense that he knows the pitcher has a fastball, sweeper and cutter in his arsenal. This is a hitter who prepares on “a different level.”
Kind of like a modern-day Ted Williams. That, you see, is because they both had the unique ability to see …
The hidden part of the game
Nationals manager Davey Martinez and Juan Soto, after he won the Home Run Derby in 2022. (Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images)
Davey Martinez was the first manager of Juan Soto’s big-league life, for five spectacular seasons in Washington. Now that Soto is back in the NL East, Martinez will get to manage against him in four series a year. He’s not looking forward to that part — but he never gets tired of watching Juan Soto, bat artist.
“Like I’ve always said,” Martinez told us, “this guy, for as young as he is — and he’s still young — he understands the hidden part of the game better than anybody I know. He really does.”
Again, we stop to point out the terminology these managers use to describe a guy who two months ago turned 26 — meaning he’s younger than the likes of Josh Jung or Spencer Horwitz or Josh Lowe. It’s not: He understands the strike zone. It’s: He understands the hidden part of the game.
And by that, Martinez said, he means: “He has a plan every pitch. Not just every at-bat but every pitch. He has a plan of what he wants to do, and you can see it.”
Rockies manager Bud Black can also see it. And he, too, described The Juan Soto At-Bat in ways that are never used to describe anyone else’s at-bats.
“When you use the words, plate discipline, that encompasses a lot of things,” Black said. “But for me, it’s how he conducts the at-bat, where it’s patience, but yet, you sense that he’s ready to hit. It’s sort of an instinctual thing. It’s an intangible that I think pitchers feel, and catchers feel. And the opposing manager. And the opposing pitching coach.
“There’s just something about the at-bat when it’s him up there. It doesn’t matter, it’s the same, whether it’s 7:05 (p.m.), hitting in the first inning, or at 9:30, hitting in the ninth. There’s not a difference in the quality of the at-bat.”
Like Lovullo and Martinez, Black is describing a hitter whose level of focus — on every pitch of every at-bat, of every inning, of every game, of every season — is just different. So what happens when the eye, the brain, the plan, the focus and the extraordinary bat-to-ball skills seem to be always working in sync?
You get Juan Soto … or Ted Williams.
Consider these quotes. They come from the Splendid Splinter. They could easily be his review of Juan Soto.
“Baseball is 50 percent from the neck up.”
“Think. Don’t just swing. Think about the pitcher — what he threw you last time up, his best pitch, who’s up next. Think.”
Sound familiar? If you’ve paid any attention when Soto is working his batter’s-box magic, it’s almost as if he’s a hitting robot, programmed by Ted Williams himself.
Said Martinez: “I tell our pitchers all the time: When you’re facing him, you need to know he’s smart. He knows what he wants to do. So if he takes a fastball, he’s looking for something. Don’t think you’re going to sneak something by him, because he’s smart. So you’ve got to be smart.”
But really, there’s more — because the Soto/Williams comparisons don’t end with this singular combination of patience, prep and focus. There’s also …
The power play
John Schneider also dreamed the Juan Soto dream. He is the manager of the Blue Jays, a team that pursued Soto all the way to the finish line. He had no trouble explaining exactly what they hoped they’d be buying.
“He’s a unique blend of plate discipline and power,” Schneider said. “I mean, you do not like facing it when you’re an opposing team.”
Plate discipline and power. When you combine them, and then apply them to all the young hitters in history, it once again connects the same two names: Ted Williams and Juan Soto.
Walk percentage and home run percentage through age 25
| HITTER | BB PCT | HR PCT | BB+HR PCT |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ted Williams |
18.9% |
4.9% |
23.8% |
|
Juan Soto |
18.8% |
4.9% |
23.7% |
(Source: Baseball Reference; minimum 2,500 plate appearances)
So there it is. There is patience. There is power. There is focus. There is damage. And there is one more thing.
The flair
It’s no secret that Ted Williams did everything — on the field, off the field — with an attitude. But Juan Soto has more than just an attitude. He has The Shuffle.
.@JuanSoto25_ does the shuffle to pump himself up. Looks like it works.
📰: https://t.co/c2QKA4hpjl pic.twitter.com/8HJvoTO3ZZ
— MLB (@MLB) March 27, 2021
Don’t feel as if you have to take a four-minute break from this piece to watch the full, epic Soto at-bat against Hunter Gaddis in Cleveland this October. But if you do, you’ll see something that makes up the full Juan Soto Experience.
The whole Juan Soto at-bat vs. Hunter Gaddis. An artist at work. Just fouling off pitches until he got a fastball.
Then he sent the Yankees to the World Series. pic.twitter.com/2C6lSIpD45
— Jeff Eisenband (@JeffEisenband) October 20, 2024
It isn’t merely that he knows what you’re trying to do to him on every pitch. He’s also going to tell you about it after every pitch … and demonstrate it, via some version of the Soto Shuffle. There is honestly nothing like this going on anywhere else in his sport.
“For me, it’s his way of keeping engaged,” Martinez said. “It really is. That’s how he gets back in the box and gets engaged.”
And it brings Martinez back to his favorite Soto story ever. It happened in a 2019 game at Citi Field, when Marcus Stroman, then a Met, struck out Soto in the first inning, then did an imitation of The Shuffle.
“So he comes back (to the dugout), and I said, ‘Did you see what he just did?’” Martinez reminisced. “And he said, ‘Don’t worry. I’ve got him.” Very next at-bat. He hit one a mile — and he kind of looked at Stroman like, ‘Don’t do that again.’”
Was there a Ted Williams Shuffle? Not that we know of. But there was a Ted Williams edge. And it is an unmistakable part of the Soto-Williams connection. Don’t take our word for it. Take the word of Charlie Manuel, former manager of the Phillies and a guy who played against Ted Williams early in his career.
“He’s kind of a flamboyant player,” Manuel said of Soto in 2021. “He’s very interesting. He calls attention to you with his talent. … At the same time, he’s cocky. But to me, it comes in a good way. You know, Ted Williams was very cocky, too.”
But you know what else Ted Williams was? A guy who played in the big leagues until he was 41. So it’s worth asking:
Where does Juan Soto go from here?
If Juan Soto ages well, he should put up some prodigious numbers. (Cole Burston / Getty Images)
Since he’s now under contract until the year 2040, it’s worth asking: Do hitters with Juan Soto’s skill set tend to age well?
“Oh yeah, I think so,” Schneider said. “You’re only as good as what you swing at, right? And he’s pretty darned good at that.”
The truth is, history shows us he’s right. As far back as 2012, Bill Petti and Jeff Zimmerman of FanGraphs studied this very concept. They found something we should take note of — that almost no skill has tended to age better through the years than plate discipline.
Guess who looms as the ultimate example of that? Right you are. Ted Williams.
Even though he left baseball to head off to war two times, Williams returned — first at age 27, then at age 34 — as nearly exactly the same hitter he was before.
Take a look at his walk and home run rates through the years — since those are the rates that most resemble the profile of the young Juan Soto — and ponder whether they lay out a blueprint for what Soto might become.
| AGE | BB PCT | HR PCT | BB+HR PCT |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Through 25 |
18.9% |
4.9% |
23.8% |
|
26-30 |
22.2% |
5.0% |
27.2% |
|
31-35 |
22.0% |
5.8% |
27.8% |
|
36-41 |
19.9% |
5.7% |
25.6% |
(Source: Baseball Reference)
You’ll notice that Williams played until exactly the same age as when Soto’s Mets contract expires — at 41. If Soto ages with even remotely similar rates … um, wow.
After his age-25 season, Williams added 394 home runs and 1,526 walks. If Soto ages like Williams, he’ll be somewhere in the neighborhood of 600 career homers and 2,300 career walks by the year 2040. And how many players in history have ever reached those two plateaus? Just one.
Barry Bonds.
So is that what’s out there for Soto with the Mets? Sorry. We forgot to pack our crystal balls for the Winter Meetings. But with a hitter this gifted — and this different — can we rule anything out?
“I don’t know what he’s going to do when he’s 40,” said Martinez. “But I know what he’s going to do come Opening Day.”
Hey, don’t we all. Power. Patience. And $765 million worth of Soto Shuffles — and the best Ted Williams imitation on Earth.
GO DEEPER
Inside Juan Soto landing the biggest contract in pro sports history from Steve Cohen’s Mets
GO DEEPER
What does history tell us about how Juan Soto will age?
GO DEEPER
What does Juan Soto’s record contract mean to the Mets’ payroll?
(Top image: Meech Robinson / The Athletic. Photos: Williams swinging: Diamond Images / Getty Images; Williams close-up: Getty Images; Soto close-up: Kyle Rivas / Getty Images; Soto swinging: Mitchell Layton / Getty Images)
Culture
Ellen Burstyn on Her Favorite Books and Her Love of Poetry
In an email interview, she talked about why she followed up a memoir with “Poetry Says It Better” — and when and why she leans on the “For Dummies” series. SCOTT HELLER
Describe your ideal reading experience.
Next to a warm fire in a house in the woods. Barring that, at home in bed.
How have your reading tastes changed over time?
When I first began reading, I read fiction. My favorite novel was “The Magic Mountain,” by Thomas Mann. Over the years I find that I am less interested in fiction and more interested in trying to learn about science and mathematics. I love the “For Dummies” series. I remember reading or hearing many years ago, maybe in high school, that the first law of thermodynamics is that energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only change form. So, I was thrilled to learn there was such a book as “Thermodynamics for Dummies.” It was interesting reading, but I’m afraid I could not quote you anything from that book.
What’s the best book you’ve ever received as a gift?
I received the “Rubaiyat” of Omar Khayyám from someone, probably from my first husband, Bill. It stimulated my love of poetry, beautifully illustrated books and also my fascination with the East and the Mideast.
Why write “Poetry Says It Better” rather than, say, a follow-up to your 2006 memoir?
“Poetry Says It Better” has some references to my life, but I feel I wrote enough about myself in my memoir, and I include some of my personal history in this book.
You write that you’ve memorized poems your whole adult life. What’s the last poem you memorized?
I am working on “Shadows,” by D.H. Lawrence. I am trying to get that securely in my memory. Of course, at 93 I am not as good at memorizing as I used to be, or at holding on to what I have already memorized. But it is good exercise for the memory to use it.
You quote a line from Kaveh Akbar: “Art is where what we survive survives.” Why does that line resonate so much for you?
That line is so meaningful to me because I know that the difficult first 18 years of my life is the emotional library I descend into for every part I’ve ever played, and every poem that has landed in my heart.
Of all the characters you’ve played across different media, which role felt the richest — the most novelistic?
I would have to say Lois in “The Last Picture Show.” She was a character I didn’t really understand right away. I had to dig for her. She was multidimensional. I feel literary characters are like that.
What’s the best book about acting, or the life of an actor, you’ve ever read?
I have to name two. “My Life in Art,” by Konstantin Stanislavsky, and “A Dream of Passion,” by Lee Strasberg.
How do you organize your books?
I’ve collected my library for 70 years. All my classic literature is together, on two facing walls in the front of my living room. On the other end of the room, I have my art books. Facing them are my travel and music books. On the fourth wall are some of my science books.
In the large entrance hall, I have one standing bookcase of the complete Carl Jung collection, and near it another bookcase of poetry anthologies. In my kitchen office are all the books about food. Then I have a writing room that contains books of poetry and science, and my Sufi books. In my bedroom are my spiritual and religious books.
What books are on your night stand?
Currently: “Anam Cara: Spiritual Wisdom From the Celtic World,” by John O’Donohue; “Prayers of the Cosmos,” by Neil Douglas Klotz; “The Courage to Create,” by Rollo May; “Radical Love,” by Omid Safi; Pema Chödrön’s “How We Live Is How We Die”; “The Trial of Socrates,” by I.F. Stone; “Our Green Heart: The Soul and Science of Forests,” by Diana Beresford-Kroeger; and “On Living and Dying Well,” by Cicero.
What book might people be surprised to find on your shelves?
Probably Ken Wilber’s “A Brief History of Everything” and Michio Kaku’s “Physics of the Future.” These are two of my favorite books. I love to read books on science that are not written for scientists but for curious readers like me.
You’re organizing a literary dinner party. Which three writers, dead or alive, do you invite?
Oh, definitely Mary Oliver, my favorite poet of all time, and Edgar Allan Poe. The thought of those two people talking to each other. Finally, Tennessee Williams, who’s written some of the greatest plays ever.
Culture
Speculative Fiction Books Full of Real Horrors
In most cases, truth is stranger than fiction. But sometimes we need strange fiction to show us the truth. My favorite works of science fiction and fantasy take place in a world that largely resembles our own, and shine a spotlight on the issues of today by blending fantastical imagination with real-world commentary.
Take “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” High school is hell (literally). Coming out (as a Slayer) is hard. The man you love could transform after sex into someone you no longer recognize (say, a vampire). Allusions to the speculative are common in everyday speech: The untested drug is a “magic pill,” the horrible boss is the “devil himself,” or the female politician is “possessed by a Jezebel spirit.” Taking these propositions seriously can shine a light on what ails us (corporate greed, worker exploitation, good old-fashioned misogyny — take your pick). It’s also what inspired me to play with the idea of actual monsters haunting an abortion clinic in my latest novel, “We Dance Upon Demons,” after I was called a “demon” while volunteering at Planned Parenthood.
When used well, speculative elements take a familiar concept that our brains might otherwise gloss over as familiar and make it just different and exciting enough that we can see new or deeper dimensions. In contemporary stories, they create a gateway for the reader to put herself in a character’s shoes. It’s hard to imagine, for example, how I would fare in the Hunger Games (poorly, I’m sure), but I definitely know what I would do if I started seeing demons at work (Google symptoms of a brain tumor).
Here are some of my favorite books that make a contemporary feast out of the simple question: What if?
Culture
Frank Stack, Painter Who Secretly Drew ‘The Adventures of Jesus,’ Dies at 88
Frank Stack, an art professor and painter who secretly moonlighted as Foolbert Sturgeon, the satirical cartoonist who created “The Adventures of Jesus,” a chronicle of Christ’s encounters with sanctimonious hypocrites that is widely considered the first underground comic, died on April 12 in Columbia, Mo. He was 88.
The death, at a hospital, was confirmed by his daughter, Joan Stack.
Mr. Stack taught studio art at the University of Missouri and was well regarded for his intricate drawings, etchings and watercolor paintings, which he often composed alone, sitting cross-legged on a quiet riverbank.
As Foolbert Sturgeon — a persona he concealed for two decades to protect his day job — he lampooned religion, academia and the military, among other sacred tendrils of the 1960s and ’70s, signing his acerbic broadsides with his vaudevillian nom de plume.
“His comics were funny, well drawn and smart,” his friend the cartoonist R. Crumb said in an interview. “And he was a very, very fine watercolor artist and oil painter. He was the real thing.”
Mr. Stack was especially adept at nudes, once drawing Mr. Crumb’s wife, the feminist underground cartoonist Aline Kominsky-Crumb, in a state of total undress.
“He did a very fine job,” Mr. Crumb said. “He really knew anatomy.”
Mr. Stack did not become as famous (or notorious) as Mr. Crumb, a subversive and misanthropic character in San Francisco’s counterculture scene, whose heavily crosshatched, grotesquely sexual drawings came to define underground comics during the 1960s.
In contrast to Mr. Crumb, whose roguish demeanor was immortalized in the 1994 documentary “Crumb,” Mr. Stack worked secretively in the Midwest, his only notable behavioral quirk an ability to deliver astonishingly long monologues on seemingly any subject that occurred to him.
“Frank is an incredible story,” James Danky, a historian and co-author of “Underground Classics: The Transformation of Comics Into Comix” (2009), said in an interview, adding: “He’s not who you think he is. He’s more than that.”
Mr. Stack got his start in creative flippancy as a writer and then the editor of Texas Ranger, the humor magazine at the University of Texas at Austin, whose staffers, known as Rangeroos, have included the gossip columnist Liz Smith, the screenwriter Robert Benton and the comic book artist and publisher Gilbert Shelton.
After graduating in 1959 with a degree in fine arts, he worked briefly at The Houston Chronicle, one desk over from Dan Rather, and joined the Army Reserve. In 1961, he enrolled at the University of Wyoming for a master’s degree in art, but was called into active duty the same year following the Berlin Wall crisis.
Attached to a data processing unit on Governors Island in New York, he rented an apartment on West 94th Street and spent his evenings attending gallery openings, plays and art house movies with Mr. Benton and Mr. Shelton, who were also living in New York. He had no use for the Army.
“My entire company was constantly grumbling, grousing, growling, snarling, moaning and whining with discontent,” Mr. Stack wrote in “The New Adventures of Jesus: The Second Coming” (2006). “CBS actually sent a film crew to the island, but they were only allowed to speak with delegated individuals who, naturally, were hardly discontented at all.”
One day, Army officers distributed patriotic pamphlets titled “Why Me?”
“The gist was something about drawing a line in the sand to save the free world from communism. It didn’t go down well at all,” Mr. Stack wrote, adding that most, “if not all, of us thought it was ridiculous and insulting.”
He responded by drawing a cartoon on the back of a computer card depicting Christian martyrs being handed a pamphlet titled “Why Me?” as they entered an arena of hungry lions. He posted it on a bulletin board. A half-hour later, it had disappeared.
Undeterred, Mr. Stack continued drawing Jesus in a series of absurd situations — being arrested, registering to vote, attending faculty parties.
In one scene, a military police officer asks Jesus to produce his identification. “I don’t have one!” Jesus says. “I don’t have anything!” In another scene, Jesus walks on water by becoming a duck.
In 1962, the Austin gang in New York went their separate ways. Mr. Stack returned to Wyoming to finish his graduate studies in art. Mr. Shelton moved back to Austin for graduate school and to edit Texas Ranger.
Mr. Shelton loved the Jesus comics and had made copies for himself. He printed a few in a newsletter that he published locally. In 1964, with help from a friend who had access to a Xerox machine at the University of Texas law school, he made an eight-page book titled “The Adventures of Jesus.”
Scholars consider it to be the first underground comic. The cover credit went to “F.S.” because Frank Stack was now teaching at the University of Missouri, where demeaning Jesus, especially in comic-book form, probably wouldn’t have looked great on a curriculum vitae.
“I’ve always loved to see my stuff in print, but I was on the horns of a dilemma,” he wrote. “Did I dare to publish the cartoons under my own name when my job was at risk if the university ever noticed that I worked in the most disgraceful of all media — the awful COMIC BOOK?”
Instead, he created the ridiculous-sounding pen name Foolbert Sturgeon, which reminded him vaguely of Gilbert Shelton. Rising through the ranks of academia, he continued publishing Jesus strips.
“I kind of liked the anonymity of it — there wasn’t anything respectable about it, so you didn’t have to be careful about what you said,” he told The Comics Journal in 1996. “And of course, as a university professor, and as a painter, and as an ‘authority’ — as a role model — you do have to be careful about what you say.”
Frank Huntington Stack was born on Oct. 31, 1937, in Houston. His father, Maurice Stack, was an oil field supply salesman, and his mother, Norma Rose (Huntington) Stack, was a teacher.
Growing up, he drew constantly — on scraps of paper, the backs of envelopes, anything he could get his hands on. He loved newspaper comic strips, especially “Tarzan,” “Prince Valiant,” “Alley Oop” and “Krazy Kat.”
During high school, he visited an aunt who lived in Austin and worked at the University of Texas. There, he came across copies of Texas Ranger and decided to apply to the school, majoring in journalism before switching to fine arts. After he joined the humor magazine, one of the first artists he published was his classmate Mr. Shelton.
“He had something unusual at the time — an appreciation for things that made people laugh,” Mr. Shelton said in an interview.
Mr. Stack’s other books as Foolbert Sturgeon include “Dorman’s Doggie” (1979), about his dog, Pingy-Poo, and “Amazon Comics” (1972), an indecent retelling of Greek myths. He dropped the pen name in the late 1980s when he began collaborating with the underground comics writer Harvey Pekar on his “American Splendor” series.
In 1994, Mr. Stack illustrated “Our Cancer Year,” an autobiographical graphic novel by Mr. Pekar and his wife, Joyce Brabner, recounting Mr. Pekar’s battle with lymphoma.
The “narrative is by turns amusing, frightening, moving and quietly entertaining,” Publisher’s Weekly said in its review. “Stack’s brisk and elegantly gestural black-and-white drawings wonderfully delineate this captivating story of love, community, recuperation and international friendship.”
Mr. Stack married Mildred Powell in 1959. She died in 1998.
In addition to their daughter, he is survived by their son, Robert; six grandchildren; and his brother, Stephen.
Writing in “The New Adventures of Jesus,” Mr. Stack reflected on spending so many years as Foolbert Sturgeon.
“If I’d stuck by my guns maybe I’d be out of a job, disinherited, back in New York (not Texas, for sure) and dead by now,” he wrote. “But I ain’t apologizing. Who would I apologize to? God and Jesus? Why would they care?”
-
Mississippi30 seconds agoAlyssa Faircloth’s no-hitter is Mississippi State’s first in NCAA softball tournament
-
Missouri6 minutes ago
Missouri Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 winning numbers for May 16, 2026
-
Montana12 minutes ago
Montana Lottery Powerball, Lotto America results for May 16, 2026
-
Nebraska19 minutes agoNebraska heads to Big Ten Baseball Tournament as No. 2 seed
-
Nevada25 minutes agoCommunities In Schools of Nevada hires new CEO, state director
-
New Hampshire30 minutes ago
Advocates say there is ‘no substitute’ for research at Bartlett Experimental Forest
-
New Jersey36 minutes agoWorld to run low on oil by 1980s: From the Asbury Park Press archives
-
New Mexico42 minutes agoTed Maher, convicted in billionaire’s arson death in Monaco, reinvents himself & orders hit on estranged wife