Connect with us

Culture

Are the FedEx Cup playoffs ‘silly’? Yeah, but Scottie Scheffler knows why

Published

on

Are the FedEx Cup playoffs ‘silly’? Yeah, but Scottie Scheffler knows why

Two weeks ago, Scottie Scheffler, the No. 1 player in the world and the current leader of the PGA Tour’s FedEx Cup playoffs, called the premise of the entire competition “silly.”

“You can’t call it a season-long race and have it come down to one tournament,” Scheffler said in Memphis, Tenn. “Hypothetically, we get to East Lake and my neck flares up and it doesn’t heal the way it did at The Players, I finish 30th in the FedEx Cup because I had to withdraw from the last tournament? Is that really the season-long race? No. It is what it is.”

In Scheffler’s mind, the FedEx Cup playoffs instead identify “the guy that plays the best in these playoff events,” not the best player throughout the season. Take Keegan Bradley, the 50th and final player to make the BMW Championship, who then won in Denver on Sunday to shoot up to No. 4 in the standings. He’ll start this week’s tournament at 6-under-par, just four shots behind Scheffler. Bradley has a solid chance to win the $25 million bonus at the end of this week in Atlanta.

“I would use Keegan Bradley as a great example of what the playoffs are,” Scheffler said Tuesday. “You can have somebody who has had not their best year, and then all of a sudden he turns it into what could be his best year or one of his best years on tour.”

At its core, what Scheffler is describing is not a season-long competition. All reasonable points, right? Why are we calling this a season-long race if that’s just not what it is?

Advertisement

It’s more complicated than that. The bone that Scheffler is picking with the Tour Championship is exactly why the format was changed to the “starting strokes” model in 2019. In the tour’s eyes, by giving strokes to each player based on their place in the standings at the beginning of the Tour Championship, the FedEx Cup is balancing the responsibilities of being a season-long race and one that ends with one winner.

GO DEEPER

What is the Creator Classic? Inside the PGA Tour’s attempt to bring in YouTube golfers

The PGA Tour wanted the FedEx Cup to culminate with a single tournament and a single champion: The player who wins the Tour Championship also wins the FedEx Cup. It’s flashy. It’s (somewhat) easy to follow. The broadcast won’t need constant cuts to a dizzying graphic of the points system changing in real time. We can just watch a golf tournament that is simply just a golf tournament — but with $25 million on the line.

In its previous format, the Tour Championship effectively had two champions: the player who performed the best at East Lake, and the one who finished the points list on top. Most famously, this led to the scene in 2018 where fans swarmed Tiger Woods in the 18th fairway after he won the former, but Justin Rose won the latter.

Advertisement

Now, points freeze before the Tour Championship, and they turn into strokes: Scheffler is starting the week at 10 under, Xander Schauffele at 8 under, Hideki Matsuyama at 7 under, Bradley at 6 under and Ludvig Åberg at 5 under. Then Nos. 6-10 begin at 4 under. Nos. 11-15 are at 3 under; Nos. 16-20 at 2 under; No. 21-25 at 1 under and No. 26-30 at even par.


The FedEx sponsorship permeates the PGA Tour’s playoffs system. (Andy Lyons / Getty Images)

It’s still confusing. And Scheffler still isn’t into the whole thing. What does the FedEx Cup mean if it isn’t an accurate representation of what the PGA Tour calls it: a season-long race?

“I think we need a season-long race. I think the FedExCup has been really good for our tour and for the game. I think it’s something exciting to finish off the year,” Scheffler said. “Personally, I thought the old format, I didn’t have a ton of issues with. Personally, when I watched it I found it kind of interesting who was going to end up where, and I didn’t necessarily mind that the winner of the Tour Championship wasn’t the winner of the FedExCup. It provides a little less volatility, which is the negative.”

“In terms of the season-long race, I think, yeah, I would have deserved to win the season-long race with winning the amount of times I did and winning a playoff event, but at the end of the day then we get here and it would be like, well, the thing we worked all year to have a great finish on TV for is now over.”

Therein lies the problem: the importance of “the product.”

Advertisement

Scheffler gave a long, honest rant about the Tour Championship and FedEx Cup format Tuesday. Some of his answers were so long that Schauffele, next on the media schedule, had to wait his turn in the corner of the media tent for nearly 10 minutes, listening to Scheffler give his take. You can tell Scheffler has thought about this subject extensively. In doing so, the world No. 1 didn’t just identify the problem with the FedEx Cup playoffs. He pointed out exactly what is stalling the PGA Tour as an organization in general.

Scheffler’s recognition of why the Tour Championship doesn’t make sense — and his acceptance of that reason — is telling considering the state of the professional game. In the face of the LIV threat, the PGA Tour has been plagued with conflicting priorities tearing it in different directions. What do the players want? What do the fans want? What do the TV networks want? It doesn’t matter. None of it can happen without the sponsors — they keep the tour running, and they always win.

“Really, it comes down to the guys putting up the money for us to play with,” Scheffler said. “At the end of the day, we have sponsors for our tournaments, and they’re going to want it a certain way, and if FedEx putting up the kind of money they’re putting up at this event, we’re going to have to play it the way they want to play it. It’s just as simple as that.”

So despite sharing his opinion in recent weeks, Scheffler concluded his news conference by saying that going forward, he isn’t interested in sharing his opinion on this subject, at least in the public eye.

“All I can do is show up and compete and give my input where it’s necessary,” Scheffler said. “Sometimes sitting up here giving my input can get blown out of proportion.”

Advertisement

Scheffler knows where he can be valuable, and he knows where he can’t. That’s just where we are right now with the PGA Tour. And that says something.

(Top photo: Christian Petersen / Getty Images)

Culture

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Published

on

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights thrillers first published as novels (or graphic novels) that were adapted into popular films. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading

Culture

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Published

on

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about books, authors and literary culture. In honor of Gen. George Washington’s birthday on Feb. 22, this week’s super-size challenge is focused on the literature and history related to the American Revolution. In the 10 multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to exhibits, books and other materials related to this intense chapter in the country’s story, including an award-winning biography of the general and first U.S. president.

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Published

on

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Let’s play romance roulette. No genre has dominated the books world in the last few years. Like romance, it accounts for the biggest percentage of book sales, their avid fan bases. Everyone has been talking about romance as a Book Review editor and as a fan of the genre myself, I put together a to z glossary of 101 terms that you should know if you want to understand the world of romance are cinnamon roll. You may think a cinnamon roll is a delicious breakfast treat, but in a romance novel, this refers to a typically male character who is so sweet and tender and precious that you just want to protect him and his beautiful heart from the world. Ooh, a rake. This is basically the Playboy of historical romance. He defies societal rules. He drinks, he gambles. He’s out on the town all night and is a very prolific lover with a bit of a reputation as a ladies’ man. FEI these are super strong, super sexy, super powerful, immortal, fairy like creatures. One of my favorite discoveries in terms that I learned was stern brunch daddy. A lot of daddy’s usually a male love interest who seems very intimidating and alpha, but then turns out to be a total softie who just wants to make his love interest brunch. I think there’s a misconception that because these books can follow these typical patterns, that they can be predictable and boring. But I think what makes a really great romance novel is the way that these writers use the tropes in interesting ways, or subvert them. If you can think of it, there’s probably a romance novel about it. Oops, there’s only one bed. This is one of my personal favorite tropes is a twist on forced proximity. Characters find themselves in very close quarters, where inevitably sparks start to fly. Why choose is the porkulus dose of the romance world. Sometimes the best way to resolve a love triangle is by turning it into a circle, where everyone is invited to play. Oops, we lost one spice level. There’s a really wide spectrum. You can range from really low heat or no spice, what might also be called kisses. Only then you start to get into what we call closed door or fade to Black. These books go right up to the moment of intimacy, and then you get into what we call open door, which is more explicit. And sometimes these can get very high heat or spicy and even start verging into kink. There’s one thing that almost every romance novel has in common. It’s that no matter what the characters get up to in the end, it ends with a happily ever after. I say almost every romance novel. Sometimes you’re just happy for now.

Continue Reading

Trending