Connect with us

Crypto

US Senators Demand SEC Halt Crypto ETP Approvals Due to Disclosure Concerns

Published

on

US Senators Demand SEC Halt Crypto ETP Approvals Due to Disclosure Concerns

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing
pressure from Democratic senators to halt the approval of new cryptocurrency
exchange-traded products (ETPs), citing concerns over risks to retail
investors.

According to a letter written to the regulator on
March 11, Senators Jack Reed and Laphonza Butler emphasize the dangers posed by
inadequate disclosures by brokers and insufficient liquidity in major
cryptocurrencies.

The senators mentioned: “We write to urge the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to take steps to protect investors
following its recent approval of the listing and trading of certain spot
Bitcoin exchange-traded products (ETPs).”

“The SEC’s approvals have provided a green light
for Wall Street to sell volatile cryptocurrency investments to ordinary
Americans through their brokerage and retirement accounts.”

Senators Reed and Butler highlighted findings from a
survey by FINRA revealing that 70% of brokers’ communications with retail
investors violated fair disclosure rules.

Specifically, the legislators expressed alarm over
brokers falsely equating cryptocurrency with cash and providing misleading
explanations of cryptocurrency risks. Such deficiencies raise concerns about
incomplete and deceptive information regarding Bitcoin ETPs.

Risk Factors

The senators argue that labeling spot Bitcoin ETFs as such obscures important characteristics,
potentially misleading retail investors. They stressed the need for investors
to understand the differences between ETPs and traditional funds.

Additionally, Reed and Butler expressed skepticism
about the integrity of cryptocurrencies , particularly highlighting Bitcoin’s
vulnerabilities and susceptibility to fraudulent schemes. They warned of the risks retail investors could face
from ETPs linked to cryptocurrencies, especially those prone to price
manipulation.

Advertisement

In January, the SEC approved 11 spot Bitcoin ETFs.
This approval happened after years of anticipation and rejections, signaling a
significant shift in how investors can access and engage with cryptocurrencies
on traditional financial platforms.

The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs simplifies retail
investors’ access to cryptocurrencies, enabling them to trade crypto through
their brokerage accounts. This eliminates the need for separate crypto exchanges
and mitigates risks associated with direct holdings, such as security breaches
and fraud.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing
pressure from Democratic senators to halt the approval of new cryptocurrency
exchange-traded products (ETPs), citing concerns over risks to retail
investors.

According to a letter written to the regulator on
March 11, Senators Jack Reed and Laphonza Butler emphasize the dangers posed by
inadequate disclosures by brokers and insufficient liquidity in major
cryptocurrencies.

The senators mentioned: “We write to urge the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to take steps to protect investors
following its recent approval of the listing and trading of certain spot
Bitcoin exchange-traded products (ETPs).”

Advertisement

“The SEC’s approvals have provided a green light
for Wall Street to sell volatile cryptocurrency investments to ordinary
Americans through their brokerage and retirement accounts.”

Senators Reed and Butler highlighted findings from a
survey by FINRA revealing that 70% of brokers’ communications with retail
investors violated fair disclosure rules.

Specifically, the legislators expressed alarm over
brokers falsely equating cryptocurrency with cash and providing misleading
explanations of cryptocurrency risks. Such deficiencies raise concerns about
incomplete and deceptive information regarding Bitcoin ETPs.

Advertisement

Risk Factors

The senators argue that labeling spot Bitcoin ETFs as such obscures important characteristics,
potentially misleading retail investors. They stressed the need for investors
to understand the differences between ETPs and traditional funds.

Additionally, Reed and Butler expressed skepticism
about the integrity of cryptocurrencies , particularly highlighting Bitcoin’s
vulnerabilities and susceptibility to fraudulent schemes. They warned of the risks retail investors could face
from ETPs linked to cryptocurrencies, especially those prone to price
manipulation.

In January, the SEC approved 11 spot Bitcoin ETFs.
This approval happened after years of anticipation and rejections, signaling a
significant shift in how investors can access and engage with cryptocurrencies
on traditional financial platforms.

The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs simplifies retail
investors’ access to cryptocurrencies, enabling them to trade crypto through
their brokerage accounts. This eliminates the need for separate crypto exchanges
and mitigates risks associated with direct holdings, such as security breaches
and fraud.

Advertisement

Crypto

Exclusive: White House set to meet with banks, crypto companies to broker legislation compromise

Published

on

Exclusive: White House set to meet with banks, crypto companies to broker legislation compromise

Jan 28 (Reuters) – The White House on Monday will meet with executives from the banking and cryptocurrency industries to discuss a path forward for landmark crypto legislation which has stalled due to ​a clash between the two powerful sectors, said three industry sources.

The summit hosted by the White House’s crypto council ‌will include executives from several trade groups. It will focus on how the bill treats interest and other rewards crypto firms can dish out on customer holdings of dollar-pegged tokens known as stablecoins, the people said.

Sign up here.

The White House meeting could help the industries, which have been fighting head-to-head over the bill, reach a compromise, and underscores how keen President Donald Trump’s administration is to get the legislation across the line. Trump courted crypto ‌cash on the campaign trail, promising to promote the adoption of crypto assets.

Reuters was first to report ​the meeting.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The sources declined to be identified discussing private policy discussions.

Advertisement
Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association which represents crypto giants including Coinbase (COIN.O), opens new tab, Ripple and Kraken, said in a statement the group ‍is “proud to participate in next week’s meeting.”

“We look forward to continuing to work with policymakers across the aisle so Congress can advance lasting market structure legislation and ensure the United States remains the crypto capital of the world,” she said.

Cody Carbone, CEO of The Digital Chamber, another major crypto trade group, credited ⁠the White House with “pulling all sides to the negotiating table.”

The Senate has for months been working on the bill, dubbed the Clarity ‍Act, which aims to create federal rules for digital assets, the culmination of years of crypto industry lobbying. Crypto companies have long argued that existing ‌rules are ‌inadequate for digital assets, and that legislation is essential for companies to continue to operate with legal certainty in the U.S.

The House of Representatives passed its version of the bill in July.

The Senate Banking Committee was scheduled earlier this month to debate and vote on the bill, but the meeting was postponed at the last minute, in part due to concerns among lawmakers and both industries over the interest ⁠issue.

Advertisement
There were also disagreements among Republicans ⁠about the bill’s stablecoin provisions, ​according to two other people with knowledge of the discussions, and senators leading the effort bill were concerned that it would not get enough votes to advance.

Crypto companies say providing rewards such as interest is crucial for recruiting new customers and that barring them from doing so would be anti-competitive. ‍Banks say the increased competition could result in insured lenders experiencing an exodus of deposits — the primary source of funding for ⁠most banks — potentially threatening ⁠financial stability.

A report from Standard Chartered on Tuesday estimated that stablecoins could pull around $500 billion in deposits out of U.S. banks by the end of 2028.
The provision at issue stems from ​a law passed last year which created a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, potentially paving ‍the way for greater stablecoin adoption.

That bill prohibited stablecoin issuers from paying interest ‌on ‌cryptocurrencies, but banks say it left open a loophole that would allow for third parties – such ​as crypto exchanges – to pay yield on tokens, creating new competition for deposits.

Reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Continue Reading

Crypto

XRP Positions as Institutional Rail While RLUSD Enters Real-World Finance

Published

on

XRP Positions as Institutional Rail While RLUSD Enters Real-World Finance
XRP is cementing its role in live institutional payment infrastructure as Ripple’s RLUSD anchors regulated stablecoin settlement, signaling blockchain rails are now trusted, production-grade systems for global liquidity, cross-border payments, and high-value financial flows.
Continue Reading

Crypto

Crypto Crime Wave Fueled by Chinese-Language Money Laundering | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Crypto Crime Wave Fueled by Chinese-Language Money Laundering | PYMNTS.com

Cryptocurrency laundering was an $82 billion problem last year, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday (Jan. 27), citing data from blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis.

Chinese-language money laundering networks made up $16.1 billion of that total as they play an increasing role in crypto crime, the report said.

“These are groups that are growing exponentially,” Andrew Fierman, head of national security intelligence at Chainalysis, told Bloomberg, per the report. “We’re talking about growth of over 7,300 times faster than other illicit flows.”

Although China has outlawed crypto transactions, illegal activity continues as the government chiefly focuses on behavior that threatens capital controls or financial stability, according to the report.

The networks “have really embraced cryptocurrencies,” said Kathryn Westmore, a senior associate fellow at the Centre for Finance and Security at RUSI, per the report, adding that crypto provides “a way to launder the proceeds of cash-generating criminal activities, like drugs or fraud.”

Advertisement

The news followed a warning from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in August, which said Chinese money laundering networks are now among the most significant threats to the American financial system, helping fuel the operations of Mexico’s most powerful drug cartels.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

“The networks have become effective partners because they can move cash quickly, absorb losses and leverage demand from Chinese nationals seeking to bypass Beijing’s strict currency controls,” PYMNTS reported Aug. 29. “By pairing cartel dollars with Chinese demand for U.S. currency, these networks have created what FinCEN called a ‘mutualistic relationship’ that strengthens both sides.”

Meanwhile, Eric Jardine, head of research at Chainalysis, discussed last year’s record-setting levels of crypto crime with PYMNTS in an interview published Monday (Jan. 26). Around $154 billion flowed to illicit addresses, the most ever recorded, and there was a 160% increase in illicit volumes.

“But treating that number as evidence of runaway criminal adoption may miss the more consequential story,” PYMNTS wrote. “What changed in 2025 was not merely volume, but the identity of the actors, the scale at which they operated, and the implications this has for banks, regulators, and the future architecture of financial blockchain compliance.”

Advertisement

The true inflection came from “a shift in who’s doing what,” Jardine said, adding that in 2025, nation states, most notably Russia, began taking part “in earnest in the crypto ecosystem,” chiefly through sanctions evasion.

Unlike earlier state-linked activity, like North Korea’s hacking campaigns, this was not marginal behavior at the edges of the system, but “industrial-scale financial activity conducted in plain sight,” PYMNTS wrote.

Continue Reading

Trending