Crypto
How Much Bitcoin Makes You a Crypto Whale?
00Being classified as a crypto whale implies holding a substantial portion of a particular cryptocurrency
In the world of cryptocurrencies, the term “whale” refers to individuals or entities that hold a significant amount of a particular digital asset, exerting considerable influence over its market dynamics. While the exact threshold for being considered a crypto whale varies depending on the context and the specific cryptocurrency in question, there are certain general guidelines and criteria used to determine whale status within the crypto community.
Understanding Whale Status
Being classified as a crypto whale typically implies that an individual or entity holds a substantial portion of a particular cryptocurrency’s total supply. This significant holding not only grants the whale considerable influence over price movements and market sentiment but also underscores their potential impact on the broader crypto ecosystem.
Factors Determining Whale Status
The threshold for being classified as a crypto whale is not fixed and can vary significantly depending on various factors, including:
Total Supply of the Cryptocurrency: The total supply of a cryptocurrency plays a crucial role in determining the threshold for whale status. Holding a significant percentage of the total supply can qualify an individual or entity as a whale.
Market Capitalization: The market capitalization of a cryptocurrency reflects its total value in the market. Whales often hold a substantial portion of a cryptocurrency’s market cap, allowing them to exert influence over price movements and market dynamics.
Percentage of Circulating Supply: Whales typically hold a large percentage of a cryptocurrency’s circulating supply, giving them significant control over the available liquidity and trading volume.
Trading Volume and Liquidity: Whales often engage in large-volume trades and transactions, contributing to significant fluctuations in trading volume and liquidity within the cryptocurrency market.
Threshold for Whale Status
While there is no specific threshold for being classified as a crypto whale, individuals or entities holding a substantial percentage of a cryptocurrency’s total supply or market capitalization are often considered whales. In some cases, owning tens of thousands or even millions of dollars’ worth of a particular cryptocurrency can qualify an individual as a whale, depending on the cryptocurrency’s market dynamics and total supply.
Impact of Whales on the Crypto Market
Crypto whales wield significant influence over price movements and market sentiment, capable of triggering substantial fluctuations in the value of a particular cryptocurrency through large-volume trades and transactions. Their actions can create both opportunities and challenges for other market participants, influencing investor behavior and market trends.
In conclusion, the threshold for being classified as a crypto whale depends on various factors, including the total supply, market capitalization, and circulating supply of the cryptocurrency in question. While there is no fixed threshold for whale status, individuals or entities holding a significant percentage of a cryptocurrency’s total supply or market capitalization are often considered whales. Understanding the role and impact of whales in the crypto market is essential for navigating the dynamic and rapidly evolving landscape of digital assets.
Crypto
Crypto industry squeezed by falling trading volume, tougher regulations – The Korea Times
Bitcoin prices are displayed at the Bithumb Lounge in Seoul’s Gangnam District, March 4. Yonhap
The domestic cryptocurrency industry is grappling with mounting concerns over a market downturn as trading activity sharply weakens amid the ongoing stock market boom and as financial authorities move to tighten regulations, industry officials said Sunday.
According to data the Bank of Korea submitted to Rep. Cha Gyu-geun of the minor Rebuilding Korea Party, both domestic investors’ crypto holdings and transaction volumes have fallen by more than half over the past year.
The value of digital assets held by investors at the country’s five cryptocurrency exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Korbit, Coinone and Gopax — fell to 60.6 trillion won ($41.4 billion) at the end of February from 121.8 trillion won recorded at the end of January last year.
Average daily trading volume also fluctuated sharply during the period. After climbing to 17.1 trillion won in December last year, trading volume plunged to around 4.5 trillion won by the end of February this year.
“The sharp drop in domestic cryptocurrency holdings appears to have been driven by both capital flowing into the strong local stock market and declines in crypto prices,” Hong Sung-wook, an analyst at NH Investment & Securities, said.
At the same time, the industry is bracing for tighter regulations as financial authorities prepare to implement revised rules under the Act on Reporting and Use of Specified Financial Transaction Information in August to strengthen anti-money laundering oversight.
Under the law, financial institutions and virtual asset service providers are required to comply with obligations such as customer identity verification and suspicious transaction reporting to prevent illicit activities, including money laundering and terrorist financing.
Industry officials are particularly concerned about a proposed rule requiring cryptocurrency transactions exceeding 10 million won involving overseas exchanges or private wallets to be automatically classified as suspicious and reported to the Financial Intelligence Unit.
Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), which represents major domestic crypto exchanges, argued that the strengthened regulations could undermine market activity by placing excessive compliance burdens on the industry.
“Applying a blanket suspicious transaction reporting requirement to all crypto transfers above 10 million won fails to reflect the unique nature of digital assets,” DAXA said in its report. “In the United States, transactions involving overseas crypto exchanges or private wallets are not automatically subject to additional reporting requirements. Instead, reporting obligations arise only when transactions above $2,000 are accompanied by clear signs of suspicious activity.”
The alliance has submitted a comment letter to the Ministry of Government Legislation on behalf of virtual asset service providers, urging authorities to reconsider the proposed amendments amid concerns they could further weaken market activity.
A representation of virtual cryptocurrency bitcoin / Korea Times photo by Shim Hyun-chul
Debate over fairness is also intensifying over the government’s plan to introduce cryptocurrency taxation next year. The change would make cryptocurrency gains subject to a 22 percent tax, despite the removal of tax obligations for general equity investors following the repeal of the financial investment income tax in late 2024.
Park Soo-young of the main opposition People Power Party noted that authorities are currently capable of tracking transactions only at the country’s five won-based cryptocurrency exchanges.
“The policy could accelerate capital outflows to overseas trading platforms such as Binance,” he said.
Oh Moon-sung, an adjunct professor at Kyung Hee University’s Graduate School of Business, argued that many of the reasons cited for abolishing the financial investment income tax, including concerns over weakening market activity and insufficient tax infrastructure, are equally relevant to the digital asset market.
“Applying taxes exclusively to cryptocurrency investments while excluding stock investments conflicts with the constitutional principle of equal taxation,” Oh said.
He added that cryptocurrency taxation should be postponed until critical conditions are in place, such as establishing clear tax guidelines for emerging digital asset transactions and building an integrated reporting system connecting domestic exchanges with the National Tax Service.
Crypto
Lagarde Blocks Euro Stablecoin Push, Calls $300B Market a Stability Risk for ECB Policy
Key Takeaways
- ECB President Lagarde called euro-denominated stablecoins a financial stability risk on May 8, 2026.
- Lagarde mentioned that USDC depegged to $0.877 during SVB’s 2023 collapse, exposing $3.3 billion in Circle reserves.
- The ECB’s Pontes project launches in September 2026 to anchor DLT settlement in central bank money.
Lagarde Warns European Banks That Euro Stablecoins Could Narrow ECB Rate Channel
Lagarde delivered her remarks at the Banco de España Latam Economic Forum in Roda de Bará, Spain. The speech, titled “ Stablecoins and the future of money: separating functions from instruments,” came as the global stablecoin market has grown from under $10 billion six years ago to more than $300 billion today.
“The case for promoting euro-denominated stablecoins is far weaker than it appears,” Lagarde remarked.
The market remains heavily dollar-dominated, with nearly 98% of stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar. Tether and Circle control a massive share of that market. The U.S. GENIUS Act, currently advancing through Congress, explicitly frames stablecoin expansion as a tool to cement the dollar’s global dominance and sustain demand for U.S. Treasuries.
Lagarde acknowledged that euro stablecoins operating under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), which took effect in 2024, could generate additional demand for euro-area safe assets, compress sovereign yields, and extend the euro’s international reach. She did not dismiss those potential gains outright.
But she argued that two risks make the trade-off unfavorable. The first is financial stability. Stablecoins are private liabilities whose backing can come under sudden pressure during periods of stress. She highlighted that when Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsed in March 2023, Circle disclosed that $3.3 billion of USDC’s reserves were held there. During that window, Lagarde said, USDC briefly traded at $0.877, more than 12 cents below its $1 peg.
“These trade-offs outweigh the short-term gains in financing conditions and international reach that euro-denominated stablecoins might provide,” Lagarde stated during her speech.
The second concern is monetary policy transmission, she explained. In the euro area, banks remain the primary channel through which ECB interest rate decisions reach firms and households. If retail deposits migrate into non-bank stablecoins and return to banks as more expensive wholesale funding, that channel narrows. ECB research published in March 2026 (Working Paper No. 3199) found that large-scale deposit substitution would weaken bank lending and monetary policy pass-through, an effect the paper noted is more pronounced in bank-heavy economies like Europe than in the U.S.
Lagarde’s position puts her at odds with Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel, also an ECB Governing Council member. In a Feb. 16, 2026, keynote at the New Year’s Reception of AmCham Germany, Nagel expressed support for the instruments. “I also see merit in euro-denominated stablecoins, as they can be used for cross-border payments by individuals and firms at low cost,” Nagel explained.
The divergence reflects a broader internal debate within the Eurosystem over how to respond to dollar stablecoin dominance and the risk of what Lagarde called “digital dollarisation.”
Rather than match U.S. stablecoin policy, Lagarde pointed to the Eurosystem’s own infrastructure plans. The Pontes project, launching in September 2026, will link distributed ledger platforms to TARGET, the ECB’s existing settlement system, allowing DLT-based transactions to settle in central bank money. The Appia roadmap, published in March 2026, sets a path to a fully interoperable European tokenized financial ecosystem by 2028.
“Our task is not to replicate instruments developed elsewhere, but to build the foundations and the infrastructure that serve our own objectives, so that we can harness the benefits of innovation without importing the fragilities,” Lagarde said.
European banks and payment firms that have already begun preparing regulated euro stablecoin products under MiCAR may now face added scrutiny as the ECB signals it prefers central bank-anchored solutions over private alternatives.
Crypto
New Alabama law targets cryptocurrency kiosk scams
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WBRC) – Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed the Cryptocurrency Kiosk Fraud Prevention Act into law this week, putting rules and regulations on cryptocurrency ATMs.
In Hoover, community members have lost more than $800,000 to scammers luring them to crypto kiosks over the last five years. Many of these ATMs are found in places like gas stations or grocery stores.
“A lot of people who are victims of these scams they’re not stupid people. They’re people who are educated and have good jobs, and many times I have lived a very full life. They just fall victim because the scammers know what language to use,” said Capt. Daniel Lowe with the Hoover Police Department.
Under the Cryptocurrency Kiosk Fraud Prevention Act, transactions will be capped, fraud warnings displayed on machines and refund mechanisms set in place for confirmed fraud cases.
“Now that we have some parameters around these kiosks to hopefully prevent some of this fraud, especially the daily limits alone will at least lower the dollar amount that people can put into one of these at one time,” Lowe said.
The law also requires the kiosks to have a customer service line based in the United States. Anyone who violates it can face civil and criminal charges.
“It’s been a really prevalent problem, and we’re glad that our state is taking some steps to help get some parameters on this and hopefully keep our citizens’ money in their pockets because they’ve earned it,” Lowe said.
Police in Hoover do want to remind you that law enforcement would never ask anyone to pay a fine by using cryptocurrency. If someone gets a call asking them to do this, they should hang up and call police.
Get news alerts in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store or subscribe to our email newsletter here.
Copyright 2026 WBRC. All rights reserved.
-
World7 minutes agoTucker Carlson on ‘SNL’ Critiques the Met Gala and Slams the ‘Michael’ Movie for Ignoring ‘The Part When He Was a White Man’
-
News12 minutes agoHow Is Pope Leo Shaping the U.S. Church? Bishops.
-
Politics19 minutes agoAfter Virginia Redistricting Map Is Tossed, Democrats Search Desperately for a Response
-
Business25 minutes agoSales Are Up. Celebrities Are In. Is Gap Officially Back?
-
Science31 minutes agoWhat Is Body Dysmorphic Disorder?
-
Health37 minutes agoA 17¢ Supplement Is Changing Lives for Women Over 50—Here’s How
-
Culture49 minutes agoXia De-hong, 94, Dies; Persecuted in China, She Starred in Daughter’s Memoir
-
Lifestyle55 minutes agoA Monument to Chocolate Is Wrapped in Layers of Mexican History