Business
See How Much the U.S. Trades With China, Canada and Mexico

12% from Mexico. 56% from Canada. 32% from Others. –$89.1 bil. Cars $208.0 bil.
22% from Mexico. 17% from Canada. 1% from China. 61% from Others. –$55.6 bil. Computers $103.2 bil.
27% from Mexico. –$56.6 bil. Telephones $117.1 bil.
9% from Mexico. –$56.6 bil. Car parts and accessories $85.5 bil.
41% from Mexico. 13% from Canada. 11% from China. 35% from Others.
–$20.9 bil. Delivery trucks $43.5 bil.75% from Mexico. 15% from Canada. –$21.3 bil. Insulated wire $29.7 bil.
52% from Mexico. 3% from Canada. 11% from China. 34% from Others. –$11.8 bil. Refined petroleum $66.2 bil.
7% from Mexico. 19% from Canada. +$31.2 bil. Electric batteries $29.3 bil.
5% from Mexico. –$14.4 bil. Video displays $20.7 bil.
49% from Mexico.
–$15.5 bil. Seats $24.0 bil.34% from Mexico. 6% from Canada. 27% from China. 33% from Others. –$13.5 bil. Medical instruments $37.5 bil.
31% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 6% from China. 61% from Others. –$4.31 bil. Petroleum gas $14.3 bil. +$2.25 bil. Other toys $15.9 bil.
6% from Mexico. –$12.2 bil. Tractors $19.4 bil.
63% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. –$7.67 bil. Electrical transformers $26.8 bil.
21% from Mexico. 5% from Canada. 15% from China. 58% from Others.
–$7.04 bil. Video and card games $13.2 bil.2% from Mexico. –$8.89 bil. Electrical control boards $18.6 bil.
43% from Mexico. 8% from Canada. 7% from China. 42% from Others. –$7.37 bil. Air conditioners $13.9 bil.
49% from Mexico. 8% from Canada. 19% from China. 24% from Others. –$8.39 bil. Refrigerators $13.2 bil.
48% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 17% from China. 31% from Others. –$7.23 bil. Gold $15.1 bil.
15% from Mexico. 42% from Canada.
–$6.75 bil. Gas turbines $28.5 bil.7% from Mexico. 22% from Canada. 1% from China. 70% from Others. –$6.21 bil. Electric heaters $11.0 bil.
17% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 55% from China. 26% from Others. –$6.93 bil. Raw aluminium $11.6 bil. –$6.35 bil. Baked goods $10.3 bil.
23% from Mexico. 48% from Canada. –$5.54 bil. Valves $17.0 bil.
19% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 20% from China. 57% from Others. –$1.67 bil. Air pumps $14.4 bil.
23% from Mexico. 5% from Canada. 22% from China. 50% from Others.
–$3.19 bil. Microphones and headphones $12.2 bil.15% from Mexico. –$5.41 bil. Centrifuges $13.7 bil.
30% from Mexico. 9% from Canada. 11% from China. 50% from Others. –$1.14 bil. Spark-ignition engines $12.4 bil.
28% from Mexico. 23% from Canada. 2% from China. 47% from Others. –$0.17 bil. Plastic housewares $7.19 bil.
7% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 77% from China. 14% from Others. –$5.79 bil. Electric motors $12.9 bil.
32% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 14% from China. 52% from Others.
–$3.98 bil. Trailers and semi-trailers $6.82 bil.62% from Mexico. 12% from Canada. 16% from China. 10% from Others. –$1.81 bil. Light fixtures $8.88 bil.
20% from Mexico. 9% from Canada. 39% from China. 32% from Others. –$5.23 bil. Excavation machinery $11.8 bil.
17% from Mexico. 15% from Canada. 18% from China. 51% from Others. –$2.56 bil. Engine parts $11.2 bil.
34% from Mexico. 6% from Canada. 11% from China. 48% from Others. –$2.22 bil. Beer $6.87 bil.
83% from Mexico. 2% from Canada.
–$5.72 bil. Liquid pumps $12.7 bil.21% from Mexico. 8% from Canada. 16% from China. 55% from Others. –$1.57 bil. Plastic lids $8.56 bil.
18% from Mexico. 25% from Canada. 21% from China. 36% from Others. –$0.55 bil. Hard liquor $11.1 bil.
43% from Mexico. 5% from Canada. –$4.97 bil. Planes, helicopters and spacecrafts $13.6 bil. –$5.30 bil. Rapeseed oil $4.91 bil. –$4.71 bil. Metal mountings $8.16 bil.
14% from Mexico. 12% from Canada. 33% from China. 42% from Others. –$2.77 bil. Rubber tires $18.3 bil.
11% from Mexico. 9% from Canada. 5% from China. 75% from Others.
–$1.15 bil. Party decorations $4.89 bil.1% from Mexico. –$4.38 bil. Sports equipment $7.21 bil.
3% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 54% from China. 39% from Others. –$3.58 bil. Iron structures $8.19 bil.
22% from Mexico. 19% from Canada. 11% from China. 48% from Others. –$3.19 bil. Electrical lighting and signalling equipment $7.30 bil.
46% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 7% from China. 43% from Others. –$2.26 bil. Machines $12.7 bil.
9% from Mexico. 13% from Canada. 9% from China. 70% from Others.
–$0.16 bil. Integrated circuits $35.8 bil.5% from Mexico. +$14.5 bil. Other vegetables $4.25 bil.
70% from Mexico. 19% from Canada. –$3.02 bil. Silver $6.03 bil.
44% from Mexico. 16% from Canada. –$2.75 bil. Parts for spacecrafts and drones $14.8 bil.
9% from Mexico. 13% from Canada. 2% from China. 75% from Others. –$3.49 bil. Broadcasting equipment $11.6 bil.
6% from Mexico. 6% from Canada. 19% from China. 69% from Others.
–$1.62 bil. Motor-working tools $6.41 bil.18% from Mexico. –$2.66 bil. Ethylene polymers $4.07 bil.
4% from Mexico. 82% from Canada. +$3.22 bil. Electricity $3.45 bil.
100% from Canada. –$2.26 bil. Rubber footwear $5.86 bil. –$3.32 bil. Tropical fruits $4.73 bil.
70% from Mexico. –$3.00 bil. Leather footwear $11.2 bil.
6% from Mexico.
–$3.05 bil. Transmissions $10.6 bil.9% from Mexico. 8% from Canada. 13% from China. 70% from Others. +$1.05 bil. Tomatoes $3.16 bil.
86% from Mexico. 13% from Canada. 1% from Others. –$2.82 bil. Other heating machinery $7.36 bil.
17% from Mexico. 12% from Canada. 13% from China. 59% from Others. –$0.97 bil. Trunks and cases $11.2 bil.
2% from Mexico. –$2.46 bil. Lifting machinery $7.41 bil.
16% from Mexico. 18% from Canada. 5% from China. 61% from Others.
–$1.51 bil. Orthopedic appliances $18.0 bil.10% from Mexico. –$0.29 bil. Therapeutic appliances $5.62 bil.
14% from Mexico. 3% from Canada. 33% from China. 50% from Others. –$2.08 bil. Iron stovetops $3.37 bil.
19% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 57% from China. 19% from Others. –$2.55 bil. Raw plastic sheeting $5.63 bil.
13% from Mexico. 29% from Canada. 6% from China. 52% from Others. +$0.66 bil. Mattresses $4.25 bil.
14% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 47% from China. 37% from Others.
–$2.37 bil. Textile footwear $7.25 bil. –$2.54 bil. Knit sweaters $12.9 bil.2% from Mexico. –$2.27 bil. Chocolate $3.96 bil.
15% from Mexico. 50% from Canada. –$1.56 bil. Iron housewares $3.24 bil.
1% from Mexico. –$2.49 bil. Industrial printers $13.2 bil.
5% from Mexico. –$0.58 bil. Live bovine animals $2.45 bil.
46% from Mexico. 54% from Canada.
–$2.08 bil. Fork-lifts $6.88 bil.13% from Mexico. 10% from Canada. 11% from China. 66% from Others. –$0.61 bil. Non-knit women’s suits $9.65 bil.
2% from Mexico. –$1.97 bil. Paper containers $3.15 bil.
15% from Mexico. 31% from Canada. 24% from China. 30% from Others. –$0.23 bil. Thermostats $4.39 bil.
31% from Mexico. 13% from Canada. 6% from China. 50% from Others. –$0.63 bil. Petroleum coke $2.66 bil. –$0.32 bil. Radio receivers $3.74 bil.
45% from Mexico.
–$1.46 bil. Plastic floor coverings $3.92 bil.2% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 49% from China. 46% from Others. –$1.93 bil. Padlocks $2.84 bil.
42% from Mexico. 10% from Canada. 21% from China. 27% from Others. –$1.51 bil. Particle board $2.18 bil. –$1.84 bil. Blank audio media $11.8 bil.
12% from Mexico. 1% from Canada. 4% from China. 83% from Others. +$2.15 bil. Electrical ignitions $4.31 bil.
35% from Mexico. –$0.77 bil. Coated flat-rolled iron $4.71 bil.
15% from Mexico. 27% from Canada. 2% from China. 57% from Others.
–$0.32 bil. Wood carpentry $3.04 bil.8% from Mexico. 54% from Canada. 6% from China. 33% from Others. –$1.56 bil. Electric filament $2.65 bil.
4% from Mexico. –$1.64 bil. Beauty products $6.68 bil.
4% from Mexico. 15% from Canada. 10% from China. 71% from Others. +$0.15 bil. House linens $5.59 bil.
2% from Mexico. –$1.82 bil. Confectionery sugar $3.15 bil.
37% from Mexico. 19% from Canada. 4% from China. 39% from Others.
–$1.45 bil. Crustaceans $6.96 bil.3% from Mexico. 24% from Canada. –$1.22 bil. Copper wire $2.47 bil.
6% from Mexico. 71% from Canada. –$0.42 bil. Navigation equipment $4.26 bil.
17% from Mexico. 7% from Canada. 20% from China. 56% from Others. –$0.98 bil. Scrap iron $2.23 bil.
16% from Mexico. 68% from Canada. –$0.67 bil. Non-knit men’s suits $7.95 bil.
12% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 10% from China. 76% from Others.
–$1.69 bil. Plastic pipes $3.41 bil.19% from Mexico. 21% from Canada. 14% from China. 46% from Others. +$0.26 bil. Combustion engines $6.16 bil.
28% from Mexico. +$3.32 bil. Plastic building materials $2.57 bil.
16% from Mexico. 34% from Canada. 19% from China. 32% from Others. –$1.27 bil. Harvesting machinery $4.24 bil.
13% from Mexico. 14% from Canada. 14% from China. 59% from Others. +$0.99 bil. Hot-rolled iron $2.70 bil.
11% from Mexico. 52% from Canada.
+$0.42 bil. Iron fasteners $6.34 bil.3% from Mexico. 6% from Canada. 17% from China. 74% from Others. +$1.40 bil. Metal molds $2.56 bil.
3% from Mexico. 46% from Canada. 16% from China. 36% from Others. –$0.91 bil. Audio alarms $3.42 bil.
25% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 19% from China. 52% from Others. –$0.94 bil. Liquid dispersing machines $3.14 bil.
16% from Mexico. 9% from Canada. 25% from China. 50% from Others. –$0.40 bil. Gas and liquid flow measuring instruments $3.94 bil.
23% from Mexico. 5% from Canada. 11% from China. 60% from Others.
+$0.12 bil. Semiconductor devices $26.1 bil.3% from Mexico. +$1.15 bil. Utility meters $1.84 bil.
77% from Mexico. 5% from Canada. 2% from China. 16% from Others. –$1.01 bil. Other vegetable residues $1.51 bil. –$1.47 bil. Vacuum cleaners $3.03 bil.
11% from Mexico. –$1.26 bil. Raw zinc $2.22 bil.
13% from Mexico. 52% from Canada. –$1.32 bil. Toilet paper $1.70 bil.
5% from Mexico. 44% from Canada. 36% from China. 14% from Others.
–$0.73 bil. Sanitary towels (pads) $1.66 bil.21% from Mexico. 49% from Canada. 15% from China. 15% from Others. –$0.73 bil. Flavored water $3.08 bil.
28% from Mexico. 16% from Canada. –$0.45 bil. Refined copper $6.80 bil.
2% from Mexico. 18% from Canada. +$0.10 bil. Radioactive chemicals $5.40 bil.
19% from Canada. 6% from China. 75% from Others. –$1.24 bil. Fish fillets $7.93 bil. –$0.98 bil. Brooms $1.78 bil.
7% from Mexico. 1% from Canada. 65% from China. 27% from Others.
–$1.05 bil. Cucumbers $1.32 bil.61% from Mexico. 38% from Canada. 1% from Others. –$1.25 bil. Aluminium structures $2.73 bil.
10% from Mexico. 28% from Canada. 10% from China. 52% from Others. –$1.02 bil. Knit socks and hosiery $2.20 bil.
2% from Mexico. –$1.20 bil. Vacuum flask $1.30 bil. –$1.17 bil. Electric motor parts $3.14 bil.
20% from Mexico. 7% from Canada. 13% from China. 59% from Others. –$0.56 bil. Blankets $1.54 bil. –$1.25 bil. Rubber pipes $2.26 bil.
40% from Mexico. 6% from Canada. 10% from China. 44% from Others.
–$0.55 bil. Motorcycles and cycles $4.14 bil.2% from Mexico. 4% from Canada. 25% from China. 70% from Others. –$0.95 bil. Shaped paper $1.78 bil.
14% from Mexico. 16% from Canada. 41% from China. 30% from Others. –$0.44 bil. LCDs $2.97 bil.
2% from Mexico. 20% from Canada. 19% from China. 58% from Others. –$0.66 bil. Uncoated paper $1.82 bil. –$0.94 bil. Revolution counters $1.74 bil.
67% from Mexico. 1% from Canada. 3% from China. 29% from Others. –$0.83 bil. Knit women’s suits $5.01 bil.
2% from Mexico.
–$1.05 bil. Textile processing machines $2.07 bil.53% from Mexico. –$1.01 bil. Iron pipes $4.98 bil.
12% from Mexico. 7% from Canada. 5% from China. 76% from Others. –$0.70 bil. Raw nickel $2.34 bil. –$1.05 bil. Bathroom ceramics $1.34 bil.
42% from Mexico. –$1.08 bil. Vaccines, blood, antisera, toxins and cultures $81.7 bil. +$7.38 bil. Cleaning products $1.88 bil.
34% from Mexico. 21% from Canada. 5% from China. 40% from Others. +$0.89 bil. Washing and bottling machines $5.67 bil. –$0.30 bil. Knitted hats $2.22 bil.
14% from Mexico.
–$0.95 bil. Sauces and seasonings $2.27 bil.19% from Mexico. 22% from Canada. 7% from China. 53% from Others. +$0.18 bil. Scrap aluminium $1.17 bil.
30% from Mexico. 61% from Canada. –$0.44 bil. Felt or coated fabric garments $2.16 bil.
9% from Mexico. 2% from Canada. 39% from China. 51% from Others. –$0.91 bil. Knit women’s undergarments $2.91 bil.
1% from Mexico. –$0.98 bil. Eyewear $2.64 bil.
2% from Mexico.
–$0.81 bil. Knit t-shirts $6.69 bil.7% from Mexico. –$0.42 bil. Brochures $1.98 bil.
7% from Mexico. 15% from Canada. 30% from China. 48% from Others. –$0.19 bil. Pig meat $1.35 bil.
10% from Mexico. 66% from Canada. 24% from Others. +$1.80 bil. Broadcasting accessories $2.47 bil.
15% from Mexico. 9% from Canada. 18% from China. 59% from Others. –$0.28 bil. Aluminium housewares $1.40 bil. –$0.95 bil. Recreational boats $3.48 bil.
20% from Mexico. 5% from Canada. 3% from China. 71% from Others.
–$0.09 bil.
Business
C.E.O.s Will Meet With Trump Amid Fears About Tariffs’ Fallout

Trump faces an increasingly tough crowd
President Trump won over Americans with a promise to return the country to “boom” times of low taxes and deregulation. Fifty days into office, he’s now pitching an economy in “a period of transition” for which he can’t rule out a recession.
His stay-patient message may get tested on Tuesday, when he is set to meet with members of the Business Roundtable, whose ranks include influential C.E.O.s — many of whose companies’ stocks have been hit hard by tariff-fueled market fears.
Stock futures are up a little on Tuesday — but still stung by Monday’s huge plunges. The S&P 500 is nearing a correction after falling roughly 2.7 percent, while the Nasdaq is performing even worse after another sharp drop.
Much of that is driven by worries about Trump’s economic policy, principally his on-again-off-again tariffs. The president is set to impose more levies as soon as Wednesday and has put companies and trading partners on notice that they won’t get exemptions.
Business leaders are getting increasingly worried. A new poll by Chief Executive magazine, conducted last week, found that C.E.O.s’ assessment of American business conditions was at its lowest level since Spring 2020. (It’s a stark contrast to far-rosier findings by a Conference Board survey last month.)
On Monday, Delta Air Lines cut its first-quarter sales forecast, blaming “the recent reduction in consumer and corporate confidence” driven by economic uncertainty. American Airlines this morning also warned of steeper losses as demand softens for leisure travel. And households are feeling gloomy about “their year-ahead financial situations,” the New York Fed’s monthly consumer survey found.
“Trump is off to a great start, so it’s disappointing to see his ‘dumb’ (as the WSJ said) tariff policy muddying the waters of where the U.S. and world economies are headed,” Don Ochsenreiter, the C.E.O. of Dollamur Sport Surfaces, told Chief Executive.
So far, Trump isn’t providing the clarity C.E.O.s want. In an interview with Maria Bartiromo of Fox News this weekend, he said that “we may go up with some tariffs. It depends. We may go up. I don’t think we’ll go down, or we may go up.”
He added that his levies strategy could take “a little time” to bear results.
How much time does he have? The “Trump bump” in the markets has become a “Trump slump” as fears grow that the trade war could reignite inflation and slow the economy.
Trump told reporters last week that he was “not even looking at the market,” suggesting that one of the most reliable checks on his behavior wasn’t working this time around. That could make Tuesday’s C.E.O. meeting a tough one for the corporate chiefs in the room.
HERE’S WHAT’S HAPPENING
Ukraine hits Moscow with a powerful drone attack ahead of truce talks. The bombardment, which the Russian authorities said had killed at least two and injured 18, appeared meant to remind Russia that Ukraine could still hit back despite reduced support from the United States. Delegations from Kyiv and Washington sat down in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to discuss a path to ending the war, after President Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky’s confrontation in the Oval Office last month.
Amazon Prime will stream “The Apprentice.” The decision to air seven seasons of President Trump’s former hit reality show — which premiered in 2004, supercharged his fame and helped vault him to the White House — underscores the tech giant’s efforts to get closer to the commander in chief. Trump, who was an executive producer of “The Apprentice,” is likely to receive royalties from the agreement. He plugged the deal on Truth Social.
Nissan replaces its C.E.O. after failed deal talks with Honda. Makoto Uchida, who has led the Japanese carmaker since 2019, will step down on April 1 and be succeeded by Ivan Espinosa, the company’s chief planning officer. Nissan has struggled with sluggish sales and earlier this year failed to strike a merger with Honda. Separately, The Times reports that Eric Schmidt, the former longtime C.E.O. of Google, has taken on his first chief executive role since leaving the tech giant: at Relativity Space, an upstart rocket company.
Tough questions confront key Musk businesses
Coming into 2025, Elon Musk appeared to be riding high given his growing political clout and the soaring fortunes of Tesla and his other businesses.
Now Tesla’s stock has tumbled below its pre-Election Day levels, having plunged 15 percent on Monday alone in its worst drop in half a decade. Companies like SpaceX and others have faced their own struggles. And speculation has grown about potential limits to his political reach.
While Musk conceded to Fox Business Network’s Larry Kudlow that he’s handling this “with great difficulty,” he professed that he was still feeling optimistic. But these recent challenges raise questions about some of the tech mogul’s companies, including Tesla and SpaceX.
Yes, Musk has had a tough several days. Among the most recent developments were the slide in Tesla shares (which Reid Hoffman, the Democratic billionaire tech mogul, poked fun at); the explosion of another of SpaceX’s Starships during a test flight; and an outage at X that Musk attributed to Ukraine, a target of his criticism.
Musk continues to draw support from President Trump, even after the tech mogul clashed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a recent Cabinet meeting. “To Republicans, Conservatives, and all great Americans, Elon Musk is ‘putting it on the line’ in order to help our Nation, and he is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!” the president wrote on Truth Social overnight. He added, “I’m going to buy a brand new Tesla tomorrow morning as a show of confidence and support.”
Musk also appeared to be committed to his government cost-cutting work. He told Kudlow that the Department of Government Efficiency worked “in consultation” with Cabinet secretaries, and that he planned to double the group’s staff to 200. (That’s despite the Trump administration saying the billionaire isn’t in charge.) The entrepreneur added that he planned to stay on for at least another year.
But the run of bad news at Tesla and SpaceX is raising concerns. Tesla’s dropping stock price is likely to amplify calls by some shareholders that Musk spend less time focusing on Washington and more on the carmaker.
And SpaceX’s latest failed test flight, which produced a shower of debris that delayed flights around Florida and the Caribbean, has spurred questions about potential delays in the rocket giant’s development process — and whether it faces growing political liabilities.
Big Law comes to a Delaware overhaul’s defense
As Delaware lawmakers prepare to hold hearings tomorrow about a bill that could reshape corporate America, some of the biggest corporate law firms are coming out in favor of it, DealBook’s Lauren Hirsch is first to report.
Today, 21 corporate law firms — including Simpson Thacher and Bartlett; Cravath, Swaine & Moore; and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison — will publish a letter strongly supporting legislation that would override a series of decisions by the Delaware Court of Chancery. These rulings have sparked backlash from companies and led many, including Meta, to contemplate moving their incorporation outside of the state.
The letter’s argument: The bill is “an important step in maintaining Delaware’s status as the jurisdiction of choice for sophisticated clients when they create companies,” the law firms write.
Some background: Delaware has been ensnared in controversy after several rulings, including Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick’s decision last year to nullify a big payout for Elon Musk at Tesla. While Musk’s ire over that decision brought attention to the chancery court, many corporate lawyers say they’re more broadly frustrated with the court’s treatment of companies with controlling shareholders, arguing that it has been overly deferential to noncontrolling shareholders.
Given how corporate America fuels Delaware’s budget, a group of Delaware state senators last month proposed a bill to amend the state constitution that would effectively override years of case law by the Delaware Court of Chancery. The group sidestepped the usual process for proposing bills, allowing it to move swiftly — but critics say that it also left out early input from key members of the influential Delaware bar.
The issue was a major topic at Tulane University’s Corporate Law Institute conference, a big gathering of deal makers held last week in New Orleans. “We are disempowering Delaware courts,” said Ned Weinberger of the plaintiffs’ law firm Labaton Keller Sucharow, arguing the amendment would erode the voice of minority shareholders.
Scott Barshay, a partner at Paul, Weiss and a top deal maker, said the amendment would help stop a corporate exodus from Delaware. “It’s very important that this legislation gets passed,” he said onstage.
The letter was born out of sideline conversations at the conference. It argues that, despite the relatively unusual intervention by the Delaware legislature, a response to corporate angst is not unprecedented.
“Over its long history at the epicenter of American corporate law, Delaware has repeatedly adjusted its approach in order to modernize and respond to market developments,” the lawyers write.
Who’s in — and who’s out: Other law firms that signed the letter include Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; and Weil, Gotshal & Manges.
Corporate law insiders will notice one major law firm that didn’t sign: Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, where Leo Strine Jr., a former chancellor of the Court of Chancery, is of counsel. (That said, Martin Lipton, one of the firm’s founders, wrote in support of the bill shortly after its release.)
At the conference, Strine allowed that more companies have become concerned about unpredictability in Delaware courts. Separately, David Katz, a senior M.&A. partner at Wachtell, said the bill wasn’t connected to Musk’s criticism of Delaware, a common critique of it.
THE SPEED READ
Deals
-
Redfin’s stock soared on Monday after Rocket Companies agreed to buy the property listing platform for $1.75 billion in stock. (Reuters)
-
Skydance accused a latecomer bidder for Paramount of fraud, asserting that the bidder was “hijacking” the regulatory approval process for its deal. (Deadline)
-
The law firm Paul Hastings recruited Eric Schiele, a top deal maker at Kirkland & Ellis, to help lead its M.&A. practice. (WSJ)
Politics, policy and regulation
Best of the rest
-
Ruth Marcus, an opinion columnist and editor at The Washington Post, said that she’s quitting after the newspaper’s publisher killed a column criticizing the new direction of its editorial page. (NYT)
-
“Hollywood Pivots to Programming for Trump’s America” (WSJ)
We’d like your feedback! Please email thoughts and suggestions to dealbook@nytimes.com.
Business
Asian Markets Slide as Global Sell-Off Continues

Fears over the future health of the global economy are continuing to rattle markets around the world, as President Trump’s resolute commitment to hold the line on tariffs fueled investor concerns about inflation and a pullback in consumer spending.
After the S&P 500 suffered its worst day of the year on Monday, the sell-off continued into Asia trading on Tuesday.
Asian markets opened mostly lower, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 index falling about 2 percent, weighed down by big declines in Japanese technology stocks. Stock markets in South Korea and Taiwan also fell more than 1 percent in midday trading.
Equity markets in China were faring slightly better. Shares in Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hong Kong ticked lower, down less than 1 percent in morning trading.
Investors have become increasingly cautious about the U.S. stock market in recent weeks as President Trump has flip-flopped on tariffs, causing confusion and uncertainty.
Growing unease about the inflationary effects of the tariffs, coupled with a broadly darkening mood about the economy, provided the catalyst for a sell-off in a market that investors have long worried was overvalued.
While current economic data has remained robust, surveys of consumers, business leaders and economists are growing pessimistic. Analysts at JPMorgan now say there is a 40 percent chance for a global recession.
The sell-off highlighted how carefully global markets are parsing the president’s public remarks about the economy.
Analysts pointed to Mr. Trump’s comments from an interview that aired on Sunday when he refused to rule out the possibility of a recession, stating that the economy is undergoing “a period of transition.” The Trump administration has offered little to assuage investors’ fears, continuing to drive a hard line on tariffs on the major U.S. trading partners Canada, Mexico and China.
In a research note on Tuesday, Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at Nomura Research Institute, said financial markets were caught off-guard by Mr. Trump’s “unwavering” commitment to push ahead with tariffs despite the economic pain that it might cause.
“Even if the tariffs lead to inflation and economic deterioration, President Trump is likely to place the blame squarely on former President Biden rather than acknowledge any shortcomings in his own economic policies,” Mr. Kiuchi wrote.
Technology stocks tumbled in the United States on Monday. Tesla shares plunged more than 15 percent, as investors assess falling sales and worry that the company’s chief executive, Elon Musk, has been distracted by his role in the Trump administration. Shares of Alphabet, Apple and Nvidia each fell more than 4 percent.
Technology shares also declined in Japan, with Sony, SoftBank, Hitachi and Fujitsu each falling more than 4 percent during trading early Tuesday morning. Other tech declines in Asia included the chip giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and the Apple supplier Foxconn in Taiwan, both down 2 percent.
Shares of the Japanese automakers Toyota Motor and Honda Motor, as well as the South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor, dipped slightly. Nissan Motor, which has struggled more than others with slumping sales and political headwinds, saw its stock price fall more than 4 percent on Tuesday.
Japanese and South Korean automakers are expected to be particularly damaged by a potential 25 percent tariff on foreign cars that Mr. Trump has indicated could take effect as soon as April 2.
In a note on Friday, Goldman Sachs said the stocks making up the main equity indexes in Taiwan, South Korea and Japan would be the most exposed in Asia if the Trump administration imposed a universal tariff on trading partners.
Bruce Pang, an adjunct associate professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong business school, said Chinese markets are moving out of step with the United States and other global counterparts. Chinese shares are getting a lift from the government’s ambitious target of around 5 percent growth and recent business-friendly comments about supporting the private sector and entrepreneurship from top leaders.
“These factors collectively help mitigate the headwinds arising from the Trump administration’s news flows,” he said.
In the year to date, shares of Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange have risen nearly 20 percent, compared with a 4 percent slide on the S&P 500.
Late on Monday, Delta Air Lines issued another warning signal about a worsening economy. The airline announced that it had cut its profit forecast for the first three months of the year, saying that rising economic worries among consumers was denting demand for air travel.
In a statement, Delta blamed the decline in demand on a “recent reduction in consumer and corporate confidence caused by increased macro uncertainty.”
Business
Commentary: A Social Security insider describes DOGE's rampage at the agency and the threat to your benefits

It started on Jan. 31, when someone named Mike Russo showed up at the Social Security Administration offices outside Baltimore and started introducing himself as a representative of DOGE, the federal budget-cutting service headed by Elon Musk.
Over subsequent days, he urged seniorSocial Security Administration officials to take the deferred resignation offer that had been sent out by DOGE under the heading “Fork in the Road.” The so-called Department of Government Efficiency set up its own internal team at the agency to ferret out information from its files. Social Security officials offered to brief the DOGE team about how the agency operates to ensure that payments are made accurately; they didn’t seem interested.
These details and others are drawn from an extraordinary declaration made in Maryland federal court by Tiffany Flick, who rose during her 30 years with the agency to become acting chief of staff to acting Commissioner Michelle King. Flick retired shortly after King was replaced as acting commissioner by Leland Dudek, formerly a mid-level agency employee, on Feb. 16.
If SSA’s…procedures are not followed…that could result in benefits payments not being paid out or delays in payments.
— Former Social Security official Tiffany Flick
Flick’s declaration includes an explicit warning that DOGE’s rampage through the Social Security Administration “could result in benefits payments not being paid out or delays in payments.”
Make no mistake: This would be catastrophic to millions of Americans and a politically toxic development.
The undermining of Social Security by the Trump administration has already begun. In a recent appearance on Joe Rogan’s webcast, Musk called the program “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time”; as I wrote, that demonstrated that he knows nothing about Social Security, and nothing about Ponzi schemes.
Trump has stated that he’s “not touching” Social Security, but in his March 4 address to Congress he claimed that Musk had uncovered vast fraud at the agency, though he didn’t back up that claim.
Trump officials have taken steps to cut Social Security employees by more than 10%, which would undermine the agency’s already overstretched ability to provide customer service to claimants and beneficiaries.
Most recently, the administration briefly canceled the right of Maine residents to register their newborns for Social Security numbers remotely at birth, requiring them instead to bring their infants to a Social Security field office to complete the necessary paperwork.
Following an uproar, that action was reversed within a day, but it raised suspicions that it was undertaken to punish Mainers for their Democratic governor’s public upbraiding of Trump at a Washington meeting.
Social Security has made payments earned by American workers, their survivors and dependents for 85 years, without a break. That record is fundamental to the program’s overwhelming popularity, the confidence it enjoys among its roughly 70 million current beneficiaries and its stature as the greatest safety net program in American history, keeping more than 22 million Americans out of poverty.
Flick’s declaration was filed as part of a lawsuit brought by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and other plaintiffs seeking to block DOGE’s access to the Social Security Administration and its data. I asked the Social Security Administration for comment on Flick’s assertions, but haven’t received a reply.
The declaration makes sickening reading. She describes how her agency was invaded by know-nothing DOGE employees who ran roughshod over agency rules and procedures designed to protect the confidentiality of private personal information about beneficiaries and their family members, as required by law.
Social Security master files that DOGE demanded and may have received access to include “information about anyone with a Social Security number, including names, names of spouses and dependents, work history, financial and banking information, immigration or citizenship status, and marital status,” Flick states.
The DOGE representatives were secretive about what they were doing at the agency, she writes. They appeared to be focused on “the general myth of supposed widespread Social Security fraud, rather than facts.” Their concerns fell into three categories: “untrue allegations regarding benefit payments to deceased people of advanced age;…single Social Security numbers receiving multiple benefits…; [and] payments made to people without a Social Security number.”
Each of those concerns, Flick writes, was “invalid” and “based on an inaccurate understanding of SSA’s data and programs.”
The assertion that payments are being made to people as old as 150 years, as I reported earlier, resulted from DOGE’s misunderstanding of the agency’s software; nevertheless it was bandied about by Musk at a White House press briefing and repeated in exaggerated form by Trump in his March 4 speech.
As for multiple benefits being paid on single Social Security numbers, that’s normal: “DOGE seemed to misunderstand the fact that benefits payments to spouses and dependents will be based on the Social Security number of a single worker,” Flick explains.
And she states that SSA officials have never seen evidence that benefits are inappropriately being paid to people without a Social Security number. DOGE didn’t give agency officials “enough information to understand the source of the concern.”
Officials who tried to block them were sidelined. As Flick describes the incursion, Dudek informed her on Jan. 30 that Russo and another DOGE representative would shortly be arriving at the agency.
Because Dudek was a mid-level employee, Flick asked why he was in contact with anyone at DOGE. She told him to cease any such contact, and informed him that all further contact with DOGE would be handled by the office of acting Commissioner King.
Over the next week or two, King’s office was peppered with demands from DOGE that a software engineer, Akash Bobba, be given access to SSA data.
“That request was unprecedented,” Flick says, not only in its nature but its haste. Ultimately, Bobba was given “read-only” access to limited SSA data. Flick soon determined that Bobba was not working in a secure location, as was required under agency rules, but off-site at the Office of Personnel Management, a separate executive branch agency.
She says it appeared that other, non-SSA people were working with him and may have had access to the protected personal information. Of greater concern, although Bobba had “read-only” access to the data, meaning that he couldn’t change it, he had the ability to “copy and paste, export, and screenshot that data.”
In any case, Russo demanded that Bobba have access to “everything, including source code,” Flick declares. “Generally, we would not provide full access [to] all data systems even to our most skilled and highly trained experts.” The request to give Bobba unfettered access to the data “without justifying the ‘need to know’ this information was contrary to SSA’s long-standing privacy protection policies and regulations,” but no one would explain why its access was needed.
Dudek was placed on administrative leave on Feb. 14 and an investigation was opened into whether he had inappropriate contact with DOGE. Two days later, President Trump named Dudek acting commissioner.
-
Politics7 days ago
EXCLUSIVE: Elon Musk PAC thanks Trump for 'saving the American Dream' in new million-dollar ad
-
Politics4 days ago
Agriculture secretary cancels $600K grant for study on menstrual cycles in transgender men
-
Politics3 days ago
Republicans demand Trump cut American legal association out of nominee process
-
News3 days ago
Gene Hackman Lost His Wife and Caregiver, and Spent 7 Days Alone
-
News3 days ago
States sue Trump administration over mass firings of federal employees
-
News4 days ago
Trump Seeks to Bar Student Loan Relief to Workers Aiding Migrants and Trans Kids
-
Movie Reviews5 days ago
‘Black Bag’ Review: Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender Cozy Up in Steven Soderbergh’s Snazzy Spy Thriller
-
News6 days ago
Who Paid for Trump’s Transition to Power? The Donors Are Still Unknown.