Connect with us

Entertainment

Don’t call her first Oscar nod in 25 years a comeback. Kate Hudson never left

Published

on

Don’t call her first Oscar nod in 25 years a comeback. Kate Hudson never left

What does one do on the morning of the Academy Award nominations? Wake up early? Try to sleep in? Wait for your publicist to call?

Having returned home late from a friend’s dinner the night before, Kate Hudson debated the best course of action ahead of last month’s nominations — before deciding she needed to wake up and hear the news either way.

“It’s been such a ride,” she says. “I wanted to be able to go back to sleep knowing that this part is over. Or I wanted to just wake up and celebrate and be tired. You prepare yourself for everything. But you just feel completely unprepared for when your name is called.”

Hudson’s lead actress Oscar nomination for her turn as Claire Sardina in “Song Sung Blue” is the culmination of an incredible awards season, in which she’s also been nominated for a Golden Globe, an Actor Award and a BAFTA. Based on a true story, the movie follows Claire and her husband, Mike (Hugh Jackman), who headlined the popular Milwaukee-based Neil Diamond cover band Lightning & Thunder in the 1980s and ’90s.

Hudson with Hugh Jackman in “Song Sung Blue.”

Advertisement

(Sarah Shatz / Focus Features)

The honor comes 25 years after Hudson received her first and only previous Oscar nod for playing Penny Lane in her breakthrough role in “Almost Famous.” And although she’s had a slew of successes in the interim — including the now-classic rom-com “How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days” and other hit movies; Netflix’s Lakers-inspired comedy series “Running Point,” currently in postproduction on its second season; and the popular podcast “Sibling Revelry,” which she hosts with brother Oliver Hudson — it can sometimes seem that we’ve underappreciated, and perhaps underestimated, Kate Hudson.

But for her, being recognized for “Song Sung Blue” isn’t some long-awaited vindication. As always, it’s about the work.

“When you’re acting, all you want to do are the things that stretch you, that are exciting,” she says. “You have these opportunities that come, and they don’t come very often, and so you get excited by that process. I don’t think you look from the outside in and say, ‘I always knew I could do this.’ It’s more, my drive is to continue doing this. It’s more, when you look into a horizon and you’re like, ‘Oh, that looks interesting. I wonder what that’s gonna be?’ versus, ‘I’m gonna do that and I’m gonna be good at that.’”

Advertisement
  • Share via

Advertisement

So the most rewarding part of the movie is not the possibility of adding trophies to her decor, but rather how complex and layered Claire is, who during the course of the movie survives a tragic accident. The role provided Hudson with “so many wonderful things to soak in and perform.”

“There was no one note,” she says of her onscreen alter ego. “There were 10. Everything mattered. The process was really extensive, which is something that I long to do all the time. But it doesn’t happen very often that you get to play so many different things in one movie. That’s our drug as an artist. It mattered that I got this right. There was a personal stake attached to it for me, which was not wanting to let Claire down and wanting to honor her life experience.”

Advertisement

While much of the industry has transformed in the 25 years between Hudson’s Oscar nominations, much has also stayed the same. “It hasn’t changed so drastically that it feels like it’s a different world,” she says. “The soul of our industry is very present. I was talking about this with Ethan Hawke [who is nominated for his turn in ‘Blue Moon’]. We’ve been having so much fun with this. We love it. And it’s nice when you’ve been doing it for so long and then you’re in the conversation and you still just love it and enjoy it.”

CENTURY CITY, CA, FEBRUARY 5, 2026: Kate Hudson is photographed at Creative Artists Agency in Century City on February 5, 2026. (Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
CENTURY CITY, CA, FEBRUARY 5, 2026: Kate Hudson is photographed at Creative Artists Agency in Century City on February 5, 2026. (Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
Kate Hudson

“I see where I had the opportunity and where that privilege comes from,” Hudson says of her Hollywood pedigree. “But I also don’t discount how much work needs to go into getting to where [I am]. It doesn’t just happen. It’s something you have to create.” (Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

Did she have a hint when filming “Song Sung Blue” that it could become a career-defining moment for her? “I don’t ever get that far outside of myself,” she says. “The goal is really just to make the best version of something that you love, and then walk away from it and hope that you’ve created something that ends up translating.”

“Song Sung Blue” also marked the first time, since becoming a mother, that she was able to leave her children for an extended period to film a movie. “I feel so lucky right now. My kids are a bit older and I can really get into my creative space,” she says, before adding with a laugh, “I don’t have any more strollers in my house. It’s a whole new world.”

Advertisement

As is her nature, Hudson talks openly and honestly about how being a mother has intertwined with her career. “Mothering doesn’t stop,” she says. “I remember being in a meeting with my dad. Within this meeting I had two phone calls, one from the school and one from someone else asking me a question about my kids. And I had to take these calls because I’m the epicenter. And my dad looked at me and he goes, ‘I don’t know what that’s like.’ I loved that he said that. He was so proud. And also like, ‘Wow, I wouldn’t know what that is, as a man.’”

Kate Hudson poses before a blue backdrop.

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

Being able to celebrate this moment with her family, including her parents Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell, is the “cherry on top” to the entire awards season for Hudson. There are not that many mother-daughter pairs who can both boast Oscar nods. “I honor that so deeply,” she says. “My mom’s 80 years old. She’s had a phenomenal career. She’s my No. 1 best friend in the world. Even though I’ve had a different type of career and we’re very different actresses, that’s my mommy and I learned from her first. So there’s something about being in the same industry and being able to celebrate each other in these moments that becomes even more meaningful because it’s understood differently.”

Hudson has never shied away from being the daughter of famous parents. “To pretend that’s not a huge part of my life would be dishonest,” she says. “It would be irresponsible to say that there isn’t an opportunity that comes from growing up in this town. The difference is if you take it for granted or if you honor it. I see where I had the opportunity and where that privilege comes from. But I also don’t discount how much work needs to go into getting to where [I am]. It doesn’t just happen. It’s something you have to create.”

She particularly credits her parents with the work ethic they instilled in her from a young age to have respect for the craft and the job. “You don’t just show up and think you’re gonna become an actor. You have to take it seriously. My dad always said put your head down and you just do the work. You just just keep plugging away.”

Advertisement

That perspective also helps her see this experience as having a bigger purpose than just her nomination. “It really feels special to be a part of the community this year that’s talking about the importance of celebrating cinema in the theater and how much we need to be saving this industry and nurturing it,” she says. “We have to protect it or else we lose the art form.”

After the hubbub abates, Hudson says the hardest part will be knowing that it will be time to say goodbye to the character and the movie. “It’s the saddest goodbye because you really love a character, and then that moment marks the real letting go of that experience,” she says. “It’s really like sending your kids to college. You’re like, well, now it just lives. It lives without me having to support it. That makes it really emotional. Win or lose, you know?”

The Envelope digital cover featuring Kate Hudson

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Ballet-themed erotic drama ‘Dreams’ dissipates in finale

Published

on

Movie review: Ballet-themed erotic drama ‘Dreams’ dissipates in finale

Mexican writer/director Michel Franco explores the dynamics of money, class and the border through the spiky, unsettling erotic drama “Dreams,” starring Jessica Chastain and Isaac Hernández, a Mexican ballet dancer and actor.

In the languidly paced “Dreams,” Franco presents two individuals in love (or lust?) who experiment with wielding the power at their fingertips against their lover, the violence either state or sexual in nature. The film examines the push-pull of attraction and rejection on a scope both intimate and global, finding the uneasy space where the two meet.

Chastain stars as Jennifer McCarthy, a wealthy San Francisco philanthropist and socialite who runs a foundation that supports a ballet school in Mexico City. But Franco does not center her experience, but that of Fernando (Hernández), whom we meet first, escaping from the back of a box truck filled with migrants crossing the U.S./Mexico border, abandoned in San Antonio on a 100-degree day.

His journey is one of extreme survival, but his destination is the lap of luxury, a modernist San Francisco mansion where he makes himself at home, and where he’s clearly been at home before. A talented ballet dancer who has already once been deported, he’s risked everything to be with his lover, Jennifer, though as a high-profile figure who works with her father and brother (Rupert Friend), she’d rather keep her affair with Fernando under wraps. He’s her dirty little secret, but he’s also a human being who refuses to be kept in the shadows.

As Jennifer and Fernando attempt to navigate what it looks like for them to be together, it seems that larger forces will shatter their connection. In reality, the only real danger is each other.

Advertisement

The storytelling logic of “Dreams” is predicated on watching these characters move through space, the way we watch dancers do. Franco offers some fascinating parallels to juxtapose the wildly varying experiences of Fernando and Jennifer — he enters the States in a box truck, almost dying of thirst and heat stroke; she arrives in Mexico on a private plane, but they both enter empty homes alone, melancholy. During a rift in their relationship, Fernando retreats to a motel while working at a bar, drinking red wine out of plastic cups with a friend in his humble room, ignoring Jennifer’s calls, while she eats alone in her darkened dining room, drinking red wine out of crystal.

These comparisons aren’t exactly nuanced, but they are stark, and for most of the film, Franco just asks us to watch them move together, and apart, in a strange, avoidant pas de deux. Often dwarfed by architecture, their distinctive bodies in space are more important than the sparse dialogue that only serves to fill in crucial gaps in storytelling.

Cinematographer Yves Cape captures it all in crisp, saturated images. The lack of musical score (beyond diegetic music in the ballet scenes) contributes to the dry, flat affect and tone, as these characters enact increasing cruelties — both emotional and physical — upon each other as a means of trying to contain their lover, until it escalates into something truly dark and disturbing.

Franco, frankly, loses the plot of “Dreams” in the third act. What is a rather staid drama about the weight of social expectations on a relationship becomes a dramatically unexpected game of vengeance as Jennifer and Fernando grasp at any power they have over the other. She fetishizes him and he returns the favor, violently.

Ultimately, Franco jettisons his characters for the sake of unearned plot twists that leave the viewer feeling only icky. These events aren’t illuminating, and feel instead like a bleak betrayal. The circumstances of the story might be “timely,” but “Dreams” doesn’t help us understand the situation better, leaving us in the dark about what we’re supposed to take away from this story of sex, violence, money and the state. Anything it suggests we already know.

Advertisement

‘Dreams’

(In English and Spanish with English subtitles)

1.5 stars (out of 4)

No MPA rating (some nudity, sex scenes, swearing, sexual violence)

Running time: 1:35

How to watch: In theaters Feb. 27

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Soho House sued after bartender alleges she was ‘drugged and raped’ by her supervisor

Published

on

Soho House sued after bartender alleges she was ‘drugged and raped’ by her supervisor

A bartender who worked at Soho House’s exclusive Soho Warehouse in downtown Los Angeles is alleging a supervisor at the posh membership club and hotel drugged and raped her, according to a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday.

The woman, who filed as Jane Doe, said in her complaint that she was “subjected to repeated sexual advances and unwelcomed physical touching” by one of her supervisors, Leonard Marcelo Vichique Maya, immediately after she began working as a bartender at Berenjak, the club’s restaurant, in September 2025.

Doe is suing Vichique Maya, Soho House, Soho House Los Angeles and Soho Warehouse for sexual harassment, retaliation and other claims..

“This is as egregious an instance of callous corporate indifference to workplace sexual violence that anyone can experience,” said her attorney Nick Yasman of Los Angeles-based West Coast Trial Lawyers in a statement.

Advertisement

Representatives for Soho House and Vichique Maya were not immediately available for comment.

Doe has further alleged that Vichique Maya made “numerous comments” about her appearance, propositioned her to be his “hook-up buddy” and told her that she “would be pregnant by now” had they met earlier, all within earshot of her supervisors and colleagues.

After two weeks on the job, Doe said that she reported Vichique Maya’s conduct to two male supervisors, including Soho House’s floor manager and food and beverage director, states the complaint, but “neither took any semblance of corrective or investigatory action.”

According to the suit, Doe claims that despite “his pattern of harassing behavior and complaints,” the company, did not address his alleged misconduct. ”

She claims his behavior escalated after a “team-bonding” work event on Sept. 13, where Doe said she became disoriented after drinking with supervisors and co-workers, eventually losing consciousness, and woke up naked in Vichique Maya’s apartment.

Advertisement

“Paralyzed and speechless despite her consciousness slowly returning, Plaintiff was condemned to simply watch in horror as [sic] MARCELO repeatedly raped her inanimate body,” states the suit.

The next day, Doe said that she reported to her floor manager that Vichique Maya had “sexually assaulted her.”

She said her general manager “confirmed” that he “appeared to be preying” on her during the work event, telling her that “These things happen between coworkers.”

When she proclaimed that she could no longer work with Vichique Maya,” she said the general manager dismissed her concerns telling her: “I have a restaurant to run; I can’t have it blow up on me.”

Despite informing three managers that she was “raped,” Doe said she was continuously scheduled to work shifts with Vichique Maya during which he repeatedly sexually harassed her.

Advertisement

In December, Doe filed a complaint with Soho House human resources, and she was assured that an investigation would be opened and “immediate corrective action” taken.

However, during the investigation, Doe said that she was placed on indefinite leave while Vichique Maya continued working. A month later, she was informed the company had completed its investigation and found her report of rape “was uncorroborated” and he “would not be disciplined.”

In February, the plaintiff said that she was forced to quit her job.

One of the first, exclusive members-only social clubs, Soho House debuted in London in 1995 and quickly became the bolt-hole of choice for celebrities and the deep-pocketed. It expanded globally with 48 houses in 19 countries.

It drew high-profile investors, including Ron Burkle through his investment fund Yucaipa.

Advertisement

In 2021, the company filed for an initial public offering on the New York Stock Exchange, but it has faced financial challenges. .

Last year, Soho House went private, selling itself to a group of investors including Apollo Global Management and actor Ashton Kutcher, who also joined its board of directors, at a $2.7-billion valuation.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

MOVIE REVIEWS: “Mercy,” “Return to Silent Hill,” “Sentimental Value” & “In Cold Light” – Valdosta Daily Times

Published

on

MOVIE REVIEWS: “Mercy,” “Return to Silent Hill,” “Sentimental Value” & “In Cold Light” – Valdosta Daily Times

“Mercy”

(Thriller/Crime: 1 hour, 39 minutes)

Starring: Chris Pratt, Rebecca Ferguson, Kali Reis

Director: Timur Bekmambetov

Rated: PG-13 (Violence, bloody images, strong language, drug content and teen smoking)

Movie Review:

Advertisement

“Mercy” is a science fiction movie based on one of the more common themes of moviedom lately, artificial intelligence (AI). This crime thriller cleverly creates an intriguing story using technology and the justice system, yet it fails to be consistently interesting and intelligent throughout. The conclusion is less significant than the initial setup, as the concluding scenes become typical action sequences.

Detective Chris Raven (Pratt) of the LA Police Department is a huge supporter of the city’s new judicial courtroom. Crimes are now judged by an AI program (Ferguson) in the Mercy Court. The court is run by an artificial program that makes decisions based on all of the evidence before it without any prejudice. Detective Raven is all for this system until he is convicted of killing his wife. Now he must use all of the data, including the AI‘s ability to tap into everyone’s electronic devices, security cameras, and even into government files, within reason, to prove he did not murder his wife.

Mercy is an interesting movie. It entertains throughout, even when the story gets sloppy and characters’ actions are irrational. This mainly occurs during the final scenes. The movie tries too hard to insert unneeded narrative twists. This is disappointing because the story is interesting. What makes it fascinating is that it happens in real time. This is the most brilliant facet.

All the other theatrics are unnecessary. Director Timur Bekmambetov (“Profile,” 2018; “Wanted,” 2008) and “Mercy’s” producers should have just kept the ending simple, no plot twists or superfluous action sequences.
Grade: C (This flick needs some mercy. Let the trial begin.)

“Return to Silent Hill”

(Horror: 1 hour, 46 minutes)

Advertisement

Starring: Jeremy Irvine, Hannah Emily Anderson and Robert Strange

Director: Christophe Gans

Rated: R (Bloody violent content, strong language and brief drug use.)

Movie Review:

“Return to Silent Hill” is about one man’s quest to return to the love of his life. The problem is she has moved on to the afterlife. Meanwhile, audiences lose part of their life watching this movie, which is unlike any of the two prequels in this series. This one is a psychological horror that bores.

Advertisement

Artist James Sunderland (Irvine) decides to return to Silent Hill, a place where many people died during a devastating illness that nearly enveloped the entirety of the city’s population. What is left there is a horror show of freakish creatures, all with violent intent. Still, Sunderland searches for the love of his life, Mary Crane (Anderson).

Think of this movie as a slow suicide, where a guy goes back to retrieve his dead girlfriend. To do so, he must travel to the modern land of the dead that Silent Hill has become. This one is a type of swan song by the main character, and the movie becomes less scary while lackluster romantic notions wander aimlessly.

Grade: D (Do not return to see this.)

“Sentimental Value”

(Drama: 2 hours, 13 minutes)

Starring: Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård, Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas and Elle Fanning

Advertisement

Director: Joachim Trier

Rated: R (Language, sexual reference, nudity and thematic elements)

Movie Review:

“Sentimental Value” is a Norwegian film that won the Grand Prix in France’s Cannes Film Festival and was nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Motion Picture. It is a solid drama filled with symbolism and family connections. It is brilliant performances by a talented cast under the direction of Joachim Trier (“The Worst Person in the World,” 2021).

This screenplay is about Gustav Borg (Skarsgård). He is a father, grandfather and a famed film director. He stayed away from his two daughters, actress Nora Borgwhile (Reinsve) and historian Agnes Borg Pettersen (Lilleaas), while he was creating works as a filmmaker. The director comes back into the lives of his daughters after the death of their mother. Their reunion leads to a rediscovery of their bond at their family home in Oslo.

Advertisement

Stellan Skarsgård is always a solid actor. He takes his roles and makes them tangible characters that seem like you know them, even when they’re speaking a foreign language. That is the quality of his act and why he gets nominated for multiple awards each season.

“Sentimental Value” is a valuable movie filled with enriching sentiment. It is an enjoyable film for those who value a good drama. The acting and original writing alone make the movie worth it. “Sentimental Value” starts in a very simple way, but everything in between, even when low-key, remains potent. Joachim Trier and writer Eskil Vogt have worked together on multiple projects such as “The Worst Person in the World” (2021). Their pairing is once again worthy.

Grade: A- (Any motive valuable movie.)

“In Cold Light ”

(Crime: 1 hour , 36 minutes)

Starring: Maika Monroe, Allan Hawco and Troy Kotsur

Advertisement

Director: Maxime Giroux

Rated: R (Violence, bloody images, strong language and drug material)

Movie Review:

“In Cold Light” sticks to a very straightforward story, primarily taking place over a short period. The problem is the story leaves one in the cold. Audiences have to guess what is being communicated because this movie uses American Sign Language (ASL) without subtitles. For those moviegoers who do not know ASL, they are left deciphering characters’ actions and facial expressions during some pivotal scenes.

Ava Bly (Monroe) attempts to start a legit life after prison. Her life changes when Ava’s twin, Tom Bly (Jesse Irving) is murdered while seated next to her. As her brother’s killers pursue her, Ava must evade law enforcement, which contains some crooked cops led by Bob Whyte (Hawco).

Advertisement

For a brief moment, this movie hits its exceptional moment when Oscar-recipient Helen Hunt enters the picture as a motherly Claire, a crime boss who seems more like a social worker/psychologist. Her long scene is wasted as it arrives too late.

French Canadian director Maxime Giroux’s style has potential in his first English-language film, but it does not fit a wayward narrative. A rarity, this crime drama has characters commit many dumb actions at once.

Moreover, Giroux (“Félix et Meira,” 2014) and writer Patrick Whistler forget to let their audiences in on their story. They allow much to get lost in translation, especially during heated conversations between Monroe’s Ava and her father, Will Bly, played by Academy Award-winning actor Troy Kotsur (“CODA,” 2021).

Grade: C- (Just cold and dark.)

More movie reviews online at www.valdostadailytimes.com.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending