OMAHA, Neb. (WOWT) – Figuring out ways to harness the power of artificial intelligence is being challenged by every industry. What works, what doesn’t and what’s ethical.

The Nebraska Supreme Court heard arguments in a divorce and custody case this month, but what the justices really wanted to know was: Did the attorney really write this?

It’s a big deal for attorneys arguing a case before the Nebraska Supreme Court. First up was an appeal of a divorce case from Omaha. But 37 seconds into the argument, the justices interrupted Omaha attorney Greg Lake.

“Before we get into that, I’d like to ask you about your brief,” a justice said.

“Of course,” Lake said.

“And your brief had a number of errors in it that were submitted. Can you explain to us how that occurred?” the justice asked.

“Absolutely, Your Honor. I was on my 10th wedding anniversary. While flying down there, my computer broke. And I uploaded the incorrect version of my brief,” Lake said.

Extensive errors discovered

The opposing attorney told the court that of the 63 references Lake made in his brief, 57 contained some form of defect.

“The brief that was submitted had misquotes from cases, fictitious cases, and misquotes from statutes. How were those all generated in your, I guess, the version that you did submit to us?” a justice asked.

“Sure. It was a draft. And when I… My writing process is when I’m drafting, I stick in things that I know wouldn’t pass muster,” Lake said.

“The elephant in the room is whether or not you used artificial intelligence. Did you?” the justice asked.

“No, I did not,” Lake said.

“With respect, if you didn’t use artificial intelligence, how do we end up with a citation to cases that don’t exist? I mean, it’s frankly a little hard to believe that’s just a citation error,” the justice said.

“Certainly, Your Honor. And again, like I said, I was… My computer was broken,” Lake said.

Client concerns

Jason Regan is the client whose divorce and custody arguments were essentially hijacked by the AI questions for four minutes, making him wonder if the merits of his case will even be considered.

“This was supposed to be where I felt my story would be heard,” Regan said.

“That’s why you go to a professional and pay big bucks for their expertise. I thought I was in safe hands,” Regan said.

Lake charges $375 an hour.

Expert perspective

Professor George McHendry teaches AI ethics at Creighton University.

“In law, that’s where we’ve seen immediate consequences of technology to made up cases,” McHendry said.

“I think you’re going to see courts grow more tired. I wouldn’t be surprised if, at some point, someone’s law license is at stake,” McHendry said.

“With a number of mistakes and basically misleading comments that were made in the brief, why shouldn’t this appeal just be treated as frivolous?” a justice asked.

“Your Honor, I don’t have a great answer for that,” Lake said.

Case outcome and broader implications

The Nebraska Supreme Court took the case under advisement. The opposing counsel suggested the entire case should be tossed. The court even asked Greg Lake’s opinion on if he should be sanctioned for his actions.

“I’m not running away from this… I made a mistake,” Lake said.

The Nebraska Counsel for Discipline can’t say if there’s been a complaint filed in this case. However, in the last few months a couple of attorneys in Douglas County have been sanctioned for using AI and paid fines.

An online database which follows AI hallucination court cases has compiled 958 of them so far across the world including the sanctions. Those wrongly using AI were mostly lawyers. Others are defendants who represent themselves.

The attorney general submitted a friend of the court brief as a reminder to the justices that AI plays a central role for making the job of an attorney more efficient and that Nebraska rules already say that if you use AI, the attorney has a duty to verify the accuracy of court briefs.

Copyright 2026 WOWT. All rights reserved.

Finally, Iowa has their big win.

In what can only be described as a rugby match played on a basketball court, Iowa outdueled ninth-ranked Nebraska Tuesday night, 57-52, to land the biggest win of the Ben McCollum era to date.

Iowa was again led by Bennett Stirtz, who finished with 25 points, 2 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, and 2 blocks in his customary 40 minutes of action. Nebraska briefly tied the game at 45 late in the second half on a Rienk Mast layup, but Stirtz saved his best for last, scoring 10 of Iowa’s final 14 points over the last 7:06 of game time to guide Iowa to their 19th win of the campaign.

The first half was back-and-forth, with neither team able to take hold on the game. Iowa did break the back-and-forth nature of the contest late in the first half and briefly took control, with the Hawks converting at the foul line and Alvaro Folgueiras knocking down a big 3 to briefly extend Iowa’s lead to 9. After a basket from former Hawk Pryce Sandfort cut the lead back down to 7, Stirtz – had to be him – made a 3 with just under a minute remaining in the first half to push the lead into double-digits, 33-23.

But Nebraska’s a tough team – they aren’t a super athletic team but they work hard on defense and they get great looks over and over; sounds awfully similar to this Iowa team – and they closed on a small run to cut the lead to 33-28 at half on a Cale Jacobsen 3 at the buzzer.

The second half can only be described as a rugby scrum. If I wanted to watch rugby scrums, I’d pirate a Six Nations feed off Sky and watch that. The whistles were out in full force against the home team early in the half – Iowa gets by far the worst home whistle in a power conference as officials constantly fell for flailing arms and head bobs, particularly from Jamarques Lawrence – but they disappeared late in the game as everything fell into under-the-rim chaos. The second half was about as physical a half of basketball as I can remember, with Nebraska slowing clawing their way back into the game and leading for two brief moments at 41-39 and 43-41.

First it was Stirtz to tie the game at 41, then Tate Sage scoring on a putback to get Iowa level again. It ended with the Stirtz Show down the stretch, highlighted by a massive Sam Hoiberg error in the final 36 seconds as he fouled Stirtz on a 3-point attempt, as Iowa finally found their way to a huge win to end their short-lived 2-game skid and cemented their NCAA Tournament bid.

Up next for Iowa is a date with No. 24 Wisconsin in Madison Sunday afternoon.

IOWA CITY — Iowa men’s basketball defeated No. 9 Nebraska 57-52 on Feb. 17 at Carver-Hawkeye Arena.

Bennett Stirtz led Iowa with 25 points and Cooper Koch added 10 as the Hawkeyes tallied their first victory against a ranked team in the Ben McCollum era. The Hawkeyes handed Nebraska just their fourth loss this season.

The Hawkeyes improved to 19-7 and 9-6 in Big Ten play. The Huskers are 22-4 and 11-4.

Here are likes and dislikes from the game.

Likes

• Bennett Stirtz’s effort: It wasn’t Stirtz’s most efficient game. He scored 25 points on 8-of-22 from the field. But so much of the playmaking and scoring burden was on his shoulders. He also spent a substantial amount of time guarding Pryce Sandfort, Nebraska’s leading scorer. Just an incredible showing of determination by Stirtz.
• Stirtz in crunch time: Stirtz was the best player on the floor down the stretch and willed the Hawkeyes to victory.
• Rebounding: Iowa’s work on the glass played an important part in the game. The Hawkeyes dominated on the boards, outrebounding Nebraska 37-24.
• Offensive rebounding: This category was 12-2 in favor Iowa. This came up big in crunch time. The Hawkeyes didn’t capitalize them as much as they could’ve but still outscored Nebraska 8-4 in second-chance points.
• Defense: The Hawkeyes were smothering on the defensive end. Nebraska was held to just 41% from the field and 21% from deep. The Cornhuskers also turned it over 12 times. Nebraska was held to a season-low 52 points. Their previous low was 58 against Michigan State.
• Limiting Pryce Sandfort: The former Hawkeye wasn’t totally shut down, scoring 13 points, but Iowa made life difficult on him and held him below his season average. Sandfort only got up seven shots from the field and was 2-of-6 from deep. Credit to Stirtz for helping contain Sandfort.
• Free throws: The Hawkeyes took advantage of their opportunities at the charity stripe, shooting 17-of-18 from the free-throw line.
• Tavion Banks: He was great on the boards, hauling in a team-high 10 rebounds. He also scored six points. Iowa coach Ben McCollum said Banks was “probably the unsung hero.”
• Signature win: Iowa picks up its first signature win of the Ben McCollum era. This is a resume-building victory for the Hawkeyes with the NCAA Tournament on the horizon.

Video: Ben McCollum reacts to Iowa basketball’s win over Nebraska

Ben McCollum meets with media after Iowa basketball’s 57-52 win over Nebraska.

Dislikes

• Turnovers: Iowa had been taking care of the ball incredibly well, but that wasn’t the case against Nebraska. The Hawkeyes turned the ball over 12 times. Nine of those came in the first half. That was the first time since Jan. 28 against USC that Iowa’s turnovers were in double-figures.
• Offense: Another rough showing by Iowa’s offense, which struggled for the third game in a row. The Hawkeyes shot just 33% from the field and 26% from deep. Pretty brutal game shooting for the Hawkeyes.
• Not enough help outside of Stirtz: There were contributions sprinkled in here and there. Cooper Koch had 10 points and Alvaro Folgueiras had seven. But so much of the scoring and playmaking burden was on Stirtz.

Video: Bennett Stirtz, Cooper Koch react to Iowa’s win over Nebraska

Bennett Stirtz and Cooper Koch meet with media after Iowa basketball’s 57-52 win over Nebraska.

Advertisement

Follow Tyler Tachman on X @Tyler_T15, contact via email at ttachman@gannett.com