Connect with us

Crypto

Ohioans may soon be able to pay fees, taxes with cryptocurrency like Bitcoin – Scioto Post

Published

on

Ohioans may soon be able to pay fees, taxes with cryptocurrency like Bitcoin – Scioto Post
New virtual money concept, Gold Bitcoins ( btc ) is Digital crypto-currency use blockchain Technology for

By: Morgan Trau – April 29, 2025 

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohioans are getting closer to being able to pay their taxes in cryptocurrency. A new GOP proposal lays the groundwork for digital tokens to become more mainstream.

With the stock market’s volatility, investment experts suggest diversifying your portfolio. Ohio politicians are trying to give more incentives for that, too.

“We are authorizing the use of cryptocurrency as just another way to keep up with the current practices that are generally accepted by the American public and by the people of the state of Ohio,” State Treasurer Robert Sprague said.

Sprague and Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose are trying to show the state is “an innovative leader,” eventually allowing Ohioans to use it to pay for state fees and services, like taxes.

The pair is proposing that state agencies be allowed to accept crypto, but it is not mandatory.

Advertisement

Although it could eventually get to taxes, it would start slower with just the secretary’s office, meaning business filings.

“My office is prepared to be the first in state government to begin accepting Bitcoin and to do so immediately,” LaRose said.

So, what exactly is cryptocurrency?

Crypto is a “peer-to-peer digital currency, and it’s outside of an independent central governing authority,” Case Western Reserve University Veale Institute for Entrepreneurship’s Michael Goldberg said.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.SUBSCRIBEThe professor explained that the online “coins” are stored in a digital database known as a blockchain. Like stocks, they can be traded and sold. One Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, fluctuates and was worth more than $94,000 as of 6 p.m. on Friday.

“Oftentimes with Bitcoin, there are less fees associated with it,” he said.

Advertisement

Two other crypto proposals are being heard in the Ohio House, with one trying to make sure that fees stay low. Both sponsored by state Rep, Steve Demetriou, R-Bainbridge Twp., one bill would “protect” cryptocurrency from putting certain taxes on it. The other would allow the treasurer to invest in “high value digital assets” in the general or reserve fund.

But because crypto spikes and falls rapidly, Goldberg warned that payments could be hard to calculate.

Government accountability advocate Catherine Turcer, with Common Cause Ohio, said this isn’t safe for the state’s finances.

“It is electronic money, anything could happen to it,” Turcer said. “Whether it’s hacking, deflation — when you pay on April 15 your taxes, and it nosedives on the 16th — it’s just too volatile.”

The treasurer explained that their system would immediately change the currency format once submitted.

Advertisement

“Our mission here is to have a thoughtful, safe and secure process for accepting this cryptocurrency and converting it immediately into United States dollars for the state treasury to hold,” Sprague said.

In 2024, the FBI reported $9.3 billion in losses due to cryptocurrency cybercrime.

There will always be financial fraud, Goldberg said, but when it’s online, it’s much more difficult to get back.

“Crypto is still a bit of the wild, wild west; it’s basically completely deregulated,” he said. “If somebody gets defrauded, it may be a bit more challenging for them to recoup their assets.”

It’s too risky, Turcer continued.

Advertisement

“Money is worth the money we say it’s worth,” she said.

Bitcoin is based on the dollar’s price, Goldberg said.

Asked whether the putting Bitcoin forward would undermine the U.S. dollar, Sprague paused, then said no.

“Having a digital asset like Bitcoin really doesn’t have anything to do with necessarily the value of the dollar,” he answered. “The number of dollars is fixed. Just because you’re allowing a transaction to occur in Bitcoin and then converting it to dollars will do nothing in terms of the strength or the weakness of the United States dollar.”

Flashbacks

This isn’t the first time the treasurer’s office tried to make crypto work.

Advertisement

Back in 2018, then-Treasurer Josh Mandel decided that Ohioans could pay their taxes in crypto. Within a year, the program was suspended because Attorney General Dave Yost issued an opinion that Mandel didn’t follow correct protocol in setting up the system.

“We’ll have a real process to this,” Sprague said in the recent press conference. “We’ll have a transparent process.”

Turcer is also getting reminded of the early 2000s, she said.

“We had alternative investments,” she said, referencing Coingate. “We were investing in rare coins — and you know what? The state of Ohio got ripped off.”

Coingate was a scam in which the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation invested hundreds of millions in “rare coins.” The investments were run by people aligned with the Ohio GOP. This eventually led to millions of dollars being lost and Gov. Bob Taft being the first Ohio governor charged with a crime while in office.

Advertisement

Crypto isn’t random, Goldberg said, and it’s been around — and profitable — for years. According to Forbes, the global cryptocurrency market cap is more than $3 trillion.

“When Bitcoin came out, I think there were a lot of questions,” Goldberg said. “And it’s held up.”

Why now?

Both Sprague and LaRose were asked if they or members of their staff own assets in cryptocurrency or if they invest in cryptocurrency-related companies.

“I wish,” Sprague laughed, and denied owning or investing in crypto.

“I do,” LaRose said. “I’m somebody that has been curious about this technology and this form of currency for a long time.”

Advertisement

He referenced financial disclosure documents, which are filed in May, that he said would show his financial involvement in crypto.

“I think at this point I own like $10,000 worth of Bitcoin that I’ve been able to amass by putting a little bit of my paycheck aside each month,” he said.

OCJ/WEWS requested his previous disclosures. None showed any crypto investments explicitly. He had only started investing in 2024, his team said on Friday.

LaRose isn’t the only politician who owns crypto and promotes it. President Donald Trump released his own coin, which just got a boost in the market since he offered a private dinner with him to the coin’s largest investors.

“It is interesting that (LaRose is) proposing this — it both curries favor with the president and could actually make him richer,” Turcer said. “The more people participate in the Bitcoin system, the more the value raises.”

Advertisement

The secretary argued that this is just to move the state forward.

“Ohioans have accepted this as a real form of currency, a form of exchange that they want to use,” he said.

Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy is also a big fan of the currency. Both LaRose and Sprague have been on the campaign trail with him.

The two were asked how the measure fits in with any interests they have in becoming Ramaswamy’s pick for lieutenant governor. Sprague said he hadn’t talked to Ramaswamy about it.

“This is something that we’re working on, together, through our respective offices, to modernize our offices and make it easier for the people of the state of Ohio… So this is something we’re doing internally,” Sprague said. “We’re not doing this on the campaign trail.”

Advertisement

LaRose was less enthused with the question.

“I’m not gonna dignify any speculation about who Mr. Ramaswamy may or may not pick as his running mate,” he said, also saying he hadn’t spoken to the candidate about his proposal. “The reason I’m supporting him is because I appreciate his intellect and his policy stances and if this is something that he’s a fan of as well, that doesn’t surprise me.”

The Board of Deposit, which includes Sprague, Yost and Auditor Keith Faber, will meet in the coming weeks to review the proposal.

Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on Twitter and Facebook.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With $5,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With ,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Both Ethereum (ETH 6.03%) and XRP (XRP 3.76%) are tried-and-tested blockchains which have survived (and sometimes thrived) for years on end. That means they’re both sturdy enough to be candidates for a big investment, like $5,000, and for holding over the very long term, or even forever.

So which of these two leading coins is the better option for a forever hold?

Image source: Getty Images.

Ethereum has more ways to grow

Forever is a long time, especially for an investment in an emerging sector like crypto. Therefore, an asset’s optionality regarding where it can derive growth is a key factor, as today’s growth drivers might peter out and new ones are likely to emerge.

On that front, Ethereum has plenty of options. It already hosts a large decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem worth more than $53 billion today, powered by a massive stablecoin base of $159 billion. That existing base of capital is a strategic asset because it gives developers and financial institutions a reason to build new products right where liquidity already lives. It also gives investors exposure to many possible growth lanes at once, from the onboarding of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to the development of new settlement rails for payments between AI agents.

Advertisement
Ethereum Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-6.03%) $-123.58

Current Price

$1924.97

Another advantage is that Ethereum has a track record of consistently shipping large protocol upgrades. The Pectra upgrade, for example, landed on the mainnet in May 2025, followed by the Fusaka upgrade in December. Two similarly large feature packages are expected for 2026, and they should help to build the chain’s ability to scale up without spiking transaction costs.

If you plan to hold an asset indefinitely, this network’s culture of iterative improvement reduces the risk that its technical capabilities will become irrelevant as emerging opportunities for growth arise. Its habit of attracting and retaining substantial capital also helps prevent that outcome.

XRP has to keep winning specific fights over time

XRP is not a bad crypto asset by any means, but its long-term burden is its far narrower positioning than Ethereum.

Ripple, the coin’s issuer, built the XRP Ledger (XRPL) ecosystem as a toolkit of financial technologies to support specific workflows in institutional finance, especially cross-border payments and money transfers, and, more recently, the management of tokenized asset capital. The coin’s value is thus derived from the utility of its ledger.

Advertisement

That focus could pay off if the financial companies the chain targets like what it’s offering, but it also concentrates risk. Financial institutions move cautiously, and winning them over is a slow, grinding process of catering to their needs and building strong relationships. Their technology adoption process can stall for years, even when the product works, and decision-makers broadly want to adopt the new tech.

To Ripple’s credit, the XRP Ledger includes plenty of features that match institutional requirements and seek to minimize their potential pain points. The network’s authorized trust lines, for instance, let tokenized asset issuers whitelist who can hold their issued tokens, which is a feature that supports regulatory constraints around who can legally custody an asset. Similarly, the ledger supports freezing tokens when suspicious activity appears, which is a control that traditional finance teams tend to expect in regulated asset workflows.

XRP Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-3.76%) $-0.05

Current Price

$1.35

Advertisement

But holding a coin forever is unforgiving of sustained competitive pressure, which XRP doubtlessly faces. Its competitors include fintech companies and other cryptocurrencies, not to mention the internal tech development capabilities of many of its target users in big banks. So it’ll need to continuously one up the other players in its space if it’s going to grow over the long term, and it’s hard to believe that it’ll win every round that counts.

The verdict

The decision here is about resilience and resources.

Advertisement

Ethereum’s “grizzled veteran” reputation today stems from surviving numerous shifts in user demand patterns while maintaining a large on-chain capital pool and growing it all the while. Its success or failure in any given crypto market segment is not guaranteed, nor was it in the past, but its constant evolution has ensured that failures are not fatal, and also that missed opportunities aren’t very damaging overall.

XRP, on the other hand, is only just starting to scale up its on-chain capital base; it has only $418 million in stablecoins. Furthermore, while it has succeeded in attracting some financial institutions to its chain, the truth is that its growth trajectory has not yet been seriously tested, and is still finding an appropriate product-market fit. Its real competitive challenges have only just begun.

So if you want a coin to buy with $5,000 and hold forever, pick the asset that can win without needing to be perfect: Ethereum. XRP is still a decent long-term hold, assuming it’s part of a diversified crypto portfolio, but it’s riskier.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Published

on

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota

Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.

There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.

Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.

Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.

Advertisement

Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users

Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.

Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.

Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.

Lawmakers weighing next steps

Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.

Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.

Advertisement

The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.

In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.

10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.

Continue Reading

Trending