Connect with us

News

Billionaire financiers lambast Donald Trump’s tariffs

Published

on

Billionaire financiers lambast Donald Trump’s tariffs

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Ken Langone, the co-founder of Home Depot and longtime Republican donor, has lambasted Donald Trump’s wide-ranging tariffs for being set too high and implemented too quickly.

Langone told the Financial Times the US president was being “poorly advised”, the 46 per cent tariff on Vietnam was “bullshit” and the additional 34 per cent tariff on China was “too aggressive, too soon” and did not give “serious negotiations a chance to work”.

“Forty-six per cent on Vietnam? Come on!” said Langone. “You might as well tell them, ‘Don’t even bother calling’.”

Advertisement

Langone is one of a growing number of billionaire financiers openly criticising the president’s decision to increase tariffs on imports to heights not seen since the 1930s as they grow increasingly alarmed at the resulting market meltdown.

The tariffs — a universal 10 per cent duty plus additional individual levies for many countries — have sent global markets into a tailspin. Over the past week, the S&P 500 has fallen almost 10 per cent.

Billionaire investor Stanley Druckenmiller, a mentor to Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, has also weighed in, posting on X on Sunday: “I do not support tariffs exceeding 10%.”

President Donald Trump announces the tariffs imposed on US trade partners in the White House Rose Garden last week © Carlos Barria/Reuters

So too did billionaire donor Bill Ackman, a supporter of Trump in the 2024 presidential campaign, who described the tariffs as “a major policy error”.

Jim Rogers, who co-founded the Quantum Fund with George Soros, wrote in an email to the FT that while “tariffs have occasionally helped a few people for fairly short periods”, they “are rarely good for anyone”.

Advertisement

Tesla and Starlink owner Elon Musk, Trump’s biggest donor, has also hit out at the tariffs. On Saturday, Musk called for “a zero-tariff situation” between the US and Europe and remarked that Peter Navarro, Trump’s senior adviser on trade, “ain’t built shit”.

In his annual letter to shareholders on Monday, JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon also criticised the measures, warning that the tariffs “will probably increase inflation and are causing many to consider a greater probability of a recession”.

“The quicker this issue is resolved, the better because some of the negative effects increase cumulatively over time and would be hard to reverse,” he added.

Wilbur Ross, Trump’s commerce secretary during his first term, has also weighed in, warning that the tariffs had had an unexpected impact.

Wilbur Ross
Wilbur Ross, who was previously commerce secretary under Trump, says he has ‘doubts about the logic of the formula to compute the tariffs’ © Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

“It’s more severe than I would have expected,” Ross told the FT. “Particularly the way it is impacting Vietnam, China and Cambodia is more extreme than I would have thought.”

Ross added that businesses and investment firms could deal with good news and bad news but warned: “It’s hard to deal with uncertainty. Fear of the unknown is the worst for people and we are in a period of extreme fear of the unknown.”

Advertisement

Langone said a “more manageable and certainly more constructive” approach would have been to impose a 10 per cent across-the-board tariff on imported goods, followed by bilateral negotiations with countries.

“I don’t understand the goddamn formula,” said Langone. “I believe he’s been poorly advised by his advisers about this trade situation — and the formula they’re applying.”

Ross, who refrained from directly criticising Trump, agreed there were problems with the way the tariffs had been calculated. “I also have some doubts about the logic of the formula to compute the tariffs. It’s a fairly unconventional way of measuring tariffs.”

He added: “I think that the countries most adversely affected hopefully will come forward and therefore quickly make a deal.”

Langone said that while he agreed with a number of measures carried out by the Trump administration, “I have a different read on when I do it, how I do it. I wouldn’t take on everything all at once”.

Advertisement

He expected Trump would “eventually” engage in a series of bilateral meetings.

“I think it’ll work,” Langone said. “Right now, what everybody’s terrified of is a tariff war.”

News

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Published

on

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Attorney General Pam Bondi, accompanied by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (L) and FBI Director Kash Patel (R), speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department on Nov. 19. Some lawmakers said the department’s release of files relating to Jeffrey Epstein had too many redactions as well as missing information.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Two lawmakers are threatening a seldom-used congressional sanction against the Department of Justice over what they say is a failure to release all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by a deadline set in law.

Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie spearheaded the effort to force the Epstein files’ release by co-sponsoring the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but both have said the release had too many redactions as well as missing information.

“I think the most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi,” Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, told CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. “Basically Ro Khanna and I are talking about and drafting that right now.”

Advertisement

Inherent contempt refers to Congress’ authority to fine or arrest and then bring to trial officers who are obstructing legislative functions. It was last successfully used in the 1930s, according to the American Bar Association.

Khanna, a California Democrat, noted that the House would not need the Senate’s approval to take such action, which he said would result in a fine for Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“I believe we’re going to get bipartisan support in holding her accountable,” he told Face the Nation.

Justice Department defends partial release

The Justice Department on Sunday defended its initial, partial release of documents, some of which were heavily redacted.

“The material that we released on Friday, or the material that we’re going to release over the next a couple of weeks, is exactly what the statute requires us to release,” said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on NBC’s Meet the Press, referring to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Advertisement

Blanche said the administration has hundreds of lawyers going through the remaining documents to ensure that victims’ information is protected. Still, lawmakers from both parties remain unsatisfied.

“Any evidence or any kind of indication that there’s not a full reveal on this, this will just plague them for months and months more,” said Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on ABC’s This Week. “My suggestion would be — give up all the information, release it.”

Blanche told NBC he was not taking the threats of contempt seriously.

“Not even a little bit. Bring it on,” he said, adding that lawmakers who have spoken negatively about Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel “have no idea what they’re talking about.”

Back and forth over Trump photo

The trove of documents released Friday contained little new information about Epstein, prompting accusations that the department wasn’t complying with the law. There was a photograph included in Friday’s release that showed a desk full of photos, including at least one of President Trump. It was among more than a dozen photographs no longer available in the Justice Department’s “Epstein Library” by Saturday, NPR found.

Advertisement

On Sunday, the Justice Department re-uploaded the photo of the desk, and provided an explanation on X.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the post read. “Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review. After the review, it was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction.”

The Justice Department did not offer an explanation for the other photos whose access had been removed.

Blanche told NBC the Justice Department was not redacting information around Trump or any other individual involved with Epstein. He said the Justice Department had removed photos from the public files “because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group, if they have any concerns about the material that we’re putting up.

“And so when we hear concerns, whether it’s photographs of women that we do not believe are victims, or we didn’t have information to show that they were victims, but we learned that there are concerns, of course, we’re taking that photograph down and we’re going to address it,” he said.

Advertisement

Earlier Sunday, the Justice Department also posted to X a new version of the 119-page transcript of grand jury proceedings in the case of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The original version had been entirely redacted.

“Here is the document now with minimal redactions. Documents and photos will continue to be reviewed consistent with the law and with an abundance of caution for victims and their families,” the Justice Department wrote in its post.

Continue Reading

News

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

Published

on

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

FILE – Russian Presidential foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov, left, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, center, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, foreground right, and Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Special Presidential Representative for Investment and Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries Kirill Dmitriev, behind Witkoff, arrive to attend talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Senate Palace of the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Dec. 2, 2025. (Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)

The Associated Press

Continue Reading

News

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

Published

on

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

new video loaded: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

transcript

transcript

First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

Put out the files and stop redacting names that don’t need to be redacted. It’s just — who are we trying to protect? Are we protecting the survivors? Or are we protecting these elite men that need to be put out there?

Advertisement
The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

By McKinnon de Kuyper

December 20, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending