Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review | Witherspoon and Ferrell Lack the Rom in ‘You’re Cordially Invited’

Published

on

Film Review | Witherspoon and Ferrell Lack the Rom in ‘You’re Cordially Invited’

Set on a stunning lake in Georgia, You’re Cordially Invited brings together two comedic powerhouses — Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell — for what is apparently a rom-com. The film relies almost entirely on the “com,” which sadly falls flat as the slapstick humor rarely lands.

The film’s premise? A classic, tired Hollywood trope of two warring wedding parties forced to share the same venue. I would say that this film, directed by Nicholas Stoller, whose career has been primarily mediocre comedies, is not his best.

The more unique spin the film attempts to have is that the only two warring people are not the brides but the family members planning the wedding. On one side is an overly loving, single father, Jim (Ferrell), who books the wedding venue for his Gen Z daughter (Geraldine Viswanathan) and her DJ boyfriend (Stony Blyden.) On the opposing wedding party, you have the tiny spitfire Margot (Witherspoon) planning her sister’s (Meredith Hagner) shotgun wedding. Margot, who left the South to pursue her career as an LA television producer, rarely returns home — a choice that has left her feeling like the family’s outsider. Her ambitious lifestyle and fast-paced career are a stark contrast to her family’s more traditional values, adding tension to her already chaotic visit. However, this spin relies heavily on overused Southern stereotypes, typical Will Ferrell antics, and cringe-worthy monologues that feel inauthentic.

Witherspoon and Ferrell, both incredibly talented in their styles and film history, feel completely mismatched. Their bickering is somewhat digestible, but their chemistry? Nonexistent. Their forced romantic tension is not just unbelievable but borderline painful to watch. When they finally kiss, it’s not a moment of triumph — it’s a moment that feels forced, like a check off the list.

Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell in ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ (2025) | Photo: Glen Wilson/Glen Wilson – © 2023 Amazon Content Services LLC

The movie lacks any real ingenuity. It’s not unfunny, but unlike the belly laughs Ferrell has managed to summon from me in the past, I never emitted more than a small giggle. The film tries hard to poke fun at woke-scolds, but it feels like it’s tiptoeing around them too much for the jokes to work. Even the comedic bits — where you’d expect Ferrell to shine—are lackluster, veering into corny and, at times, outright cringeworthy territory.

Advertisement

The film relies too much on exaggerated antics and predictable gags rather than genuine wit.

The underlying, meaningful message of family dynamics –  a father’s happiness riding on his daughter’s versus a misunderstood daughter and sister feeling like the black sheep in a family that genuinely does miss her. However, this theme takes a backseat to surface-level humor, only to be neatly wrapped in a quick, boxed-in resolution at the very end.

If you are looking for a movie that will turn your brain off, a comedy that feels silly and ludicrous, then look no further — you have arrived. However, suppose your brain remains on, and you notice the utter lack of romance and the random, scatterbrained nature of the scenes. In that case, you may find yourself ending the movie early.

But beware if you have children. The R rating feels forced, as the scenes constantly bolster profanity that is unnecessary and does little to add to the humor.

Ultimately, You’re Cordially Invited is a movie that contains so much talent yet is entirely too forgettable. At least the setting is beautiful. But if you get an invite to watch this, consider eloping instead.

Advertisement

View trailer here.

Emotional, All-Night School Board Meeting Ends with Layoff Notices to 85 Santa Barbara Unified Teachers

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Project Hail Mary’ Review: Ryan Gosling and a Rock Make Sci-Fi Magic

Published

on

‘Project Hail Mary’ Review: Ryan Gosling and a Rock Make Sci-Fi Magic

In contrast to other sci-fi heroes, like Interstellar’s Cooper, who ventures into the unknown for the sake of humanity and discovery, knowing the sacrifice of giving up his family, Grace is externally a cynical coward. With no family to call his own, you’d think he’d have the will to go into space for the sake of the planet’s future. Nope, he’s got no courage because the man is a cowardly dog. However, Goddard’s script feels strikingly reflective of our moment. Grace has the tools to make a difference; the Earth flashbacks center on him working towards a solution to the antimatter issue, replete with occasionally confusing but never alienating dialogue. He initially lacks the conviction, embodying a cynicism and hopelessness that many people fall into today. 

The film threads this idea effectively through flashbacks that reveal his reluctance, giving the story a tragic undercurrent. Yet, it also makes his relationship with Rocky, the first living thing he truly learns to care for, ever more beautiful. 

When paired with Rocky, Gosling enters the rare “puppet scene partner” hall of fame alongside Michael Caine in The Muppet Christmas Carol, never letting the fact that he’s acting opposite a puppet disrupt the sincerity of his performance. His commitment to building a gradual, affectionate friendship with this animatronic creation feels completely natural, and the chemistry translates beautifully on screen. It stands as one of the stronger performances of his career.

Project Hail Mary is overly long, and while it can be deeply affecting, the film leans on a few emotional fake-outs that become repetitive in the latter half. By the third time it deploys the same sentimental beat, the effect begins to feel cloying, slightly dulling the powerful emotions it built earlier. The constant intercutting between past and present can also feel thematically uneven at times, occasionally undercutting the narrative momentum. At 2 hours and 36 minutes, the film feels like it’s stretching itself to meet a blockbuster runtime when a tighter cut might have served better.

FINAL STATEMENT

Project Hail Mary is a meticulously crafted, hopeful, and dazzling space epic that proves the most moving friendship in film this year might just be between Ryan Gosling and a rock.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dan Webster reviews “WTO/99”

Published

on

Dan Webster reviews “WTO/99”

DAN WEBSTER:

It may now seem like ancient history, especially to younger listeners, but it was only 26 years ago when the streets of Seattle were filled with protesters, police and—ultimately—scenes of what ended up looking like pure chaos.

It is those scenes—put together to form a portrait of what would become known as the “Battle of Seattle” —that documentary filmmaker Ian Bell captures in his powerful documentary feature WTO/99.

We’ve seen any number of documentaries over the decades that report on every kind of social and cultural event from rock concerts to war. And the majority of them follow a typical format: archival footage blended with interviews, both with participants and with experts who provide an informational, often intellectual, perspective.

WTO/99 is something different. Like The Perfect Neighbor, a 2026 Oscar-nominated documentary feature, Bell’s film consists of what could be called found footage. What he has done is amass a series of news reports and personal video recordings into an hour-and-42-minute collection of individual scenes, mostly focused on a several-block area of downtown Seattle.

Advertisement

That is where a meeting of the WTO, the World Trade Organization, was set to be held between Nov. 30 and Dec. 3, 1999. Delegates from around the world planned to negotiate trade agreements (what else?) at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center.

Months before the meeting, however, a loose coalition of groups—including NGOs, labor unions, student organizations and various others—began their own series of meetings. Their objective was to form ways to protest not just the WTO but, to some of them, the whole idea of a world order they saw as a threat to the economic independence of individual countries.

Bell’s film doesn’t provide much context for all this. What we mostly see are individuals arguing their points of view as they prepare to stop the delegates from even entering the convention center. Meanwhile, Seattle authorities such as then-Mayor Paul Schell and then-Police Chief Norm Stamper—with brief appearances by Gov. Gary Locke and King County Executive Ron Sims—discuss counter measures, with Schell eventually imposing a curfew.

That decision comes, though, after what Bell’s film shows is a peaceful protest evolving into a street fight between people parading and chanting, others chained together and splinter groups intent on smashing the storefronts of businesses owned by what they see as corporate criminals. One intense scene involves a young woman begging those breaking windows to stop and asking them why they’re resorting to violence. In response a lone voice yells their reasoning: “Self-defense.”

Even more intense, though, are the actions of the Seattle police. We see officers using pepper spray, tear gas, flash grenades and other “non-lethal” means such as firing rubber pellets into the crowd. In one scene, a uniformed guy—not identified as a police officer but definitely part of the security crowd, which included National Guardsmen—is shown kicking a guy in the crotch.

Advertisement

The media, too, can’t avoid criticism. Though we see broadcast reporters trying to capture what was happening—with some affected like everybody else by the tear gas that filled the streets like a winter fog—the reports they air seem sketchy, as if they’re doctors trying to diagnose a serious illness by focusing on individual cells. And the images they capture tend to highlight the violence over the well-meaning actions of the vast majority of protesters.

Reactions to what Bell has put on the screen are bound to vary, based on each viewer’s personal politics. Bell revels his own stance by choosing selectively from among thousands of hours of video coverage to form the narrative he feels best captures what happened those two decades-and-change ago.

If nothing else, WTO/99 does reveal a more comprehensive picture of what happened than we got at the time. And, too, it should prepare us for the future. The way this country is going, we’re bound to see a lot more of the same.

Call it the “Battle for America.”

For Spokane Public Radio, I’m Dan Webster.

Advertisement

——

Movies 101 host Dan Webster is the senior film critic for Spokane Public Radio.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – As its title suggests, “Scream 7” (Paramount) is the latest extension of a long-lived horror franchise, one that’s currently approaching its 30th anniversary on screen. Since each chapter of this slasher saga has been a bloodsoaked mess, the series’ longevity will strike moviegoers of sense as inexplicable.

Yet the slog continues. While the previous film in the sequence shifted the action from California to New York, this second installment, following a 2022 quasi-reboot, settles on a Midwestern locale and reintroduces us to the series’ original protagonist, Sidney Evans, nee Prescott (Neve Campbell).

Having aged out of the adolescent demographic on whom the various murderers who have donned the Ghostface mask that serves as these films’ dubious trademark over the years seem to prefer to prey, Sidney comes equipped with a teen daughter, Tatum (Isabel May). Will Tatum prove as resourceful in evading the unwanted attentions of Ghostface as Mom has?

On the way to answering that question, a clutch of colorless minor characters fall victim to the killer, who sometimes gets — according to his or her lights — creative. Thus one is quite literally made to spill her guts, while another ends up skewered on a barroom’s pointy beer tap.

Through it all, director Kevin Williamson and his co-writer Guy Busick try to peddle a theme of female empowerment in the face of mortal danger. They also take a stab, as it were, at constructing a plotline about intergenerational family tensions. When not jarring viewers with grisly images, however, they’re only likely to lull them into a stupor.

Advertisement

The film contains excessive gory violence, including disembowelment and impaling, underage drinking, mature topics, a couple of profanities, several milder oaths, pervasive rough and considerable crude language and occasional crass expressions. The OSV News classification is O — morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending